<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Dogs House &#187; Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/tag/iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another News Round Up</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/another-news-round-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/another-news-round-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blame game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobsm recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic wand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart ass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=9964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/another-news-round-up/.Looks like Obama is not so keen on following his rules about lobbyists: Despite the job title, McLaughlin wasn&#8217;t a registered lobbyist. Still, ethics rules created by an Obama executive order prohibit McLaughlin from &#8220;participat[ing] in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/another-news-round-up/">http://www.onebigdog.net/another-news-round-up/</a>.<br /><p><strong>Looks like Obama is not so keen on following his rules about lobbyists:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Despite the job title, McLaughlin wasn&#8217;t a registered lobbyist. <strong>Still, ethics rules created by an Obama executive order prohibit McLaughlin from &#8220;participat[ing] in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to&#8221; Google</strong>. But the e-mails show McLaughlin has been involved with formulating policy that directly affects Google, regularly trading e-mails with Google&#8217;s &#8220;evangelist,&#8221; and lobbyist.</p>
<p>~snip~</p>
<p>And only when I followed up with a question about the e-mails with lobbyist Davidson did Weiss admit <strong>&#8220;they did violate the President&#8217;s Ethics Pledge,&#8221;</strong> and note that McLaughlin had been reprimanded.  [emphasis mine]  <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/White-House_-Google-violate-lobbying-pledge-97103794.html">Washington Examiner</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Well so much for the no lobbyists lobbying for their special interests.  How&#8217;s that transparency thing working out for ya?</p>
<p><strong>Iran blinks after much bluster:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Iran will not be sending a blockade-busting ship to Gaza in defiance of Israeli warnings, an Iranian lawmaker said Saturday, citing Israeli &#8220;restrictions.&#8221;  <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100626/ap_on_re_mi_ea/gaza_blockade_2">Yahoo News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Iran was going to send the blockade buster to help get &#8220;humanitarian&#8221; aid ships through.  Perhaps the idea of being sunk by the Israeli Navy did not appeal to Iran.  Imagine the humiliation if that happened.</p>
<p><strong>Maybe the Islamic radicals don&#8217;t care who is leading our country:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>As for the revolutionary Islamists&#8211;be they al-Qaida, Hamas, Hizballah, the Taliban, and the Muslim Brotherhoods&#8211;or the radical regimes&#8211;be they Iran, Syria, the de facto Islamic Republic of Gaza, or others&#8211;all the U.S. governments are definitely the same. Indeed, they make this point explicitly in their declarations and media every day.</p>
<p>To them, the American people are &#8220;all the same&#8221; and the American governments are &#8220;all the same.&#8221; The argument between liberals and conservatives on this point is irrelevant. They hate the United States because of its values and they also hate the United States because of its policies.  <a href="http://www.gloria-center.org/gloria/2010/06/terrorists-world-view">Gloria Center</a></p></blockquote>
<p>While liberals love to exclaim that George Bush made the world, particularly the world of Islam, hate us, the reality is they hated us long before Bush was president.  They bombed the WTC the first time under Clinton, attacked the Cole and other targets under Clinton and planned 9/11 under him.  They do not like us no matter who is elected to lead us and they will continue to attack us until they are defeated.</p>
<p>How is that citizen of the world plan working out?</p>
<p><strong>Another broken Obama promise?  Gitmo remains open.</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Stymied by political opposition and focused on competing priorities, the Obama administration has sidelined efforts to close the Guantánamo  prison, making it unlikely that  President Obama will fulfill his promise to close it before his term ends in 2013.  </p>
<p>~snip~<br />
“The president can’t just wave a magic wand to say that Gitmo will be closed,” said a senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal thinking on a sensitive issue. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/us/politics/26gitmo.html?bl">The New York Times</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Obama can&#8217;t wave a magic wand and make things happen but he sure acted like it when, with much fanfare, he signed the Executive Order to close it within one year of him taking office.  That pen was his magic wand and he waved as if his deeming it so would make it happen.</p>
<p>This is what you get when you put someone with no leadership experience in charge.</p>
<p><strong>Joe Biden Admits they can&#8217;t recover the jobs.</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Vice President Joe Biden gave a stark assessment of the economy today, telling an audience of supporters, &#8220;there&#8217;s no possibility to restore 8 million jobs lost in the Great Recession.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20008924-503544.html">CBS News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Biden goes on to do what has become the main theme of this regime, blame it all on Bush.  That excuse is getting old.  Hey Joe, the mess belongs to you and you and Obama got it because you convinced America you could fix things.</p>
<p>Now you admit that you can&#8217;t.</p>
<p><strong>Is ACORN running the Census?</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Two Census Bureau managers from a Brooklyn  field office were fired after their bosses found they faked household surveys to meet deadlines, the Daily News learned.</p>
<p>Instead of pounding the pavement and knocking on doors, the corner-cutting people-counters mined the phone book and Internet to make up answers to questionnaires, regional director Tony Farthing said.  <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/06/26/2010-06-26_2_census_bigs_axed_for_fakin_it.html">NY Daily News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>This census has been poorly run and has cost billions more than any previous census.  Perhaps that is because the Obama regime is using numbers of census employees to artificially lower the unemployment rate.  These people are counted as new jobs but will be gone in a few months.</p>
<p>The folks who did this should be prosecuted for falsifying a government record.  This is what happens when a corrupt regime runs things.</p>
<p><strong>Biden calls store manager a Smart ass.  Custard&#8217;s last stand:</strong></p>
<p>Joe Biden, VP of the Obama regime, was out getting a frozen custard (he thought he was getting ice cream) and when he asked how much he owed the manager said not to worry about it, &#8220;It&#8217;s on us.&#8221;  Then the manager told Biden to lower our taxes and we will call it even.  Biden told the man to say something nice instead of being a smart ass.  I thought the request for lower taxes was saying something nice.</p>
<p>This is the disdain the regime has for the average guy on the street.  If you think you are paying too much in taxes and express that thought you are being a smart ass.  This is because the regime, with people like Biden who have NO business experience, think they know better than you.  Shut up you serfs and quit being smart asses.  We know what is best for you.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/06/26/biden_calls_manager_who_told_him_to_lower_taxes_a_smartass.html">Video at Real Clear Politics</a></p>
<p><strong>Extending an open hand to Iran:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>CIA Director Leon Panetta says Iran probably has enough low-enriched uranium for two nuclear weapons, but that it likely would take two years to build the bombs.</p>
<p>Panetta also says he is doubtful that recent U.N. penalties will put an end to Iran&#8217;s nuclear ambitions.  <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100627/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_us_iran">Yahoo News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It would seem as if the Obama doctrine of bowing to all the world leaders and extending an open hand to the bad people of the world has not paid off.</p>
<p>The Iranian leadership knows Obama is weak and they are pushing the limits.  They have enough nuclear material for two bombs and will have those bombs in the near future (and probably sooner than the estimated two years).</p>
<p>How is that world experience working out for ya?</p>
<p>Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton9964" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fanother-news-round-up%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Another%20News%20Round%20Up&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/another-news-round-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flotilla Might Be Blessing For Israel&#8217;s Iranian Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/flotilla-might-be-blessing-for-israels-iranian-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/flotilla-might-be-blessing-for-israels-iranian-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flotilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=9839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/flotilla-might-be-blessing-for-israels-iranian-dispute/.The Iranians have been threatening to wipe Israel off the map for a number of years now and Israel has had to listen to the trash talk with little or no support from the international &#8220;community.&#8221; Iran has been working its way toward nuclear weapons [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/flotilla-might-be-blessing-for-israels-iranian-dispute/">http://www.onebigdog.net/flotilla-might-be-blessing-for-israels-iranian-dispute/</a>.<br /><p>The Iranians have been threatening to wipe Israel off the map for a number of years now and Israel has had to listen to the trash talk with little or no support from the international &#8220;community.&#8221;  Iran has been working its way toward nuclear weapons as the world pretends to care and pretends to be working to stop them.</p>
<p>There was once word that Israel would attack Iran before allowing it to produce nuclear weapons but any discussion of that is poo pooed by the US government.  No matter what happens and no matter what is said, Israel turns out to be the one blamed in any conflict.</p>
<p>An unrelated situation might give Israel the chance to knock off Iran without having to be the ones to start the conflict.  The so called peaceful humanitarians have been attempting to run Israeli blockades and have been turned away.  A recent attempt ended in bloodshed and death as the &#8220;peaceful&#8221; people attacked Israeli soldiers and were justly sent to meet their makers.  The group has vowed to keep sending ships until it is able to break the blockade.  A recent ship was boarded and taken to an Israeli port for inspection.  The people on that ship learned from the deaths of the others and did not attack the Israeli soldiers.</p>
<p>This particular situation might be what pits Israel against Iran.  The Iranians have stated that they would send their Navy to escort the humanitarian aid vessels.  </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Iran&#8217;s Revolutionary Guard naval forces are prepared to escort the peace and freedom convoys that carry humanitarian assistance for the defenceless and oppressed people of Gaza with all their strength,&#8221; pledged Hojjatoleslam Ali Shirazi, Khamenei&#8217;s personal representative to the guards corps.  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/06/gaza-blockade-iran-aid-convoy">Guardian UK</a></p></blockquote>
<p>If the Iranians escort those vessels and refuse to stop then the Israeli Navy will be pitted against the Iranian Navy and the Iranians will not stand a chance in that particular engagement.  The Iranians are only offering to help in order to provoke the Israelis but the ploy might benefit the Jewish state.</p>
<p>Once the Israelis get rid of the Iranian Naval vessels escorting the flotilla the encounter will be more than enough reason for the Israelis to attack Iran and keep on attacking until that place is unable to mount any future offensive operations.  It might even be sufficient enough to end the Iranian&#8217;s nuclear ambitions.</p>
<p>This potential situation can only be a good thing for Israel.  It will have reason to take care of Iran and will not have started the conflict.</p>
<p>All because the people who refuse to do things the proper way insist on breaking the blockade.</p>
<p>See, some good can come from this whole mess.</p>
<p>Maybe the Iranian plan is what <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100606/D9G622MG0.html">Hillary was talking about</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton9839" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fflotilla-might-be-blessing-for-israels-iranian-dispute%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Flotilla%20Might%20Be%20Blessing%20For%20Israel%26%238217%3Bs%20Iranian%20Dispute&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/flotilla-might-be-blessing-for-israels-iranian-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Other Nuclear Talks</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-other-nuclear-talks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-other-nuclear-talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=9567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/the-other-nuclear-talks/.Barack Obama is in DC with the heads of other countries to discuss the need to reduce the nuclear arsenals that countries have and to make it harder for terrorist groups to obtain nuclear material. It has been reported that great progress has been made. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/the-other-nuclear-talks/">http://www.onebigdog.net/the-other-nuclear-talks/</a>.<br /><p>Barack Obama is in DC with the heads of other countries to discuss the need to reduce the nuclear arsenals that countries have and to make it harder for terrorist groups to obtain nuclear material.  It has been reported that great progress has been made.</p>
<p>The progress in Iran, that is.</p>
<p>In what seems to be a recurring theme, Russia made an announcement that looks like it was timed to embarrass Obama.  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1413223820100414">The nuclear reactor that Russia is building in Iran</a> will be up and running by August.  Not to worry though, we have been assured that the reactor is for peaceful purposes and we have no doubt that is the truth because the peaceful, sane, leader of Iran has told us so.  If he were some kind of Holocaust denier who wanted Israel wiped off the map then we might have something to worry about.</p>
<p>Interestingly, there seems to be a great deal of concern that Iran might have other ideas on how to use the reactor and could &#8212; Wait for it&#8211;use it to produce nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>And to top it off, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/world/middleeast/15israel.html">Syria has delivered long range missiles to Hezbollah</a>.  Hmm, long range missiles and nuclear material, I wonder what could happen if some nut put those two together&#8230;</p>
<p>Good thing the rational leader of Iran and the anti terrorist group Hezbollah are the ones in possession or things might get bad for places like Israel.</p>
<p>It is also fortunate that Obama had all these leaders here to tell them America would be reducing its number of nukes and got these folks to sign on that they would make it harder for terrorists to get their hands on nuclear material.  Otherwise a country like Russia might build a nuclear reactor in a country that sponsors terrorism.</p>
<p>Thank God Obama is on the case.</p>
<p>Kind of makes me wonder though, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-04-13-nuke-plans_N.htm">why there was discussion about what Americans should expect</a> in the event a nuke detonated here.  As an aside, the 72 hours discussed here is standard for a federal response (like it was in Katrina, which was met).  However, I am willing to bet (and I hope I never have to find out) that it will be much longer than 24-72 hours if a nuke detonates here.</p>
<p>But we have nothing to worry about.  The Russians have told us that they will work hard to keep terrorists from getting nuclear material and I am sure they will get right on that right after they get paid for building terrorists a reactor to make their own nuclear material.</p>
<p>Looks like Israel will be making a surprise visit to Iran sometime around September.</p>
<p>Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton9567" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fthe-other-nuclear-talks%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=The%20Other%20Nuclear%20Talks&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-other-nuclear-talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Gearing Up For Trouble With Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/us-gearing-up-for-trouble-with-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/us-gearing-up-for-trouble-with-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/us-gearing-up-for-trouble-with-iran/.The United States under Barack Obama is beginning to take the threat from Iran seriously. The administration is sending missile defense systems to four countries and placing two ships capable of shooting Iranian missiles down, in the area. After trying the diplomacy route the adminsitration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/us-gearing-up-for-trouble-with-iran/">http://www.onebigdog.net/us-gearing-up-for-trouble-with-iran/</a>.<br /><p>The United States under Barack Obama is beginning to take the threat from Iran seriously.  The administration is sending missile defense systems to four countries and placing two ships capable of shooting Iranian missiles down, in the area.  After trying the diplomacy route the adminsitration must have realized that it will not work.</p>
<blockquote><p>The US is dispatching Patriot defensive missiles to four countries – Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Kuwait – and keeping two ships in the Gulf capable of shooting down Iranian missiles. Washington is also helping Saudi Arabia develop a force to protect its oil installations.</p>
<p>~snip~</p>
<p>The deployment comes after Obama&#8217;s attempts to emphasise diplomacy over confrontation in dealing with Iran – a contrast to the Bush administration&#8217;s approach – have failed to persuade Tehran to open its nuclear installations to international controls. The White House is now trying to engineer agreement for sanctions focused on Iran&#8217;s Revolutionary Guard, believed to be in charge of the atomic programme. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/31/iran-nuclear-us-missiles-gulf">Guardian UK</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It is interesting that the Guardian points out that Obama&#8217;s approach has been different than Mr. Bush&#8217;s because Obama tried diplomacy first.  I think the Bush administration tried diplomacy but not very much of it because George Bush understood the threat and knew that Iran would not respond.</p>
<p>Now, 12 months into his term, Obama has realized the same thing.  Obama has ended where Bush was after a 12 month delay that involved an unsuccessful attempt at diplomacy.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, if Obama thought this was best then that was his call to make but now that it has failed we can all see that Bush was pretty much on target.  Iran is not interested in diplomacy.</p>
<p>Wow, one year in and Obama is gearing up for a conflict with Iran.  He promised to get us out of war but might be getting into another.</p>
<p>I have no problem with the US protecting people in that region, especially our friends in Israel (though this country is not mentioned and is probably the last thing on Obama&#8217;s mind) but I have never been one of the Code Pinko anti war types that supported Obama.</p>
<p>They must be taking gas over this.</p>
<p>If Iran launches a missile we should shoot it down and then send about ten thousand Tomahawks into the country divided among their nuclear facilities.</p>
<p>That would send a message&#8230;</p>
<p>I hope Iran shoots first.  Obama can&#8217;t really be a preemptive war kind of guy and still curry favor with the dope smoking peaceniks on the left&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8948" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fus-gearing-up-for-trouble-with-iran%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=US%20Gearing%20Up%20For%20Trouble%20With%20Iran&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/us-gearing-up-for-trouble-with-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Refuses Entry To John Kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-refuses-entry-to-john-kerry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-refuses-entry-to-john-kerry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-refuses-entry-to-john-kerry/. Iran has decided that it does not want John Kerry (he served in Vietnam you know) visiting. Kerry had been pushing this idea that he could go over and talk to the Iranians and let them know what swell folks the Obama clan are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-refuses-entry-to-john-kerry/">http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-refuses-entry-to-john-kerry/</a>.<br /><div class="lpic"><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/comradkerry.png" alt="Comrad Kerry" /></div>
<p>Iran has decided that it does not want John Kerry (he served in Vietnam you know) visiting.  Kerry had been pushing this idea that he could go over and talk to the Iranians and let them know what swell folks the Obama clan are and how they all want peace in our days.  Kerry wanted to just show up and ask them to stop building nuclear weapons and maybe, just maybe there would be a prize in that Cracker Jack box.</p>
<p>Iran said thanks but no thanks.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Members of the Iranian parliament’s Foreign Relations Committee (a subcommittee of the parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission) voiced opposition to the request after studying the issue,” Hassan Ebrahimi, head of the committee, told the semi-official <a href="http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8810131533">Fars News Agency</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Seems they don&#8217;t want him either.  That is too bad because I was hoping he would go over there and they would keep him.</p>
<p>Big Dog Salute to <a href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/01/john-kerry-denied-entry-into-iran/">Gateway Pundit</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8710" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Firan-refuses-entry-to-john-kerry%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Iran%20Refuses%20Entry%20To%20John%20Kerry&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-refuses-entry-to-john-kerry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Get Mr. Joe Wilson Plame On The Case</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/better-get-mr-joe-wilson-plame-on-the-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/better-get-mr-joe-wilson-plame-on-the-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valerie plame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/better-get-mr-joe-wilson-plame-on-the-case/.Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame&#8217;s husband, is the guy who was sent on a mission by Mrs. Plame, a so called covert CIA agent (I am still having trouble reconciling how she was supposed to be covert but you could call the CIA and ask for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/better-get-mr-joe-wilson-plame-on-the-case/">http://www.onebigdog.net/better-get-mr-joe-wilson-plame-on-the-case/</a>.<br /><p>Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame&#8217;s husband, is the guy who was sent on a mission by Mrs. Plame, a so called covert CIA agent (I am still having trouble reconciling how she was supposed to be covert but you could call the CIA and ask for her and they would put you through), to see if Iraq was trying to obtain yellow cake uranium.</p>
<p>He came back and lied about a few things.  He claimed that Hussein (the one in Iraq not the one in the White House) had not tried to purchase uranium though at the time he made the allegation there was reason to believe that he had.  <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/bushs_16_words_on_iraq_uranium.html">According to Fact Check</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ironically, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who later called Bush’s 16 words a “lie”, supplied information that the Central Intelligence Agency took as confirmation that Iraq may indeed have been seeking uranium from Niger.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wilson also claimed that VP Dick Cheney had sent him on the mission but he was sent by his wife, not the VP.  But this post is not about Joe Wilson and Iraq.  It is about Joe Wilson and Iran.</p>
<p>We need Joe Wilson to quickly go to Kazakhstan and determine if Iran has been trying to purchase Uranium.  Then we need him to hurry back and write a report and we need it to be done quickly.  Obama&#8217;s tired butt will be back from Hawaii soon and he will deliver the State of the Union Address next month.  We need to make sure he does not insert 16 words that will lead us to war with Iran.</p>
<p>This is all necessary because:</p>
<blockquote><p>Iran is close to clinching a deal to clandestinely import 1,350 tons of purified uranium ore from Kazakhstan, according to an intelligence report obtained by The Associated Press on Tuesday. Diplomats said the assessment was heightening international concern about Tehran&#8217;s nuclear activities.</p>
<p>Such a deal would be significant because Tehran appears to be running out of the material, which it needs to feed its uranium enrichment program.</p>
<p>The report was drawn up by a member nation of the International Atomic Energy agency and provided to the AP on condition of that the country not be identified because of the confidential nature of the information. <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091229/D9CT7GEO1.html">My Way News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>This is all looking eerily familiar.  With the claim that a nation that some of us think is an enemy trying to sneak in uranium, with reports from unnamed sources, with heightened tensions, it all looks just like the lead up to the invasion of Iraq.</p>
<p>There is a bit of a difference.  Iraq was in violation of UN Resolutions from the first Gulf War and our Congress gave authorization to use military force there.  Iran has been an enemy for decades and we should have handled it before but it is unlikely that a Democratic controlled Congress would vote to authorize military force there at this point in time (and frankly we do not need another war).</p>
<p>So, we need Mr. Valerie Plame to quickly write up a report saying that none of this is true so we can avoid a fight that liberals have no will to start or complete.</p>
<p>Of course, we could just let the Israelis handle it and be done with it.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how Obama and his liberals handle this.  We were told that Hussein was no threat to us and we had no right to go in there (a subject for another debate) so how will we be sold Iran?  Will we be told that the uranium means nothing and that they cannot harm us (Obama said they were a little nation and not a threat) or will we be pitched a great story of how dangerous they are?</p>
<p>It will be interesting because it was the Dems who ignored the reports about Iran and then gleefully said I told you so when an incorrect (false?) report indicated Iran had no nuclear program.  They had one and it was hidden.  By the time we were informed about it they were well ahead of where we thought they would be.  They also suddenly had a few more enrichment facilities.  Perhaps if Democrats had not ignored what they were told.  Well, you never could trust that George Bush to keep you safe.</p>
<p>In any event this will be a tough one for the Democrats.  They already demonstrated their weakness on national security this week (maybe White House security was put in charge of the airports) and if they ignore Iran they will look even weaker.  If they take action it will be in direct conflict with how they felt and what they said about Iraq.</p>
<p>Maybe they will just let Obama decide the matter.  The way he deliberates and as long as it takes him to arrive at a decision, Iran should have enough nuclear weapons to cause the end of the world.</p>
<p>Like I said, let&#8217;s just &#8220;mind&#8221; our own business and let Israel settle the issue.  At least we know the job will be done right.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8657" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fbetter-get-mr-joe-wilson-plame-on-the-case%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Better%20Get%20Mr.%20Joe%20Wilson%20Plame%20On%20The%20Case&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/better-get-mr-joe-wilson-plame-on-the-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Impotence Of Words</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeasement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/.There will be a war- just how big, or how severe, is still to be determined, but all the key players are lining up, all while our Resident thinks the sound of his mellifluous voice will sooth the savage nuclear holocaust. He is a legend in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/">http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/</a>.<br /><p>There will be a war- just how big, or how severe, is still to be determined, but all the key players are lining up, all while our Resident thinks the sound of his mellifluous voice will sooth the savage nuclear holocaust. He is a legend in his own mind- unfortunately, he impresses no one else, especially the ones he has needed to impress. It is to the point now where even internet pundits and newspapers are opining about the impotence of our Resident.</p>
<blockquote><p>Will all the pundits who relied on the discredited 2007 NIE on Iran now admit that they were wrong? That they bought into and kept citing, without any serious questioning, the now clearly politically skewed analysis in the so-called National Intelligence Estimate of that year? You remember: the considered consensus wisdom of the entire U.S. intelligence community, which misled the world into believing there was nothing to worry about Iran’s nuclear program, that it had virtually ceased. When, in fact, out of the three components of a nuclear weapons program, at most one <em>might</em> have been suspended, if that.</p>
<p>Will the congressional intelligence committees demand to know how such a deliberately misleading report was being leaked and fed to the public by half-baked pundits even <em>after</em> (we now learn) some part of the “intelligence community” knew — before the the NIE was issued — about the secret nuclear fuel facility we’re now reading about?</p>
<p>What took them so long? Or if there were reasons to keep silent about it, why issue a report that deliberately misled the world into the opposite conclusion? The NIE now appears to be a deliberate LIE — deliberate disinformation, disingenuously written by its authors, who should be hauled before the committees and asked how they could have made such fools of the “intelligence community” and those who took their report seriously.</p>
<p>pajamasmedia.com</p></blockquote>
<p>First, the lie- the report, as Ron correctly says, gave the Iranians about two years free rein on constructing the essential components necessary to make a bomb. This report also puts Israel in a corner- and if our Resident thinks he can control, or even should control Israel, he is vastly wrong, but perhaps he has wanted this all along- certainly he has almost willfully made every diplomatic miscue he possibly could.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Obama administration&#8217;s positive tone following its first diplomatic encounter with Iran covers a deep and growing gloom in Washington and European capitals. Seven hours of palaver in Geneva haven&#8217;t altered an emerging conclusion: None of the steps the West is considering to stop the Iranian nuclear program is likely to work.</p>
<p>Not talks. Not sanctions, even of the &#8220;crippling&#8221; variety the Obama administration has spoken of. Not military strikes. And probably not support for regime change through the still-vibrant opposition.</p>
<p>For obvious reasons, senior officials won&#8217;t state this broad conclusion out loud. But it&#8217;s not hard to find pessimistic public statements about three of the four options. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called the prospects for diplomacy &#8220;very doubtful.&#8221; Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has said military action will do no more than &#8220;buy time.&#8221; Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, echoing private statements I&#8217;ve heard from the Obama administration, told me last week that a strategy of backing the Iranian opposition &#8220;would take too long&#8221; and might well produce a government with the same nuclear policy.</p>
<p>washingtonpost.com</p></blockquote>
<p>It is rapidly becoming obvious to almost everyone except, apparently the Resident, that the time for action is rapidly approaching- and what form it takes, or who is who&#8217;s allies, well, that part is truly murky, and the most dangerous aspect of the whole scenario, because of America&#8217;s &#8220;diminishment&#8221; on the world stage, due in large part to the Resident&#8217;s Perpetual Apology Tour, and the rise of Russia, China, and India as emerging powers. Especially Russia.</p>
<blockquote><p>American officials said concern about Russian experts acting without official approval, had been raised by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in a report more than a year ago.</p>
<p>“There has been Russian help. It is not the government, it is individuals, at least one helping Iran on weaponisation activities and it is worrisome,” said David Albright, a former weapons inspector who is president of the Institute for Science and International Security.</p>
<p>However, Israeli officials insist that any Russian scientists working in Iran could do so only with official approval.</p>
<p>Robert Einhorn, the special adviser for non-proliferation and arms control to Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, is understood to believe that Russian companies have also supplied material that has been used by Iran in the production of ballistic missiles.</p>
<p>The disclosures came as Iran agreed at talks in Geneva to submit to IAEA inspections of its newly disclosed enrichment plant, which is being built under a mountain on a military base at Qom. Iran revealed the plant to the IAEA to pre-empt being caught out by an imminent announcement from western governments, which had discovered its existence.</p>
<p>The West says the plant is tailor-made for a secret weapons programme and proves Iran’s claim that its nuclear programme is intended only for peaceful purposes is a lie. The plant is designed to hold 3,000 centrifuges — enough to produce the material needed for one bomb a year.</p>
<p>Iran’s conduct over the next few weeks will determine whether the West continues its new dialogue or is compelled to increase pressure with tougher United Nations and other sanctions.</p>
<p>timesonline.co.uk</p></blockquote>
<p>Sanctions? I think the time for that may be well past. Just as you can really only help those who are willing to help themselves, you can only punish those who fear the punishment- nothing else works, and I am afraid the Resident doesn&#8217;t know that, and there is no one telling him this reality. Just as he knows nothing about the military, and thus is disengaged about Afghanistan, he thinks, even after his ignominious defeats at all of his meetings, including the Olympics plea, tha the power of his personality will still win the day.</p>
<p>I have bad news for him- his ego is not a weapon- nor is it particularly impressive, as you actually have to be able to back it up on the world stage, and so far, he has bupkus. The rest of the world laughs at him, and apparently it is obvious to everyone but him.</p>
<p>I wish he could do something about this situation, I truly do- the alternative will be very deadly to the whole world, but I am afraid he is not up to the task, as I have thought all along.</p>
<p>Our Resident likes to quote Lincoln, but the President he should look to now might be Teddy Roosevelt-</p>
<p>&#8220;Talk softly- but carry a big stick.&#8221;<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8079" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fthe-impotence-of-words%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=The%20Impotence%20Of%20Words&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-impotence-of-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Drops Nuclear Bombshell</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-drops-nuclear-bombshell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-drops-nuclear-bombshell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahmadinejad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret nuclear facility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-drops-nuclear-bombshell/.Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has disclosed that his country has a second nuclear enrichment facility that was built underground and could be enriching Uranium by next year. This is a bombshell disclosure and was made ONLY because the secrecy of the program had been breached [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-drops-nuclear-bombshell/">http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-drops-nuclear-bombshell/</a>.<br /><p>Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has disclosed that his country has a second nuclear enrichment facility that was built underground and could be enriching Uranium by next year.  This is a bombshell disclosure and was made ONLY because the secrecy of the program had been breached by Western Intelligence Agencies.  Ahmadinejad found that his cover was busted so he is disclosed the information (which contradicts his country&#8217;s earlier claims that it had no undisclosed programs).</p>
<blockquote><p>Iran revealed the existence of a covert uranium enrichment facility to the U.N. nuclear watchdog this week after it discovered the project&#8217;s secrecy had been breached by Western intelligence agencies, FOX News has learned. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555303,00.html">Fox News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Barack Obama will have a press conference today to announce this stunning information and will say that the West has been tracking it for years.  This is a cover your tail event because, despite Obama&#8217;s claims, we were caught by surprise.</p>
<blockquote><p>President Obama will call attention to the existence of the underground facility in an early-morning statement to reporters here before the opening of the G-20 economic summit in Pittsburgh, and will say that Western intelligence agencies have been tracking the facility for years. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/25/AR2009092500289.html">WaPo</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it is correct to say Obama will call attention to it.  Ahmadinejad already did that.  Obama is going to speak so it looks like this was no surprise.  He can&#8217;t let it look like he is in over his head.</p>
<p>The left has been enabling Iran for years with regard to its nuclear program.  As George Bush was making his case a now discredited report was released that stated Iran had no nuclear program and had abandoned its ambitions.  The left went nuts and drank that up like it was fresh Obama Kool Aid.  They believed that it showed Bush was itching for a reason to attack Iran and that he was trumping up reasons like he did (in their minds) to invade Iraq.</p>
<p>On the campaign trail, then candidate Obama, said that Iran was a small country and not of real concern.  He did not perceive them as much of a threat and dismissed their impact on the world.  He back peddled on that statement when his rivals pointed out his naivete.</p>
<p>So which is it Mr. Obama?  Are they not a threat with no nuclear program of which to speak (as the report claimed) or have we been tracking them for years?  If we have been tracking them for years how could a report come out claiming they had abandoned their program?  Both cannot be true.</p>
<p>Iran is a dangerous country because it is headed by a fanatical psychopath who is hell bent on wiping Israel off the map and ushering in the appearance of the twelfth Imam.</p>
<p>It is dangerous because the Democratically controlled Congress has dismissed warnings for several years and it is more dangerous because while Obama was out apologizing for America and working on one world governance the leaders of that country kept working in secret to build its nuclear program.</p>
<p>The fact that Obama keeps opposing Israel, a nation that has no problem taking out its enemies, is another impediment to stopping Iran and does nothing more than enable Ahmadinejad and his henchmen.</p>
<p>How is that Hope and Change working out for you?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton7987" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Firan-drops-nuclear-bombshell%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Iran%20Drops%20Nuclear%20Bombshell&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-drops-nuclear-bombshell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Provides a Good Lesson</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-provides-a-good-lesson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-provides-a-good-lesson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-provides-a-good-lesson/.&#8221; When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another&#8230;.&#8221; This is the beginning of our Declaration of Independence, one of the seminal documents of the past three centuries regarding government and its powers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-provides-a-good-lesson/">http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-provides-a-good-lesson/</a>.<br /><p>&#8221; When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
This is the beginning of our Declaration of Independence, one of the seminal documents of the past three centuries regarding government and its powers and limitations over the people government presides over. The other major document, The Constitution, delineates the powers and the limits of those powers the government may impose.</p>
<p>One of the rights the Constitution provides is Freedom of Speech- a &#8220;right&#8221; the Iranians are really trying to exercise, through networking, the Facebook and MySpace sites, twitter, and text messaging. Because the Iranian government is a totalitarian regime, and seeks to control their people, they have been busy censoring these various messaging mediums as soon as they can.</p>
<p>Luckily for the Iranians, this is tantamount to plugging holes in a dyke with a finger- it won&#8217;t hold for long before another hole springs up.</p>
<p>These people are truly brave- here in our country, if you protest, you might be called a bad name- there, you might be shot, or worse. What&#8217;s worse than being shot? Would you really want to know first hand? I doubt it- I know that I would not, but these people risk worse than being shot just by protesting their governments stolen election.</p>
<blockquote><p>Shortly after Neda Agha-Soltan bled her life out on the Tehran pavement, the man whose <a title="The video" href="http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?&amp;next_url=/watch%3Fv%3DOjQxq5N--Kc">40-second video of her death</a> has ricocheted around the world made a somber calculation in what has become the cat-and-mouse game of evading <a title="More news and information about Iran." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/iran/index.html?inline=nyt-geo">Iran</a>’s censors. He knew that the government had been blocking Web sites like YouTube and<a title="More articles about Facebook." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/facebook_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Facebook</a>. Trying to send the video there could have exposed him and his family.</p>
<p>Instead, he e-mailed the two-megabyte video to a nearby friend, who quickly forwarded it to the <a title="V.O.A. Web site" href="http://www.voanews.com/english/index.cfm">Voice of America</a>, the newspaper <a title="The Guardian’s Web site" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">The Guardian</a> in London and five online friends in Europe, with a message that read, “Please let the world know.” It was one of those friends, an Iranian expatriate in the Netherlands, who posted it on Facebook, weeping as he did so, he recalled.</p>
<p>nytimes.com</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep, these Iranian thugs of the government would have gone after not only the people texting and taking videos, but also their families. What a free and fair government they are. This is stifling free speech on a grand scale, over the little matter of a stolen election. Jimmy Carter would have said it was a fair and free election, but Iran is one country where he has not the fortitude to travel to, even if they would let him.</p>
<p>What is truly disheartening, is the fact that despite all of Hussein&#8217;s high and  mighty rhetoric on freedoms that he espoused in Cairo, there has not been a statement coming from the White House that could be said to even remotely have a spine to it.</p>
<p>I understand that Hussein has a calculating mind, but it seems that he wants the current regime to stay in power, thus the limp- wristed commentary he has issued. Perhaps he has more in common with the current dictators than first appears to meet the eye. I hope not, but there could be at least a statement of solidarity with all who seek freedom- but nooooooo.</p>
<p>At least the Internet, and all its permutations, make free speech more possible, and not less so, and this is a good thing- now, if only the President might use his personal bully pulpit, employ his freedom of speech, and at least get his butt off of the fence long enough to say something substantial about a peoples struggle for freedom.</p>
<p>Perhaps he could use his powers to Twitter.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton7007" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Firan-provides-a-good-lesson%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Iran%20Provides%20a%20Good%20Lesson&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/iran-provides-a-good-lesson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Nuclear Power For The US But OK for Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/no-nuclear-power-for-the-us-but-ok-for-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/no-nuclear-power-for-the-us-but-ok-for-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/no-nuclear-power-for-the-us-but-ok-for-iran/.Warner Todd Huston has an excellent post up at Stop the ACLU in which he discusses Obama&#8217;s statements that it is OK for Iran to have nuclear energy in order to power its country. This is the same Bozo who opposes nuclear power to provide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/no-nuclear-power-for-the-us-but-ok-for-iran/">http://www.onebigdog.net/no-nuclear-power-for-the-us-but-ok-for-iran/</a>.<br /><p><a href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/06/02/obama-nuclear-power-ok-for-enemies-but-not-for-us/">Warner Todd Huston</a> has an excellent post up at Stop the ACLU in which he discusses Obama&#8217;s statements that it is OK for Iran to have nuclear energy in order to power its country.  This is the same Bozo who opposes nuclear power to provide energy in this country.  B. Hussein Obama would rather waste money pursuing unproven green technology than use nuclear energy here.  With the Iranians, who will develop nuclear weapons in their &#8220;peaceful&#8221; program, it is OK.</p>
<blockquote><p>In Prague last month, Obama said that he saw no reason why his administration wouldn’t “support Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections.” And today in London, Obama reiterated that support by agreeing that Iran’s announced intentions for nuclear power were “legitimate aspirations.”</p>
<p>Not only that, but just last month Obama approved a nuclear power deal with the United Arab Emirates, as well. So, it’s nuclear power for everyone but the U.S.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an excellent point.  Why is it OK for other countries to have nuclear power plants but not OK for us?  Why is Obama keeping his own country from having nuclear energy?</p>
<p>Another interesting story at <a href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/06/02/obamas-islamic-roots/">Stop the ACLU</a> deals with Obama&#8217;s Muslim roots.  The post points out that it was taboo to mention Islam and Obama together and the use of his middle name was forbidden with supporters calling those who did racists in the Pavlovian response to which we have become accustomed.</p>
<p>Now it would appear that Obama is comfortable with his Muslim roots and embraces them.  I guess he was not too comfortable with them when he thought they could lose him an election but now that he is in, it is all good.</p>
<p>That just means he was not honest with people (though many of us had the sense to see that).</p>
<p>So King Hussein of the US is now comfy with his Muslim roots.  Maybe that is why he is comfortable with Muslim countries having nuclear reactors.  They would not hurt a Muslim brother, would they?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip"><em>If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader.  If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</em></div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton6769" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fno-nuclear-power-for-the-us-but-ok-for-iran%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=No%20Nuclear%20Power%20For%20The%20US%20But%20OK%20for%20Iran&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/no-nuclear-power-for-the-us-but-ok-for-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

