Comments on: Unions Are Getting Payback

By: Blake

Blake — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:45:28 +0000

We shall see, D

By: Darrel

Darrel — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:32:53 +0000

A “a new guarantee of subsidized healthcare for the poor” (my cite) will include “people who make less than 33,000 dollars” per year (your claim).

By: Blake

Blake — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:21:20 +0000

Yes, and it’s painfully evident.

By: Darrel

Darrel — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:00:50 +0000

You forgot that I only have a high school education.

By: Blake

Blake — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:27:37 +0000

Darrel, you are a legend in your own mind, that’s painfully obvious- you are so special. You bring nothing to the party except painfully crude left wing propaganda and obvious smears.
I’m not too bright? I positively glow compared to you, boy-a goat herding piano tuner? Right.

By: Darrel

Darrel — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:24:05 +0000

Boy, you better hope ad hominem attacks don’t make a person “look so pathetic.”

Cause then, *you* are in real trouble in the “pathetic” department.

Actually, an ad hominem attack is when you substitute a personal attack for an argument.

I always provide the argument. Some times I add a little spicy to keep your attention. But you hurl a hundred childish insults to my one. And you forget entirely about the “providing the argument” part. That’s the important part.

I pointed out that you’re not too bright, because it’s obviously true. And remember, as you said just yesterday. It’s not an insult if it’s true!

D.
—————-
ps. Thanks for your prayers. No really. Every little bit helps.

By: Blake

Blake — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:41:25 +0000

You provide a link that says nothing of any use to your argument, as usual. I guess I need to quit taking you seriously.

By: Blake

Blake — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:37:57 +0000

I must be doing something right- I have you foaming at the mouth in an ad hominem attack that just makes you look so pathetic. you are a sad little man- I will pray for you.

By: Darrel

Darrel — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:21:34 +0000

BLK: “Union members legacy costs have killed GM and Chrysler-”>>

DAR
You mean they were actually going to give those older retired workers their pensions? After they paid into it all those years?

How ridiculous.

What we should do with old people:

a) put them on ice flows and let them float out to sea (that’s what the Canadians do, or so I’ve heard)

b) Use them as one way astronauts (Franken’s recommendation)

It’s the only sensible thing to do.

Poor “rightwork,” actually trying to reason with Blake! He’ll learn. Blake is like a rabid dog in a cage. A little dog, drooling, not too bright. He’s not interested in “reasons” for believing things but rather barking and trying to bite people. This doesn’t amount to much because of the cage (powerless), and the “not too bright part.”

D.
—————–
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy: that is the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”
–John Kenneth Galbraith, economist, author

By: Darrel

Darrel — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:07:04 +0000

BLK: “how does this plan help poor people”

DAR
“Reporting from Washington — Senior House Democrats on Friday introduced their plan for reshaping the nation’s healthcare system, calling for a new government insurance option, a new mandate on employers to provide coverage and a new guarantee of subsidized healthcare for the poor.”

LINK

You know, even by accident I would think you would get something right once in a while. You know what they say about blind pigs and acorns.