Ha ha! Just kidding! I would still despise you.

So you have two choices here: Either you wrote your your article so early that asking where the left’s cries over the aggression was a silly statement, or you published it well after the fact without checking. I’m not sure I’d want to defend either stance but you’re clearly going with option 1.

“However, the big protests you are referring to did not mention Libya. They were aimed at Iraq and only Iraq when they started.”

They were certainly organized for Iraq as they have been every weekend at this time of the year but to suggest they did not mention Libya is to yet again ignore the obvious:

There was little talk at the D.C. protest of the U.S. missile strikes against Moammar Gadhafi’s forces in Libya on Saturday, part of an international effort to protect rebel forces.

But the Times Square demonstration that was meant to mark the eighth anniversary of the Iraq invasion quickly became a protest against Saturday’s military strikes.

Right. You’re just overflowing with support, I can feel it. I don’t support the attacks no matter who is in office or why they think it’s necessary. It’s nonsense.

“It must be eating you alive that your messiah attacked.”

No, not really. If I wanted a truly anti-war president I would have voted for the Green Party. You’ve invented this image of Obama supporters as being in lock-step with everything Obama does but now you see that’s simply not true.

“Obama was going to bring everyone together and fix our broken image. He did nothing more than add to the tarnished image.”

Right, again with the support. It’s impressive how you’ll set aside your partisan differences.