by Big Dog on Dec 29, 2010 at 16:30 Political
Barack Obama’s records are held tighter than state secrets and if we applied the same security to our sensitive documents as he has to his records Julian Assange would not be a household name. Newly elected Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie wants to put an end to one of the issues that has plagued Obama and that is the issue of his birth.
Abercrombie said he will look for a way to get the information out so that it will end the controversy once and for all.
Of course Abercrombie is not a disinterested party and has boldly claimed that he knows Obama was born in Hawaii. The problem with Abercrombie is that he contradicted himself in his statement attesting to Obama’s birth. The 72 year old claims to have been friends with Obama’s parents and stated that he was here for the birth:
“Maybe I’m the only one in the country that could look you right in the eye right now and tell you, ‘I was here when that baby was born.” Yahoo News
From a statement like that one can only conclude that Abercrombie was at the hospital and saw Obama’s mother go into the delivery room and later appear with a child. That is the only possible conclusion from a statement that he was “here for the birth.” It would make no sense to assume he meant in Hawaii because a lot of people were in Hawaii then and have no personal knowledge of the event which negates the claim to being the only person who can look you in the eye and make such a claim. Abercrombie gave the impression he was at the hospital.
But later in the article Abercrombie says he saw young Barry and his family at social events but that he was not at the hospital when Obama was born.
Abercrombie, 72, has said he remembers seeing Obama as a child with his parents at social events, although he acknowledged that he didn’t see his parents with their newborn son at the hospital. [emphasis mine BD]
So which is it? Was he here (at the hospital) or was he not? How can he say he was the only one here (meaning at the hospital) but then say he was not at the hospital?
Obama was born in August of 1961 and I was born before that date so I could say I was here when he was born depending on what the word here means.
I think there is no doubt he wanted to give the impression that he witnessed the birth.
But if he was never at the hospital that could not possibly be true…
Maybe Abercrombie did not see them at the hospital but was there for the birth. After all, wasn’t Obama born in a stall and placed in a manger?
Never surrender, never submit.
E-mail Print This Post