Muslims are on the Warpath over Movie
Mar 30, 2008 Political
Geert Wilders of the Netherlands produced a movie that basically showed the religion of Islam for the violent cult that it is. His movie, a 15 minute or so short, showed the written word of the Koran and then had clips of Muslims whose words and deeds upheld the words of that violent book. Wilders showed that Islam is a violent religion through word and deed and now he has round the clock protection because Muslims have threatened to kill him. Seems to me that they are making the point of his movie for him. You can see the movie at Stop the ACLU.
LiveLeak, which had originally hosted the movie, has had to pull it from the servers because of threats made to its workers by Muslims who are upset with the content of the movie. One cannot blame LiveLeak for acting in the best interests of its workers but one has to see the irony in Muslims using threats of violence to pull a movie that shows Muslims are violent and that their “Holy Book” teaches that violence. The United Nations U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned the movie as anti-Islamic and offensive and said their is no reason for this incitement to violence. The question is, if the movie is wrong why would there be an incitement to violence? It is simple, Muslims are stone aged barbarians who use violence to achieve their goals. If they are “offended” then they will riot in the streets and kill people in order to show how peaceful they are.
Part of the problem here is that Muslims take great offense at any knock on their religion while they routinely castigate the great and true religions of the world. It is not unusual for Muslims to talk about killing all the Jews and to slander that great and chosen religion. It is not unusual for Muslims to destroy Christian churches in Muslim countries and for them to refuse to allow churches to be built. However, they have no problem with building Mosques in Western countries and they cry, sue, and riot at any hint of objection to their plans.
The United Nations Human Rights Council has passed a resolution which talks of protecting all religions but the only religion that is named is Islam. The Human Rights Council is comprised mostly of members from Arab nations which is ironic in and of itself because they have some of the worst human rights violations in the world. The UN will allow this kind of manipulation of the system in order for Muslims to have greater leverage and in order for them to squash any opposition to their brutal religious practices. The resolution gives Muslims free reign to carry out any of their criminal activities by allowing them to challenge any opposition as a violation of UN Resolution. Everything will be seen as defamation to them when Islam is concerned but you can be certain that the Muslims will not stop defaming Israel and the Jews.
Muslims threaten death to those who refuse to buy into their claims of peace while they kill and maim everything in sight. Always on Watch has a post about Kevin of the Amboy Times blog. He has been threatened because he keeps a running list of things that offend Muslims. With as many things that offend Muslims I wonder where he gets all the bandwidth? Muslims have no problem threatening people, rioting, and killing and they have no problem talking badly about any person or country that is not Islamic but let someone talk badly about their perverted religion or their child molesting prophet and they come unhinged. I say screw them. If they want violence then let’s give it to them and let’s show them what it really is. It is time to fight back against these half baked cretins and show them that we would like to live in peace but that we will not be pushed around. No one is safe from these animals, including American Citizens.
UPDATE: This via Breitbart; “The film equates Islam with violence. We reject that interpretation,” Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende said in a solemn statement a few hours after the film appeared on the LiveLeak video sharing website.
He rejects the idea that Islam is violent while calling for Muslims to exercise restraint and to not commit violent acts. The article is laced with threats from members of the cult of Islam. If Wilders was wrong there would be no fear of violence.
Give the Brother a Break
Mar 8, 2008 General
Robert Downey Jr has a role in a new movie entitled Tropic Thunder. According to the Daily Mail, the movie:
The film centres[sic] on a group of pompous actors making the most expensive Vietnam war movie ever made.
Fed up with their self-involved cast, the film’s makers drop them into the jungle to take care of themselves, where they get caught up in a conflict they don’t realise[sic] is real.
However, all is not well in movie land because Downey Jr plays the part of a black man. He wears black make-up and a wig to play the part of a black actor.
Oops, that does not sit well with groups that want to know why a white man is playing a black person. Was there no black man to fill the role? This is over the line and cannot be tolerated.
My question; Who the hell cares? Their profession is acting and their job is to make people believe something that is not true. In this case Downey Jr looks like a black man and therefore he is making people believe something that is not true.
Why are there never concerns when black guys wear white make-up and play white people? Why are there no concerns when a woman plays a man or vice versa? It seems to me that this is much ado about absolutely nothing as is the flap over a white actor on SNL playing the part of Barack Obama, who incidentally is half white.
If this movie used Downey’s character to portray stereotypes of blacks and showed them unfavorably then there might be an issue but still, that issue never arises when people like Eddie Murphy wear white make-up to see how good whites have life. Murphy is a comedian and what he did was funny though it made fun of typical white stereotypes.
I wonder if this will pass without the race baiters making a big deal about it. If there is any way whatsoever that Sharpton and Jackson can play this for face time on some camera, somewhere, we will be in for another diatribe about the racist whites.
BTW, Jack Black is in the movie (just his name is ironic) and his hair is bleached blond. Should we protest that a blond actor was not found to play the part?
Judges Pan Hillary Movie
Jan 10, 2008 Political
This, according to the AP:
The early reviews are in, and three federal judges appeared in agreement Wednesday that a movie lambasting Hillary Clinton seemed an awful lot like a 90-minute campaign advertisement. Breitbart
Hillary: The Movie is a 90 minute story that details the public life of Hillary Clinton and it features many people who know her well and know what kind of person she is. It features those who know how corrupt she really is and it demonstrates that in a, well documentary format. But the judges, two of whom are conservatives, are not buying that claim. I guess you may not attack a liberal Democrat in a movie or you will get in trouble.
John Kerry fought hard and had Stolen Honor removed from some television stations. It was a documentary that showed how he was a phony war hero and how he disgraced his service and his fellow sailors during his service in Vietnam (he was there you know) and during his protests when he returned. Some Fox channels showed the documentary but there was a lot of controversy. After all, one cannot dis a Democrat.
However, when the target is a Republican, all bets are off. Micheal Moore was allowed to show Fahrenheit 911 all over without worrying about campaign finance issues. I am not sure if Moore spent his own money on the show but was it required to have political disclaimers? Moore had at least 50 errors in the film and most were outright lies and distortion of the truth. To top it off, it was aired and released and given away for free just before the election in order to help defeat George Bush. That was the stated goal of Moore and yet, he was not taken to task like those who are defending the Hillary movie.
I believe that the DVDs are not regulated by the campaign laws. I am more than willing to buy one. I would suggest that the people who made it consider showing it for free on the web. They can show it and then sell the DVD.
This is a biased world where Democrats are a protected species and anything goes when it comes to Republicans. But then again, we have always had a soft spot for the handicapped…
Maybe the judges were afraid the movie would make Hillary cry…
Hillary is Satan.
Tags: bias, campaign finance, Democrats, Hillary, movie