Contessa Brewer of MSNBC learned a tough lesson while interviewing Republican Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama. During the discussion on the debt situation and the debate taking place Brewer said that without the bailouts we would have been in a depression. When Brooks responded that we would not have been in a depression Brewer asked him if he had a degree in economics.

The question was designed to take validity away from anything he said. It was designed to show he was not any kind of expert and that he had no special knowledge of the subject. There are two funny things involved here. Brewer asked the question in a manner that would have the viewers believe that his arguments had no validity because he is no expert but that they should agree with her views on the situation even though she is no expert. She has a journalism degree.

The second funny thing is that he answered her that he did have a degree in economics and that he graduated with top honors. Yes, Brooks has two degrees, one in law and one in economics and they come from Duke University.

Brewer was open about it one her Facebook page stating that she just learned why lawyers are taught to never ask questions they don’t know the answer to. Some of the comments were vile but most of them just laughed at what happened to her. In a similar posting her supporters claimed that Brooks was lying (one indicated he committed perjury and we let people like that vote) and that his degree does not matter.

The same types of people who tell us Obama is the smartest man in the world (and certainly smarter than Bush) because he has a degree from Harvard dismiss another person’s degree because the message does not agree with them. While I am the first to admit that a degree does not make a person smart I also realize that if you are going to claim Obama is a genius because of his degree you have to afford that to everyone with a degree. I might mention here that George W. Bush had a degree as well (several I believe).

It was fun to see the gotcha moment happen against the reporter instead of the politician. Reporters are always looking for a gotcha so when it happens to them I love it. Normally I would just say she had a bad interview and got smacked but Brewer is a partisan hack who has made very partisan remarks and deliberately manipulated the news to paint Republicans as racists. It was she who reported, as a cropped picture of a man carrying a rifle over his shoulder was displayed on screen, that a man of color was in the White House and the white people show up with guns strapped to their hips and legs. The person carrying that weapon was black and MSNBC cropped the picture in order to mislead people. She knew it was a lie.

This is not the only thing she has said as a member of the media wing of the Democrat party so she was not just having a bad day today, she got what she deserved.

It might turn out to be good for her. I did not know who she was or that she was the one involved in the lies previously discussed. I had to look around to know who she was and what she had done (I knew about these incidents I just did not know who was involved). This is because she is a nobody on a network that no one watches. Her gaffe today probably gave her more recognition than she could ever hope to get at MSNBC.

In any event, I am glad it happened to her and I am sure that she will have many more of these moments because she is not a journalist, she is a political operative for the Democrats. She is cut from the same cloth as Matthews, Olbermann, and Schulz.

You can see the video at Real Clear Politics.

Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Keith Olbermann, one of the morons over at MSNBC, has a segment where he names the worst person of the week. The winner is usually some conservative who did something Keith did not agree with. He throws a tantrum and spews all kinds of hatred, the Kind Nancy Pelosi has heard and that leads to violence, and then he names the worst person.

Olbermann and his network have been critics of the media getting involved in politics (siding with a party rather than just reporting):

Olbermann, as well as MSNBC executives, was a vocal critic of the $1 million donation by Fox News’ parent News Corp. to the Republican Governor’s Association earlier this year, saying at the time, “We now have another million reasons Fox News is the Republican news channel.”

In a subsequent show, Olbermann also pressed House Majority Whip James Clyburn if there was a “legislative response” to a networks that “starts to shill for partisan causes.” CNN

The parent company of FOX donates and this is reason to show them as the Republican channel and he pressed a Congress critter for a legislative response for networks that shill.

MSNBC is the media wing of the Democrat party. They are in the tank for anything Democrat and routinely bash Republicans. Olbermann should be careful what he asks for because he might be the one to get a legislative response. As an aside, isn’t it interesting that Olbermann would want Congress to get involved in suppressing First Amendment rights? Typical lib.

In any event, Olbermann seems to have a bit of a shill problem himself. CNN (in the above linked article) is reporting that Olbermann has been suspended indefinitely for violating MSNBC’s ethics policies.

Who knew MSNBC would have an ethics policy? You have to be ethical for one of those.

As for Olbermann, he donated money to three different candidates (all Democrats). Evidently he was supposed to get permission before he did that (which is probably MSNBC’s way of ensuring money only goes to Democrats) and he didn’t so he was suspended. I am not surprised that Olbermann would rail against FOX making a donation and then turn around and make one himself. He is a hypocrite.

So it looks like one of the nicest things to come from this election is that Olbermann will not be on TV. Not that very many people watch him or anything. More people will see him during his suspension than see him on TV.

Unless, of course, he spends his time curled up on his bed in the fetal position as he is wont to do when he is chastened by his boss.

So Keith, for being a hypocrite, for being a shill for Democrats, for violating your company’s policies and for being a regular puke, you are hereby named the worst person of the decade.

And one last thing; HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

One can only hope.

Looks Like lunatic Keith Olbermann of PMSNBC might be on his way out the door. Olbermann, who has had problems at every network where he has worked, is said to have upset some folks when he referred to a supposedly former employee in a negative light. The former wmployee turns out to still do work for the network and is an attorney to boot.

Olbermann’s ratings are in the dumper and he gets beat like a drum by every show on FOX. In fact, just about every show on FOX’s prime time lineup beats all MSNBC shows combined.

Olbermann’s ratings probably only exist because some TVs are tuned to MSNBC as a matter of habit like in some lounges and in nursing homes and mental institutions. It looks like there are viewers but no one is actually watching. Olbermann might be in trouble with the bosses and this might mean he is on his way out. This is not the first time the brass has been mad at him. He usually locks himself in his room or refuses to get out of the bathtub when the bosses are mad. I figure he has probably be lying in the fetal position with his thumb in his mouth for most of the weekend.

Does anyone really pay attention to this unsophisticated moron? This guy, with his birth control glasses, and slicked back hair looks like he would make a perfect add in favor of abortion.

So here’s to wishing Keith all the bad luck in the world and hoping they pull his miserable show off the air.

Sources:
Capitol Hill Blue
Jed Eckert
The Rhetorican

Stevie Wonder Could Have Seen This Coming

Janeane Garofalo, the skank dirtball who is allergic to bathing, has weighed in with her assessment of the people who attended the peaceful Tea Party protests which were grass roots and driven from the bottom up, unlike the George Soros flash protests of the left (yeah Meathead, I know what you wrote). According to this Franken like comedian (as in NOT funny) the protests were driven by racial hatred by a bunch of white people who can’t stand having a black man (actually a HALF black man) as president.

“Let’s be very honest about what this is about. This is not about bashing Democrats. It’s not about taxes. They have no idea what the Boston Tea party was about. They don’t know their history at all. It’s about hating a black man in the White House,” she said on MSNBC’s “The Countdown” with Keith Olbermann Thursday evening. “This is racism straight up and is nothing but a bunch of teabagging rednecks. There is no way around that.” Washington Times

There is a way around this mindless prattle and that is by listening to the truth. Skank insults the intelligence of every person (estimated at about 300,000) by saying they had no idea what the first Boston Tea Party was about. The last thing anyone needs is a moron like Garofalo trying to teach them.

The Tea Parties were not about racism and they were not totally about Resident Obama. They were about the out of control spending and waste of tax dollars by our government. This includes George Bush and most members of Congress regardless of party. People like Garofalo need to keep telling these lies in order to protect the sainted Won. It is a slap in the face to him because he was supposed to be the Won who would calm the seas, bring us together and make the world a better place. It is not good for there to be so much discontent when the sainted Won is in office.

Garofalo also took aim at Fox News which is strange because she was on the payroll of Fox when she appeared in the hit series 24. I like her character in the show. She is obviously liberal and demonstrates how they act by opposing a legally questionable thing until the person asking says she needs to do it to feel better and atone for an earlier mistake. Just like a lib, “if it makes you feel good then it is OK.”

Anyway, Garofalo was on the Keith Olberdouche show so that means she is getting more exposure from blogs than she did on the show because hardly anyone watches it.

As for her assertions, I take them with a grain of salt. I stated long ago that no matter what was done if it was seen as opposition to the Won (even though the Tea Parties were opposition to oppressive government) then it would be labeled racist. If someone opposes redistribution of wealth, racist. If someone opposes tax increases or out of control spending, racist. If someone, well, you get the picture.

This is not surprising coming from Garofalo. She is a skank, or as Cleveland on Family Guy might say; “oh, that’s just nasty.”

Isn’t it strange that the MSM and all the libs will run around like their heads are on fire and their a$$e$ are catching because they feel conservative talk show hosts might incite violence but they give a pass to people like this (especially Olberdouche) who routinely say things that could cause hatred and violence. How many people who believe the whole racist redneck tag will resort to violence because of it? I am not saying the talk hosts should be blamed because I have said quite often that people are responsible for their own actions but does anyone else see the hypocrisy?

As for intelligence and all the insults about conservative brains, look who is saying it. Garofalo could not pour water out of a bucket if the directions were written on the bottom.

I hope they whack her character in 24. It would be fun to watch her die a horrible death (but only in the show).

I know Olberdouche and the others at PMSNBC don’t have very high ratings. I would not have known about this were it not for Amanda Carpenter and Shari Elliker because I do not watch that network. It seems to me that it is the place where morons go to watch equally moronic people drool all over themselves.

It is no secret that the Lame Stream Media are uber leftists who despise the right. With the exception of Fox News, the balance are so far left they hold up the walls. The liberal media are far from objective and when Obama became the front runner they abandoned all pretense of impartiality and went to bat for the man. They ignored stories, helped him push his lies and they spun any story that needed spinning. Rush Limbaugh calls them stenographers for the Obama administration.

The LSM are great supporters of the right to protest so long as the protest is a leftist group and funded by George Soros. Then it is a worthy cause and must get attention. The gay marriage issue in California received all kinds of media attention when the gays threw sissy fits and held protests because they did not get their way. The LSM could not wait to tell us how unfair it all was. In fact, any time a gay issue results in a protest the LSM is there.

Let pro abortion advocates protest about some worry about losing the right to murder unborn children and the LSM slobbers all over themselves covering the issue. Let some murderer come close to his execution time and liberals protest to keep from frying the guy. Those protests get plenty of news coverage and the LSM is all on the side of the murderer.

Let the right wing organize a grass roots effort to protest something and the LSM either ignores it or insults it. The LSM this week have had a great time bashing the tea parties that took place around the country as hundreds of thousands of people protested government spending and tax increases. The LSM kept using the term tea bagging and had fun with all the sexual innuendo. For those who do not know, tea bagging is a vulgar sexual term. Keith Olberdouche had fun with it as did others. One in particular was the homosexual Anderson Cooper who exclaimed it was hard to talk when you are tea bagging. He should know considering that he plays tea cup to Obama’s Mr. Lipton. However, Cooper seems to be able to speak while servicing the Resident.

The most childish report came from David Shuster who gave an account more fitting for Saturday Night Live than MSNBC though it might be close since one is a comedy and the other a joke. Here is what Shuster passed off as news (it would be helpful if you know the definition of tea bagging before you read this):

DAVID SHUSTER, HOST: For most Americans, Wednesday, April 15th will be Tax Day. But in our fourth story tonight: It‘s going to be teabagging day for the right-wing and they’re going nuts for it. Thousands of them whipped out the festivities early this past weekend, and while the parties are officially toothless, the teabaggers are full-throated about their goals.

They want to give President Obama a strong tongue-lashing and lick government spending-spending they did not oppose when they were under presidents Bush and Reagan. They oppose Mr. Obama‘s tax rates-which will be lower for most of them-and they oppose the tax increases Mr. Obama is imposing on the rich, whose taxes will skyrocket to a rate about 10 percent less than it was under Reagan. That‘s teabagging in a nut shell.

Taking its inspiration from the Boston Tea Party when colonists tossed British tea into the sea because the tax in it had not been voted on by their own duly-elected representatives-that‘s exactly the opposite, of course, of today‘s taxes, known in some quarters as taxation with representation.

But as “New York Times” columnist, Paul Krugman, points out today, this time, the tea bagging is not a spontaneous uprising. The people who came up with it are a familiar circle of Republicans, including former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, both of whom have firm support from right-wing financiers and lobbyists. As well as Washington prostitute patron, Senator David Vitter, who has issued statements in support of teabagging but is publicly tight-lipped.

Then there was the media, specifically the FOX News Channel, including Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. Both are looking forward to an up close and personal taste of teabagging themselves at events this Wednesday. But most amusing of all is Neil Cavuto, a member of the network‘s executive committee. Neil‘s online bio says he joined the network in July of 1996, three months before the FOX News Channel went on the air.

Cavuto, defending his network‘s proportion of teabagging said, quote, “We are going to be right in middle of these teabaggers, because at FOX, we do not pick and choose these rallies and protests. We were there for the Million Man March.

Can we roll that footage, the FOX News coverage of the Million Man March backing in October of ‘95?

Of course, the Million Man March occurred, as NewsHounds.org points out, almost a year before FOX News was on the air.

We can only speculate why widespread teabagging made Cavuto think of the Million Man March, unless he got them confused with Dick Armey. And in Cavuto‘s defense, if you are planning simultaneous teabagging all around the country, you‘re going to need a Dick Armey. News Busters

This is the contempt that the LSM has for the right in America. They insult us and they are disparaging toward us. They have lost any hint of objectivity. Can you imagine them treating anti war protesters like this? Imagine how they would have reacted if Cindy Sheehan and her band of rag tag morons had been treated this way by Fox.

Do you suppose you would ever hear the LSM treat Code Pink this way?

Of course not. They only have a dislike for the right and they will attack us any chance they get.

However, the good news is that MSNBC has a small audience. Nearly every show on Fox beats EVERY show at MSNBC in the ratings department and often single Fox shows beat all the MSNBC shows COMBINED. There is a reason that people do not watch morons like Olberdouche and Shuster and that is beacuse they are pathetic pukes who should be beaten with a bat. As a disclaimer, I am not inciting anyone to actually do that. I am only stating that they should be beaten, not that anyone actually do it. God knows we don’t want the LSM crying about hate speech.

But, if anyone beat them with bats I would not cry about it and I would certainly understand why.

It isn’t bad enough that Shuster has all the sexual references but he also lies. He claims that the people now protesting Obama did not say anything when Bush spent all that money.

First of all Bush did not spend the money and neither did Obama. The Constitution only allows Congress to spend it. Second of all, we did complain about the out of control spending during the time the Republicans were in charge. I will also point out that the tea parties (I have not heard the word tea bagging used by anyone but the media and a few morons who comment here) were not aimed at Obama. They were largely a right wing effort but there were a number of Democrats involved. These were aimed at government, both parties. These were a sign that we have had enough of all the spending and that the idea of our grandchildren paying the debt is appalling to us. And I will add that no matter what the tax rates were in the past raising taxes during a recession is stupid and will result in worse financial problems.

But, if Shuster wants to get picky, Obama has created a deficit that is many times larger than the one Bush left after 8 years and Obama has done that in 3 months. Obama is sending more than any president in history.

We have had enough and we are not going to take much more of this and we will continue to resist and to protest. As for the LSM, no one expects them to be objective. However, they might think twice about what they will say before venturing out into the crowds where they will have no protection. Though I know the people on the right are well behaved when they protest, you might have to watch for the right wing extremists. You never have to worry about left wing extremist groups at these protests. They prefer to fly planes into buildings.

We never have to worry about Olberdouche and Shuster because they are a couple of limp wristed bed wetters who would never go out where it might be dangerous. They are a couple of cowards. As for Anderson Cooper, he is a puss as well. The only place you will see him is covering protests against doing away with glory holes is San Francisco.

I am rather surprised that the likes of Shuster and the others knew what tea bagging was. They are liberals and liberals are like a batter with an 0-3 count.

No balls.

A great deal has been made about the comment that was made by David Shuster of PMS NBC when he said that it appeared as if the Clinton campaign was sort of pimping out Chelsea. This caused a firestorm among the liberals who are uninformed about the newer meaning of those words. They insist that Shuster was calling Chelsea a whore. I can see how they would make that mistake since the Clintons have been whoring themselves out since they started in public life. Everyone knows that the Clintons are available to the highest bidder. Regardless of what the Clinton whoring class thinks, the reality remains that Shuster meant she [Chelsea] was being used.

The interesting thing is that the Clinton folks say they did not know what the phrase “pimping out” meant which I find interesting because that is all they do. Case in point, Hillary is pimping the attention to this to make PMS NBC look like a bunch of sexist pigs so she can score big with the women, especially the feminists who are always itching for a reason to bash a man. Unfortunately, it was probably a man who had to explain what pimping out meant.

Hillary is certainly pimping out the who issue (using it for those who still don’t know) by sending a letter to PMS NBC. Ti Hillary, it was not enough for her to have received an apology and for Shuster to get suspended. The letter does not exactly make it clear what she wants but it makes very clear that Hillary is pimping this for all it is worth. She states that she found the remarks offensive (even though none of them knew what they meant) and she wants everyone to know she was a mother first. She stated that she is in public life and can take the heat but that it is unfair to attack her daughter who is only helping with a campaign.

For the record, Shuster did not attack the fragile flower known as Chelsea. His statement was about Hillary. He asked if Chelsea was being pimped out [by her mother] in some weird sort of way. That is not an attack on Chelsea, it is a statement about the campaign and what it looks like to him. But the Clintons were never ones to let the facts get in the way of anything.

If I ran PMS NBC I would not have suspended Shuster or made him apologize (same with Chris Matthews for that matter). However, that is a decision made by the company and it is within their rights though it is certain that the decision was not made based upon right or wrong, only on how the company might lose money if “thick skinned” Hillary decided not to participate in debates.

What I would do if I ran the network is tell Hillary Clinton she is free to participate if she wants or to not participate if she does not want to but that the debate will go on with or without her. I would let her know that the network is in charge of how it is run and not a political candidate. Then, if she did not show I would give Barack Obama the debate time to answer questions and allow him as much time as he wanted to attack Clinton. All those attacks would go unanswered and then Hillary would see what hardball really is.

I cannot stand these people. They are such hypocrites. Hillary talks about the appropriateness of words used when she drops F bombs all the time. She and her husband have floated inappropriate word choices throughout this campaign and apologize if they receive backlash. They are using a comment about using someone to their advantage. In other words, she is pimping the pimping out remark.

Educated people who pay attention to our culture know what this phrase meant. I would say however, that the campaign had a legitimate argument if the comment was made about Bill Clinton because when you talk pimp in reference to him it is about sex.

Source:
The Politico
Related:
Political Punch