As if We Needed Further Proof About Democrats and Islam

Two items today in the news that serve only as a reminder of that which is already known by thinking people but denied by those who live with the disease of liberalism.

The first is a story that reports an Islamic group has claimed responsibility for the terror attacks in India:

An obscure Islamic group claimed responsibility for a series of synchronized explosions that killed at least 45 people in western India, warning of “the terror of Death” in an e-mail sent to several television stations minutes before the blasts. My Way News

Most terror attacks are by Islamic groups, obscure or otherwise. Sure, there have been acts of terror committed by individuals not associated with any group much less Islam. These people are the exception rather than the rule. When one hears of a terror attack Islam is the first thought because the majority of terror attacks have been committed by that cult. The fact that an Islamic group is taking credit for the India terror attacks should come as no surprise. CAIR might try to convince us that Islam is not a violent cult but CAIR supports terror and defends terrorism.

The second item is conformation of an item that everyone with a brain already knows but that Clinton supporters have been denying for years. Anytime someone mentions that Clinton’s inaction and cowardice led to 9/11 there is always an outcry that it is a tactic to just blame things on Clinton and that it was not true especially since it happened on Bush’s watch. Well, now bin Laden’s driver has confirmed that Clinton is to blame for 9/11:

The United States could have killed bin Laden in Khartoum, Sudan, before he moved to Afghanistan in 1996, Hamdan told his interrogators. They could have killed him after al Qaida’s 1998 twin bombings at the U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Or after the October 2000 suicide bombing of the USS Cole, at the port of Aden in Yemen, which left 17 U.S. sailors dead.

Instead, ”Bin Laden was emboldened.” So he struck with the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, leaving nearly 3,000 dead. McClatchy

This information will only come as a surprise to those who still think Clinton handled things wonderfully and that he was a great president. People who saw nothing wrong with what Sandy Berger did will still defend the pervert in chief and will claim it is a lie and a distortion of the truth. The Clinton folks, including Bubba himself, had a cow over the movie The Path to 9/11. Clinton called it “lies” even though it was accurate and supported by the facts. ABC backed down and changed part of the movie. Now we have bin Laden’s driver confirming that it was all true.

Bill Clinton’s cowardice and refusal to get bin Laden caused 9/11. Remember this in November. We tried the Democrat’s plan for national security and it gave us an attack on our soil that killed 3000.

If you value your life, don’t vote Democrat.

Big Dog



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

26 Responses to “As if We Needed Further Proof About Democrats and Islam”

  1. Bosun says:

    BD, We are at war with radical islam. The only problem is we cannot tell who is radical and who is not.

    Just look at this UK survey that was posted at World Net Daily over the weekend:

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=70673

    Quote:
    If ignorance and poverty are responsible for the growth of extremist views in the Islamic world, someone needs ask Muslim students, privileged enough and bright enough to attend some of the United Kingdom’s best universities, why one-in-three of them endorses killing in the name of Islam.

    The report of this finding, based on a poll of 600 Muslim and 800 non-Muslim students at 12 universities in the UK, and conducted by YouGov on behalf of the Center for Social Cohesion, will be released tomorrow as “Islam on Campus.”

    Among its findings of Muslim beliefs:
    *40 per cent support introduction of Shari’ah into British law for Muslims
    *One-third back the idea of a worldwide Islamic caliphate based on Shari’ah law
    *40 per believe it is unacceptable for Muslim men and women to associate freely
    *24 per cent do not think men and women are equal in the eyes of Allah
    *25 percent have little or no respect for homosexuals.
    *53 per cent believe killing in the name of religion is never justified (compared with 94 per cent of non-Muslims), while 32 per cent say it is
    *57 percent believe Muslim soldiers serving in the UK military should be able to refuse duty in Muslim countries
    *More than half favor an Islamic political party to support their views in parliament
    *One-third doesn’t think or don’t know if Islam is compatible with Western views of democracy

    “Significant numbers appear to hold beliefs which contravene democratic values,” Hannah Stuart, one of the report’s authors, told the London Times. “These results are deeply embarrassing for those who have said there is no extremism in British universities.”

    Radicalized Islam is growing in the United States regardless of what CAIR says.

    Now in regards to Clinton dropping the ball on terrorism. Bill and his boys have been running from the truth a long time. I knew when I was told about Operation Bojinka several years ago by one of the Philippine Police Constabulary involved in the bust.

    So, when the planes hit the WTC, I said Bojinka, Bin Laden, and several other things that I could not repeat here. Actually the 911 report deals with this too.

    Yep, Bill and the boys have been running a long time and this latest revelation will be dealt with in the typical clintonese fashion.

    The left would rather **** Bush that to place the blame on Bill.

    I would place the blame on sheeple apologists and appeasers who fail to see the caliphate reorganizing.
    __________________

    Bosuns last blog post..Religion of Peace targets Olympics

  2. Bunny Colvin says:

    Wise and Brave Canine-

    Your post is scaring me to death! All those out of touch liberal Commies are going to get us killed! Will YOU protect me, macho man? Will McSame? Will the twominutemen?

    Oh good, bravest Bojangles has crawled out of his make-believe Afghani cave. He’s taking a break from chasing down the terr’sts (only in his own mind) to spread his message of fear and xenophobic paranoia. What a swell guy.

    BoBo- the 9/11 report deals with what you said immediately after the attacks? Where were you, in the underground bunker with Dick(face) Cheney?? You must be an important man. Teach us, wise one.

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Adolf & Hussein- What’s in a Name?

  3. Raven says:

    So uh…Buns- I hear thru the grapevine that you’re a man??

    May I ask WHY use a rather feminine name like Bunny? And why did you use the name C. M.* in that email you sent me, begging me not to ban you from my site?

    Not that is matters, I’m just curious.

    *Edited to remove name [BD]

  4. Bosun says:

    Bunny, Do you work for Media (doesn’t) Matters? :)

    Bosuns last blog post..Religion of Peace targets Olympics

  5. Reason says:

    As Bosun says, we are at war with Islam and we just don’t know it. We call it “radical Islam” because too many of us don’t understand that their most sacred religious writings promote the slaughter of non-believers, enslavement of “Peoples of the Book”, and global domination.

    No poll will ever be accurate since Islam encourages the deceiving of non-believers. In Christianity and Judaism one is not supposed to deny their faith, however in Islam one may deny their faith in order to deceive non-believers. Also they may dissemble and tell half truths in order to deceive non-believers. These practices are called Taqiyya and kitman respectively.

    Many of the liberals are like Nero, they are too self-absorbed, ignorant, and short sighted to see the threat to the things they supposedly hold dear. Religious freedom, or rather the right not to believe in anything. Equal rights, well at least the Muslims will enslave and execute without out regard to race only belief. Gay Marriage, Bunny won’t be worried about whether or not he and his partner can be together anymore. They’ll be dead since in most countries run by Sharia law the penalty for homosexuality is death, the more moderate ones only imprison and fine you for it. Wealth redistribution programs? Well as a good Muslim you are supposed to give alms, however that doesn’t prevent the wealthy from living lives of luxury while the majority of their nation lives in poverty, good-bye welfare.
    Women’s rights? Fuggetaboutit. No more bikini’s, half shirts, low rise jeans, Daisy Dukes, etc. for you. Its the hijab, chador, and burkha for you.

    Just because we don’t acknowledge the war that has been going on for over 1300 years doesn’t mean its not going on. We are taught about the Crusades and taught to be ashamed of them as aggressive campaigns of religious persecution against Muslims. However we are often not taught about the aggressive and bloody expansion of Islam from 632 to 1500 C.E.

    Islam is a threat, and not just to Christianity but to all Western ideals of personal freedom and equality, Eastern philosophies such as Buddhism, the ideals of Communism and Socialism, anything and everything not Islam and Sharia law is threatened.

  6. Reason says:

    Some reading for those unfamiliar with Islamic beliefs and goals.

    http://europenews.dk/en/node/12574

  7. Bunny Colvin says:

    Ravenous- as I stated on your war-crazed zombie blog, the names Bunny and Connie can both refer to men. Connie Mack is a current repuke Congressman from Florida. But you wouldn’t know that, it’s real world stuff. And all this action with posting my name (there, now here)- what is the point of that? No, I don’t work for Media Matters. I’m just any ordinary guy whom happens to have opinions which differ from yours. Why put my name out there and cross your fingers hoping that some nut will come after me? I wouldn’t do that to you, Big Brother.

    unREASONable- more of your tired, xenophobic B.S. Take your garbage to some neo-Nazi site, will you please? You are 100% certifiably batshit crazy. Maybe the twominutemen will take you in. Grab your gun and head for the border, chump.

    PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST….unREASONable ain’t tryin to hear dat…what a wacko!

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Adolf & Hussein- What’s in a Name?

  8. Scott says:

    Xenophobic? Hardly. The information I provide is well documented in historical fact, the Quran and the Sunnah, the writings of both ancient and modern Muslim clerics and scholars, and current news stories. When was the last time a Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, Taoist, Jewish, or Shintoist strapped a bomb to themselves and blew up a busload of people, many of whom are kids going to school or intentionally flew a plane into a building full of people?

    Where is your information backing your views on Islam? Do you even have anything that resembles an informed opinion? Or like usual you’ve got no clue and you are just spewing garbage?

  9. Reason says:

    No Muslims don’t pose a threat to anyone…

    http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=cc32fe37-79a9-4ebf-a90a-b1db4aa718ec

    http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=12865&size=A

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/2461830/Killing-for-religion-is-justified,-say-third-of-Muslim-students.html

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/2463208/Iraqs-Christians-form-new-militias-to-combat-Islamic-extremists.html

    The people who believe there can be peace in the Middle East don’t understand the Islamic religion and culture. There cannot be peace in the Middle East until it comes under total control of Islam, also known as being brought into “dar al-Islam”. Then they will brutally enforce the peace by oppressing the Peoples of the Book and killing anyone else who doesn’t convert.

  10. Bunny Colvin says:

    I’m beginning to think that Scottie cannot be a real person. NO ONE can be wrong this often. Even the LoofDawg BillO hits one out of 20 or so on the head. Scottie must be a fellow liberal, lobbing me softballs. He must be. On to business….

    Ok, first. What do you say of your oil rig blunder? What is your opinion on that, “Scottie”?

    “Xenophobic? Hardly. The information I provide is well documented in historical fact, the Quran and the Sunnah, the writings of both ancient and modern Muslim clerics and scholars, and current news stories. When was the last time a Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, Taoist, Jewish, or Shintoist strapped a bomb to themselves and blew up a busload of people, many of whom are kids going to school or intentionally flew a plane into a building full of people?”

    I think “Scottie” must really be the guy that pitched BP to Josh Hamilton. This is so easy. When was the last time a “Christian” did something like this? Well, the first one that came to my mind was the one on Sunday…

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,392081,00.html

    There have probably been killings at the hands of a “Christian” somewhere in the world since then. So you are wrong…YET AGAIN.

    In my eyes, anyone who commits a terroristic act cannot be a “Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, Taoist, Jewish, or Shintoist or MUSLIM”. These people are mentally disturbed and interpret the texts and teachings of their religion in a different fashion than any sane or truly religious person would. They are evil, crazy, or (usually) a combo of both.

    Now, some of the confused posters on this site (unREASONable, especially) subscribe to the belief that the message of Islam is to kill everyone whom is not Muslim. I have asked every non-terroristic Muslim I’ve ever met (all of them were non-terroristic) if this is indeed the message. They have all told me that it is not.

    Scottie, I can’t believe that, after all this time has passed since your SoCal oil spill, you came @ me wit dis week ass shit. You don’t know when to quit yo.

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Adolf & Hussein- What’s in a Name?

  11. Bunny Colvin says:

    And, “Scott”, PLEASE feel free to stop over at my blog at http://www.deciders.wordpress.com if you wish to discuss ANYTHING that is on your mind. Your insights would be greatly appreciated. Thanks buddy!

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Adolf & Hussein- What’s in a Name?

  12. Victoria says:

    In my eyes, anyone who commits a terroristic act cannot be a “Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, Taoist, Jewish, or Shintoist or MUSLIM”. These people are mentally disturbed and interpret the texts and teachings of their religion in a different fashion than any sane or truly religious person would. They are evil, crazy, or (usually) a combo of both.

    This was at the beginning of an article I received in my email recently:

    Will we ever stop hearing from
    the politically correct, about the ‘peaceful Muslims’?

    5. Isn’t the Muslim Religion peaceful?

    Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the
    predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the
    dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian (?)), that made no
    difference. You either went along with the administration or you were
    eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for
    political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests).
    (see http://WWW.Nazis.testimony.co.UK/7-a.htm)

    Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the
    six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of
    anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the world
    focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his
    way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world – German,
    Christian or any others.

    Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US , but kill
    all in the way — their own people or the Spanish, British, French or anyone
    else. The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no
    protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims
    there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim
    leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing — by their own
    pronouncements — killing all of us ‘infidels.’ I don’t blame the peaceful Muslims.

    What would you do if your choice were to shut up or die?

    So Mr. Bunny Colvin you and everyone else like you can live in your dream worlds and if there is more of you than people with common sense (which I hope not) we are going to wake up one day wearing sheets or dead.

  13. Bunny Colvin says:

    Vic-

    Nice to meet you. I find particularly interesting your writing… “Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US , but kill
    all in the way — their own people or the Spanish, British, French or anyone
    else. The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no
    protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims
    there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim
    leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing — by their own
    pronouncements — killing all of us ‘infidels.’ I don’t blame the peaceful Muslims.”

    I do not even understand what this means. That because there were peaceful Germans during the third reich, there are peaceful Muslims now during a time of increased activity by Muslim terrorists. To this, I agree. But what does that say? What is your position? That because of this proven factual statement we should have prosecuted every German citizen then and every citizen of every Muslim nation now?

    I do not understand your logic. Please explain to me what we should do with “peaceful Muslims”. You say that you don’t blame them, but how are they to be handled?

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Adolf & Hussein- What’s in a Name?

  14. Bunny Colvin says:

    Oh, and how can one “wake up one day” if he/she is dead on said day?

    Just curious.

    PEACE

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Adolf & Hussein- What’s in a Name?

  15. Joe reinhart says:

    Bunny, it doesn’t work. It wasn’t a bomb, he wasn’t a christian and he wasn’t a terrorist nor was a member of any organized terorist plan.

    “…his hatred of gays and liberals, and his expectation…with first-degree murder in the Sunday shooting at a Knoxville, Tenn., Unitarian church that left two people dead and five injured. Police said he acted alone.

    “It was hateful words. He was saying hateful things,” she said, but refused to elaborate.

    Sounds like a pretty good guy to me! Heart was in the right place!
    Bwaaaaaa!
    You know bunny, I love having a battle of wits, but you are entirely unarmed. Go home a grow a brain, ok.

  16. Joe reinhart says:

    And Victoria, ignore the little Gollum. We do. It isn’t that your point is unclear; it is. Bunny really has no brain. He makes real bunnies look smart.

    If he were in Nazi Germany he would be a quizzling. If there were a stoning at the local little league baseball feild, he would be showing the kids how to throw the first stone,and justify his actions doing it.

    Oh, I long for the days when being a traitor was still a capital crime!

  17. Reason says:

    Sorry Bunny but you’re grasping at straws again. One whackjob with a gun is not equivalent to a suicide bomber. What this proves is your complete lack of understanding of Islam and your acceptance of Muslim apologists words as truth.

    Why is it that there are Muslims at the heart of almost every violent conflict worldwide? Can you answer that one Bunny? You can’t just blame it all on the US, they are attacking China, India, Ethiopia, and in other places across the globe.

    If this were a “small segment of backward extremists” as you and apologists claim how is that they are performing attacks across the globe? BO claims that it is economic disparity and lack of education that spurs these extremists. How then does that explain that Ayman al Zawahiri was born to upper class doctors and had a Masters in Surgery from the University of Cairo? How do you explain that many of the 9/11 terrorists had Masters degrees in fields like Mechanical Engineering, Finance, and Architecture?

    With the above information and the known practice of Taqiyya how pray tell would you know an “non-terroristic” Muslim from one that participates in weekly meeting on planning the bombing of the local stadium? Only a moron would state “I have asked every non-terroristic Muslim I’ve ever met (all of them were non-terroristic) if this is indeed the message. They have all told me that it is not.” I’m sure the 9/11 hi-jackers ran around admitting that they were terrorists to everyone that asked.

    As for what is to be done with Muslims…I’ve listed that elsewhere. Its a unique issue that has little precedent. A war of culture and ideals that involves people spread across the globe, with no real clear “opponent”. Islam itself has assured that the “peaceful Muslim” cannot be separated from the Jihadist who is working to undermine their enemy.

    I’ve outlined our options elsewhere, but the long and short of it is: outright war against Islam and ALL of its adherents, deportation and containment to existing Muslim states of Muslims by Western nations, or we submit and Western Culture and ideals die.

    Bunny likes to call me a xenophobe, however I neither hate nor fear people merely because they are different from me. Hate clouds one’s mind, just as Bunny’s self-hate, and America-hate could his thought process. It is when those differences pose a real and evident threat to my country, my neighbors, my family, and myself that I take issue. If Islam were not a threat to the ideals laid down by the Declaration of Independence, and the freedoms granted by the Amendments to the US Constitution then I wouldn’t have an issue with it. Just as I have no issues with Atheism, Buddhism, Christianity, Judaism, Taoism, Confucianism, Native American Spiritualism, Hinduism, Sikhism, etc.

    You merely need to read the news to see the evident threat posed by Islam and its adherants. I’ve even linked you a few in this thread.

  18. Reason says:

    Yep Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance…

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7077892.stm

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,394522,00.html

    Didn’t we oust the “radicals” from power in Afghanistan? The Taliban were the extremists right?

  19. Bunny Colvin says:

    Swines,

    Interesting to hear that you find this tragedy humorous. I can’t say that I do. In fact, if some idiot opened fire on a w(r)ong wing (r)epuke gathering tomorrow, I wouldn’t even crack a smile. You find these things somehow funny, I most certainly do not.

    Tell me this little piggy, is this guy a “terr’st”???………….

    http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/07/04/la.airport.shooting/

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Adolf & Hussein- What’s in a Name?

  20. Bunny Colvin says:

    Oh, and Vickie-

    Refer to me as Major Bunny Colvin, not “Mister” Bunny Colvin. Thanks.

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Are these boots made for walkin’?

  21. Reason says:

    From the information provided in that article in cannot be ascertained what the gunman’s motives were. It only states his nationality not his religious affiliation, thus you don’t know whether or not he’s a Muslim.

    The Israelis (as stated in the article) believed it was a terrorist act, but from the information provided nothing concrete can be ascertained. Perhaps more information can be found in follow up articles, though the story is so old that most aren’t available without opening a subscription of some type.

    From the little I can garner beyond that article it looks a bit more like a “suicide by cop” deal than an act of terrorism in the official sense. Though some could argue that his act by its very nature was an act of terror.

  22. Bunny Colvin says:

    “Though some could argue that his act by its very nature was an act of terror.”

    Yep. Just like that act of terror in the church in Tennessee on Sunday. But you guys refuse to recognize that as terrorism, for the perpetrator is a “Christian”.

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Are these boots made for walkin’?

  23. Reason says:

    Actually I was more referring to the fact that the perpetrator was Egyptian (Arab), likely Muslim, and targeted an Israeli airline ticket counter when I wrote what you quoted.

    What would you call Columbine? Virgina Tech? Westroads Mall? Salt Lake City Mall? The Amish School?

    While murderous rampages can “terrorize” communities, they often are the work of a single person with severe issues. Rare cases can be more than one individual like Columbine, but the majority are sole perpetrators.

    Terrorism is generally defined as “The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.”

    While the media has played up the TN gunman’s views, hating Christians, Gays, and Liberals and trying to take a bunch with you on your way out doesn’t quite make it terrorism. His ultimate goal was his own death while taking a few people he hated with him, not coercing or intimidating those groups or the government into his views. If anything his actions would have the exact opposite, eliciting sympathy from most normal people for the people he attacked.

  24. Big Dog says:

    It was not an act of terror it was a criminal act. Not all acts of violence are terror as Reason points out with the definition of terror.

    None of the mentioned incidents were acts of terror, they were crimes or mass murder. There was no attempt to influence government.

  25. Bunny Colvin says:

    You two bloodhounds are on this one! You guys never let me down.

    “Terrorism is generally defined as “The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.””

    Did it ever occur to you that the gunmen in the TN church shooting and LAX shooting might have had the “intention of intimidating or coercing society for ideological reasons”? I mean the a$$ clown in Tennessee preached hatred of gays, so he murdered congregants of a church that preached tolerance. Do you fail to recognize that in this idiots twisted mind, he likely was advancing his ideological agenda and at the same time “intimidating society”. It’s clearly terrorism. Just because it wasn’t an Arab blowing something up, doesn’t disqualify it from being terroristic. You better take it easy on the policework kid, you aren’t exactly a super sleuth.

    Dog- Now you’re an expert on crime classification? You don’t even like the police.

    Bunny Colvins last blog post..Are these boots made for walkin’?