Comments on: Why to Reject McCain

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 15 May 2008 19:45:34 +0000

“No matter how you wrap up a skunk, it is still a skunk.”
Check out this deck of cards that has McCain portrayed as a skunk!
http://blog.politicallywild.com/index.php?blog=2&title=5_of_clubs_john_mccain_republican_deck&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1

Jims last blog post..Wild Card 2 – Bill Clinton – Republican Deck

By: Neocon News » Massive Monday Link Dump

Neocon News » Massive Monday Link Dump — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:33:15 +0000

[...] Big Dogs Weblog » Why to Reject McCain [...]

By: Schatzee

Schatzee — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:52:46 +0000

HERE HERE Ogre – I’m with that idea.

By: Ogre

Ogre — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 02:22:50 +0000

The border problem is SO simple to fix. Just stop giving away free crap to non-citizens. Problem solved because they’d go home.

And I mean no free education, no free hospitals, no free social security — nothing. They’ll leave, we won’t have to deport them. Oh, and we’ll have more money in our own pockets because we won’t be spending it on them.

That’s Ron Paul’s position!

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:40:29 +0000

Arthur, you said it best when you said “If I were a real conservative…”

If you were you would not have endorsed McCain. You don’t have to deport 12 million. Make the climate right and they will leave, as we are starting to see because of the economy and employers reluctant to hire them.

McCain abandoned POWs and that violates an important rule. He did it with Kerry, how nice?

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:34:10 +0000

Brutus, I read it. It called for securing the border but not doing it before anything else.

The amnesty in the 1960s was authored by Ted Kennedy. Then the amnesty of 1984 was authored by him and in the bill it said we would secure the border and there WOULD NEVER BE A NEED FOR FUTURE AMNESTY.

This is why people were up in arms because they knew that part would be forgotten. Nothing until the border is secure.

It helps when you know the history.

By: Schatzee

Schatzee — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 02:14:32 +0000

Deporting 12 million illegals may be difficult but if we started fining the companies that employ illegals, refusing all illegals any government-funded assistance, and restricting them to receiving ONLY emergency health care, I believe they would emigrate to greener pastures (so to speak). Securing the borders is a must – and we need to let border patrol agents do their job without fear of reprisals. I just don’t think Juan McCain has it in him to do these things. He is too much of a social liberal (from what I can tell anyway).

By: Brutus

Brutus — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 02:08:35 +0000

BigDog,

If you read the McCain-Kennedy bill that was the first thing it called for (securing tbe border.)

And actually if you look at the polls, most Americans support something similiar.

By: Arthur

Arthur — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:22:09 +0000

Deporting 12 million illegals will never happen…it would not matter of Rush was President, it still would not be possible. McCain or Rudy’s position is the most tenable way to deal with it. Romney will have four different positions between now and November so what he says is irrelevant. As for Whoulter says..if I were a real conservative I would not want her endorsement, she is an ignorant whore.

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:38:29 +0000

Pretty sure there are better ways to solve the problem and the best starts with securing the border. Then deal with the rest through attrition.

When nearly 90% of America did not want it then it is obvious he was not voting per his constituents…