Not saying it offended you, just that you thought, and stated that the intent was to offend. My intent was far from this. I did say though that you are offended automatically it seems every time somebody mentions the flag. A better phrase would have been “go on the defense.”

Maybe in your zeal to attack me you failed to recognize that very, indisputable fact.

Yes, we have argued flag burning in the past. Yes I support flag burning. But no, there is no attempt to show desecration here. There is no attempt to argue what is legal or not. There is no attempt to mean anything secret. There is no attempt to offend anyone.

Yet, here we are arguing over it. And I wonder who started this argument? Was it me? No, it was you, Mr. Big Dog, who is automatically offended when somebody mentions a flag that isn’t bowing down to it. That is why when you posted the first entry I said, “Uh, something like that.”

It didn’t make sense. It was blown way out of what I wanted to say or do. Then you write back and say “IT IS A BLANKET or are you too dense to see that?” You called me a degenerate as well. That’s when I got totally cracked up at how dumb you were being. I write and entry called “Today It’s a Blanket” and you say “IT IS A BLANKET.” It doesn’t get any funnier than that if you ask me.

So I made the mistake of calling you a “fu*king Nazi” because it was so funny. I guess you can call me dense and degenerate but I can’t call you a Nazi simply because when people say Nazi they think of all those big bad things. Excuse me.

Now here we are again still arguing this because you just can’t let it go. Sure you’re published. You’ve done all those great things. How come you went and made something out of nothing, and then argued all hell just to be right and prove me wrong about an entry that is just a title and an image?

Now you’ve taken Daniel’s comment to try and argue you are ultimately correct. Well, you’re not correct. I’m saying you’re wrong, and I’m saying you’re dumb. Just for you in the future I’ll only mention the American flag when I’m worshiping it. That should keep you plenty happy, you idiot.

Personally, I would rather Big Dog’s name not even appear on this site anymore. I say just ignore him.”

The obvious intent is to show I had some problem with this flag/blanket wrapped around an old lady. Let us look at what I wrote in the post:
“But even if we take for granted that it was a Flag the inference is still off target. The Flag was not being desecrated, it was not being burned and it was not being urinated on. The Flag was wrapped around one of our most vulnerable citizens and protecting her. When you think about it, is not that what the Flag is a symbol of, the protection of our way of life and the freedoms we have come to take for granted?

This symbol of Freedom was wrapped around an elderly and frail person almost echoing those words from the Statue of Liberty, “Give me your tired…” Though this was a blanket and not a Flag it is obvious that the intent was not to desecrate or dishonor it. Unfortunately, there are those among us who are either unwilling or lack the ability to understand the difference.”

The amazing thing is that I am accused of being unable to read. Perhaps if those folks actually read what I wrote they would understand it. If not, they could get someone to tutor them.

Now you can make all the arguments you want about what is legal and what is not but burning a Flag is desecration whether it is legal or not. So my argument that there was no desecration and in fact, it was symbolic of the nation is accurate.

The fact is underwear, shirts, shoes and yes even blankets that have the image of the Flag are NOT flags. Therein lies the difference.

I file this under W for waste of time.

Though I will say that your utterance of “you f’ing Nazi” was not a joke by any stretch of the imagination. It has become far too common place for many on the left to call people that and refer to Bush as Hitler. That is plain wrong. I don’t see how that can be considered a misquote. There are many names you can call me that might actually fit. That one is not one of them and it was intended to portray me in a very unfavorable light just as those who called our soldiers that and those who refer to our President are attempting to do.

Just because I use the F word you question my vocabulary? I say fu*k that. Ooops. Theres me goes agin!!!11

Anyway, it’s becoming clear to me that you can’t read. Frankly I’ve just had enough of you misreading me and blowing up about it. Nothing you say can be trusted. You can call me names, make all the rude statements about me that you want. You resort to that every time you forget how to read. It doesn’t change the fact that you are wrong.

You are dumb on this one. Any time somebody says anything about the flag you lose it and start to make stupid statements. When going back it becomes clear that you are always the first and last to call names.

It’s a good show of ego to think that things I post at my site are made to insult you or the flag, but this one was posted just because the photo touched me. Thanks though for going and turning that into another stupid argument. File this under M, for moronic.

And anyone who burns a flag is a degenerate.

And to make it clear, it is one thing to insult someone or call them a name. One like Nazi has implications that are not well intended. Suppose it were racist, pedophile, or sexist? All are bad things and not germane to any argument.