Name calling Leads To Ban From Entry Into US

A 17 year old British ladd is not allowed to enter the US. He has been banned from entering the US for LIFE.

What did this young man do? Did he commit an act of terror? Did he provide arms to our enemies? Did he hijack an American airplane?

No, he called Barack Obama a p***k. I don’t know what word that is and there are some who are saying it was punk. That could very well be but I see too many “*”s for that. I think it might be a word that means to poke a small hole with a sharp object that rhymes with thick.

The Ladd got drunk one evening (and that is a problem in and of itself) and sent an email to the White House calling Barack Obama a name.

So now he has been banned form coming to America for LIFE. Isn’t that just a bit extreme? Is Obama so sensitive that he and his henchmen have to worry about a teenager calling Obama names? Hell, American citizens call him worse every day (maybe throwing them out is next). Some teen calls him a name and he can never come here.

If only this regime were as strict and aggressive with people who are actually at threat to this country. Imagine how things would work out if they enforced our immigration laws and banned the illegals from here for life.

No, you call Obama a name and you are banned but if you come here illegally and actually have a negative impact on this country you are coddled and made a victim. The regime is working hard to keep from deporting them but banning kids who call names.

We do not need immigration reform, we need to enforce the laws we have.

But until we do this kid can sneak into the US and he will be welcomed with open arms by the regime.

Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

17 Responses to “Name calling Leads To Ban From Entry Into US”

  1. Obama’s famous thin skin is very easily punctured. That’s the way it is with persons of high arrogance and no actual achievements. To be called a “p***k” at close range might just disembowel him!

  2. Adam says:

    Actually if you read the reports the only thing the teen could remember was calling him a “p***k” in the e-mail:

    He said that he had called President Obama a ‘p***k’ but when asked if the action taken to ban him from going to America ‘forever’ was extreme, Mr Angel said he had been more abusive than that.

    The teenager added that he had been watching some conspiracy theory programmes such as the ones about 9/11 and had been researching the Illuminati – a lot of which he believed in.

    Sarah Wilkinson, a spokeswoman from Bedfordshire Police said: “The individual had sent an email to the White House which was full of abusive and threatening language. …”

    I’m sure whatever it was in reality probably wasn’t worth banning over either of course but writing this off as simply a thin-skinned Obama case is a bit misleading.

    • Big Dog says:

      Regardless of what was written, the kid is not a threat. We have greater threats to this country that Obama and his peeps willfully aide and abet. They are working NOT to deport people who come here illegally but will ban FOR LIFE a person who wrote an email while drunk.

      They do less to ban people who are radicals and who support Hamas and other terror organizations than they do to ban someone who wrote a nasty email.

      • Adam says:

        “Regardless of what was written, the kid is not a threat.”

        Maybe after all this buzz we’ll find out more about what was in the e-mail. I tend to agree though that no matter what was in it he was not a threat. Given that we really don’t know though, I find it hard to speculate.

        “They are working NOT to deport people who come here illegally but will ban FOR LIFE a person who wrote an email while drunk.”

        What does that even mean? Deportation and company audits are up under Obama, not down. Granted, the Obama administration doesn’t treat every illegal like an evil criminal as your side seems to prefer…

        • Big Dog says:

          I know it is tough for you to understand why we prefer to treat people who break the law as criminals but, wait for it, people who break the law are criminals. Some are evil and some are not but they are ALL criminals.

          You probably need to look at what they are doing regarding illegals. They are not deporting them if they have committed no other crime. That is contrary to the law. But then again, the rule of law is something your side is very, very weak on.

          I don’t care what was written, I know it was not enough to ban for life when we have people on watch lists who come here.

        • Adam says:

          “They are not deporting them if they have committed no other crime.”

          And why should they? These people are the very least of our worries. Given the finite nature of law enforcement resources I’d say it makes all the sense in the world to look the other way when the only crime is being here illegally.

          You’ve said yourself that you want a crackdown on businesses hiring illegals and that has quadrupled under Obama. Feel free to praise Obama for that point any time you’re ready.

          • Big Dog says:

            I would like to see this crackdown you tout. I have not heard of anything in a long time. Perhaps you can get some unbiased numbers to show how Barry has cracked the whip.

            Why should they not deport if they committed no other crime? Let’s explore, people avoid paying taxes and the government goes after them but WHY SHOULD THEY? We have bigger fish to fry. Hell, it is not that much money and the illegals are consuming more tax dollars than that so why go after people who pay no taxes?

            why stop people who are speeding? Not that important in the grand scheme of things. Why not look the other way when the only crime is not paying taxes or speeding?

            Because we do not get to select which laws to enforce. If we do that then we begin to allow other crimes to go unpunished and we get more people willing to break the law. If people know they will not be sent home if caught, more will come. i know that is the Democrat voter drive but it is against the law.

            A tough concept for liberals, law…

  3. Adam says:

    But I do love how all of these good sources like WND and Fox News just leave off any details about the fact that e-mail contained some sort of threat and pretend the kid is banned just for name calling.

  4. Adam says:

    “Because we do not get to select which laws to enforce. ”

    I know it’s hard to comprehend when you see it so black and white. It’s just that the issue is large and complicated and dealing with the worst aspects of illegal immigration first is the most logical and moral thing to do.

    “Perhaps you can get some unbiased numbers to show how Barry has cracked the whip.”

    Fox News August 23, 2010:

    Under Obama, employer audits are up 50 percent, fines have tripled to almost $3 million and the number of executives arrested is slightly up over the Bush administration.

    But under President Obama, the numbers of arrests and deportations of illegals taken into custody at work sites plummeted by more than 80 percent from the last year of the Bush administration. In the current fiscal year 2010, which ends Sept. 30, ICE has arrested 900 workers.

    Under the direction of Obama there has been a decreased focus on the individuals when their only crime is being here illegally, and increased focus on the employers.

    We can’t wave our magic wand and deport every illegal immigrant in America. We have to focus on the employers and the worst criminal offenders first.

    • Big Dog says:

      I agree and have always said we should go after those who employ but IF we catch an illegal (we don’t need to look for them to catch them) we should get rid of them.

      As for the report, it says audits are up and fines have tripled but that arrests of illegals down. So these illegals can just go to another company and get hired. I would like to see an indepth analysis to see what businesses are being targeted. Given that the majority of car dealerships closed were owned by people who donated to Republicans it is not beyond belief that he would target and fine businesses that are owned by the same kind of people.

      However, taken at its face I appreciate the effort to crack down on the employers.

      I will point out that the arrests and deportations have plummeted under Obama.

      And yet, this claim is made by one of his sockpuppets:

      “No administration in the history of this nation removed more illegal immigrants from the country than we did last year and I expect the records to continue. We’re serious about enforcement. We’re going to go out and we’re just going to do it,”

      I do not see how this squares and if they will lie about this what other information in the story was lied about?

    • Blake says:

      But the illegals are “asked” to show up for deportation hearings, then released- of course, they DO NOT SHOW UP FOR THESE HEARINGS- only a true progressive would believe that they would- or perhaps they really know that this “catch and release” method is the only way they believe they can have it both ways.

  5. Virginia says:

    Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America , and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:

    1. $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens.
    ( that’s Billion with a ‘B’ )

    2.. $2.2 billion dollars are spent each year on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.

    3. $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

    4. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they still cannot speak a word of English!

    5. $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.

    6. $3 Million Dollars ‘PER DAY’ is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. That’s $1.2 Billion a year.

    7. 28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.

    8. $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.

    9. $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

    10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that’s two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US. –

    11. During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from other terrorist countries. Over 10,000 of those were middle-eastern terrorists. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroine, crack, Guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border.

    12.. The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.& nbsp; –

    13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families & friends.

    14. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States !’

    Total cost a whopping $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR!!!

    and this is for California

  6. Virginia says:

    What we are seeing, is Barack Obama unplugged. He is a man used to being cosseted and who believes negative comments about him are a violation of an unwritten moral code.

    Bar a kid for life, that is pure stupid, but then again when we are living under the rule of a enemy lover, who only thinks his fella bro’s in the east have right here. I could go on for ever about what a piece of crap Mr. Obama is, and I do inform every one I know about him , so guess that means I am on his first let her die list, since I am a senior. If I am lucky, he will from diaherra of the mouth, talking his sh*t all the time, and it amount to nothing but pure BS.

  7. Virginia says:

    Obama’s Backdoor Amnesty
    by Connie Hair

    09/13/2010

    The Obama administration has begun implementing a backdoor amnesty through selective enforcement of U.S. immigration law.

    A leaked internal memorandum from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) — part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) — entitled “Administrative Alternatives to Comprehensive Immigration Reform” revealed a series of “deferred action” plans to sidestep legislative requirements.

    Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-Fla.), ranking Republican on House Homeland Security Committee’s oversight subcommittee, spoke with HUMAN EVENTS about these recent actions — or orders for inaction.

    “It’s a separation of powers issue,” Bilirakis told HUMAN EVENTS in an exclusive interview. “I think they feel that they don’t have the votes in both chambers to pass amnesty. This should go through the legislative process.”

    obama knows he will not be elected and maybe impeached, that is why he is back dooring voters into the USA, to vote for him.

  8. Adam says:

    “I will point out that the arrests and deportations have plummeted under Obama. … I do not see how this squares and if they will lie about this what other information in the story was lied about?”

    That article speaking in terms of deportations from work sites being down, not all deportations. According to other sources the man in question is correct that deportations in general are record high.

  9. Big Dog says:

    The WaPo is part of Obama media. I want to see the numbers in writing from a credible source.