<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Resident&#8217;s Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:25:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138386</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138386</guid>
		<description>That depends on the authority they are given, Adam- Take Cass Sunstein, who will probably be confirmed by the Senate, because the only really crazy things HE&#039;S said are about animal rights-
Well, those statements cause me some concern, as he seems to believe that animals have the rights to sue- of course, abetted by an attorney who will mystically &quot;know&quot; what the animal wants- that&#039;s beyond flakey- but as Regulatory &quot;Czar&quot;, he will be in a position to cause a lot of trouble over a few animals- and I bet he brings his pivot man, Peter Singer with him- oh wait- Singer likes to have sex with animals, so, my bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That depends on the authority they are given, Adam- Take Cass Sunstein, who will probably be confirmed by the Senate, because the only really crazy things HE&#8217;S said are about animal rights-<br />
Well, those statements cause me some concern, as he seems to believe that animals have the rights to sue- of course, abetted by an attorney who will mystically &#8220;know&#8221; what the animal wants- that&#8217;s beyond flakey- but as Regulatory &#8220;Czar&#8221;, he will be in a position to cause a lot of trouble over a few animals- and I bet he brings his pivot man, Peter Singer with him- oh wait- Singer likes to have sex with animals, so, my bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138364</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138364</guid>
		<description>You are assuming that something has been proven.  We have someone&#039;s word for it and no legal paper.  The one shown is not even allowed in Hawaii for certain land purchases.  It would be over and done if he would release conclusive proof.  I bet if he released his school records they would show some interesting things like he was registered as a foreign student.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are assuming that something has been proven.  We have someone&#8217;s word for it and no legal paper.  The one shown is not even allowed in Hawaii for certain land purchases.  It would be over and done if he would release conclusive proof.  I bet if he released his school records they would show some interesting things like he was registered as a foreign student.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138320</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138320</guid>
		<description>Why should Obama do more to prove something he has already proven?  To try and convince a bunch of nutjob birthers that have already denied or constructed an elaborate conspiracy around every piece of evidence there is already out there to prove Obama was born in Hawaii?  Like it would even help.

No, you would never be done with it.  It&#039;s time all you birthers just come to terms with reality and accept the evidence that is out there and stop demanding more evidence that you&#039;ll just question anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should Obama do more to prove something he has already proven?  To try and convince a bunch of nutjob birthers that have already denied or constructed an elaborate conspiracy around every piece of evidence there is already out there to prove Obama was born in Hawaii?  Like it would even help.</p>
<p>No, you would never be done with it.  It&#8217;s time all you birthers just come to terms with reality and accept the evidence that is out there and stop demanding more evidence that you&#8217;ll just question anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138308</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138308</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny because now that Jones is gone the &quot;czars&quot; you&#039;re smearing the most poop around about are all Senate confirmed or in the process of becoming that way, so I don&#039;t really see your point.  You have zero evidence to suggest Jones was not vetted so I don&#039;t see your point there either.

If you take out the &quot;czars&quot; that are confirmed by the Senate and you take out the &quot;czars&quot; that predate Obama&#039;s tenure you are left with just a handful of these people who serve Obama directly or under a Cabinet post.  It&#039;s not the scary situation you folks want to make it, it&#039;s just more of the garbage we&#039;re accustomed to seeing from your side these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny because now that Jones is gone the &#8220;czars&#8221; you&#8217;re smearing the most poop around about are all Senate confirmed or in the process of becoming that way, so I don&#8217;t really see your point.  You have zero evidence to suggest Jones was not vetted so I don&#8217;t see your point there either.</p>
<p>If you take out the &#8220;czars&#8221; that are confirmed by the Senate and you take out the &#8220;czars&#8221; that predate Obama&#8217;s tenure you are left with just a handful of these people who serve Obama directly or under a Cabinet post.  It&#8217;s not the scary situation you folks want to make it, it&#8217;s just more of the garbage we&#8217;re accustomed to seeing from your side these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138290</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138290</guid>
		<description>If there WAS  a record, we would have seen it, unless the answers on it were just too embarrassing to the Resident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there WAS  a record, we would have seen it, unless the answers on it were just too embarrassing to the Resident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138286</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138286</guid>
		<description>Cabinet posts are vetted, and confirmed by a process, so there is much more transparency there- with Jones, there was none- there was not required to be, although for anyone who will be that close to the Pres. and the decision- making process, there should be some kind of vetting done, don&#039;t you think so?
If these Czars, or whatever the hell you choose to call them are going to advise the Resident, might you feel better knowing they are not whackjobs? Or that they might be inclined to off the Resident?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cabinet posts are vetted, and confirmed by a process, so there is much more transparency there- with Jones, there was none- there was not required to be, although for anyone who will be that close to the Pres. and the decision- making process, there should be some kind of vetting done, don&#8217;t you think so?<br />
If these Czars, or whatever the hell you choose to call them are going to advise the Resident, might you feel better knowing they are not whackjobs? Or that they might be inclined to off the Resident?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138248</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138248</guid>
		<description>First of all you have no record of the vetting process for a person like Jones so you&#039;re just speculating that he didn&#039;t go through a similar vetting as Rahm Emanuel.  Is Emanuel, Chief of Staff OK but a &quot;green jobs czar&quot; working under a cabinet post is not?

Second, take the 15 or so of the 30+ &quot;czars&quot;  that aren&#039;t Senate confirmed and compare them with the 100&#039;s of other positions in the West Wing and the Executive Branch in general that the media doesn&#039;t say qualify as a &quot;czar&quot; and tell me what is so wrong or unconstitutional and worthy of this fear-mongering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all you have no record of the vetting process for a person like Jones so you&#8217;re just speculating that he didn&#8217;t go through a similar vetting as Rahm Emanuel.  Is Emanuel, Chief of Staff OK but a &#8220;green jobs czar&#8221; working under a cabinet post is not?</p>
<p>Second, take the 15 or so of the 30+ &#8220;czars&#8221;  that aren&#8217;t Senate confirmed and compare them with the 100&#8242;s of other positions in the West Wing and the Executive Branch in general that the media doesn&#8217;t say qualify as a &#8220;czar&#8221; and tell me what is so wrong or unconstitutional and worthy of this fear-mongering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138245</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138245</guid>
		<description>The item that was released was not a brith certificate (which we know exists because he said he had it and Hawaii said they had one).  No, what you have is a certification of birth.  It does not show the items required to prove citizenship when applied to this because Hawaii allowed foreign births to be registered.

I had to show my certified true copy of a BC and it had all my data on it.  I have my original.

There is also question about the authenticity of his released COLB.  Suspicious it was released through Kos.  Just get the real one that names the hospital and we can be doen with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The item that was released was not a brith certificate (which we know exists because he said he had it and Hawaii said they had one).  No, what you have is a certification of birth.  It does not show the items required to prove citizenship when applied to this because Hawaii allowed foreign births to be registered.</p>
<p>I had to show my certified true copy of a BC and it had all my data on it.  I have my original.</p>
<p>There is also question about the authenticity of his released COLB.  Suspicious it was released through Kos.  Just get the real one that names the hospital and we can be doen with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138240</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138240</guid>
		<description>My passport required me to present the same kind of birth certificate as Obama.  This was the same for enrollment in college, etc., so I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about.

I have never seen my hand written one. It&#039;s long gone.  I use a copy gained from state records in the same fashion Obama had his certificate made in 2007.

Do you think Obama&#039;s copy of his birth certificate released would not work for these things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My passport required me to present the same kind of birth certificate as Obama.  This was the same for enrollment in college, etc., so I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>I have never seen my hand written one. It&#8217;s long gone.  I use a copy gained from state records in the same fashion Obama had his certificate made in 2007.</p>
<p>Do you think Obama&#8217;s copy of his birth certificate released would not work for these things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-residents-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-138224</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7846#comment-138224</guid>
		<description>There are conflicting stories.  The guy from Hawaii said the BC on file meets the standards for Hawaii.  When he was born people were alloed to register births of those born outside the country.  His grandmother said he was born in kenya and she was there when he was born.  The issue deals with the laws in effect at the time.  The issue could be cleared up by release of the BC.  That is the one document that clears it all.  I know you like the idea of not saying the sky is blue because the 100th person has not said but if the standard is to ask 100 people then that standard must be met.  In America, the standard for proving citizenship is the birth certificate.  They did not take my word when i joined the Army or when I applied for all the jobs I have had, they made me show it.  They also made me show it when I got my passport.  So why is it that he is not held to that standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are conflicting stories.  The guy from Hawaii said the BC on file meets the standards for Hawaii.  When he was born people were alloed to register births of those born outside the country.  His grandmother said he was born in kenya and she was there when he was born.  The issue deals with the laws in effect at the time.  The issue could be cleared up by release of the BC.  That is the one document that clears it all.  I know you like the idea of not saying the sky is blue because the 100th person has not said but if the standard is to ask 100 people then that standard must be met.  In America, the standard for proving citizenship is the birth certificate.  They did not take my word when i joined the Army or when I applied for all the jobs I have had, they made me show it.  They also made me show it when I got my passport.  So why is it that he is not held to that standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

