The Sugar Epidemic In Politics Is Soon Over
Jan 10, 2017 Commentary, Political
The Lame Stream Media and the Democrat stenographers in the media, those from the media wing of the Democrat Party have had such sweet and sugary things to say about B. Hussein Obama for the last eight years (actually 12 if you go back to his convention appearance) so much so that there is a diabetes epidemic among that crowd. There is a shortage of insulin because of the sugary overload of words stated about Obama by the media puppets who have the amazing ability to speak passionately about their messiah while their mouth is full of his….
To this group of sycophants nothing Obama did was wrong. If he farted it smelled like lilacs and should be bottled for future use. If he misspoke it was overlooked as a passionate man who is eloquent with words and must be listened to.
This link has a large number of direct quotes about B. Hussein by his sock puppet media and reading them is sure to make you wonder if objective journalism has become extinct.
After you read those quotes you will need a dose of insulin to keep from going into sugar shock but have no fear.
You see, the media hate Donald Trump. The very people who talked about Obama as if he would walk on water and not get his feet wet will bash Trump with little or no restraint. Their talk will be bitter, sour and acidic. In other words, you will not die of sugar shock while listening to them talk about the man they hate, the man who made them all eat crow.
The media will be no more objective in its reporting about Trump than it was in its reporting about Obama.
But if you feel the need for a sugar fix just listen to Sean Hannity.
He is to Trump what the linked media were to Obama….
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
The Terrorist Gays
Aug 16, 2012 Political
Janet Napolitano of Homeland Security is quick to label people who are affiliated with the TEA Party or right wing as terrorists even though none of these people have been shown to cause violence against government or any group of people. TEA Party rallies have been peaceful and the places where they gather are always left in better shape than when they arrived.
The violence committed has been committed by the left. The recent violence has been caused by people with leftist beliefs.
Despite this, the Democrat media contorts itself to make some connection to the right. They will falsely claim that a right winger is the cause or blame Sarah Palin or Rush Limbaugh for the violence when the truth is that left wing nut jobs cause the problems. The left loves to try and make right wingers out to be terrorists (the DHS calls them potential terrorists).
The latest terror attack was against a conservative group by a radical gay activist who has taken the violence of the gay movement to a new level. The gays have been physically violent and verbally abusive when they do not get their way. They have been known to attack little old ladies just because those ladies disagree with the gay agenda.
Now, gay activist and terrorist Floyd Corkins II of Virginia is the latest left wing nut job to commit violence and this time the violence was against a conservative group. Corkins walked into the Family Research Council and opened fire after denouncing their policies. He shot a guard who was able to subdue him despite his injuries.
The media that is quick to label anyone as a right wing terrorist when the target is a left wing entity has remained relatively silent about this shooting. Perhaps this is because the media is happy about it. The left wing groups have labeled FRC as a hate group so it only stands to reason that those who attached the label are responsible for the violence.
After any other shooting involving a left wing victim the media goes out of its way to blame Palin, Limbaugh, Malkin, Hannity and any other right wing public figure. It is their “hate speech” that incited the violence, they say.
If that is the case then it stands to reason that the various liberal entities that have labeled the FRC as a hate group are responsible for the FRC shooting.
Though I doubt you will hear anyone in the liberal media jump to make that claim. Hell, I doubt they will ever make that claim. If anything the media will claim that the gunman was pushed to it by the right.
When a nut uses a gun to cause harm the liberal left is always ready to ban guns and blame the right (even though most of the violence is caused by the left) so I want to know if the FRC shooting shows we need to ban gays…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: conservative, dhs, gay activist, liberal violence, media, terrorist
Media In Tank For Obama On Gas Prices
Apr 2, 2012 Political
Richard Thaler, who has informally advised the Obama Regime, has a piece up at The New York Times where he discusses gas prices and tells us why they are out of any president’s control. He discusses the market and the supply and demand aspects and he even throws out the inaccurate claim about us having 2% of the world’s oil but using 20%.
He is doing something now that he and the rest of the Democrat controlled media refused to do under George Bush, and that is to defend the leader over higher gas prices. The major reason is that a Democrat is in the White House.
When George Bush was in the White House and gas prices went up the Democrats and their media allies blamed it all on Bush, or as the talking points from the Democrats called them, the two oil men in the White House. Here is a video of Democrats blaming George Bush. If you look closely one of them is Barack Obama (he remains pretty good at blaming Bush).
The New York Times did not write any articles claiming that no president controls gas prices. None of the Democrat media rushed in to point out the items Thaler claims in his article. No, the media were more than happy to pile on and Blame Bush. It was the two oil men in the White House and their policies that caused the high gas prices.
Now that poor little Barry Obama is in there and prices are rising they all have to come to his defense. While doing so, they also point out that higher prices will mean little in the next election (but just in case they need to point out that no president is to blame).
The same media were busy during the Bush years pointing out how higher gas prices would hurt him in the midterm election.
This is what happens when the media are part of the political party.
Let’s help Thaler out a bit. This article discusses the lies that Obama has told (one of which Thaler repeated) regarding our energy. Note the numbers reported by folks in the business.
Let us also tackle the claim that gas prices are out of president’s control. Barack Obama prefers higher gas prices. He can claim that he is working for the little guy and that he wants gas prices to drop but if he does it is only short term and that term is until Election Day. If he gets reelected then prices will go up and he will not mind a bit. He will not have to answer to voters and he can go all in on his energy desires. How did he put it? Oh yeah, he will have more flexibility.
Obama does not have a problem with higher prices. He just wishes they had risen more gradually. His policies are designed to have an increase in prices so people will want more of the failed green energies he is pushing and so that more will buy the failed Chevy Volt, the car produced by Government Motors.
Obama’s EPA is pushing policies that will cause all energy prices to skyrocket (something Obama admitted would happen under his policies) and this is one reason we have higher gas prices. Another is the moratorium on drilling. Obama and his toadies claim there is more drilling going on but any drilling is under items approved under George Bush and is being done on private land, something over which Obama has little control.
Gas is a global commodity over which presidents have little control. However, policies can affect the domestic cost of it and Obama is more than happy to see the cost of gasoline increase though he prefers it to be gradual. He might also like to see it come down before the election but once he has more flexibility he will work to force us into smaller cars or alternate energies by working to increase the price of fossil fuels.
That is what he has said, that is what he wants, and that is what he will do.
No matter how much Richard Thaler and the rest of the Obama media claim to the contrary, Obama is affecting prices and there is no doubt the media are covering for him.
Just ask George Bush, one of the oil men who lived in the White House.
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Tags: blame bush, Bush, Democrats, energy policies, gas prices, lies, media, new york times, Obama
Media Translations
Oct 13, 2010 Opinion, Political
A number of different headlines caught my attention today that pointed out the slanted media reporting. As a public service, I’d like to translate a few headlines so they actually report the truth:
#1: Obama agency busts plan to sell rifles to Americans. Translation: Obama is scared that if people are allowed to buy cheap rifles, his government will be attacked. He will do all he can to prevent private firearm ownership, but has to be careful because he knows that if he is honest about his position, he will alienate even more voters.
#2: Council on American-Islamic Relations Launches ‘Islamophobia’ Division. Translation: CAIR, an association intent on the overthrow of the American government, will be attempting to use the freedom of the government system to crush freedom of speech for anyone who disagrees with them. CAIR will continue to demand that people be jailed for saying anything they don’t like. NOTE: If you are going to claim Islam is peaceful, and its “just a few” bad apples, go back under your rock. That’s like me wearing a Nazi SS uniform and claiming I actually like Jews and the rest of Nazism is just “misunderstood.”
#3: School District Settles WebcamGate. Translation: Taxpayers screwed again as working people held responsible for fools in school district. District officials continue on their way, not concerned with reality because they’re not going to be held responsible for their actions.
#4: Biden, Obama’s Traveling Salesman, Makes Hard Sell to Voters. Translation: You’re too stupid to understand government. Vote Democrat because they’re smarter than you.
#5: Obama: 24/7 media makes it hard to focus ‘on the long term’. Translation: You’re stupid. Vote Democrat because they’re smarter than you.
#6: MTV Denies That Obama Telecast Is Political. Translation: You’re stupid. Obama campaigning for Democrats isn’t a campaign appearance because, well, shut up, you’re stupid. Just listen to Obama and vote for Democrats.
#7: The Proof Is In The Numbers: America Is Getting Poorer. Translation: Well, sometimes the headlines are just right.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: doubletalk, media
Lying Liars and the Media
Sep 23, 2010 Political
I guess one of the biggest things that bothers me about the media (and society and politics) today is the total lack of honesty. I remember stories from when I was younger about “Honest Abe.” For those raised in the public schools today, that refers to Abraham Lincoln, a former president of the United States. Now I don’t agree with many of the things Lincoln did, but I remember the stories we learned about him. I don’t know that they’re true stories, but when it’s a story told to children, the moral is important. And that story about Lincoln traveling through the snow to return a few pennies shows that trait of honesty. And I bet he was honest in his raucous debates for public office, too. Maybe that’s why he lost a few times.
But today’s media, especially in the last month or so, has been virulently dishonest. I know for some reporters, it is just them being incredibly lazy, but if you’re that lazy, you really should just quit trying to be a journalist. Did you know that journalists allegedly subscribe to standards and ethics? If you ask them about it, they’ll claim they do, anyway. As a journalist, they are supposed to listen and gather information, verify it, and report the facts. But today most journalists are really just cheerleaders for the Democrat Party. Why? It doesn’t really matter. But take, for example, all “reporting” done recently relating to Obama’s speeches.
In many, many speeches and appearances, Obama continues to claim that Republicans are blocking his agenda and the Democrat agenda. That appears to be the Democrat election strategy for this year. Well, that is a complete and total lie. No, literally. That’s a complete false statement and Obama knows it. Any reporter should know it, and any journalist would know it as well.
For those who don’t understand how the Congress works in this country, the US Senate has 60 Democrats (58 that will claim to be D, 2 that are D, but won’t admit it, and that’s not counting the Democrats with an R after their name). With 60 votes in the Senate, they completely and literally have total control. With 60 votes, they can literally pass anything through the Senate.
There are 256 Democrats in the US House of Representatives (compared to 175 Republicans). With 256 votes, again, the Democrats can literally pass anything through the US House. There is absolutely no way any Republican in the House or the Senate can stop anything that Democrats want. The ONLY way ANY vote fails in either the US House or the US Senate is for at least one Democrat to vote against it. Do I need to type that again? Obama and the Democrats can literally pass anything they desire with every single Republican voting against it.
When Obama claims that Republicans have “blocked” something of his, it is a complete and total lie. I’m sorry, but there is no other way to put that. The Republican Party is completely and totally incapable of blocking anything in Congress today. A journalist should know that.
Now I’m not expecting Obama to change his lies. But I would like for reporters to at least be honest and report that he’s a liar. You know they would if a Republican made those same claims.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]