Comments on: Why I like Sarah Palin

By: Jo's Cafe

Jo's Cafe — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:23:53 +0000

WeekEND Wrap 28…

Jo wrapping up her week.
……

By: detoxdiet

detoxdiet — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:44:55 +0000

eventhough there are lots of criticisms against Sarah Palin, i still admire her. she also did a lot of things in the area of politics specially in Alaska.

By: Do Dogs Like Or Dislike The Sound Of The Dog Training Clicker?

Do Dogs Like Or Dislike The Sound Of The Dog Training Clicker? — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 08:51:02 +0000

[...] Big Dogs House » Blog Archive » Why I like Sarah Palin [...]

By: Blake

Blake — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:10:21 +0000

Not true, Darrel, but after the Gays win the right to “marry”- which is funny, really- next up will be people marrying goats- all thanks to some wingnut liberal.
Thanks D.

By: Darrel

Darrel — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:09:06 +0000

Thanks to the liberals success in beating back conservatives.

Next up… equal rights for gays. The liberals fight for this civil right, the conservatives fight against. You will lose. Again. Watch for it.

By: Blake

Blake — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:09:51 +0000

Sen. Byrd did not change his views or his party- he just said whatever would get him reelected. He, like most pols is a whore to whoeveror whatever gets him elected, period.
So to hold him up as an example is not good.

By: Blake

Blake — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:26:27 +0000

Yep- even by Darrel’s count it has been a long time since property rights for women were an issue.

By: Darrel

Darrel — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:14:32 +0000

DAR
Seems about 1920 in the US.

See: women’s rights.

Excerpt: “…the National Woman Suffrage Association, which campaigned for women’s suffrage at a federal level as well as for married women to be given property rights, and the American Woman Suffrage Association, which aimed to secure women’s suffrage through state legislation. In 1920 the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution gave women the right to vote.[24]“

By: Darrel

Darrel — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:54:43 +0000

BLK: “…as misleading as saying that Dems were all for civil rights-”>>

DAR
That would be misleading. Political parties, especially the Dem’s, tend to contain a “tent” of ideas with a spectrum of views. At that time the Dem’s were full of social CONSERVATIVES. And conservatives have been very consistent in their clinging to the past and opposition to reform in the areas of civil rights as I have shown above.

I said: “Everyone knows this is true,” but I immediately followed it with the following challenge:

“…but if it isn’t [true] you shouldn’t have any trouble *burying* me in examples of conservatives pushing for an advancement of these rights against liberal opposition.”

When are you going to do that?

BLK: “Didn’t Sen, Byrd used to be a Grand Wizard in the KKK?”>>

DAR
Actually, he was “Exalted Cyclops.” Can’t say conservatives didn’t have a sense of humor!

As his wiki blurb states:

“A lifelong Democrat, Byrd did not leave the party as its views shifted from social conservatism to social liberalism.”

He also said; “I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times… and I don’t mind apologizing over and over again. I can’t erase what happened.”

Lester Maddox and George Wallace were, in their day, Demo’s. Today they would be, of course, Republicans. Sort of like David Duke.

By: Blake

Blake — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:56:11 +0000

I do too- I am tired of Republicans trying to be “Liberal lite”- we need to get back to what has made the conservative movement the best party for the United States.