Your People Congressman?
Jul 21, 2014 Immigration
Democrat Congressman Luis Gutierrez of Illinois spoke at a La Raza (The Race) conference and told people that Obama said he would stop the deportation of “our people.” Gutierrez went on to say that Obama helped by not deporting the so called Dreamers but that now he needs to reunite the Dreamers with their parents. He went on to say that amnesty for 100,000 was not enough and that amnesty needed to be granted to millions of “our undocumented.”
I am confused here. Gutierrez is an elected representative of a district in Illinois. Are not the people of that district “his people”? As far as I know he was not elected to represent the illegal aliens who are coming here in direct violation of our law.
If Gutierrez thinks that the illegals are his people and that the undocumented are his people then he is not fit to serve in Congress. He is certainly unworthy of the position he holds in Illinois because he is not representing the people of his district.
This man is a traitor who advocates for the illegal invasion of our nation and amnesty for the millions who have broken the law. He should be taken into custody immediately and tried for treason. Anyone who invades a country is an enemy of that country and Gutierrez is aiding and abetting the enemy. He is in violation of the law and of his oath to the Constitution.
When the SHTF Congressman people will remember who you said were your people and treat you accordingly.
If these are truly your people then you need to lead them back across the border and stay there with them.
You are worthless and a coward. Nothing but a little puto.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: amnesty, gutierrez, illegal alien, liar, traitor
PVT Manning Is No Hero
Jun 3, 2013 Political
The long awaited trial of Private Bradley Manning began today at Fort Meade Maryland. It has been a few years since Manning was arrested for releasing hundreds of thousands of documents that he contends the public had a right to see and the disclosure of which would spark a debate on our role of our military and our foreign policy.
Perhaps he is correct about all of those assertions. It is quite possible that the contents of the documents should be available to the public and perhaps they would spark debate. Let us assume all of that is true.
Another truth is that Manning was not in a position to make that call and it was not his right or his duty to release the information.
Bradley Manning was charged with analyzing intelligence and guarding that information. He was supposed to guard the information in accordance with the rules established for it. Someone classified the information and decided that it was not to be publicly available.
Manning disregarded the classifications and the instructions to keep the information from being released. He decided and took it upon himself to gather it and release it to someone who would make it public. This is where he went wrong. He broke the law and he is no hero for doing so.
People in certain positions within the government are charged with doing jobs that require secrecy. Manning was in such a position and he failed to do what he was trained to do. He failed to do what he was ethically and legally bound to do.
The fact of the matter is it does not make any difference if the information is damning, if it should be available to the public or if it would spark debate because Manning was not allowed to take that decision and he was not allowed to release the information.
There are those who support him and call him a hero. He is a traitor and he should spend a very long time in jail.
Suppose something he felt should be made public resulted in a terror attack in America. Suppose what he released was used by the enemy to attack and kill members of our military. I know that many on the left might still view him as a hero but most folks would be quite upset if what Manning released was used to harm them or their families or our nation.
Manning is a confused young man with many mental health issues. He got in a snit and did something very stupid and now he will have to pay.
No matter what, he is no hero.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: bradley manning, disclosure, lies, secrets, spying, traitor
Hillary Chooses Party Over Country
Oct 25, 2012 Commentary, Political
The murder of our citizens in Libya and the subsequent cover up by the Obama regime is an ongoing nightmare. It is now obvious that additional security was requested and denied, that Obama knew about the attacks within hours (and might have watched it), and that he did not send help to our people who were brutally murdered. Reports are that our Ambassador was repeatedly sodomized before being murdered and that the two former Seals who went to provide help were beheaded. Help was an hour away and they fought for seven hours so Obama could have gotten help there in time.
He went to bed instead. Yes, the guy who is bragging that he will stay up for more than 24 hours campaigning could not stay up on the night of the attack and send help.
After this all took place Obama and his mouth pieces went on TV and told America that this was in response to a video. They continued with this lie even as evidence to the contrary continued to see the light of day.
People died and Obama lied.
[note]Barack Obama says he will look out for YOU. How can you take him seriously when he did not look out for our citizens in Libya?[/note]
Hillary Clinton took the blame about two weeks after the attack (coincidentally just before the last debate) but evidence suggests that she actually requested additional security and that it was denied by Obama (or his regime).
Bill Clinton is urging his wife to release everything she has in order to clear her name and avoid criminal prosecution (and if anyone knows about criminal prosecution it is Bill Clinton). Bill and Hillary have had several arguments about this because Hillary is reluctant to release what she has which is believed to be enough to cost Obama his reelection bid.
While Bill Clinton wishes his wife would “exonerate” herself by releasing the documents that show she wasn’t at fault for the tragic security failure in Libya, the secretary of state refuses to do so because she doesn’t want to be viewed as a traitor to the Democratic Party. News Ninja
It comes as no surprise to those of us who know the real Hillary but it should send chills down the spines of all Americans that this woman is more concerned about betraying her party than she is about betraying her country.
This is typical of liberals. They put party before country and don’t really care how what they do affects the nation or the people as long as it benefits the party.
If Hillary has information about what happened she has a duty to release it not to exonerate herself or to hurt Obama but to let Americans know what happened and why. I know, I know, it is a pipe dream to expect a liberal, particularly a Clinton, to do the right thing.
If Hillary stands pat and refuses to release these documents and they come to light later on (via subpoena or she willingly releases them) after the election and they show Obama lied about what took place then she needs to be prosecuted for treason.
Liberals, Hillary told you she was the most qualified to handle the 3 am phone call. She screwed that up and is now involved in the biggest cover up in our history.
Remember, when Watergate happened, no one died.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: beheading, Clinton, libya, lies, loyalty, murder, Obama, seal, sodomy, traitor, treason
Stupak Sold Out The Babies And America
Mar 24, 2010 Political
Bart Stupak held out for a long time. He said that he needed language in the health care bill that would disallow the use of federal dollars for abortions. He sounded principled and he had a little gang that followed him. The votes of the gang were obviously needed because it passed by just four votes.
The initial word was that Obama was going to sign an Executive Order stating federal dollars would not be used for abortion. The EO has no weight and the bill Obama signed into law will be the final word on the matter. Obama, by the way, had a big ceremony to sign the bill but had no time to sign that pesky EO.
He might get around to it.
But does it matter? Stupak claimed the EO allayed his worries and changed him to a yes vote. The reality is that Stupak received $726,409 in federal grants for three small airports in his district. After that money was obligated, he changed his vote. I do not believe in coincidences in politics so there is no doubt in my mind that Stupak was bought off. The airport money bought his vote and the EO provided him cover.
Add this three quarters of a million dollars to the amount of money the health care legislation will cost. We can add that to the 10 billion dollars the IR-SS will need to track insurance compliance, the amount needed for the doc-fix, and the untold millions or billions used to bribe other members of Congress. All of this money is part of the cost of the legislation no matter where they hide it because it was needed to pass the legislation.
Stupak showed his true colors and now we need to look closely at his other so called pro-life hold outs to see what special money they got for their votes.
We are going to run roughshod over Congress this November and throw a lot of the bastards out of office. They will pay for their treason with their jobs though I have no doubt Owebama will find them other jobs in government.
They are unworthy of their jobs and they are unworthy of the name American. They are traitors who usurped the Constitution and they need to go. Nothing less than a bloodbath is acceptable.
And if these people think they will sway public opinion with their trinkets and shiny beads they have another thought coming.
If they are not in a solidly blue, safe seat, they will be in trouble.
Mr. Stupak, I hope you feel good about your decision and I hope the thirty pieces of silver were what you really wanted because you are history this November.
It is time to abort these sell out Democrats.
UPDATE: Stupak intended to vote for the bill all along even if the abortion issue failed. This video spells it all out. Stupak is a weasel. [Thanks to the Lonely Conservative]
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: bart stupak, constitution, lies, Obama, traitor
Obama Gives Away Just A Little More
Dec 27, 2009 Political
I guess the following will give Glenn Beck something to discuss for the next week. It seems that Obama has signed an Executive Order that grants Interpol immunity from searches and FOIA requests. Looks like that police force that Obama wants to put out there might be here sooner than we think. As Anchoress puts it:
This now says that Interpol is no longer subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Their premises or staff can no longer be searched either. Their files are not subject to legal subpoena or discovery. Our government could just hand documents and files over to Interpol and Americans would no longer have access to them. Interpol can legally keep files now on all citizens of the US with no right to redress.
This is one example of the liberals giving away the sovereignty of our nation a little at a time. And it is an example of the MSM’s assistance. The EO was not reported by the MSM and little fuss was made of it since we were preoccupied with Tiger Woods and the health care takeover. The reality is that Interpol can now keep records on Americans that are untouchable. Any American arrested through Interpol activity will have less due process than the terrorists Obama so desperately wants to help. As Ed Morrissey puts it:
. . .it appears to mean that Americans who get arrested on the basis of Interpol work cannot get the type of documentation one normally would get in the discovery process, which is a remarkable reversal from Obama’s declared efforts to gain “due process” for terrorists detained at Gitmo. Does the White House intend to treat Americans worse than the terrorists we’ve captured during wartime?
Ronald Reagan signed the original EO that gave Interpol personnel diplomatic status with two exceptions. Interpol had to produce records when demanded by the courts and could not be immune from their actions. This required them to have the same accountability as our law enforcement agencies. Now, Interpol can do just about anything, not turn over any records related to what they did and then claim diplomatic immunity.
NRO explains it this way:
On Wednesday, however, for no apparent reason, President Obama issued an executive order removing the Reagan limitations. That is, Interpol’s property and assets are no longer subject to search and confiscation, and its archives are now considered inviolable. This international police force (whose U.S. headquarters is in the Justice Department in Washington) will be unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United States.
~snip~
Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?
Where are the media on this? Why are they not investigating to see why this rookie in the White House is signing away protections put in place by a much wiser man? What possible reason could Obama have for doing this? Why has there been no attention given to this?
This EO has the potential to cause a lot of problems for American citizens and has the potential to take some of our sovereignty away. Why is the moron in the White House doing this to our country? Until a response that is well reasoned and makes sense comes from the White House my default position is that Obama did this to weaken this country and it is a precursor of bad things to come.
Considering the sordid history of Interpol, this cannot be a good thing no matter how one spins it. It must be bad or Obama would not have done this on the sly. When he thinks he is doing a good thing he has a media blitz. He hid this one. It is part of that transparency that has not been so transparent.
Buy lots of guns and even more ammo.
Here are links to others weighing in on this very bad thing.
Threats Watch | Death By 1000 Paper Cuts | The Patriot Room | Pierre Legrand’s Pink Flamingo Bar | Brutally Honest | Wizbang | Atlas Shrugs | Noisy Room
Thanks to GM Roper for the image.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: immunity, interpol, nazi police force, Obama, ronald reagan, sell out, traitor