Who Is The UN To Decide?
Jun 19, 2012 Political
Helen Clarke of the UN Development Programme recently stated that environmental concerns lead her to believe that people in the West do not need more cars, televisions and other consumer luxuries.
Here we go with more environmental hyperbole. The UN has tried to lasso free nations into an environmental jail cell where those nations can be controlled because of hyperventilation over the environment.
Of course, the UN is the entity that has used the manipulated climate data to discuss global warming. It is a corrupt organization whose members live the life of luxury regardless of how poor their home nations are. These people live the life of luxury that Clarke has decided the West does not need in a larger quantity.
Who the heck is the UN to decide what any nation needs? Who is the UN to decide how many televisions, cars or other items people need?
It is not a matter of need; it is a matter of want.
We in the West have things that we need and, for the most part, our needs are met. The other items are what we want. If we want smart phones, many TVs and several cars then that is our business so long as we can afford them.
As for the needs of the poorer countries, perhaps Clarke should worry about the things they actually NEED.
People who do not have enough food, water, and medical care don’t really spend a lot of time worrying about one television much less several.
How about the leaders of the poor countries worry about meeting the basic needs of their people and the folks in the wealthier countries can worry about what their money will buy for them, based on what they want?
I am tired of the UN trying to decide what is best for me and my country.
America did very well for a very long time before the UN came into existence and this great nation will be here long after the thugs in the UN have taken that organization into ash bin of history.
The citizens of the United States are a free people and as such we decide what we want to do with our money even if it includes buying luxury items of any quantity.
And we don’t really care if some half baked socialist do-gooder from the UN likes it or not.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: luxury items, redistributive policies, united nations, wealth
Obama Is The Commander In Thief
Jul 1, 2010 Political
Barack Obama tried to hide his agenda for wealth redistribution until he slipped up and told Joe the Plumber that he [Obama] wanted to spread the wealth around. Since he took office he has done nothing to help the economy and has quadrupled the national debt. The 600 billion dollar debt Bush left was bad enough but Obama is up to 1.4 TRILLION and he has not completed two years.
Obama is busy spending money we do not have to reward his supporters as was the case with the Stimulus and he is busy working on taking wealth from those who produce and giving it to those who do not. He is doing this with the takeover of health care, the banks, the car companies and with a cap and tax scheme.
Obama said jobs (a three letter word for Joe BiteMe) were his number one priority. Private companies added 13,000 new jobs in June. How is that for Stimulating the Economy?
Obama is piling up huge amounts of debt that we will not be able to pay. He has burdened generations of unborn children by saddling them with debt.
The national debt of the US is at its highest level since WW II and will be 62% of our economy by the end of the year:
The federal debt will represent 62% of the nation’s economy by the end of this year, the highest percentage since just after World War II, according to a long-term budget outlook released today by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. USA Today
Barack Obama has his heart set on taking wealth and spreading it around to “level the playing field” and he does not care how he goes about this theft.
Additionally, he has stolen the future of millions of unborn Americans by amassing debt we cannot possibly pay off.
Barack Obama is the Commander in Thief…
Never surrender, never submit.
If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.
Tags: debt, Obama, redistribute, spread the wealth, thief, wealth, world war II
Nationalized Socialism Is Obama’s Goal
Mar 21, 2009 Political
It is no secret to people who are not infected with Obamaitis that he is a radical who has studied Saul Alinsky and that he wants to make this country a Socialist haven. He has already worked toward that and his grand plans include socializing health care and confiscating wealth from the affluent and giving it to the less affluent. His toadies are also working on back door gun bans to run around the Second Amendment. Top it off with the re-imposition of slavery in this country and it is not hard to see we are heading in the wrong direction.
Recently, the government demonstrated its intentions by using the tax policies to negate legal contracts and to punish those who received money to which they were entitled. The punitive taxes are being implemented because Congress failed in its duties. They are punishing people in order to cover the mistakes they made and that Obama allowed. This is how government will handle laws it does not like. Unfortunately, this will probably stand because the courts do not like to get involved in tax legislation.
I know there are many who are happy about this but they ignore the rule of law in their delight. But, but, Congress is only taking care of the mess that these companies made. These companies got taxpayer money so we Congress can make sure they act right.
Thought to ponder: Barney Frank said the US owned part of AIG so it was OK to negate legal contracts. Why has he not advocated for negating the autoworker union contracts? We gave them money as well.
I know, people believe that Congress has every right to get involved in businesses that taxpayer money has gone to (even though some companies were forced to take the money) but now Obama wants to go after all executive pay regardless of whether the companies received a bailout or not. Drudge is reporting that a Sunday New York Times piece will report that:
Obama will call for increased oversight of ‘executive pay at all banks, Wall Street firms and possibly other companies’ as part of sweeping plan to ‘overhaul financial regulation’, NY TIMES reporting Sunday, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE…
What gives Obama the right to decide executive pay in any company? What gives him the right to decide how much money an individual is allowed to make?
Nothing in our system of government does but Obama does not like our system of government. He wants us to be a Socialist nation where government decides what people do and how much they make. He wants to take wealth and move it in a downward direction rather than encourage people to make money and move upward.
Maybe a few things can happen to derail this phony leader and his gang of Socialist conspirators. First of all, companies that did not get bailout money should tell the administration they WILL NOT cap pay or bonuses and that as long as they make money they will decide how to spend it. All companies (whether they got bailout money or not) should stop ALL political donations. If they employ lobbyists then they should fire them. Not one dime should come from anywhere in the financial district. That would reduce the amount of money going to politicians by millions. I also wonder how it would screw things up if all the folks at AIG who received bonuses donated enough of it to charity to offset the punitive taxes imposed by Congress. I would donate 100% of it to charity before I paid 90% in taxes on it.
Congress and the usurper in the White House are out of control. They are going balls to the walls in order to steamroll this country. They want Socialism and they are working very hard to get it. I read a quote that Socialism works until you run out of other people’s money. We are already spending the money of future generations. When will the madness stop?
I asked earlier why the Democrats are not going after union contracts the way they did the AIG contracts. They want more union people in this country and they are working hard to get all the workers unionized through card check and through fast track amnesty plans for illegals. They want nationalized socialism with workers who do the bidding of their charismatic leader.
They called George Bush the Nazi and compared him to Hitler but Obama is more closely aligned with those items. If we do not oppose him now it will not be long before brown shirted Obama Nazis will be marching in our streets.
What do you think a national civilian security force is for? Here is a hint: It is not to stop people from outside our borders. That only leaves those within…
Join the resistance.
Wake up America.
If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.
Tags: aig, bonus, confiscation, nazi, Obama, socialist, taxes, wealth
