Obama’s Middle Name Brings In The Feds
Oct 9, 2008 Political
A sheriff mentioned the name Barack Hussein Obama at a rally when he was introducing a speaker. Now the federal government is investigating him for a violation of the Hatch Act. I thought the Hatch Act applies to members of the federal government and not local politicians. Seems the feds have it in their minds that the Hatch Act applies.
Let us assume it does. How on Earth does saying the complete name of the guy constitute a violation of campaigning laws? Hussein is his middle name. We refer to Franklin Delano Roosevelt as FDR which is using his middle initial. We refer to Clinton as William Jefferson Clinton but somehow it is against the law to use Barack Obama’s middle name.
This is an example of your hard earned tax dollars at work. It is also an example of the lunacy that will engulf us if Obama is elected. He already has his Nazis out in Missouri to ensure no one says anything negative about The One.
It is a shame that Barack Hussein Obama has a list of rules that Barack Hussein Obama does not want you to break. Like when Barack Hussein Obama will not let you talk about his ears or when Barack Hussein Obama will not let you say any code words that mean racist things. Barack Hussein Obama and his supporters are carrying things a bit too far. I said Hussein and the Justice Department can take a flying leap.
Barack Hussein Obama and his surrogates are trying to create an environment where people are afraid to speak and where political discourse is discouraged. Well screw him and his supporters as well.
Obama Was Affiliated With National Socialist Party
Oct 8, 2008 Political
I have been writing that Obama is a Socialist and wants to turn this country into a Communist one. A person named Herold took me to task in the comments of another post and said anyone who would say that Obama was a Communist is a racist. That is the wonderful thing that some folks do when they have no real argument, just scream racist. Obama is a Socialist and he wants to bring Communism to America. His radical associates are proof enough that he likes people who live on the fringe and will do anything, including detonating bombs on our own soil, to get what they want. Dictionary.com defines socialism as:
(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.
We are a Capitalist society and at this point in time the Democrats in Congress are ringing the death bell for that form of society by telling us that the free market does not work and that it is time for more government involvement and oversight. They rapidly took 700 billion dollars to redistribute around the country and took on the debt of private entities. They claimed it had to be done immediately or the credit crisis would be over. I have received instant approval of one credit card and have been offered at least five more in that amount of time and I know if I applied for them I would have gotten them. With me banks do what they should have done all along with others and that is lend to people who are credit worthy.
No matter how one looks at it, the Democratically controlled government is pushing Socialism on us. They are involving themselves in matters they have no business in and they are redistributing our wealth. Barack Obama is completely on board with this and he wants to take us past Socialism and into Communism. Barack Obama already has a head start because he was once affiliated with a Socialist political party. Matthew Weaver at No Quarter has a very involved and well documented piece demonstrating how Obama courted and was affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). As Weaver puts it:
Barack Obama was an active participant in the 1990s, and a direct political beneficiary, of the Chicago New Party and, importantly, the Chicago DSA, a group of socialists affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America. [emphasis in original]
According to Weaver and his evidence, Obama actively participated and signed a contract stating he would have a visible and active relationship and he asked them to “…join him with his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration.”
So, despite what Herold the commenter says, Obama is working toward Communism. He was part of a Socialist party which should come as no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention. Just last night Obama said health care was a right (provided by the government of course and in violation of the Constitution) and he plans on taxing wealthy people to pay for programs for not so wealthy people which is the redistribution of wealth that Socialists like.
Obama and his party are doing all the things they need to do to move us into a political scheme that has failed everywhere it has been tried and they will eventually inch us into Communism with Obama as the Dear Leader.
So, at the risk of having the uninformed like Herold call me a racist, I will say it again; Barack Obama is a Communist.
He has just not reached his full potential yet…
I guess he will throw the Socialist party under the bus and claim this is not the Socialist party he knew.
Tags: communist, Obama, racism, socialist party member
The Debate Was Boring
Oct 8, 2008 Political
The Second Debate was boring and the moderator spent more time worrying about theatrics than letting them engage. Of course, that was his job and they did agree on a format but it seemed that the format was not going to work right out of the gate. I don’t know if there were other lights but the ones I saw were on the floor so it might have been hard for them to see the lights while looking at the people.
John McCain was strong on economic issues and he made Obama look like a child on foreign policy. Obama held his own but he kept spewing falsehoods or half truths. He said that John McCain voted against alternative energy (some number times) and that he now wants it. McCain voted against energy bills loaded with lard.
Obama is not able to tell the difference because when McCain pointed out that Obama had requested almost 1 million dollars for each day he has been in the Senate for pork, Obama said pork was only about 18 billion dollars so we should not really worry about it that much. For McCain’s part, he said we had to reign in foolish spending and then said we were going to buy down debt in the housing market. I don’t know what possessed him to say that but I hope whatever he is talking about is a good, well thought plan.
Though I think that McCain laid the groundwork for the weeks ahead by putting out a theme, I don’t think he changed any minds (or very few) and I don’t think Obama did either. People who supported McCain going in probably still do and those supporting Obama going in have not changed. Undecideds are probably still undecided and want to see the next debate and what happens in between.
It is too bad that most of this sounded like rehashed campaign stump speeches (from both of them) than a real debate of the issues.
I do agree with McCain and think people should look at the records of each man. I know Obama has a thin record but look at it anyway. Look at both of them and learn before you vote. No matter who you vote for you will be able to say you were informed. It is your choice but remember that not long ago a young, charismatic Democrat promised to only raise taxes on those making over 200k. His name was Bill Clinton and once he was in office it took him fewer than 2 months to decide things were terrible and that he had to raise taxes on everyone.
Barack Obama will do the same. There is no free lunch people and in order for him to give something he has to take something and that is not right. Don’t let Obama pull a Clinton on you because then we all have to suffer for your ignorance.
Yep, the debate was boring and no surprises. The liberal media will claim Obama won, the right will say McCain did and they will all spin it that way for a few days.
It was boring. Some of the after debate interviews had more action. Mitt Romney being told by Claire McCaskill that she spit on the earpiece that she handed to him to use. She should have been punched in her mouth. Last thing Romney needed was her saliva on the earpiece. She is a liberal, no one knows where that mouth has been.
Perhaps at the next debate they can do something to keep people awake.
GOP Ayers Out Obama Ties To Terrorist
Oct 6, 2008 Political
Barack Obama and his surrogates have downplayed his association with unrepentant terrorist William Ayers telling us that they spoke in passing or were neighbors and the impression is always that there was nothing to their relationship. The Drive by Media has been guilty of ignoring the connections and of trumpeting the lies from the Obama camp without one ounce of journalistic effort to get at the truth.
The GOP has unleashed a compilation of facts showing that Obama’s relationship with the domestic terrorist is much more than he, his surrogates, or the Drive by Media has reported. Yes, it is true that Obama was 7 or 8 when Ayers and his band of Communists attacked our country from within but Obama was in his 40s when Ayers said that he did not regret setting the bombs and felt that the group had not done enough. Obama has stated that he denounced the acts of Ayers but Obama has not distanced himself from the man who hosted the coming out party for the chosen successor to State Senator Alice Palmer. Obama was the chosen one and Ayers hosted his coming out party. Obama did not loathe Ayers’ acts enough to decline the invitation.
The GOP post indicates that the neighbors are all part of a social circle and that Michelle and Barack Obama are part of that social group which includes Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn. Ayers posed for a magazine article entitled No Regrets and the photo for the article has him standing on an American Flag. That was in 2001, one month before the Islamic terrorist attacks on this country. Obama has continued his association with Ayers since that time and he has voiced no opposition to Ayers’ treatment of the Flag. The GOP site contains quite a few details.
Sarah Palin has been untethered since the VP debate and has gone on the full attack. She made the connection of Obama to Ayers and said that Obama does not see America like the rest of us do. Basically, Palin pointed out that Obama has a terrorist as a friend and he has never ended that friendship. Palin is spot on and she needs to keep up these attacks and start adding all the other shady characters from Obama’s past.
A Democratic strategist tried to minimize Palin by saying:
“It’s a giant changing of the subject,” said Jenny Backus, a Democratic strategist. “The problem is the messenger. If you want to start throwing fire bombs, you don’t send out the fluffy bunny to do it. I think people don’t take Sarah Palin seriously.”
My friend Don Surber had to agree with Backus and brilliantly points out:
Yes, if you want fire-bombing done right, Obama is the expert on who to call.
Truer words were never spoken.
Look For Troops To Be Disenfranchised
Oct 6, 2008 Political
The members of the military are overwhelmingly conservative and have been a solid Republican voting block for a very long time. The Republican party holds values that most in the military find in line with their own and the members cannot stand liberals who always wave the white flag of defeat. Liberals lost Vietnam and if they have their way they will lose Iraq.
I have been told by Obamabots that members of the military are donating more to him than to McCain. I think this is incorrect and it would be hard to demonstrate because Obama has some shady bookkeeping practices. He has a lot of small dollar donors who have given small amounts that add up to 3 or 4 times the legal limit. Obama has also received huge sums of money from people overseas who are NOT American citizens. So when he says that more people in the military have donated to him I would ask, which country’s military?
A recent poll shows that McCain holds a 68%-23% lead over Barack Obama in support of military members. McCain’s support among black members is down and given that many of them are experiencing a chance to vote for a black man, it is not surprising. Not all blacks in the military support Obama and many of those who do seem to be doing so based upon his color. There are those who don’t hold that view:
Army Sgt. 1st Class Derriel D. Collins, who is black, said he was influenced by McCain’s service record, though he acknowledges black friends question his decision.
“I’m not going to give [my vote] to you just because you’re black,” he said. “It doesn’t work like that.” Military Times
The huge amount of support McCain receives means that military votes will once again be targeted by liberals. In 2004 Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania disenfranchised a lot of military voters by disallowing their votes and in 2000 Al Gore worked to exclude the absentee ballots of our men and women serving around the world. These liberals are well aware that a close election could be decided by the absentee ballots of those who serve this country. Since the votes will overwhelmingly go to the Republican, those voters become enemies of the Democratic party. The liberals will do everything they can to keep the votes of our military from counting.
This, of course, is reprehensible. Who would have thought that the very people who protect our freedoms would be denied the rights they ensure others may practice? This should surprise no one because liberals hate the military and believe that money spent on defense would be better off spent on welfare moms who squirt out babies and refuse to work as well as ILLEGALS who break the law to enter this country and steal from the taxpayer.
The military should get a roster of all members who voted absentee and then send liaison officers to every state to ensure that the ballot was received and counted. Any person found disenfranchising those members should receive a mandatory 20 year jail sentence.
Who do you trust in this country, the party that wants to give convicted felons the right to vote, allow people to vote 3 or 4 times, and allow dead people to vote Chicago style, but works to deny military members the right to have their votes counted or the party that wants only those who are legally allowed to vote to do so? After all, Democrats are the party that opposes an ID requirement to vote. Why do you suppose that is?
In an earlier interview Obama said he had to earn the trust of the members of the military. I’d say he failed to do that by a 68-23 margin.
Perhaps our military does not like Obama because he associates with terrorists?
Other Sources:
Washington Post
Newsweek
Tags: disenfranchise, McCain, Military, Obama, support
Loading ...
Loading... 
