Jun 7, 2013 Political
Valerie Jarrett, the Communist running the White House (and you thought Obama was doing that?), has stated that Eric Holder will keep his job. She said that he is resilient and has the confidence of Barack Obama so these scandals will not force him out.
“Eric never loses sight of what he’s there for,” said Jarrett. “He’s there to be the chief lawyer for the United States of America and to make sure that all of our rights are protected, and to defend our country, to make sure that he is an advocate for those whose civil rights have been infringed upon–anyone whose rights have been infringed upon. And there are people all around the country who are counting on him to be the attorney general. And so yes he is resistant, and he is tough, and he is strong, and he is perfectly capable of defending himself, and he is an outstanding attorney general, who enjoys the full confidence of the president of the United States.” Weekly Standard
There is no doubt that Holder knows what he is there for. He is there to exact revenge on Obama’s enemies. He is there to ignore the crimes of minorities and to suppress conservatives. Let us not forget that Jarrett was the one who said that once they won the election (the 2012 election) there would be payback and they would be taking revenge on people.
Holder is part of the team doing that. He is trampling on the First Amendment (and several others for that matter) and he is going after conservatives, period.
If he was truly an advocate for civil rights then he would be balls to the walls to get to the bottom of the IRS scandal. The civil rights of many conservative groups (as well as other groups opposed to Obama) were violated by the IRS. Can anyone show me where Holder has gone after anyone involved? Is Holder seeking indictments of those who broke the law?
Jarrett is right in one respect. There are people around the country who count on him. The Obama Regime is counting on him to continue exacting revenge and those who have been wronged by government are counting on him to uphold the law and punish those who broke it.
Guess which group is getting his attention?
Eric Holder is a racist, partisan hack who cares not about the people who have been harmed if they are people who either do not look like him or hold the same political philosophy as he and his cronies in the Regime. We saw it with the New Black Panther Case and we are seeing it now.
Holder is one of the people involved in the criminal activity. How can he be looking out for our civil rights when he is busy violating them?
I think Jarrett is correct that Holder will not go anywhere. He can’t because there are still a bunch of rights he has not trampled on.
Holder leads the Department of Just-Us and that is why Obama supports him….
Never surrender, never submit.
Jun 4, 2013 Political
If there was ever any doubt that the Obama Regime is anti Israel one need look no further than the recent disclosure of secret Israeli information that the Obama folks allowed to happen. Obama pretends to be a friend of Israel but he is a Muzzie sympathizer and would love to see the Israelis get smacked around by the enemies surrounding the tiny country.
The Israelis have plans for a top secret military installation that the Obama Regime promised to build. The facility would house a ballistic missile defense system, the Arrow 3. In what many might consider an act of sheer stupidity (I think it was deliberate) the regime published an open request for bids on the 25 million dollar project.
This allowed the secret details of the project (which included more than 1000 pages of details) to be seen by anyone and that includes Israel’s enemies.
As one might expect, the Israeli military (and by extension the government) is not happy about this:
If an enemy if Israel wanted to launch an attack against a facility, this would give him an easy how-to guide. This type of information is closely guarded and its release can jeopardize the entire facility.
This is more than worrying, it is shocking. [unnamed official] McClatchy
It should come as no surprise that this happened because the Regime is anti Israel and because these morons can’t keep anything secret. Why on Earth the Israelis would want the Obama Regime involved is beyond me. Israel should have worked directly with contractors and kept the leaky regime out of things.
Well, another leak of secret information has occurred. Do you suppose Eric Holder will use this to illegally obtain more information from the press?
Never surrender, never submit.
Sep 18, 2012 Political
The Department of Justice, led by racist Eric Holder, has had a remake of its website and gone are the Red, White, and Blue. Yes, the waving American flag has been replaced with the Black and Gold similar to that seen in the Muslim flag. It is interesting that as Muslims attack American Embassies and burn our flag while raising the al-Qaeda flag, Holder has abandoned the American flag for what looks like association with the Muslim flag.
Was this a not so subtle change to appease the Muslims or was it a more concentrated effort to remove America from AMERICAN Justice?
I don’t know and we may never either because no matter what the reason for the change, the Department of Sharia run by Holder will use Media Matters to put out the appropriate narrative.
Internal DOJ emails indicate that the communications staff there collaborated with Media Matters for America (a left wing propaganda firm) to stop or spin stories about various scandals in the Holder Department.
The scandals there are many. Fast and Furious and the cover-up. The death of Brian Terry and the cover-up. The New Black Panther voter intimidation case and dismissal by Holder. All these things are criminal and involve Holder but he has been happy to use Media Matters as a research arm and propaganda distributor.
So we might never know if the Sharia Department under Holder changed the website to be Muslim compliant or if this was something that was planned for some other reason because no matter what, Media Matters will ensue the proper propaganda is distributed.
We need criminals in jail and adults running the country and we need it soon.
If these amateurs get a second term running this nation we will surely fall.
Never surrender, never submit.
Jun 20, 2012 Political
There has been a tendency on the part of this administration [Bush Administration] to try to hide behind Executive Privilege every time there is something a little shaky taking place and I think the administration would be best served by coming clean on this. ~ Senator Barack Obama
Attorney General Eric Holder is involved in a very bad cover-up of wrong doing in a little thing known as Fast and Furious. Fast and Furious was an illegal gun running operation conducted under the direction of Holder. It was all designed to allow the Obama regime to enact strict gun control but went south when guns the regime allowed to flow into Mexico showed up at murders, including the murder of a Border Patrol Agent. Make no mistake, the guns were allowed to run into Mexico because the Justice Department forced gun dealers to make illegal sales.
Holder has been under investigation for nearly a year and has stonewalled every step of the way. He refuses to release documents relating to the illegal operation and a vote to hold him in contempt looms in the House.
Through all of this the Obama regime claimed ignorance of the operation (and they even blame it on, wait for it, Bush). BTW, this has been disproved) and Holder has done his best to protect Obama from being implicated in the operation. Obama did not see anything, has no knowledge and is not involved.
Eric Holder wrote a letter to Barack Obama asking him to invoke Executive Privilege to cover the documents that Holder does not want to release. Barack Obama did indeed invoke Executive Privilege. Now, if Obama has never seen them and was not involved then how could he possibly know they are documents that should be protected by Executive Privilege? It seems that Barack Obama knows what is in those documents and he is invoking Executive Privilege in order to assist Holder in the cover-up.
This is the same Barack Obama who, as a Senator, said that he was against hiding behind Executive Privilege. This video is from an interview on the Larry King Show:
When Richard Nixon was president there was a little thing called Watergate. Nixon was threatened with impeachment and eventually resigned from office because of it. It is believed that Nixon was not involved in the decision to conduct the break in, his staff was involved in that. Nixon got in trouble because after he was informed about it he was implicated in the cover-up that took place. The reason Nixon was implicated is because he had a recording system in his office and there were tapes of the meetings where the cover-up was discussed. Nixon attempted to assert Executive Privilege to keep the tapes from being released but the Supreme Court ruled that he had to hand them over.
Nixon attempted to assert Executive Privilege in order to cover-up the wrong doing and he ended up losing his job under threat of impeachment (and the certainty he would be found guilty by the Senate). Does this sound familiar?
Today Barack Obama had his Richard Nixon moment and time will tell if he will be treated the same way by the Democrats and their media wing.
Never surrender, never submit.
Jun 10, 2012 Political
Eric Holder and the other race hustlers on the left have convinced people that requiring ID to vote is racist and disenfranchises people. This flies in the face of reality because many of the people who would allegedly be disenfranchised have ID. None of them ever cry about needing ID to get welfare or board a plane, buy liquor or tobacco products or any of the dozens of other things that an ID is needed for.
No, they happily provide ID and no one ever cries about racism or being disenfranchised.
This is all a smoke screen to protect those who should not vote but do and the reason is simple. Those folks vote for Democrats. Democrats know that requiring an ID to vote would cost them votes. This is not racism and it is not disenfranchising. It is simply ensuring the law is followed and that the one person one vote principle is followed so long as the one person is legally allowed to vote. It is quite simple and is no more an impediment to voting than requiring an ID to buy alcohol is an impediment to those who are legally allowed to drink.
You know that it is all a sham and it is easy to see. One must present an ID to get into the building where Eric Holder works.
One must present an ID to get into the Democrat Convention.
And one must provide an ID to get a book signed by Michelle Obama.
This is all an elaborate game designed to protect those among us who break the law by voting when they are not allowed to do so. The Democrats want to protect their base and they want to ensure they get as many votes as possible whether they are legal or not.
If they really think IDs are racist and that it disenfranchises people to request an ID then perhaps they would take things further by removing ID requirements all together. No more ID to buy alcohol or tobacco, no more ID to enter government buildings, no ID to enter the Democrat Convention and no ID to get on a plane.
That will never happen but Democrats will fight tooth and nail to keep states from requiring an ID to vote.
Their hypocrisy never ends.
Never surrender, never submit