Comments on: The Impotence Of Words http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/ "Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right" Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:25:29 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Big Dog http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141453 Big Dog Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:41:45 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141453 Hey Hack, you have a good site. Thanks for stopping by our corner of the net. There are a few liberals wandering around here but you get use to them. Hey Hack, you have a good site. Thanks for stopping by our corner of the net. There are a few liberals wandering around here but you get use to them.

]]> By: Adam http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141442 Adam Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:04:54 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141442 Oh, right. I forgot I was talking to Mr. Anti-logic. No refutation needed when it just feels right inside based on all your anecdotal life experience... Oh, right. I forgot I was talking to Mr. Anti-logic. No refutation needed when it just feels right inside based on all your anecdotal life experience…

]]> By: Hack http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141439 Hack Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:23:30 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141439 Great post Big Dog. Feel free to check out our blog. http://www.hackwilson.blogspot.com Link share? Great post Big Dog. Feel free to check out our blog.

http://www.hackwilson.blogspot.com

Link share?

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141433 Blake Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:59 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141433 No refutation needed when talking to the intellectually inept. No refutation needed when talking to the intellectually inept.

]]> By: Adam http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141430 Adam Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:22:22 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141430 Nice refutation, Blake. Nice refutation, Blake.

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141416 Blake Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:24:44 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141416 Fools. Fools.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141412 Darrel Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:43:27 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141412 ADM: "I can’t find the article I read showing coverage maps and arguing for the alternative plan">> DAR Sure, here is a <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/cernigapnimaachuda/missile-defense-debate-maps" rel="nofollow">good one</a>. It references the BBC, here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8265190.stm D. ADM: “I can’t find the article I read showing coverage maps and arguing for the alternative plan”>>

DAR
Sure, here is a good one.

It references the BBC, here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8265190.stm

D.

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141398 Blake Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:58:07 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141398 And the clouds of War get thicker, much thicker- http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/04/un-report-says-iran-has-enough-info-to-design-a-workable-bomb/ And the clouds of War get thicker, much thicker-
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/04/un-report-says-iran-has-enough-info-to-design-a-workable-bomb/

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141389 Blake Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:19:11 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141389 Look- all Iran has to do, as I have said, is buy an intercontinental missile from Russia- then they could put a nuke anywhere, but you miss the bigger picture. Even when there were tsars in Russia, they have had an expansionist worldview, and have tried to push the Siberian peoples over to populate what is now Alaska- they only sold us Alaska because they thought they could get it back. They even had forts and settlements all down the California coast in the 17- 1800s. I do know that Poland and the Czech Republic know more intimately than you about Russian rule, and they would like some insurance. Now, they do not even know whether Nobama's got the stones to stand by his treaties, or if he will give them over to Russia, because he can't confront anyone- he has no fortitude and is incapable of taking a stand. To do that, you would have to have principles. Look- all Iran has to do, as I have said, is buy an intercontinental missile from Russia- then they could put a nuke anywhere, but you miss the bigger picture.
Even when there were tsars in Russia, they have had an expansionist worldview, and have tried to push the Siberian peoples over to populate what is now Alaska- they only sold us Alaska because they thought they could get it back.
They even had forts and settlements all down the California coast in the 17- 1800s.
I do know that Poland and the Czech Republic know more intimately than you about Russian rule, and they would like some insurance.
Now, they do not even know whether Nobama’s got the stones to stand by his treaties, or if he will give them over to Russia, because he can’t confront anyone- he has no fortitude and is incapable of taking a stand.
To do that, you would have to have principles.

]]> By: Adam http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-141387 Adam Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:47:54 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079#comment-141387 Actually, studies have shown what we have going forward that we know works as opposed to the "missile shield" actually covers more space in it's protection. The only folks wishing there were missiles in Poland are the defense contractors who were getting paid for the work and for the chicken hawks who have a knee jerk objection to a Democrat talking about defense. I can't find the article I read showing coverage maps and arguing for the alternative plan but maybe if DAR is reading this he might remember such an article. Actually, studies have shown what we have going forward that we know works as opposed to the “missile shield” actually covers more space in it’s protection.

The only folks wishing there were missiles in Poland are the defense contractors who were getting paid for the work and for the chicken hawks who have a knee jerk objection to a Democrat talking about defense.

I can’t find the article I read showing coverage maps and arguing for the alternative plan but maybe if DAR is reading this he might remember such an article.

]]>