Would A SEAL Club A Liberal?

Liberal talk show host Mike Malloy asked a question on his radio program (I am surprised anyone heard it) wanting to know when SEAL Team 6 would drop in on George W Bush. SEAL Team 6 is the team credited with the killing of Osama bin Laden. Malloy said that Bush has killed more innocent people so the team should pay him a similar visit. In other words, Malloy wants to know when a military team will KILL George W Bush. That is the only message one can get from this:

“So when does Seal Unit 6, or whatever it’s called, drop in on George Bush? Bush was responsible for a lot more death, innocent death, than bin Laden. Wasn’t he, or am I wrong here?,” Liberal radio talk show host Mike Malloy said on his show Monday evening. Real Clear Politics

Yes Mike, you are wrong here and so much for the civility the liberals cried for.

But let’s look at this. The military loves George Bush and they know he was a genuine leader. Before some liberal twit links to some soldier or soldier’s parent (like Cindy Sheehan) expressing disgust, keep in mind that any group has people who feel differently than the majority. Believe it or not, some liberals do not like Obama but that does not negate the statement that liberals love Obama. If it makes you feel better, add the word most.

If the SEAL Team had the opportunity to drop in on two people and those two were Bush or Malloy, who do you think they would drop in on?

It would not be Bush.

But this also begs the question, if Bush is responsible for these deaths and should be visited by the SEAL Team, should not they visit Obama? He is responsible for the deaths of lots of people and a lot of those folks are our military members. When Bush was in office we got daily death counts from the state run media but now they ignore the mounting deaths piling up under Obama. Obama is responsible for the deaths of innocent people in Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan, just to name a few. I wonder if Malloy would like to see Obama get a visit for all the deaths he has caused.

And to top it all off, Obama received a Nobel Prize for Peace.

Obama killed Osama (or so the story goes), and he killed the children of leaders as well as some of their other family members.

Mike Malloy is another liberal moron who is a follower of the failed policies of liberalism. He is another in a long line of liberal morons who blame everything on Bush.

Well, except the good things that happen. Then it was a liberal triumph.

Fortunately, our military does not take out our own people (even though liberals seem to desire this) but if they did Bush would not have to worry.

Malloy, on the other hand, might be swimming with Osama and the fishes…

Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

11 Responses to “Would A SEAL Club A Liberal?”

  1. Adam says:

    “Yes Mike, you are wrong here and so much for the civility the liberals cried for.”

    This isn’t the first stupid thing Malloy has said and probably not the last. I would never call for Bush’s death but I do think this is another case of how whoever wins a war gets to decide which side’s actions were right and wrong.

    • Eoj Trahneir says:

      What are you talking about? Is that really the barbaric mind-set of the liberals?
      What you are saying is, had Hitler won the war, mass murder of Jews, retards and handicap people (and by extension, liberals, because they fit all three criteria!)would be OK! It would be moral! It would be ethical!

      Or are you saying, and I hope you are, that you don’t know what the words “right” and “wrong” mean. Either way you are an idiot, but at least you are just an ignorant idiot in the second scenario.

      Liberals, proving themselves incapable of leadership since 1931~

  2. victoria says:

    I suppose from your post that you actually think that this “President” and the Democrats are actually going to win this war. This incompetant boob actually made our troops on one of our Naval ships give Obama whoops I mean Osama a “proper Muslim burial” and now won’t show the photo because it might incite the enemy. This enemy is already incited and ready to kill anyway and they should be the ones who are worried about whether we are “#$%^ssed off or not. We the people have had to watch this POS on broadcasts taunting us and lecturing us and calling himself the “strong horse.” It is us who have had to watch beheadings of various people and troops. It is us who watched the towers come down. Not to mention the many family members of the victims of this POS before 9/11 and on 9/11. This son of #$%^tch in the White House was ready to publish all the pictures of the Abu Grab(sp) incident to hurt our military anyway he could. Not to mention the fact that there is not one thing that apparently can be believed about what happened. It was on BBC that there was a blackout of about 20 to 25 minutes while the seals were actually carrying this thing out. You know that picture of everyone in that room “watching the whole thing.” What a crock and what a bunch of liars up there and in the media. It would be funny if it wasn’t so sickening but it is for damn sure not how you win a war.

    • Adam says:

      My statement was more about the fact that US came out on top in Iraq so therefore our culture gets to decide who committed atrocities and who didn’t. I don’t think Bush = Osama because of Iraq as Malloy is falsely suggesting but I do think that there is little consideration by most Americans as to the level of harm done by the Iraq war at the directives of President Bush.

      And for the record putting “president” in quotes does not change the fact that Obama is the sitting president of the United States after winning a free, fair, and uncontested election. Calling Obama by the name “Osama” just shows how even elderly individuals like yourself can still be childish. If it makes you feel better to see photos bruised and bloody dead terrorists then I’m sure you can find those around the Internet without having Obama release Osama’s latest glamor shots.

      • Eoj Trahneir says:

        I remember Liberal like you, and you still, calling Bush much worse names than “president.”

        How many times did we have to see media reruns of the trade center’s collapse? OK, that’s how many times I want to see Obama..I mean Osama’s dead dead dead picture on the prime-time news.

        Not because I want to see his dead face, but because it is payback time. And I wan to have it. It is part of my “closure ceremony.” It is part of “a level playing field.” It is equal and just representation of reality.

  3. Eoj Trahneir says:

    “But this also begs the question, if Bush is responsible for these deaths and should be visited by the SEAL Team, should not they visit Obama?

    The fallacy of petitio principii, or “begging the question,” is committed “when a proposition which requires proof is assumed without proof,” or more generally denotes when an assumption is used, “in some form of the very proposition to be proved, as a premise from which to deduce it.”

    It has nothing to do with “raises this addition question,” or “leads to this additional thought.”

    Get your fallacies straight.

    • Eoj Trahneir says:

      Which isn’t to say I don’t totally agree with your observations! Malloy can swim with the facetious any day. Sooner the better.

  4. Blake says:

    Adam- I do not know who this Malloy guy is, but he is like all other progressives, elitist, and a legend in his own mind, but nowhere else.
    The problem with people like him, is that he and other progressives believe they are so much smarter than the “great unwashed masses”, that they simply must be the natural leaders. Truthfully, we have gotten on great without these egotistical asshats, and if Seal Team Six went thru the government, doing an “Osama” to everyone they encountered, we would probably have better government- and you know, according to Napolitano, that could easily happen, since all our returning servicemen are going to be swallowed up by “Militias”, and everybody’s gonna die.

  5. victoria says:

    http://www.mudvillegazette.com/034214.html
    This is long but worth the read and shows more of what a fraud and liar and incompetant ahole is up in WA.

    • Eoj Trahneir says:

      Good report, and well worth reading.
      There will be no reply from Adam about this.
      It is far too cut and dried, showing HIS “president” as the fraud and liar that he is.
      No, Adam will remain silent, or refuse to read it, because it isn’t Major Media story puffing Obama.

  6. victoria says:

    Oh and I should include arrogant and careless with the lives of others.