Aug 16, 2012 Political
Janet Napolitano of Homeland Security is quick to label people who are affiliated with the TEA Party or right wing as terrorists even though none of these people have been shown to cause violence against government or any group of people. TEA Party rallies have been peaceful and the places where they gather are always left in better shape than when they arrived.
The violence committed has been committed by the left. The recent violence has been caused by people with leftist beliefs.
Despite this, the Democrat media contorts itself to make some connection to the right. They will falsely claim that a right winger is the cause or blame Sarah Palin or Rush Limbaugh for the violence when the truth is that left wing nut jobs cause the problems. The left loves to try and make right wingers out to be terrorists (the DHS calls them potential terrorists).
The latest terror attack was against a conservative group by a radical gay activist who has taken the violence of the gay movement to a new level. The gays have been physically violent and verbally abusive when they do not get their way. They have been known to attack little old ladies just because those ladies disagree with the gay agenda.
Now, gay activist and terrorist Floyd Corkins II of Virginia is the latest left wing nut job to commit violence and this time the violence was against a conservative group. Corkins walked into the Family Research Council and opened fire after denouncing their policies. He shot a guard who was able to subdue him despite his injuries.
The media that is quick to label anyone as a right wing terrorist when the target is a left wing entity has remained relatively silent about this shooting. Perhaps this is because the media is happy about it. The left wing groups have labeled FRC as a hate group so it only stands to reason that those who attached the label are responsible for the violence.
After any other shooting involving a left wing victim the media goes out of its way to blame Palin, Limbaugh, Malkin, Hannity and any other right wing public figure. It is their “hate speech” that incited the violence, they say.
If that is the case then it stands to reason that the various liberal entities that have labeled the FRC as a hate group are responsible for the FRC shooting.
Though I doubt you will hear anyone in the liberal media jump to make that claim. Hell, I doubt they will ever make that claim. If anything the media will claim that the gunman was pushed to it by the right.
When a nut uses a gun to cause harm the liberal left is always ready to ban guns and blame the right (even though most of the violence is caused by the left) so I want to know if the FRC shooting shows we need to ban gays…
Never surrender, never submit.
Sep 7, 2011 Political
The left went bonkers when Sarah Palin said that we don’t retreat, we reload. They went apoplectic when her map with bull’s eyes on it was used to blame her for a crazed liberal who shot Congresswoman Giffords and a number of other people in Tuscon. That type of map was invented by Democrat strategist Bob Beckel but when he used it all was fine.
Every time there is an act of violence by a liberal the left claims the criminal is a right wing nut and that this person was inspired by right wing talk. Rush Limbaugh was blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing (and McVeigh was referred to as right wing) and Palin, along with a host of others, was blamed for the Tuscon massacre.
After Tuscon, Barack Obama called for civility (though he has been guilty of violent metaphors) and said we owed it to the people who were shot to have more civil discourse. That call, hollow as it was to begin with, fell on deaf liberal ears.
The TEA Party has been demonized, called names, blamed for the violence of the left and has been called racists. All claims are untrue but that takes away from the narrative. The left is devoid of ideas and the things it has put in place are not working. Barack Obama now has a record that he will need to defend. There is now something to look at that even the blind left can’t ignore. So he needs to gin up the mob against an enemy and that enemy is the TEA Party.
In the past few weeks we have heard members of the racist organization, the Congressional Black Caucus, say the TEA Party can go straight to hell and that the TEA Party members of Congress would like to see black people lynched. This is rhetoric designed to point the mob toward the TEA Party and help Obama win a second term. It is all about mob behavior as those on the left are unable to think rationally on their own.
This past week we had a Vice President call the opposition barbarians and the president of the Teamsters Union say of the TEA Party, we will take the sons of bitches out.
The left has yet to condemn these words, any of them, and has actually defended those who said them. Why, Hoffa was only talking about voting. His violent metaphor leaves little doubt that he was calling for more than voting people out. The TEA Party he referred to is a group of American citizens of all stripes. He did not talk about voting the members of the TEA Party in Congress out, he labeled the entire TEA Party as the enemy and said they would take the sons of bitches out. As a side note, there are about 80 million TEA Party members and 14 million union members so good luck with that.
Defenders of Hoffa were the first to point to less violent metaphors used by right wing talkers as the reason for the Tuscon massacre. Right wing talk, military jargon (be careful calling it the Obama CAMPAIGN), and maps were all used to point the fingers of blame. Those violent right wingers are causing trouble.
So keep this in mind when you hear the left justify the violent talk of its mob. To them, right wingers call for violence and the left only calls for votes.
Certainly the left would condemn any violence called for if it were real instead of just a call to get out the vote.
So where are those on the left condemning this violent video game? This game allows people to kill TEA Party zombies. Among those who can be violently killed are most FOX News commentators, Sarah Palin, and the Koch brothers, just to name a few.
Don’t worry though, killing TEA Party zombies, I am sure, is just a metaphor for beating them at the ballot box. Of course, like the TEA Party Hoffa attacked, most of those in the game are not running for office.
Don’t let little things like facts get in the way of your mob mentality. You evil right wingers just sit back while we incite violence. We are only (wink, wink) calling for people to be eliminated at the ballot box.
I want you to imagine how the left would act if there was a game (designed by the evil Koch brothers, of course) that allowed people to kill liberal zombies. The left gets upset when we talk about killing terrorists so one can just imagine how they would act if a kill the liberal zombie game featuring zombies like Obama (you racists, killing the black guy), Begala, Clinton (either one), Carville, Chrissie Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow or any other liberal were introduced. We would never hear the end of it and the state run media would be featuring it on the hour for days on end.
You can also bet that no explanation about only looking for votes would satisfy the mob.
Jimmy Hoffa might very well have been talking about taking people out with a vote (unlikely given the words) but if that is true it is certain he meant by any means necessary. Union thugs intimidating people and committing violence and Black Panthers intimidating voters with threats of violence are all part of the mob mentality.
And it will get worse in the next year as more and more liberal mob leaders call for violence under the guise of getting out the vote.
Here is a non violent way to respond to Jimmy Hoffa. UPS has Teamster drivers, FedEx is non union. The Christmas season is fast approaching and there will be lots of packages shipped. If you order something and have a choice in how it is shipped, choose FedEx. If you ship something be sure to use FedEx. Let Hoffa see that words have meanings and saying the wrong ones has consequences.
And to you liberals who think this is wrong, I am just calling for people to vote, with their wallets…
Never surrender, never submit.