As if We Needed Further Proof About Democrats and Islam
Jul 27, 2008 Political
Two items today in the news that serve only as a reminder of that which is already known by thinking people but denied by those who live with the disease of liberalism.
The first is a story that reports an Islamic group has claimed responsibility for the terror attacks in India:
An obscure Islamic group claimed responsibility for a series of synchronized explosions that killed at least 45 people in western India, warning of “the terror of Death” in an e-mail sent to several television stations minutes before the blasts. My Way News
Most terror attacks are by Islamic groups, obscure or otherwise. Sure, there have been acts of terror committed by individuals not associated with any group much less Islam. These people are the exception rather than the rule. When one hears of a terror attack Islam is the first thought because the majority of terror attacks have been committed by that cult. The fact that an Islamic group is taking credit for the India terror attacks should come as no surprise. CAIR might try to convince us that Islam is not a violent cult but CAIR supports terror and defends terrorism.
The second item is conformation of an item that everyone with a brain already knows but that Clinton supporters have been denying for years. Anytime someone mentions that Clinton’s inaction and cowardice led to 9/11 there is always an outcry that it is a tactic to just blame things on Clinton and that it was not true especially since it happened on Bush’s watch. Well, now bin Laden’s driver has confirmed that Clinton is to blame for 9/11:
The United States could have killed bin Laden in Khartoum, Sudan, before he moved to Afghanistan in 1996, Hamdan told his interrogators. They could have killed him after al Qaida’s 1998 twin bombings at the U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Or after the October 2000 suicide bombing of the USS Cole, at the port of Aden in Yemen, which left 17 U.S. sailors dead.
Instead, ”Bin Laden was emboldened.” So he struck with the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, leaving nearly 3,000 dead. McClatchy
This information will only come as a surprise to those who still think Clinton handled things wonderfully and that he was a great president. People who saw nothing wrong with what Sandy Berger did will still defend the pervert in chief and will claim it is a lie and a distortion of the truth. The Clinton folks, including Bubba himself, had a cow over the movie The Path to 9/11. Clinton called it “lies” even though it was accurate and supported by the facts. ABC backed down and changed part of the movie. Now we have bin Laden’s driver confirming that it was all true.
Bill Clinton’s cowardice and refusal to get bin Laden caused 9/11. Remember this in November. We tried the Democrat’s plan for national security and it gave us an attack on our soil that killed 3000.
If you value your life, don’t vote Democrat.
Tags: attacks, bill clinton, Democrats, islam, terror
Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim, Just Ask Qadhafi
Jun 19, 2008 Political
I know this has been beaten to death and I know that B. Hussein Obama attended a Christian church and proclaimed he was a Christian. While there were some things that bothered me about his claims I pretty much took him at his word. I was suspicious that he was born a Muslim and attended a mosque but then he really had no belief and then became a Christian. According to the Muslims this means he has to be killed and they usually issue fatwas and whatever else it is they use to put out hits on people who convert. Since this never happened one had to wonder but I figured that he was more likely than not a Christian. As an aside he probably will not release his birth certificate because it will list his religion as Muslim. I know there are people who say it has been released and it was posted at Kos but that was not a birth certificate. It was an official document indicating that a Certificate of Live Birth is on record. A real Certificate of Live Birth has more information on it (and the authenticity of the Kos document has been questioned).
Now, as I stated, I was accepting the Barry is a Christian story until I read that he is a Muslim. I read this from a credible source, Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi. Yes, he is credible. You know, takes one to know one and all that. Besides, the Democrats in Congress have been taking the word of Muslims who claim our troops committed crimes over the word of our soldiers (look at disgraced scumbag and low life maggot John Murtha). If some Muslim makes claims against our troops their words are given more weight by the left. Therefore, it is only fair to give more weight to what a leader of a Muslim country has to say about Barry than what Barry or his supporters say.
There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama. All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency.
~snip~
We still hope that this black man will take pride in his African and Islamic identity, and in his faith, and that [he will know] that he has rights in America, and that he will change America from evil to good, and that America will establish relations that will serve it well with other peoples, especially the Arabs. MEMRI [all emphasis mine]
Here is a Muslim leader telling us that Obama is a Muslim and that he has their support though (as indicated in the linked article) he has made statements they are unhappy with. They are sure he is just saying what he needs to get elected. Is Qadhafi saying that Obama is lying to advance Islam, a practice known as taqqya? Is it a coincidence that prominent (and I use that to distinguish from the average person) Muslims have expressed a desire to make America a Muslim country and that these people not only support Obama but want him to embrace his Islamic identity? They only believe that Islam is good. To them all others are bad so how is it they believe that Obama will change America from bad to good? And one other item in the piece is interesting. Isn’t it illegal for foreigners to contribute to a candidate? That is what he says has happened even though he claims it was legal.
I know that the Obama bots will go nuts and start crying hit job or Republican attack but this information comes from a Muslim who is not an American citizen. It comes from a leader of a Muslim country. Qadhafi’s statements leave no doubt as to what he means and what he says Obama is. This is at least worth a closer look. It is the least we can do.
After all, the left always takes the word of Muslims over that of our troops. Obama is not fit to polish a soldier’s boots so we should at least give Qadhafi the same courtesy people like John Murtha give to Muslims accusing the troops.
Obama could actually be a Muslim and not a Christian. Qadhafi could know what he is talking about and if he does it will mean that if Obama wins he will have successfully lied his way into the White House.
Now that would be change the Muslims could believe in.
Tags: islam, muslim, Obama, phony christian, qadhafi, taqqya
Don’t Take Flight 93 to Mecca 6-5-08
Jun 5, 2008 Flight 93
A call for America’s churches to step up as witnesses for the truth about the Flight 93 memorial
Three segments of American society get paid to investigate and report facts: academia, the press, and government. For two and a half years, all three have been spinning desperately to avoid and suppress the facts about Islamic and terrorist memorializing symbolism in the Flight 93 memorial.
Luckily there is a fourth segment of society that is also charged to witness truth, not for pay, but on religious principle. Asked by Pilate to account for himself, Jesus answered:
To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. [Jn. 18:37.]
Those who follow Jesus are supposed to do the same, which means first of all checking and reporting the facts when the importance of an issue warrants it.
The importance of the Flight 93 memorial to our churches could not be clearer. The Islam of the al Qaeda terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 is a religion of murder and deceit. Their self-professed strategy is to hide amongst us, pretending to be trustworthy friends, while plotting mass-murder against Christians, Jews, and all non-Muslims.
Whether this religion of deceit is the “true” Islam, as the bin Ladenists assert, or a bastardization of it, a deceptive memorial to the 9/11 terrorists is a direct challenge to the truth witnessing capacity of our society, and to the truth witnessing character of our Christian churches.
In a contest between deceit and honesty, there is no doubt which is stronger. Witness exposes and destroys deceit. If our churches enter this contest, they win. But will they enter? THAT is the test. If our churches stand by, and fail to witness truth, then the al Qaeda religion of murder and deceit may well succeed in stabbing its terrorist memorial mosque into the heartland of America.
The father of one of our Flight 93 heroes is asking America’s churches for help
In consultation with Tom Burnett Sr., Alec Rawls has put together a flyer that all of us can take to our local churches to try to organize sanctioned fact-checking efforts that our churches can stand behind publicly two months from now.
August 2nd is the next public meeting of the Memorial Project. Tom and Alec will both be traveling to Somerset PA to rally opposition. Mancow Muller is urging his national radio audience to attend, and groups like Rolling Thunder are also being contacted.
With Mr. Burnett in attendance, even a modest turnout will bring substantial news coverage, but coverage alone is not enough. We are facing a fact-checking blockade by the mainstream media, and can only break it by enlisting churches or other independent groups to sponsor their own fact checking efforts.
Are you a member of any kind of group where interested members could set up an ad hoc committee to check a few basic facts about the planned memorial? The full group or chapter could then make an official decision whether to stand behind this fact checking publicly in a press release that Tom and Alec can announce at the August meeting.
Christian churches may be our best bet, being charged by Jesus to be witnesses for truth, and having “chapters” all over America. Thus this initial effort is addressed in particular to our churches, but any group that wants to expose important truths can perform the same service.
The flyer prints out front and back on a single sheet of paper. It has a couple of color graphics, but prints fine in black and white for inexpensive copying. If you want to participate, just add your contact info at the bottom (the file is MS Word and can be altered), then go see if you can raise some interest!
Tags: churches, flight 93 memorial, islam, Mecca, muslims symbols
Don’t Take Flight 93 to Mecca 5-22-08
May 22, 2008 Flight 93, Political
Mancow: “I’m gonna take a sledge-hammer to it” “You’ll go to jail for it?” “Absolutely”
Radio talk show host Mancow Muller is asking his listeners to help SHUT DOWN the crescent memorial to Flight 93. (Audio 27 seconds.)
Mancow describes how the giant crescent points to Mecca, and how the four terrorists are consistently placed in the symbolic Islamic heavens (the crescent and star parts of the design), while the 40 heroes are consistently depicted as symbolically damned (placed outside of the symbolic Islamic heavens). Good stuff (1 min, 21 sec).
“You have to see it to understand…” says the pro-war libertarian host, directing his listeners to CrescentOfBetrayal.com where they can find pictures like this (a familiar sight for our blogburst readers):
The Tower of Voices. 40 symbolic souls, literally dangling down below an Islamic shaped crescent, soaring in the sky overhead.
Using Islamic symbol shapes invites an Islamic interpretation, and in Islam, if you don’t go to heaven, you go to hell (the fate of ALL unbelievers). Forty symbolic souls, never to rest in peace, gonging for eternity in their symbolic Islamic damnation.
Mancow on civil disobedience
Congressman Tancredo was scheduled to come on Tuesday’s show, but got stuck in a hearing. Near the end of the show, Mancow says Tancredo will be rescheduled, then he lays it on the line. He thinks his show and his listeners have the power stop this atrocity from being built, but if the crescent memorial does get built, he is going to take a sledgehammer to it. They can send him to jail. At that point it won’t matter. There are limits to what Americans should stand by for (1 min, 21 sec).
Last week’s show was good too, with segments from Tom Burnett Sr. (45 sec) and Alec Rawls (2 min, 49 sec). (Alec also did an hour long interview with Tracy at No Compromise blog radio last week. To listen, scroll down to May 15th.)
Robert Spencer
An unexpected extra came in the middle of Tuesday’s show when Robert Spencer was on to talk about Islam. Mancow asked what Spencer thought about this memorial controversy and Robert stepped up with another piece of the expose, pointing out that the 9/11 date is to be placed on the center line of the giant crescent, in exactly the position of the star on an Islamic crescent and star flag. (43 seconds.)
Exactly right. The date goes to the star on the Islamic flag. The date goes to the terrorists. Graphical proof here (“Terrorist memorializing feature #1″.)
With the difficulty of getting just the Mecca orientation across, the discussion almost never reaches these other explosive details. How does Mr. Spencer find the time to be so knowledgeable about so many things? You da MAN Robert!
Pilgrimage to Somerset
When Mancow is able to reschedule the two Tom’s, Tom Burnett says he is going to urge listeners who want to visit the memorial to plan for the weekend of August 2nd, when the Memorial Project is scheduled to have its next public meeting. Then they can help protest the crescent design, and anyone can sign up to speak during the public comment period.
Maybe we can even get Mancow to make the pilgrimage, and if Congressman Tancredo will call for a Congressional investigation, we just might be able to ram the food cart through the cockpit door. Just do it baby. Let’s roll.
To join our blogbursts, just send your blog’s url.
Tags: Flight 93, islam, Mecca, memorial, opposition, tancredo, Terrorism
Don’t Take Flight 93 to Mecca 5-8-08
May 8, 2008 Flight 93
No more do-overs for terrorist memorializing architects
Defenders of the crescent design keep accusing Tom Burnett Sr. of trying to get an improper “do over” after failing back in 2005 to sway the design-competition jury. But who is really seeking the do-over? The American people rose up in protest in 2005 when they saw that the Memorial Project wanted to plant a bare naked Islamic crescent and star flag on the flight 93 crash site:
That uproar forced the Memorial Project to agree to redesign the memorial so that it would no longer include Islamic symbol shapes (whether they are intentional or not). But nothing significant was changed. Every particle of the original crescent design remains completely intact in the so-called redesign, which only disguised the original crescent with a few irrelevant trees, placed to the rear of a person facing into the giant crescent.
The American people caught a hijacker trying to re-hijack Flight 93, and the Memorial Project told him to go back outside and try again, which is exactly what he did. Now they accuse Tom Burnett of wanting an improper do-over?
There were dozens of articles and television segments about the crescent controversy this week, mostly in Pennsylvania, with some national news coverage by Fox News television and AP. This post is an attempt to capture the general thrust of the new wave of position statements.
The Memorial Project is inverting every moral imperative at this point, and it all comes from their fervent desire to reverse the results of September 2005. Their embrace of the crescent was rejected by America and they are determined to undo that defeat, to the point of being willfully blind to massive evidence of al Qaeda sympathizing intent.
The new face of the Memorial Project: Edward Felt’s wife and brother take the lead
Sandra Felt, one of the Flight 93 family members who helped select the Crescent of Embrace design, admits that she never paid any attention to warnings about Islamic and terrorist memorializing symbolism in the crescent design:
Sandra Felt has known for nearly three years about complaints that the design of the proposed Flight 93 National Memorial allegedly contains Islamic symbols, but she never gave them any credence.“I don’t even think about it,” said Felt, whose husband, Edward, died on … United Airlines Flight 93.
And nobody blames her. It shouldn’t be on the Flight 93 families to investigate evidence that any one of us can easily fact check. But Sandra and her brother in law Gordon Felt, now President of Families of Flight 93, are going further, pretending for some reason that the charges people have made against architect Paul Murdoch are actually being leveled against them.
How could that be, when three of the features that our petition lists as unacceptable–the Mecca orientation of the giant crescent, the 44 glass blocks on the flight path, and the giant Islamic sundial–were not even discovered until after the crescent design was selected? Nobody blames the family members for approving design features they had no inkling were there, yet Gordon Felt says that warnings about the design are “quite hurtful, to think we would want to create a memorial to those who murdered our loved ones.”
Nobody ever suggested any such thing, but Felt is getting as much mileage as he can out of this excuse NOT to look at the facts, telling Fox News television:
I was outraged, for anyone to infer that family members who have been such an integral part of this process have in any way been involved in memorializing the murderers of our loved ones. I find it extremely offensive.
This after expressing his anger at Tom Burnett last week for Tom’s failure to submit to the Memorial Project’s “democratic process.” Tom lost the jury vote, so in Felt’s view, he is apparently supposed to shut up now. Strange view of democracy.
Tags: flight 93 memorial, islam, Mecca, opposition, terrorist design
Loading ...
Loading...
