Oct 30, 2012 Political
One would think that after Obama killed Osama (and you know he did because he keeps telling us he did) he (OBL) might not be so eager to help out Barry. It appears though as if OBL is a big Obama supporter so much so that he has donated at least $20 to the campaign. How could that be? After all, it is illegal for foreigners to donate to our political campaigns. Not to mention that OBL is dead. And let’s make no mistake, the Navy Seals killed him.
During the 2008 election Pam Geller of Atlas Shrugs wrote lengthy and detailed posts about the illegal donations that were flowing into the Obama campaign. She documented the lack of security at the donation website and the huge numbers of illegal donations coming from overseas and not from Americans living overseas.
This was not looked into and one would think that in the past four years the Federal Election Commission could investigate but that never happened. Perhaps they are turning a blind eye. No matter what the reason, this should have been investigated.
Of course, we know the Attorney General would not investigate. His job depends on Obama staying in office and this guy would not prosecute the Black Panther intimidation case (note to Panthers, not a good idea to try it again). Eric Holder is a racist who does not uphold the law. He does not abide by the oath he took.
In any event, the idea that Obama is playing fast and furious, I mean loose with the campaign laws is again in the news but not as much as it should be. The media are covering for him and trying to help him get reelected.
Several people who are not American citizens have made small donations to Obama just to prove that it could be done. They proved that Obama fails to employ the industry standard website credit card security that would prevent illegal donations from coming in. To make sure they were fair they tried the same thing at the Romney website. His site rejected the donations.
To leave no doubt in anyone’s mind, a person donated in the name of Osama bin Laden, The address information was bogus (but did have a US zip code) and the credit card used was a prepaid card. The $15 donation went through and Bin Laden was added to the mailing list. This person received nine more emails requesting donations. To make sure this was not a fluke he donated $5 more and that money was accepted.
There is no doubt that Barack Obama is taking illegal donations. The names of donors who give fewer than 250 dollars are not released and a number of his donations lack information like zip codes. This is the Chicago way and Obama is a Chicago thug politician. He does not think the rules should apply to him and he is not honorable so he breaks the law. His donation process is flawed allowing him to take money from non citizens thus allowing them to have some influence in our election process.
Mitt Romney’s campaign does not do this and neither did John McCain’s. The only person doing the illegal stuff is Barack Obama. Will anyone call him out on this?
Democrats scream about voter ID Laws and claim that these laws disenfranchise people. Nothing could be further from the truth. People need IDs to get welfare and if they do not have one they can go get one free of charge. If they can get to the polling place they can get to the MVA for an ID, period.
But Democrats oppose this and they oppose it for one reason. It makes it more difficult for them to cheat. The cheating starts at the top as Obama has demonstrated and it rolls downhill. A politician’s son, who worked in his campaign, was caught on tape telling someone how to vote more than once. In Ohio the Democrats are busing in Somalis and telling them how to vote. They don’t speak English (and might not even be allowed to vote) but they are being brought in and someone is voting for them in the name of Democrats on the ticket.
This is the kind of stuff that Democrats do and have done for a long time. Nixon beat Kennedy without the fraudulent votes and Coleman beat Franken without the fraudulent votes.
This runs rampant in the Democrat party and it starts with the top guy.
Barack Obama has deliberately set up his site so that he can receive money from illegal sources.
He is a felon and should be in jail. I will settle for throwing him out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue on 6 November. Then the Romney Administration can decide if he should be prosecuted.
Imagine what would happen if a Republican was caught doing this….
never surrender, never submit.
Oct 22, 2012 Political
What Makes You Think He Can Secure This Nation Or Its Assets?
Tonight there will be a debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney and the topic will be foreign policy. It remains to be seen if the moderator will be an impartial director or an Obama surrogate like Candy Crowley but in any event, Romney has a great opportunity to clean Obama’s clock.
Because Barack Obama has failed in the foreign policy arena and he has failed to provide security for this country. He runs around claiming he killed Osama bin Laden and that act has al-Qaeda on the run and in disarray. Then the attack in Libya happened and obliterated the al-Qaeda claim because it was that terror group that murdered our citizens. The subsequent cover-up has been a disaster and has demonstrated why Obama and his regime MUST go away.
Let’s look at reality. Obama was dragged off a golf course to watch our military get Bin Laden using polices from the Bush administration that Obama opposed. Obama claimed we don’t spike the football and then has mentioned the Bin Laden killing dozens of times during his reelection bid. After Libya the Obama regime claimed that some obscure movie caused the attack when, if we are to accept this spontaneous riot meme, the constant droning about Bin Laden probably caused the murders. In any event, the movie maker remains behind bars, his freedom taken because Obama is more interested in protecting his own job than protecting the First Amendment right of the movie maker.
It is obvious that Obama has failed in the security arena. The security of our nation and its assets is a BIG job and Obama is not up to the task. Let us look at a microcosm of Obama security; the security of his donation website.
The Obama donation website is not secure. It is set up so that anyone from any place using fraudulent information can donate. Foreigners have deliberately donated to his campaign using obviously phony information in order to show that anyone can donate. It is a violation of our law for campaigns to knowingly solicit or accept donations from foreign sources and yet, Obama routinely does this. In 2008 Pam Geller of Atlas Shrugs ran a number of detailed posts exposing illegal donations to Obama when he first ran for office. This was ignored by the MSM and those in charge of enforcing our laws.
As an aside, the same people who made illegal donations to Obama tried doing so to Mitt Romney and their donations were rejected because they failed to pass industry standard security measures that Romney uses and Obama does not.
Barack Obama does not require credit card users to supply the security code from the card. His site does not check the address registered to the card to the one provided and therefore his lax security allows him to receive illegal donations.
If Barack Obama cannot secure something as simple as his donation website how can anyone expect him to provide adequate security for the nation and its assets?
But Big Dog, it benefits Obama to have lax security on his website. Yes, and it was to his advantage to have lax security at our Libyan Embassy because he needed to show that his support for the change in government there resulted in a safer place.
He failed in that demonstration and four Americans were murdered. If Barack Obama takes credit for the death of Bin Laden then he MUST accept responsibility for the murder of four Americans.
Obama’s foreign policy incompetence resulted in the murder of four Americans in Libya. This was not the first foreign policy that resulted in the murder of Americans. Obama’s Fast and Furious resulted in the murder of Americans as well.
Obama is involved in a cover up of the failure of his regime to secure our people and our assets. He has engaged in lying and deception and has been aided by a compliant media (ala Candy Crowley) that is more interested in helping him get reelected than it is in reporting on the failures that led to the murders of our citizens and the subsequent cover up.
Let’s recap. Barack Obama ignored a number of requests of for added security in Libya. He ignored the requests even though every other nation closed shop in Libya. He ignored those requests even though the Red Cross packed up and left. He ignored those requests even though our Embassy had been attacked several times in the past year. He ignored the requests even though the anniversary of 9/11/01 was on the horizon.
He ignored those requests and people died.
In the last debate Obama said he was offended that people would call him and his regime into question regarding this issue. Really?
Let me say this Mr. Obama. Given that your incompetence led to the murder of four Americans and given that you have been involved in a cover up of what happened I hope you will understand that I don’t give a damn what offends you.
We cannot trust Obama to do something as simple as secure his donation website so why would we expect him to be able to handle the complex security required of our nation and its assets?
Remember in November.
Obama MUST go…
Never surrender, never submit.
Apr 4, 2012 Political
Barack Obama claimed his regime would be the most transparent in history. Why, we would be able to see through it all because he would hide nothing from us.
Then, of course, he set about hiding things. He is not transparent and he does the very things that he scolded George Bush for.
Hell, he even threw in the individual mandate after chiding Hillary Clinton about how it was wrong during the Democrat Primary in 2008.
But I might have to change my mind about Obama’s transparency. Barack Obama is so transparent that anyone can donate to his campaign.
Barack Obama’s donation page is not set up with the usual security that helps to prevent people from illegally donating money to his campaign. He did the same thing in 2008 and it is believed (and documented by some web sites such as Atlas Shrugs) that illegal donations flowed freely into his campaign.
The same thing is happening now.
As reported here, the campaign takes illegal donations and people are demonstrating how easy it is. How much more of a flag does one need than the name Illegal Contributor? How much more of a flag does one need than having an address as the State Penitentiary? If the website used the credit card verification code (like the Republican’s sites do) then this donation would have been flagged as potentially illegal. The code would not have matched the address.
But Obama does not want illegal donations stopped. If they do not flow into his campaign he will not be able to get huge sums of money from illegal donors both here and overseas.
Practically all of us know how the Democrat media would be playing this if a Republican were getting illegal donations and did not have security in place. The cries would be heard around the world.
Obama, who was an alleged Constitutional Law professor, excoriated the Supreme Court during one of his State of the Union Addresses. It involved their decision on campaign contributions and Obama was not happy with it.
Isn’t it amazing that the same Democrats who scream about unlimited donations have no problem with allowing unlimited illegal donations to flow into the Obama campaign?
Let me decipher. What Obama was saying when he railed against that decision was; hey, we don’t like the idea that you allowed everyone to receive as much money as we do. How dare you level the playing field?
The case Obama did not like was Citizens United.
In November the citizens are going to unite to send Mr. Transparency packing.
Never surrender, never submit.
Aug 4, 2008 Political
Barack Obama is a man who will say or do anything to win. He has changed many of his positions over the last few months in order to move toward the center. It is amazing that politicians always move to the center in order to win but never figure that they should stay there because that is what people voted for. It seems that the Change you can believe in happens to be his positions. Just this past week he changed to “in favor of” drilling. Well, it gets even better.
Obama is now saying that the delegates from Florida and Michigan should count. He was opposed to allowing those votes when Hillary Clinton would get most of them because he did not have his name on the ballot. Obama believed it would not be fair to allow Clinton to get the lion’s share of the delegates when her name was the only one on the ballot and he had a point. However, now that her name will not be up for nomination in Denver, he wants the delegates from those states to be able to have full voting rights. If his argument was that Hillary did not deserve them because his name was not on the ballot then why does he deserve them at this point in time? After all, his name was not on the ballot so he could not have earned any of them but now he is willing to accept all of them. They say it is for party unity but I bet this will further infuriate the Hillary supporters.
Barack Obama has made two statements that might not sit well with his base. He now supports drilling thus placing many of the obstructionist Democrats in a tight spot and he now favors allowing full votes for the Florida and Michigan delegates which will likely infuriate Hillary supporters. It would seem that the Messiah is having a bad week and now Rasmussen shows McCain with a slight lead.
And all this before the stuff hits the fan about the illegal foreign donations that Obama has been accepting. [Atlas Shrugs] Now you know why Obama put the hold on filling the empty FEC position.
This guy embodies Chicago politics. I HOPE this will be his undoing.