<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Dogs House &#187; hussein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/tag/hussein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale Of Two Obamas</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/a-tale-of-two-obamas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/a-tale-of-two-obamas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=11474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/a-tale-of-two-obamas/.What a difference actually being in charge makes. It was so much easier for Barry Obama when he could sit back and pass judgement on the decisions of others and wow the world with his wisdom by telling people he would have done something differently. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/a-tale-of-two-obamas/">http://www.onebigdog.net/a-tale-of-two-obamas/</a>.<br /><p>What a difference actually being in charge makes.  It was so much easier for Barry Obama when he could sit back and pass judgement on the decisions of others and wow the world with his wisdom by telling people he would have done something differently.  Remember when George Bush was in charge and Barry, a wet behind the ears state senator, was at a 2002 anti war rally:</p>
<blockquote><p>President Barack Obama, as an Illinois state senator in 2002, said that using military force to topple a murderous dictator amounted to a “dumb war” and should be opposed.</p>
<p>The “dumb war” Obama was criticizing was the planned invasion of Iraq and the murderous dictator was its leader, Saddam Hussein. Obama, speaking at an anti-war rally in Chicago on Oct. 2, 2002 said that while Saddam was a brutal tyrant, that was not enough to justify using military force to remove him from power.  <a href="http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-2002-toppling-brutal-dictator-dumb">CNS News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Yep, the fact that Hussein was a brutal dictator was not enough to remove him.  In the speech Obama admits Hussein had WMD, a claim that the left said Bush was lying about (which means that Obama is also a liar)</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;He has repeatedly defied U.N. resolutions, thwarted U.N. inspection teams, <strong>developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. </strong>He&#8217;s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.”  [emphasis mine]</p></blockquote>
<p>Now that Barry is the leader he can&#8217;t sit back and vote present.  He has sent our military to Libya to remove a brutal dictator, something he said was a &#8220;dumb war&#8221; in 2002.</p>
<p>His poll numbers are at their lowest ever and since a slip in the polls for the Tea Party is enough to compel liberals like Harry Reid to say America does not care about the Tea Party anymore I guess we can conclude that America does not care about Obama anymore.  The same standards must apply even in liberalville.</p>
<p>Obama has even <a href="http://ca.news.yahoo.com/u-support-order-defection-could-buoy-libya-rebels-20110330-230403-138.html">authorized covert operations in Libya</a>.  I guess when he decides to remove a dictator it is a noble thing in his mind.</p>
<p>I love when nose in the air elitist liberals have to eat their own words.</p>
<p>It is hard being a leader.  Life is easy when you can second guess those in charge and wait for opinion polls before deciding what course of action you would have taken.  This is not real leadership but allows the gifted politician to fool the morons among us.</p>
<p>Perhaps they should take back this guy&#8217;s Nobel Peace Prize.</p>
<p>If not they should award one to George W. Bush.</p>
<p>Cave Canem!<br />
Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton11474" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fa-tale-of-two-obamas%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=A%20Tale%20Of%20Two%20Obamas&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/a-tale-of-two-obamas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Not His Middle Name That Worries Them</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-his-middle-name-that-worries-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-his-middle-name-that-worries-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspicion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=10081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-his-middle-name-that-worries-them/.Barack Hussein Obama thinks that his middle name makes some of the Israelis suspicious of him. I believe that the Israelis are not so shallow as to allow the middle name of Hussein to cause suspicion. They are a thoughtful people and if they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-his-middle-name-that-worries-them/">http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-his-middle-name-that-worries-them/</a>.<br /><p>Barack Hussein Obama thinks that his middle name makes some of the Israelis suspicious of him.  I believe that the Israelis are not so shallow as to allow the middle name of Hussein to cause suspicion.  They are a thoughtful people and if they are suspicious of Obama it is because of his deeds and not his name.</p>
<blockquote><p>During the interview Wednesday, when confronted with the anxiety that some Israelis feel toward him, Obama said that &#8220;some of it may just be the fact that my middle name is Hussein, and that creates suspicion.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/obama-israelis-suspicious-of-me-because-my-middle-name-is-hussein-1.300793">Haaretz</a></p></blockquote>
<div class="rpic"><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/obamadance.gif" alt="Obama Dance" /></div>
<p>Obama has snubbed Israel and has appeared to take the side of the people who are out to wipe that country off the map.  His administration has given millions of dollars to the Palestinians and Obama has snubbed the Israeli Prime Minister.  Barack Obama treated the man like a common servant during a previous visit and has been less than receptive to Israel defending itself.</p>
<p>If the Israelis are suspicious of Obama it is because his actions warrant such suspicion and not because of his middle name.</p>
<p>Then again, maybe it is Bush&#8217;s fault&#8230;</p>
<p>Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton10081" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fits-not-his-middle-name-that-worries-them%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=It%26%238217%3Bs%20Not%20His%20Middle%20Name%20That%20Worries%20Them&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-his-middle-name-that-worries-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Biden On Iraq, Then And Now</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/joe-biden-on-iraq-then-and-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/joe-biden-on-iraq-then-and-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casualties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world war II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=9042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/joe-biden-on-iraq-then-and-now/.Politicians are a special group of people who can say one thing on one day and the exact opposite on another. Obama has done it and so have many others. The latest is from VP Joe (nobody messes with Joe) Biden. Biden has an entirely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/joe-biden-on-iraq-then-and-now/">http://www.onebigdog.net/joe-biden-on-iraq-then-and-now/</a>.<br /><p>Politicians are a special group of people who can say one thing on one day and the exact opposite on another.  Obama has done it and so have many others.  The latest is from VP Joe (nobody messes with Joe) Biden.  Biden has an entirely different take on Iraq now than he did in 2002:</p>
<p>Joe Biden in 2002: &#8220;We have no choice but to eliminate the threat. This is a guy [Saddam Hussein] who is an extreme danger to the world.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/02/14/flashback_biden_2002_on_saddam_we_have_to_eliminate_the_threat.html">Real Clear Politics</a> - Video]</p>
<p>We had no choice but to eliminate him.  Admittedly, we could have gone in and just eliminated him and that might have solved the issue.  Instead, after a lot of talk and diplomacy, we resumed the war with that country.  We eliminated the threat that Biden referred to in 2002.</p>
<p>But now Nobody Messes with Joe says that what we did was not worth the price we paid.</p>
<blockquote><p>Vice President Joe Biden says the Iraq war hasn&#8217;t been worth its &#8220;horrible price.&#8221; <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100214/D9DRV98G1.html">My Way News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>There is no doubt that the price of the war has been horrible.  Any time we lose members of our military it is horrible.  It is also too much to lose just one person but was the victory worth the cost?</p>
<p>We got rid of the guy Biden said had to go and remember, no one is smarter on foreign policy than Joe, just ask him.  We have a fairly stable country in Iraq that could grow to be a big ally and trade partner.  It is on the path to self governance and freedom.  The people who lived under the oppression of Hussein might see things differently than Biden.  And remember, Biden said we had &#8220;NO CHOICE&#8221; but to eliminate Hussein.  If we had no choice then cost is not a deciding factor.</p>
<p>It is one thing to lament at the price in blood and treasure but it is another to say the venture was not worth it.  We entered WWII and liberated Europe after we were attacked at Pearl Harbor.  We suffered nearly half as many US deaths in the D-Day invasion than in the entire Iraq War.  Total deaths in WWII are much higher than they will ever be in Iraq so was the effort worth it?</p>
<p>According to Biden it might not have been.</p>
<p>The last thing the public needs is for its leaders to say that the price we paid in blood and treasure was not worth the outcome.</p>
<p>But Biden did say that it could be one of the major accomplishments of the administration.</p>
<p>Obama picked him because he is an insurance policy.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton9042" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fjoe-biden-on-iraq-then-and-now%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Joe%20Biden%20On%20Iraq%2C%20Then%20And%20Now&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/joe-biden-on-iraq-then-and-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Is Why I Call Him Hussein</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/this-is-why-i-call-him-hussein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/this-is-why-i-call-him-hussein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramadan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/this-is-why-i-call-him-hussein/.Remember when the National Day of Prayer was, back in the spring? Do you remember how Hussein observed it? Do you? He ignored the day- unlike his predecessor, President Bush, Hussein just totally ignored a nation&#8217;s religious heritage, which is mainly Christian and Jewish, and went [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/this-is-why-i-call-him-hussein/">http://www.onebigdog.net/this-is-why-i-call-him-hussein/</a>.<br /><p>Remember when the National Day of Prayer was, back in the spring? Do you remember how Hussein observed it? Do you?</p>
<p><strong>He ignored the day-</strong> unlike his predecessor, President Bush, Hussein just totally ignored a nation&#8217;s religious heritage, which is mainly Christian and Jewish, and went on down the road, figuratively speaking. Okayyyyyyy&#8212;&#8212; not the smartest move, but then, unlike others, (mainly left- wing loons) I have never said that this guy was smart- indeed, I have said repeatedly that I thought he was dumber than a bag of hammers.</p>
<p>He proved it again the other day, at the start of Ramadan, when he &#8220;spoke&#8221; to the arab world to wish them well and extend &#8220;blessings&#8221;-</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s even translated into several languages.<br />
From the White House blog:<br />
President Obama extends his best wishes to Muslims around the world during Ramadan. (public domain) </p>
<p>Sous-titrage disponible en français.<br />
Имеются русские субтитры<br />
Özürlüler için altyazılı<br />
Teks tersedia dalam bahasa Indonesia<br />
Kapsyen tertutup terdapat di dalam Bahasa Melayu</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, do you remember how Obama <a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/05/figures-obama-skipping-prayer-day.html">observed</a> the National Day of Prayer?<br />
<strong>He distanced himself from it.</strong><br />
The Washington Times reported:</p>
<blockquote><p>President Obama is distancing himself from the National Day of Prayer by nixing a formal early morning service and not attending a large Catholic prayer breakfast the next morning. </p>
<p>All Mr. Obama will do for the National Day of Prayer, which is Thursday, is sign a proclamation honoring the day, which originated in 1952 when Congress set aside the first Thursday in May for the observance. </p>
<p>For the past eight years, President George W. Bush invited selected Christian and Jewish leaders to the White House East Room, where he typically would give a short speech and several leaders offered prayers&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe he was serious when he said America was a <a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/06/obama-us-one-of-largest-muslim.html">Muslim nation</a>?<br />
gatewaypundit.blogspot.com</p></blockquote>
<p>Yea, maybe so- why else do you <em>intentionally anger so many people </em>who you are allegedly the leader of, while obsequiously kissing the A$$es of people you have no control over? Or perhaps it is brain damage-let&#8217;s put him on a waiting list for about a year for an MRI to find out if he&#8217;s one prayer rug short of a mosque. He can take the government plan- after all, it is good enough for us.</p>
<p>Of course, if he is crazy, then maybe the government plan is a load of manure. Heck, why prevaricate- we all know its a load of manure anyway, driven by a man who is so full of himself that it is a wonder his head fits in any enclosed space.</p>
<p>What I find amusing is Air America&#8217;s take on Hussein- now they find that he will lie to the left too, and they have their panties in a wad over the meetings with big Pharma on this healthcare fubar- they are incensed that he did not keep his pledge to have the talks on C-SPAN, and actually have the transparency he pledged to.</p>
<p>Go <a href="http://www.redstate.com/bs/2009/08/20/its-pretty-bad-when-you-have-air-america-calling-you-a-liar-mr-president/">here</a> to hear the radio hosts trash the Resident-</p>
<p>At least he is an equal opportunity liar- we on the right knew he was going to lie- we had listened to him during the longest campaign in history. Jews have crossed deserts in half the time that campaign took- so we knew that the lies were there. But it has taken the left awhile now to figure out that Hussein used them as a steppingstone to the White House.</p>
<p>When Air America is pissed at you, then you have really taken a left. It would be a NatGeo moment to film the chase of Hussein by a pack of rabid union goons who have had their health plans switched to the Gubbmint option- watch as they begin to flank him. See their pack mentality, as they circle while the Alpha hoffa sneaks around back to sever the achilles tendons- aaah yes, there he goes down, slashed at the heels. Now unable to walk, the pack dispatches him quickly in a frenzy of entitled perks.</p>
<p>Ah well, it was but a dream&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. or was it?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton7688" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fthis-is-why-i-call-him-hussein%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=This%20Is%20Why%20I%20Call%20Him%20Hussein&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/this-is-why-i-call-him-hussein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can&#8217;t Handle  The Health</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/you-cant-handle-the-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/you-cant-handle-the-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/you-cant-handle-the-health/.Lawmakers are on &#8220;recess&#8221;, (makes you think of carefree children, playing on a playground- probably not far from the truth- the children part, anyway), and hopefully they are getting an earful from people who know that this &#8220;Healthcare&#8221; package is detrimental to virtually everyone it will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/you-cant-handle-the-health/">http://www.onebigdog.net/you-cant-handle-the-health/</a>.<br /><p>Lawmakers are on &#8220;recess&#8221;, (makes you think of carefree children, playing on a playground- probably not far from the truth- the children part, anyway), and hopefully they are getting an earful from people who know that this &#8220;Healthcare&#8221; package is detrimental to virtually everyone it will affect; and it will affect virtually everyone. The main reason for this is that private insurers cannnot match the price that  the government can impose, thus driving these insurance companies out of business.</p>
<p>People who run small businesses will throw their employees into the &#8220;public&#8221; option, exacerbating the situation, and when you essentially &#8220;dump&#8221; 20- 46 million new people into an existing infrastructure, <strong>without</strong> having the commensurate number of doctors added to the mix, you have a problem that all the smooth language of our brainless leader cannot solve.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the members of Congress, all but one, have opted to keep their medical insurance, foregoing the public option they keep reassuring us is really good. Listen, you didn&#8217;t believe it when you were little, and your mom said strained peas were tasty, especially when she wouldn&#8217;t take a bite, so why would you believe this?</p>
<blockquote><p>Too much, too fast, too expensive. Those are some of the objections lawmakers have voiced against the healthcare overhaul Democrats are attempting on Capitol Hill.</p>
<p>But many Americans think Congress is out of touch. How, they wonder, can lawmakers empathize with the underinsured or those lacking insurance when they receive a benefits package &#8212; heavily subsidized by taxpayers &#8212; that most of us can only envy?</p>
<p>Among the advantages: a choice of 10 healthcare plans that provide access to a national network of doctors, as well as several HMOs that serve each member&#8217;s home state. By contrast, 85% of private companies offering health coverage provide their employees one type of plan &#8212; take it or leave it.</p>
<p>Lawmakers also get special treatment at Washington&#8217;s federal medical facilities and, for a few hundred dollars a month, access to their own pharmacy and doctors, nurses and medical technicians standing by in an office conveniently located between the House and Senate chambers.</p>
<p>In all, taxpayers spent about $15 billion last year to insure 8.5 million federal workers and their dependents, including postal service employees, according to the Office of Personnel Management.</p>
<p>latimes.com</p></blockquote>
<p>There will be unintended consequences- for one thing, all the plans Congress has at its disposal are, for the moment, private plans, and they rely not on Congress to keep them afloat and profitable, but millions of regular people to share the risk. If Congress succeeds in forcing millions of people onto a public plan, there will not be enough people to make Congress&#8217; plans sustainable for their own health- they will in effect, have forced themselves onto the public option, or they will have to subsidize an insurance company.</p>
<p>This could be funny, as they try to undo their own laws, or forge a &#8220;special&#8221; exemption for federal workers- I mean, Federal workers, from the Resident on down, already enjoy health coverage anyone else would envy.</p>
<blockquote><p>In all, taxpayers spent about $15 billion last year to insure 8.5 million federal workers and their dependents, including postal service employees, according to the Office of Personnel Management.</p>
<p>Generous plans are available in private industry. But the federal coverage far surpasses that enjoyed by 70 million Americans who are underinsured and at financial risk in the event of a major health crisis &#8212; not to mention the estimated 46 million who have no medical insurance.</p>
<p>&#8220;For the average worker, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan would probably look quite attractive,&#8221; said Pete Sepp, a spokesman for the National Taxpayers Union, a pinch-penny advocacy group.</p>
<p>Indeed, a question often surfaces: Why can&#8217;t everyone enjoy the same benefits as members of Congress? The answer: The country probably couldn&#8217;t afford it &#8212; not without reforms to bring costs way, way down.</p>
<p>latimes.com</p></blockquote>
<p>So once again, we see that these hypocrites that want us to sacrifice, and ration our health, will not do the same when it comes to their families. Why should we believe them, when they tell us  that the fire doesn&#8217;t burn, when they won&#8217;t stick <strong>their</strong> hand in the flames? The very fact that they are not willing to use the same care package that we the people do, should make anyone with even a remedial brainstem ask why not.</p>
<p>The old saying,  &#8221;What&#8217;s good for the goose is good for the gander,&#8221; is applicable here, and this plan should be summarily rejected out of hand. This plan is truly not about the people, but a blatant power grab to gain more control over the American people and their options. This is all about the government wanting more control over your lives and your choices. You see, they know better than you, because <strong>they truly believe they are smarter than you.</strong></p>
<p>Until The Resident, and ALL his minions, czars, lackeys, and suck- ups are willing to go by the same rules that the rest of us have to, this proposed law should die the ugly death it deserves, and <strong>ANY</strong> member of Congress that votes for this obamanation of a bill should <strong>be immediately impeached for high crimes against the American people.</strong></p>
<p>Because anyone who votes for this bill is a traitor, plain and simple.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p>
<blockquote></blockquote><div id="tweetbutton7425" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fyou-cant-handle-the-health%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=You%20Can%26%238217%3Bt%20Handle%20%20The%20Health&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/you-cant-handle-the-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Checks and Balances</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/checks-and-balances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/checks-and-balances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trouble in River City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/checks-and-balances/.Our form of government, as we all have been taught (at least those who have had a government and/ or civics course would know), has three branches of governmental powers and duties, all designed to split the power, so no one branch could rule over the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/checks-and-balances/">http://www.onebigdog.net/checks-and-balances/</a>.<br /><p>Our form of government, as we all have been taught (at least those who have had a government and/ or civics course would know), has three branches of governmental powers and duties, all designed to split the power, so no one branch could rule over the other two. This truly took a lot of thought, and was revolutionary for it&#8217;s foresight in that day and time. It still is, or would be if the Socialists were not so intent on working around the strictres of this government.</p>
<p>The Executive branch is the titular head of the government, but has to answer to the Legislative branch- this is supposed to keep the President honest, and within bounds legally. The president proposes legislation- a laundry list of what he believes need to be done to keep this country on course. If he is an honest man, he proposes things we actually need, and things we can afford.</p>
<p>It is up to the Legislative branch to actually write the laws that the president wants done, but in addition, these lawmakers have yet another duty, a higher duty, and that is to the people they serve. If the president is proposing onerous laws, laws that would harm the people back in the Representative&#8217;s or Senator&#8217;s areas, it is their duty to oppose this. This not only gets them re- elected, but it serves the greater good of the people they represent.</p>
<p>This is admittedly a fine balancing act, where your duty to country and your duty to the people you represent can sometimes be seemingly at odds. But, if you are honest, and truly want what is best for all, you will be able to craft just laws that will serve the country well. Unfortunately, there are many lawmakers who will blindly follow this Resident and his Socialist agenda. Once upon a time you could count on legislators to protect their turf from even a president within their own party, jealousy being a strong emotion, and turf is something to protect- but not now, apparently.</p>
<p>Even if not, there is the third branch, the Supreme Court, where all the laws can be looked over to see if it passes the Constitutional Test- does it co- exist within the framework of the Constitution? The Supreme Court is supposed to be the arbiter of All Things Constitutional. In recent years, there has been a distinct ideological split in the makeup of the court, and that makes for often close and contentious decisions- when they do make decisions.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Court doesn&#8217;t take every case- just those where there could be a question of constitutionality from lower courts, so there is a lag on the time something becomes law to when the Court might rule on it, and Hussein is going to try and pack the Supreme Court so the &#8220;empathy&#8221; factor favors him.</p>
<p>If Barry can tilt the court, and he maintains the party majority in the legislature, he can be King in everything but name- he can pass whatever laws he wants, and tax us until we bleed, and I believe he will. I have no sense of ease in his ability to govern with an even hand, I do not believe he wants to- at least not until he has made over our country into something we do not recognize, a faint ghost of what we once were.</p>
<p>When that happens, you can be sure of one thing- we will have war(s)- the rest of the world will see us as weak, and they will be right, and we will have fights with Mexico in the south over the borders, N. Korea, China, Iran, and of course Russia will all test our will and our ability to deter their plans.</p>
<p>Russia will begin to try to take back the satellite countries like Lithuania, Estonia, the Ukraine, and Poland. It has already begun to creep into Georgia again. China practically owns us- at least our debt, and we have a Resident who is all talk. Whoop-de-do.</p>
<p>Just when we need to be strong, Hussein will wussify us, I guarantee this- this is already happening.</p>
<p>We are writing checks we can&#8217;t cash, because we have nothing in our balances.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton7260" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fchecks-and-balances%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Checks%20and%20Balances&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/checks-and-balances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;re The Odds?</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/whatre-the-odds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/whatre-the-odds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subversion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/whatre-the-odds/.Right on time, in the summer in Chicago, where they can bask like lizards in the summer heat they like so well, come the Jihadist Conventioneers. Oh, they call it something else, but the Islamic group that touts itself as a recruiter for Al-Qaida (even though [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/whatre-the-odds/">http://www.onebigdog.net/whatre-the-odds/</a>.<br /><p>Right on time, in the summer in Chicago, where they can bask like lizards in the summer heat they like so well, come the Jihadist Conventioneers.</p>
<p>Oh, they call it something else, but the Islamic group that touts itself as a recruiter for Al-Qaida (even though they are <strong>NOT</strong> on a terrorism Watch List- <strong>Why Not?</strong>).</p>
<p>This group, Hizb ut- Tahrir, an Islamic group that openly espouses an Islamic World, is holding it&#8217;s first United States conference in Chicago, the home of Hussein- go figure- they probably like the revolutionary ambience, even though the scent of pork runs through Chicago politics as pervasively as through the slaughterhouses nearby.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Hizb ut-Tahrir is a global Sunni network with reported ties to confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Al Qaeda in Iraq&#8217;s onetime leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. It has operated discreetly in the U.S. for decades.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Now, it is coming out of the shadows and openly hosting a July 19 conference entitled, <strong>&#8220;The Fall of Capitalism</strong> <strong>and the Rise of Islam,&#8221;</strong> at a posh Hilton hotel in a suburb of Chicago.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Hizb ut-Tahrir insists that it does not engage in terrorism, and it is not recognized by the State Department as a known terror group.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">But some terrorism experts say it may be even more dangerous than many groups that are on the terror list.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">foxnews.com</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">This is insane- this would be akin to the Communist Party holding a symposium on the &#8220;Fall of Capitalism&#8221; in say, New York, during the Cuban Missile Crisis. I know, the &#8220;Liberals&#8221; won, but you might think they still love their country- a fact that is becoming much less clear with every day. If Homeland Security doesn&#8217;t flood this gathering with every agent it has at its disposal, then someone is engaged in traitorous activity at the highest levels. Here is why:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">&#8220;Hizb ut-Tahrir is one of the oldest, largest indoctrinating organizations for the ideology known as jihadism,&#8221; Walid Phares, director of the Future of Terrorism Project at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told FOXNews.com.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Phares said that Hizb ut-Tahrir, rather than training members to carry out terrorist acts like Al Qaeda, focuses instead on indoctrinating youths between ages of 9 and 18 to absorb the ideology that calls for the formation of an empire — or &#8220;khilafah&#8221; — that will rule according to Islamic law and condones any means to achieve it, including militant jihad.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Hizb ut-Tahrir often says that its indoctrination &#8220;prepares the infantry&#8221; that groups like Al Qaeda take into battle, Phares said.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">&#8220;It&#8217;s like a middle school that prepares them to be recruited by the high school, which is Al Qaeda,&#8221; he said. &#8220;One would compare them to Hitler youth. &#8230; It&#8217;s an extremely dangerous organization.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">foxnews.com</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Hitler youth, with a twist of jihad- smells a bit like teen spirit,doesn&#8217;t it? I am sure it is oh so innocent, as I know the Liberal pinheads will tell me. I am blowing this all out of proportion, they will say. Really? Will you stake your life and the lives of your friends and family on this? Will you stake the future of your country on this?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">I am not willing to be so sanguine about this- this is another wedge that our enemies seek to drive into our side, just to see if they can, now that they have an arab- sounding &#8220;friend&#8221; in the White House. Just because we have a history of tolerance for other religions does <strong>NOT</strong> mean we need to roll over and show our belly when a religiously based terrorist sympathizer group wants to set up shop in our back yard.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is one of the group&#8217;s most famous alumni, New Statesman journalist Shiv Malik reported, citing intelligence sources. In addition to plotting the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, he also is implicated in the World Trade Center bombing of 1993, the Bali nightclub bombings and the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Malik&#8217;s report, the public policy institute the Nixon Center and the counter-extremism think tank the Quilliam Foundation agree that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who was the leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq until he was killed in June 2006, also was once a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">They say other former members include Asif Muhammad Hanif, a British man who blew himself up outside a bar in Tel Aviv, killing four people (including himself) and wounding more than 50; and Omar Bakri Mohammed, a radical cleric currently banned from Britain who praised the 9/11 attacks, raised funds for Hezbollah and Hamas and called for attacks on the Dublin airport because U.S. troops transfered there on their way to Iraq.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">Segal said Hizb ut-Tahrir is becoming more active online in the U.S. — particularly on social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace — and now it may be able to add a significant number of Americans to its ranks.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">foxnews.com</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">And because of all the liberals in our schools,not properly  teaching our students the subject of History, our children are NOT getting the proper background to enable them to recognize this threat for what it truly is- a blatant subversion of our people. This trend needs to be halted in its tracks, <strong>NOW</strong>. If not, then everyone will end up under an Islamic thumb, with our women wearing burkas, and not being allowed to drive or have other rights we all take for granted today,</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">You say this cannot happen, but if one looks at history, all it takes is forgetting for a moment that it <strong>CAN </strong>happen.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;font-size: 1em;margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1em;margin-left: 0px;color: #000000;padding: 0px">If we forget for one moment- if we do not have eternal vigilance, this can and will happen.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton7245" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fwhatre-the-odds%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=What%26%238217%3Bre%20The%20Odds%3F&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/whatre-the-odds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not Blackmail, It&#8217;s Brownmail</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-blackmail-its-brownmail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-blackmail-its-brownmail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union graft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union incompetence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unprincipled people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-blackmail-its-brownmail/.Man oh man- just when you think people can not possibly get much weirder, here you go. In a &#8220;payback&#8221; scheme, the Hussein administration is trying to &#8220;level&#8221; the playing field for UPS, which is a mainly ground deliverer, versus FedEx, who ships mainly by air. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-blackmail-its-brownmail/">http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-blackmail-its-brownmail/</a>.<br /><p>Man oh man- just when you think people can not possibly get much weirder, here you go.</p>
<p>In a &#8220;payback&#8221; scheme, the Hussein administration is trying to &#8220;level&#8221; the playing field for UPS, which is a mainly ground deliverer, versus FedEx, who ships mainly by air.  Why does this matter? Because FedEx has fewer onerous labor contracts with unions, who backed the Hussein administration, and now want mo&#8217; money and more control over FedEx.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">Now it is the Teamsters&#8217; turn at the trough. Congress might change labor law to assist UPS, a Teamsters stronghold, by hindering its principal competitor, FedEx.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">At 2 a.m. in Memphis, where FedEx is headquartered, the airport is humming as FedEx sorts and dispatches many of the 3.4 million packages — 10 million pounds of freight — it ships daily, mostly with its fleet of 654 aircraft. Eighty-five percent of FedEx packages go by air; 85 percent of UPS&#8217; go only by truck. This matters because:</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">The growth of railroads had put America&#8217;s increasingly integrated economy at the mercy of local strikes. “Brakemen in Altoona, signalmen in Wichita,” says Fred Smith, could cripple the transportation network. Smith, FedEx&#8217;s CEO, says that in 1926 Congress, to protect commerce, passed the Railway Labor Act (RLA). It ensured that any bargaining unit for workers must be systemwide so that no local unit could hold the railroads hostage.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">In 1935, the National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act), which covered everyone except railway workers, allowed organizing and bargaining based on localities. The path to unionization is steeper under the RLA, which requires a nationwide vote by all workers.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">&#8212;&#8211;George Will, Washington Post,  7/18</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">This would be bad enough for FedEx, since it faces a threat of being hamstrung by every rinky- dink local union that figures it needs mo&#8217; money, but apparently every organization wants a bite of FedEx&#8217;s butt- people you might think are friends turn out to be whores themselves, and sell their allegiance for money- you say mercenary, I say whore.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-left: 0px;font-size: 100%;vertical-align: baseline;background-color: transparent;line-height: 1.2857em;margin-bottom: 1.2857em;padding: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">The American Conservative Union asked <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25027.html" target="_blank">FedEx </a>for a check for $2 million to $3 million in return for the group’s endorsement in a bitter legislative dispute, then flipped and sided with UPS after FedEx refused to pay.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-left: 0px;font-size: 100%;vertical-align: baseline;background-color: transparent;line-height: 1.2857em;margin-bottom: 1.2857em;padding: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">For the $2 million+, ACU offered a range of services that included: “Producing op-eds and articles written by ACU’s Chairman <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12646.html" target="_blank">David Keene </a>and / or other members of the ACU’s board of directors. (Note that Mr. Keene writes a weekly column that appears in The Hill.)”</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-left: 0px;font-size: 100%;vertical-align: baseline;background-color: transparent;line-height: 1.2857em;margin-bottom: 1.2857em;padding: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">The <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9727.html" target="_blank">conservative group’s </a>remarkable demand — black-and-white proof of the longtime <span style="color: blue !important;font-weight: normal;font-size: 100%;vertical-align: baseline;background-color: transparent;padding: 0px;margin: 0px"><span style="font-family: Arial;font-weight: normal;border-style: initial;border-color: initial;font-size: 100%;vertical-align: baseline;border-top-width: 0px !important;border-top-style: none !important;border-top-color: initial !important;border-left-width: 0px !important;border-left-style: none !important;border-left-color: initial !important;border-right-width: 0px !important;border-right-style: none !important;border-right-color: initial !important;border-bottom-width: 1px;border-bottom-style: solid;border-bottom-color: initial;padding-top: 0px !important;padding-right: 0px !important;padding-bottom: 1px !important;padding-left: 0px !important;color: blue;background-color: transparent;width: auto !important;float: none !important;margin: 0px">Washington </span></span>practice known as “pay for play” — was contained in a private letter to FedEx that was provided to POLITICO.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-left: 0px;font-size: 100%;vertical-align: baseline;background-color: transparent;line-height: 1.2857em;margin-bottom: 1.2857em;padding: 0px;border: 0px initial initial"> The letter exposes the practice by some political interest groups of taking stands not for reasons of pure principle, as their members and supporters might assume, but also in part because a sponsor is paying big money.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>politico.com</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">In 1981, UPS began air services and in the 1990s it tried to be put under the RLA. In 1993 UPS said all its operations, “including ground operations,” are properly subject to the RLA “because the ground operations are part of the air service.” FedEx <span style="padding: 0px;margin: 0px"><em>supported</em></span> UPS&#8217; efforts, even though the vast majority of UPS parcels never go on an airplane, whereas FedEx&#8217;s trucking operations exist to feed its air fleet and distribute what it carries.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">FedEx characterizes itself as the “world&#8217;s most effective airline” and UPS as “a 100-year old trucking company.” FedEx, Smith insists, is not anti-union; its pilots are unionized. He says that the pay and benefits for its drivers are, on average, higher than those of UPS drivers, and that new FedEx drivers must wait only three months to be eligible for benefits whereas UPS drivers must wait a year. Nevertheless, today&#8217;s Democratic majority in Congress, with UPS now aligned with the Teamsters, wants to put FedEx&#8217;s ground pickup and delivery operations under the NLRA, thereby making FedEx&#8217;s entire integrated system susceptible to disruption by local disputes.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">FedEx characterizes what Congress might do for UPS as the “Brown Bailout.” But properly used, “bailout” denotes a rescue of an economic entity from financial distress. Although UPS is suffering from the recession, so is FedEx. Furthermore, UPS, whose revenue is 36 percent more than FedEx&#8217;s, began advocating this injury to FedEx long before this recession.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">What UPS is doing is called rent-seeking — bending public power for private advantage by hindering a competitor. This practice is banal but can have entertaining ricochets:</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">If Congress makes FedEx&#8217;s operations more precarious by changing the law to make it easier for local disputes to cripple its operations, Smith says a multibillion-dollar order for 15 Boeing 777s will be automatically canceled. One of the unions lobbying on behalf of UPS and the Teamsters is the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, whose members make 777s.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">&#8212;- George Will, Washington Post  7/18</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">I just have to shake my head at the complete and utter stupidity of unions- the saying &#8220;cut off your nose to spite your face&#8221; must have been coined about the ridiculous actions of these unions, but to then have a Conservative group tearing like piranhas at the fresh meat of FedEx, hoping to get money for their endorsement is just cynical in the extreme, and cannot help the economy, or any other aspect of life in the United States, it&#8217;s just lining the pockets of white collar extortionists. </p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">The unions can be excused- they are the village idiots here.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">It&#8217;s the so- called &#8220;Conservatives&#8221; that I find to be criminally liable and totally without morals.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial">And that is inexcusable. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial"> </p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 7px;padding-left: 0px;margin: 0px;border: 0px initial initial"> </p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote><div id="tweetbutton7231" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fits-not-blackmail-its-brownmail%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=It%26%238217%3Bs%20not%20Blackmail%2C%20It%26%238217%3Bs%20Brownmail&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/its-not-blackmail-its-brownmail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are THESE Saved Jobs?</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/are-these-saved-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/are-these-saved-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/are-these-saved-jobs/.Today&#8217;s the day- oh boy, I&#8217;ll bet the workers at the Chrysler dealerships who voted for Hussein are feeling a bit betrayed by the beloved leader. Oops&#8212; his bad. Yep, today, at least one third of all Chrysler Dealerships, with their salesmen, repair crews, make ready [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/are-these-saved-jobs/">http://www.onebigdog.net/are-these-saved-jobs/</a>.<br /><p>Today&#8217;s the day- oh boy, I&#8217;ll bet the workers at the Chrysler dealerships who voted for Hussein are feeling a bit betrayed by the beloved leader. Oops&#8212; his bad. Yep, today, at least one third of all Chrysler Dealerships, with their salesmen, repair crews, make ready and body repair people, all are out on the street. Hussein must be so proud. Yes, in one bold stroke, he put another several hundred thousand people onto welfare. Democracy at work, as he does that voodoo he does so well.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="storybody">As of today, those dealerships may not operate as Chrysler new-car showrooms, nor may they provide warranty service. </p>
<p>The two courtroom triumphs were clear wins for the automaker, which filed for bankruptcy April 30 and has been blazing through what can be a drawn-out process.</p></div>
<div class="storybody">They are also a victory for the Obama administration. </p>
<p>It has lent Chrysler $8.6 billion in bailout funds and has pushed the automaker&#8217;s bankruptcy on a fast track, arguing that time is of the essence in ensuring the company stays in business. Under terms of its deal with Fiat, the sale of Chrysler into a new entity must be completed by Monday.</p></div>
<div class="storybody">latimes.com</div>
</blockquote>
<p>This is a total of 789 dealerships, and the reasons given are murky at best, and completely dishonest at worst. The fact that the dealerships have to actually buy the automobiles makes this a case of the government hindering commerce, something that should be unthinkable in a free market system, but as we have seen, Hussein wants to redistribute the wealth. You could see it in the way the government restructured the bankruptcy of Chrysler, and that of GM, giving the unions first grab at the candy, and shorting the creditors who by contract law rights, should have been first in line.</p>
<p>And now comes the flood- stuff flows downhill, and the dealers are at the bottom, and if you think Hussein cares about the dealers, think again.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="storybody">The original motion to reject the dealers&#8217; contracts was, in our view, extremely overreaching and appeared to preempt multiple state franchise laws,&#8221; said Stephen Lerner, an attorney representing roughly 340 of the targeted dealers.</p>
<p>He and other lawyers argued for several hours Tuesday that the automaker&#8217;s decision to eliminate a quarter of its dealer body was capricious, unwarranted and arbitrary. Further, they contended, the automaker had not shown that doing so would improve its financial situation. </p></div>
<div class="storybody">On May 14, the automaker notified the dealers slated for elimination that it would use the bankruptcy process to terminate their franchises Tuesday. Chrysler argued that its network of roughly 3,200 dealers was far too large, affecting profitability and customer service. </p>
<p>In response, dealers sought to nullify the terminations or at least extend the deadline, giving them more time to unload inventories of vehicles and parts. But the bankruptcy judge, Arthur Gonzalez, soured those hopes. His ruling dictated that as of close of business Tuesday, those dealers would no longer be allowed to sell new Chrysler, Jeep and Dodge vehicles, perform factory warranty service or display signage indicating that they are Chrysler retail showrooms.</p></div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<div class="storybody">latimes.com</div>
</blockquote>
<p>This is just another in the series of &#8220;Let&#8217;s see just how badly we can run this Nation.&#8221;  Between this action, and the &#8220;Czars&#8221;, people Hussein appointed, who have noone but Hussein to be accountable to, we are on the way down the hill, with Hussein greasing the slide.</p>
<p>What will now happen, is that the jobless numbers will increase, and Hussein will use this CRISIS OF HIS OWN MAKING to ask for more power and more money, so he can do other stuff that doesn&#8217;t work either.</p>
<p>The man isn&#8217;t a man- he is ignorant, he is spineless (Yes, Virginia, he DID just tell Iran they could have nukes), and he is dedicated to the destruction of the Capitalistic system in this country. If you do nor believe this, just ask any dealer of American cars today- if they are not out of business, they are scared that they will be next.<br />
And they will- no doubt of that- it&#8217;s only a matter of time.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="storybody">On Friday, the automaker sent those dealers contracts guaranteeing reallocation of their remaining stock &#8212; amounting to roughly 26,000 vehicles as of last week, according to spokeswoman Carrie McElwee. </p>
<p>But the automaker will charge dealers $350 for each car and truck that is reallocated, and in some cases the loss on the vehicles could be larger than that. McElwee said that closed dealers also would have the option of selling any remaining new cars on their own, but that they would not have access to any sales incentives, nor would they be able to advertise as Chrysler dealers. </p>
<p>But because dealers had been scrambling to unload vehicles, many had sold cars for a larger loss, leading to frustration among those selected for closure.</p>
<p>&#8220;We had another dealer come by who basically wanted us to lose 10% of invoice price on every car,&#8221; said Gary Kihs, general manager of Larry Menke Inc., a Chrysler dealer in Seaside, Calif.</p></div>
<div class="storybody">latimes.com</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t you just love it when the government orders you to lose money on YOUR cars- talk about arm- twisting- I can tell that Hussein simply must have our best interests in mind when he hurts us so lovingly. </p>
<p>He amputates our businesses with all the subtlety  of a Civil War Surgeon using an axe on someone&#8217;s leg.</p>
<p>At least give them something to bite down on.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip"><em>If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader.  If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</em></div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton6851" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fare-these-saved-jobs%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Are%20THESE%20Saved%20Jobs%3F&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/are-these-saved-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Protectors of Hussein</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-protectors-of-hussein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-protectors-of-hussein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excusers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incompetence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/the-protectors-of-hussein/.I have been posting on this site for a little while now, and I have begun to notice something curious. Some of my posts have been, in my opinion, critical of BHO (Barak HUSSEIN Obama), the &#8220;Christian&#8221; man with muslim roots, who is doing such a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/the-protectors-of-hussein/">http://www.onebigdog.net/the-protectors-of-hussein/</a>.<br /><p>I have been posting on this site for a little while now, and I have begun to notice something curious. Some of my posts have been, in my opinion, critical of BHO (Barak HUSSEIN Obama), the &#8220;Christian&#8221; man with muslim roots, who is doing such a bang- up job of destroying our country at a break- neck pace. Some of my posts have been on different subjects, barely touching on Hussein&#8217;s gross incompetence when it comes to all things real and important.</p>
<p>The one thing I have found is that when I post something critical of his Saintedness, the moonbats come out in droves, ready to feast, much like buzzards at a carcass- and with all the finesse and manners, I might add. One might think there would be an automatic &#8220;Hussein&#8221; alert-&#8221; quick, roll out so- and- so&#8212; we HAVE to refute!&#8221; To the keyboards, one and all! And so they arrive, circling the post like a pack of hyenas, ready to attack with half- truths and innuendo, plus the occasional outright slur. That&#8217;s okay, but there is something curious here.</p>
<p>If the column is not critical of Hussein, they leave it alone, by and large- no comment, positive or negative, and that is curious indeed, because several of the most rabid, left wing, atheistic moonbats just LOVE the &#8220;sound&#8221; of their own voices, and feel the more the better. Not true, but you just can&#8217;t convince some people.</p>
<p>Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong, I welcome the back and forth- I have my opinion, and they have theirs, but I find it to be curious that they only have an opinion that they want to share if it is about Hussein- but not so much if it is anything else. Are the mindless acolytes of the Sainted One actually that mindless? Have they no opinions other than hiz Lowness?</p>
<p>I see a lot in the political world that outrages me- I know that there&#8217;s a lot that outrages the disciples of Hussein (probably some of what I write does this- tough), but I would think, indeed I would hope, that they are not as one dimensional as they seem to be. Their whole being (and keyboard) devoted to one thing and one thing only, the unquestioning and blind devotion to the Cause- the destruction of America as we know it.</p>
<p>Oh, I know they do not think of it as such- if they did, they would be in support of me, but they are not- alas!I guess I will have to truck on, trying to convince many of the baby- boomers and failed hippies that their 60s philosophy never did work, and it is time to grow a new set of philosophies- ones that actually relate to the real world and its threats.</p>
<p>In the fifties and early sixties, people left their teen years eager to become adults, and embrace adult ideas and ethics. but now, since the late sixties and on, people seem to want to stay children, and abrogate many of their responsibilities. This has led to an unfortunate emphasis on self- how does this affect me, how do I profit, what do I get out of this? It&#8217;s all about &#8220;me, me, me!&#8221;</p>
<p>All of this egoistic nonsense  instead of &#8220;how does this affect my country, how can I help my country?&#8221; How self absorbed, how conceited some of these people can be.</p>
<p>Oh, there are true believers on both sides, and the sides have become polarized- often not by the problems and their possible solutions themselves, but by the personalities driving these ideas. The acolytes who attack me and others are rabid in their unquestioning adherence to blind faith dogma, rather a contradiction to the atheistic ones, as they have traded their belief in God for a belief in someone they treat as a god- kind of hypocritical in a twisted, very perverse way, but it takes all kinds, I guess.</p>
<p>So bring it on, all you excusers, and &#8220;explainers&#8221;, and protectors of Hussein, the patron saint of wanton government control, I can take it. Believe me, I am not going away.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a shame you have no opinions other than those relating to Hussein.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip"><em>If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader.  If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</em></div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton6839" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fthe-protectors-of-hussein%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=The%20Protectors%20of%20Hussein&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-protectors-of-hussein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

