Those Environmentally Friendly Liberals

There is a Facebook Event posting indicating that if the government shuts down and there is no trash service that people should dump their trash on Speaker Boehner’s lawn. Now that is just classy but so typical of liberals.

This is no grassroots item from people who are fed up with government. It is being organized by people who have connections to the DNC:

Goodman is listed in the Democratic National Committee network. Treadway is the political and logistics director for the liberal group Netroots Nation. CNN

This is not some way of saying that they are disgusted with the whole process. It is a concentrated effort to place blame for the shutdown (if it occurs) on the Republicans. If it were a protest over the whole issue then these folks would also be throwing their trash on Harry Reid’s and Nancy Pelosi’s lawn. They might even consider throwing it on the White House lawn.

If they actually wanted to hold those who are to blame responsible then the issue would be with the Democrats. They had majorities in both chambers of Congress and FAILED to pass a budget. They decided to ignore the issue because of the election and then did not take it up after they got their heads handed to them in November. I am sure they decided to put the onus on Republicans but make no mistake, the Democrats failed to fulfill their Constitutional duty and pass a budget.

The event indicates that even if there is no shutdown they will continue with plans to dump their trash. Further proof that this is not about being upset over the process and more about partisan posturing.

Can you imagine the names that people like Chrissie Matthews would be calling Tea Party members if they organized something like this against Democrats?

Also, how environmentally friendly are these liberals? We already know they care little about Mother Nature from seeing how they leave the places where they protest.

I wonder if the police will be around to arrest these people for illegal dumping…

Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

2 Responses to “Those Environmentally Friendly Liberals”

  1. Blake says:

    Liberals believe that they should be held to a different set of standards, and whatever they do, even if it is littering someone’s lawn, or beating the hell out of someone, that these actions are justified, since their hearts are pure, and they know better than anyone else.
    They “condescend ” to acknowledge the “great unwashed masses”, and call us idiots at their brie and wine parties, but it is they who suffer from “willful ignorance” of life as it truly IS.
    If we the people could (and we SHOULD) be able to carry weapons openly, then there would sooner be fewer liberal idiots around.
    Check out the 2nd amendment- there is NOTHING in there about permits- it is really a very straight-forward, simple, easy to read RIGHT.

  2. Eoj Trahneir says:

    Liberals don’t believe in any standards, Blake. They don’t have any, and are affronted that you do. That is why a conservative in the toilet-stall paying a boy for a BJ really is big news, and liberals are..well, they are the boys. It isn’t hypocritical if you don’t have any ethics or morals to violate!

    But you are both spot on! There are laws about dumping your trash on some one else’s lawn and I hope the cops are not only waiting, but waiting in the dark, and prepared to prosecute to the fullest extent the law allows.

    The important fact here is premeditation; organized intent to break the law.
    It is no different than terrorism, except they aren’t blowing up their babies to make their pathetic point.

    That’s probably because they aborted their babies already, but why make a law if it isn’t going to be enforced?