The Rich Will Avoid Taxes
Nov 5, 2008 Political
It has already started. People know that taxes will go up under Obama and those who are very wealthy will figure out how to avoid them. Agents for sports figures are already working on a way to avoid the increase on upper wage earners by trying to get their clients’ bonuses before the end of the year.
The mega rich will always figure out how to avoid taxes. They are wealthy enough to do that. People who are well off but not wealthy will get screwed as will ALL taxpayers when Dear Leader allows the Bush tax cuts to expire. When they do, the people in the middle class are going to find out very quickly that the idea that Bush cut taxes for the rich is a LIE that Democrats, along with “we had a balanced budget and a surplus”, keep telling in order to appear blameless for the problems facing this country.
We will see how Obama and his Congress handles things but I have already decided how I will deal with some of them. I will no longer help those who need it. No contributions, no donations, no nothing. Let Obama help them. I have no empathy for anyone who gets screwed under an Obama administration. I don’t care if they become homeless, lose their jobs or pensions or can’t afford their bills. The only donations I plan on are the ones from my ads on this page. They go to the military and that will continue.
Speaking of the military, I predict that many people will now decide not to join the service and many more will leave it. Obama will not have the size military he needs to protect this country because most members of the military are conservative and they know he will not support them. I wonder how many of the liberals with their hands out will join the service to help out Barry O?
It will be a long 4 years for people not wealthy enough to figure out how to avoid taxes. I kind of hope that Obama and his Congress close the loopholes the rich use so that ALL the libs in Hollywood who supported him will pay much more in taxes. These sports players, many of whom are black and openly supported Obama, should have to pony up a lot of their income in the Obama tax plan.
As for me, I will continue to work because not everyone can be on welfare and guns and ammo are not cheap.
Sarah Palin Is A Fighter
Oct 22, 2008 Political
Here is the latest ad from Our Country Deserves Better PAC. It is called Sarah’s a Fighter:
This is a comment one of the inclusive, diverse liberals left at the You Tube site:
Sarah Palin has 2 retarded kids right?
Well, one has down syndrome and the other one VOLUNTEERED to fight in Iraq.
How does she expect the country to get behind her when even God hates her?
How is this for pure hatred? She has two retarded kids, one with Down Syndrome and the other is a retard for joining the military to fight in Iraq. According to this (dare I say it) typical liberal twit, anyone who joins the military to defend this country is a retard. This is the attitude the left has toward our troops. This is what they think about the people who are infinitely better than they will ever be.
This is the kind of hatred I saw at all the moonbat protests in DC. This is the kind of hatred that people express when they damage property that has a McCain/Palin sign displayed. This is just pure intolerance and the person who said this is an ignorant jackass who should be severely beaten.
Then this twit is so ignorant that he suggests that Palin’s child has Down Syndrome because God hates her. No jackass, God hates you cretins who murder children in the womb. God hates you schmucks who murder the unborn and protest to save convicted murderers from the death penalty. God hates you maggots who protest the men and women of the armed forces who protect your right to say stupid things and God sure as hell hates idiots who make fun of the disabled.
If you get the urge to pick on retards start by selecting those in the Democratic Potty. Pick on Harry Reid and his boxing induced brain damage, Joe Biden and his aneurysm brain damage, Ted Kennedy and his brain cancer, and Nancy Pelosi and her Botox numbed brain.
And don’t forget to point to Barack Obama whose brain was fried by excessive use of drugs.
You want retards, look no farther than the liberals you give Lewinsky’s to.
Say what you want little twit but when you do, thank God that a member of the United States military stood guard over your freedom so that you could spew the stupidity.
Tags: liberals, Military, retards, sarah palin
Maryland Hotel Becomes Target Of Obamabots
Oct 16, 2008 Political
Prince Georges County Maryland is infested with liberals. The county is one of the heavily populated liberal counties in Maryland that ensure Democrats always win. Out of 23 sub divisions, four or five of them are densely populated and liberal so their votes always decide the elections even though the rest of the state votes Republican. Prince Georges is one of those infested areas.
The Colony South Hotel made a serious mistake on Sunday night when a marquee was programmed with the words: Country First: McCain/Palin.
On Monday morning the moonbats were going to work and saw the sign. They started making phone calls and the hotel, the NAACP (why in hell are they involved) and God knows who else were inundated with calls concerning this affront to their way of life. Threats were made, pulling Democratic events from the hotel was discussed, and by midday the hotel had taken down the offensive words.
I imagine that the heavily black population felt this was some racist attack so they had to call the NAACP. It is well known that the Obama storm troopers will assault anything they see as offensive to their Dear Leader and in this case, it was no different.
A community activist said that businesses had to respect the sentiments in their marketing areas and the sign was viewed as blatant disrespect. A University of Maryland professor said [displaying the marquee in] “an area that is strongly African American was like putting a stink bomb in the middle of the living room.” In other words, Obama is black and there should be NO black people supporting the white guy.
Businesses are free to put up any signs they want and it is certainly true that people are free to stop using those businesses. However, I can’t help wondering what would have happened if this had been a hotel in Alabama and the marquee said Obama/Biden. If local residents complained and the sign came down, how long would it be before Obama was decrying the racism, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton were on TV organizing protests and the NAACP was issuing statements about the racists in the south.
I have patronized businesses with Obama signs. They are free to support who they want and I actually feel sorry for the misguided twits who are so ignorant that they support the guy. If he wins and their tax increases make prices go up then they will wish they had considered something else but by then it will be too late.
I am not a big fan of signs on lawns and on the streets. I would not be inclined to put stuff like that on my lawn or my vehicle. I certainly would not do it in Maryland because when you display stuff like that in liberal areas (which I have to travel through) they vandalize your stuff. And though I am not opposed to shooting someone who needs it, I would just as soon not have to do that.
I am thankful that where I live people are normal so there are few Obama supporters.
Tags: liberals, Maryland, mccain palin, naacp, obama biden, prince georges county
Did Obama Bite Off More Than He Can Chew?
Sep 18, 2008 Political
I have read all the rantings over John McCain’s ads last week and how some people say they are full of lies. People lost their minds when John McCain accurately stated that Barack Obama wanted to teach sex education to kindergarten children. Obama and his supporters claim that it only dealt with inappropriate touching so children would know when someone was doing something wrong. Turns out that the curriculum that Obama wanted followed is absolutely inappropriate for children of that age and goes way beyond protection of children.
But the yappers were out screaming and when Karl Rove said that both campaigns were taking one step too far and distorting the truth the liberals, who live with their heads stuck someplace that blocks their ears, only picked up the part about McCain. Then they actually agreed with Rove, something I never thought I would see. Obama vowed to fight back. He is going to hit hard. Actually, he is just putting out statements taken out of context and telling lies. That is all OK but it would be nice if the same liberals who cried about their perception of McCain lying would go after The One.
I guess they don’t really have to go after him. Barack Obama did something really stupid today. He put out an ad that targeted Hispanics and the ad is in Spanish. The ad criticizes McCain and says he lied to the illegals. One can debate McCain’s record of reaching out to the Hispanic community. His support for amnesty was a major reason people were not enthusiastic with his nomination. If not for Sarah Palin, McCain would be toast. No, Obama can lie, in fact he did, about McCain’s record because this is politics and that is what happens. When a man runs scared he abandons his principles. No, Obama attacked Rush Limbaugh and he used two quotes from Limbaugh completely out of context. The use is so inaccurate that there is no way to look at it except as a deliberate distortion of the record; a lie.
Just so people know, the ad indicates that Limbaugh said “…stupid and unskilled Mexicans” and “You shut your mouth or you get out!”
The problem with this is that they are completely out of context. Here is what was said:
Railing against NAFTA in 1993, Limbaugh said, “If you are unskilled and uneducated, your job is going south. Skilled workers, educated people are going to do fine ’cause those are the kinds of jobs NAFTA is going to create. If we are going to start rewarding no skills and stupid people, I’m serious, let the unskilled jobs that take absolutely no knowledge whatsoever to do — let stupid and unskilled Mexicans do that work.”
Not one of his most eloquent moments, to be sure, but his larger point was that NAFTA would mean that unskilled stupid Mexicans would be doing the jobs of unskilled stupid Americans.
~snip~
[while describing Mexican immigration law]
“And another thing: You don’t have the right to protest. You’re allowed no demonstrations, no foreign flag waving, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our President or his policies. You’re a foreigner: shut your mouth or get out! And if you come here illegally, you’re going to jail. ABC
Limbaugh said that if there are jobs for stupid and unskilled people then stupid and unskilled Mexicans can do them rather than stupid and unskilled Americans. The second part is when he is telling people the Mexican immigration law. He is telling people what the Mexican government’s position is. People do not have to agree with the point of view he expressed but Stevie Wonder can see that the Obama ad is a huge, deliberate lie.
Why is this a mistake for Obama? Barack Obama has to pay for airtime when he wants to run an ad. Every time he wants to put up an ad it costs him money. Rush Limbaugh has three hours of airtime each and every workday and he does not have to pay to get it. In fact they pay him to be on. Admittedly, Limbaugh has been on Obama’s case but truth be told, until McCain picked Palin Limbaugh was not on board with him. I don’t think McCain and Limbaugh like each other.
The point though, is that Limbaugh could unleash on Obama for three hours a day and he could have all those authors on for interviews. You know, the ones that Obama supporters try to shut down on orders from The One; the Constitutional lawyer who wants to deny others their right to express their views. Yes, Limbaugh could start taking all kinds of Obama quotes and using them out of context and he could keep playing that stuff for three hours a day, five days a week and it would not cost him a dime.
Obama would be forced to answer some of the allegations especially when they start going on the Internet and become viral. I just don’t think it was smart of Obama to pick a fight with a guy who talks for a living, reaches tens of millions of people a week, and has all the airtime and resources he wants to attack as much as he wants.
It was a boneheaded thing for Obama to do. Before anyone dismisses Limbaugh’s audience as a bunch of conservatives, he attracts a lot of Independents and that is the demographic that will decide the election. He might even convert some of the liberals who listen to him (we know they are there).
Do you suppose the same media that just last week called McCain sleazy will have the same to say about Obama?
Right……
Others:
Washington Post | Rush Limbaugh | Politico
Tags: ad, Democrats, immigrants, liberals, mexicans, obama lies, Rush Limbaugh, sleazey ads
Second Amendment Work Not Quite Done
Jun 26, 2008 Political
The ruling by the Supreme Court today on the Second Amendment was a good ruling but there is still work to do. Already, proponents of gun control are claiming that the ruling allows them to decide where, when and under what circumstances people may have guns. Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler stated as much today. The reality is, the ruling gave no such restrictions.
The important thing to look at is what the Court was asked to decide. They were asked if gun ownership was an individual right and the case stemmed from a lawsuit over the DC gun ban which makes it a crime to have a functional weapon in one’s own house. The Court ruled that gun ownership is an individual right and that citizens in DC had a right to have them in their homes (in ready to use, functional configuration). That is what they were asked to rule on and that is what they did. There will be future lawsuits to iron out the limit of that individual right.
The reaction from Mayor Fenty of DC and Mayor Daley of Chicago was right out of the liberal playbook. Gavin Newsome of San Francisco also chimed in. They cannot believe the Court ruled this way and wonder how they could have reached such a conclusion. I wonder how any normal person could reach any other conclusion than what the Court did. [My Way News]
All three Mayors cried about the increased violence that would result from the decision and this is just a bunch of crap. These places already have extremely stringent gun laws and look at their murder rates. You see, the people causing those murders are those who are not supposed to have guns or are using them illegally. The Court’s decision deals with law abiding citizens and addresses the ability to deny gun ownership to criminals and the mentally ill.
Gun laws have not stopped the violent crimes in cities where gun control is the most strict. It is simple, criminals do not obey the law. Look at the crime rates in areas where there are strict gun laws and compare them to rural America where gun ownership is widespread (the bitter folks Obama talked about). The reality is, gun control has been a huge failure and has not reduced crime. Crime is reduced in places where the citizenry is armed.
Ask Mayor Daley how is strict gun control has worked out. He had more murders last weekend in his city than my county did all of last year (and this year combined). Ask Mayor Fenty how the decades of gun control in DC has helped his city which is more than the Nation’s Capital, it is the murder Capital. Handgun violence should not exist under the laws that existed there and yet there were countless shootings. Ronald Reagan was shot in DC so the strict gun laws did nothing to prevent that. Ask Gavin Newsome, who wants the justices to visit the housing projects in his city and see the violence, how it is that his city has gun violence with its strict gun laws.
If gun control is the answer and will end violence why do cities with strict gun control allow their police officers to carry guns? If there will be no gun violence there is no need for the police to carry a gun. It is also worth asking why Chicago allows its Aldermen to carry concealed weapons or why gun control advocate Dianne Feinstein of California has a carry permit. Why is it that these people have a Second Amendment right that idiots like Daley, Newsome and Fenty want to deny the rest of us?
We have scratched the surface in this battle but now that the camel has its nose under the tent we will be able to chip away at the unconstitutional gun laws that government has imposed upon its citizens. We will now be able to combat the tyranny of government. We will also be able to instill fear in the liberals. They want your guns so you have no means to resist tyranny. Now that it is decided law that YOU have the right to keep and bear arms (a right I knew I had all the time and will never relinquish) they will have lost a method used to control the citizenry.
If you think liberals are not afraid of gun owners you need to ask why it is the Amendment they attack all the time. Why do they regulate that freedom to death? No other Amendment in the Bill of Rights has the restrictions and impositions on it that the Second Amendment has and that is because it is the very Amendment that allows the average citizen a means of resistance against a tyrannical government.
It would also be interesting to know why liberals immediately attacked this ruling and started interpreting it as a victory for them. Nancy Pelosi said the ruling would not keep DC from regulating guns. Leave it to a liberal to find ways around a law with which he disagrees. Amazingly, whenever the Court makes a ruling that liberals like (abortion, rights for terrorists) it is considered settled by the liberals and not open for debate or discussion. When a ruling affecting the rights of citizens is made in favor of the citizens the liberals immediately fight to get around the right.
So, who are they fighting for? Who do they represent? Why are they so opposed to people having the right affirmed in the Second Amendment.
My prediction is, there will be no blood baths. There will be no increase in gun violence and in places where gun laws are relaxed or repealed there will be a reduction in crime. Professor John Lott has studied this and written about it.
We have won this battle but the war is not over yet.
Tags: gun bans, liberals, rights, Second Amendment, supreme court
Loading ...
Loading... 
