<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perks Of Elitist Congressional Health Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/comment-page-1/#comment-141215</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8050#comment-141215</guid>
		<description>They have smart cards (so to speak) but the different agencies have different computer systems and there are issues with records of those deployed and the movement all across the world.

I think they are slowly making the systems all talk to each other but this is taking time and lots of money.

It is like any large bureaucracy, lots of waste in time and effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have smart cards (so to speak) but the different agencies have different computer systems and there are issues with records of those deployed and the movement all across the world.</p>
<p>I think they are slowly making the systems all talk to each other but this is taking time and lots of money.</p>
<p>It is like any large bureaucracy, lots of waste in time and effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/comment-page-1/#comment-141211</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8050#comment-141211</guid>
		<description>[The care is great. The paperwork and cost are not so good.]

DAR
  Okay, got it. I don&#039;t remember you clarifying this before.

  Maybe they ought to get a smart card (invented in the US) like Canada, France, UK and Germany have. I think I read that the VA has this too.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[The care is great. The paperwork and cost are not so good.]</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Okay, got it. I don&#8217;t remember you clarifying this before.</p>
<p>  Maybe they ought to get a smart card (invented in the US) like Canada, France, UK and Germany have. I think I read that the VA has this too.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/comment-page-1/#comment-141183</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8050#comment-141183</guid>
		<description>Replace a Republican with a Dem, replace the Dems with Reps.
Then tell them they are replaceable also-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replace a Republican with a Dem, replace the Dems with Reps.<br />
Then tell them they are replaceable also-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/comment-page-1/#comment-141166</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8050#comment-141166</guid>
		<description>Darrel, I believe we went through this before and I told you then that I meant that it leaves a lot to be desired and I used the wrong words when I wrote it.

I think when we discussed this I told you that the care by the people was great but that the troops had to go through a maze in paperwork.

I used the word little when I meant that the paperwork and cost leave a lot to be desired.  My past statements about the extreme cost of the military health care system and the paperwork involved coupled with my previous clearing up of this should keep you from continually using a mistake I made (improper use of a word) to claim I have two positions.  

To clear it up one more time.  The care is great.  The paperwork and cost are not so good.

That do it for ya?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darrel, I believe we went through this before and I told you then that I meant that it leaves a lot to be desired and I used the wrong words when I wrote it.</p>
<p>I think when we discussed this I told you that the care by the people was great but that the troops had to go through a maze in paperwork.</p>
<p>I used the word little when I meant that the paperwork and cost leave a lot to be desired.  My past statements about the extreme cost of the military health care system and the paperwork involved coupled with my previous clearing up of this should keep you from continually using a mistake I made (improper use of a word) to claim I have two positions.  </p>
<p>To clear it up one more time.  The care is great.  The paperwork and cost are not so good.</p>
<p>That do it for ya?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/comment-page-1/#comment-141157</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8050#comment-141157</guid>
		<description>This kind of reminds me of the house bank issue some years ago.  Congresscritters getting special banking perks that virtually nobody else in the country could get (like being thousands of dollars in the hole without account closure or overdraft fees).  

So far as getting rid of them, I am in favor of 100% turnover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of reminds me of the house bank issue some years ago.  Congresscritters getting special banking perks that virtually nobody else in the country could get (like being thousands of dollars in the hole without account closure or overdraft fees).  </p>
<p>So far as getting rid of them, I am in favor of 100% turnover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/comment-page-1/#comment-141154</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8050#comment-141154</guid>
		<description>&quot;While the troops are navigating the unbelievable paper storm and administrative maze that is military care,...&quot; --Big Dog, today

vs.

“How many here have actually worked in military medicine? The care is the best in the world, the administrative side and the costs leave little to be desired. Military medicine is a bit of a specialty of mine.”
--Big Dog, Monday Jun 15th, 2009 at 23:09

I wonder which one of these statements is true?

&quot;unbelievable... administrative maze&quot;

Or an

&quot;administrative side [that] leave little to be desired&quot;

Bigd: &quot;the prices are reasonable because there are a lot of federal employees in the pool.&quot;

DAR
  Hey, want even more reasonable prices? Put *everyone* in the same pool. That&#039;s something our peer countries figured out a long time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While the troops are navigating the unbelievable paper storm and administrative maze that is military care,&#8230;&#8221; &#8211;Big Dog, today</p>
<p>vs.</p>
<p>“How many here have actually worked in military medicine? The care is the best in the world, the administrative side and the costs leave little to be desired. Military medicine is a bit of a specialty of mine.”<br />
&#8211;Big Dog, Monday Jun 15th, 2009 at 23:09</p>
<p>I wonder which one of these statements is true?</p>
<p>&#8220;unbelievable&#8230; administrative maze&#8221;</p>
<p>Or an</p>
<p>&#8220;administrative side [that] leave little to be desired&#8221;</p>
<p>Bigd: &#8220;the prices are reasonable because there are a lot of federal employees in the pool.&#8221;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Hey, want even more reasonable prices? Put *everyone* in the same pool. That&#8217;s something our peer countries figured out a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-perks-of-elitist-congressional-health-care/comment-page-1/#comment-141092</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8050#comment-141092</guid>
		<description>And the aura of entitlement shines so bright, attracting all the insects.
Our Congress- dwarves standing on the shoulders of giants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the aura of entitlement shines so bright, attracting all the insects.<br />
Our Congress- dwarves standing on the shoulders of giants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

