Think Of A Pez Dispenser
Apr 3, 2013 Political
I know that trying to teach a liberal anything is like trying to teach a pig to sing but I feel it is an obligation to try particularly when the liberal idiot in question is a lawmaker. You see, when lawmakers are uninformed and work to pass laws detrimental to us and they do so with no understanding of the topic they want to regulate then it is important to try to educate them. It will likely not help them because most of them are mind numbed morons but pointing out their stupidity might help people remove them from office so they can no longer damage us and infringe on our freedom.
Colorado Democrat Representative Diana DeGette is the latest moron to show her ignorance. She is involved in the sweeping anti gun legislation that has resulted in the loss of millions of dollars in business for the state. In fact, the total loss will likely exceed a billion dollars as hunters are shunning the state, outdoor shows have cancelled filming there and at least one firearms related company is moving out of the state. All of this coming as uninformed morons like Diana DeGette work hard to infringe.
DeGette does not know how firearms work and she does not know that a magazine is the device that the ammunition is placed into so that a firearm (that uses a magazine, of course) can function through that ammo. DeGette thinks the magazine is a throw away item and that once the ammo in the magazine is spent, the magazine is no longer of any use.
I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those now they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available. RCP
In order to teach a libeal one must make the lesson simple. Cartoons and crayons are wonderful tools to help liberals. I want to make it easy to help DeGette understand how a magazine works.
Ms. DeGette, think of the magazine as a Pez dispenser. You use one by taking a package of candy and inserting it in the dispenser. Each time you lift the little Pez head a candy comes out (it is a semi automatic candy dispenser in that one candy is ejected with each activation of the head). Now Ms. DeGette, what happens when the Pez dispenser runs out of candy (ammo)? Do you throw it away?
Of course not. You simply open another package of candy and insert it in the dispenser and you are ready for rapid fire candy dispensing.
This is how a magazine works. Each has a limit on how many rounds it will hold. The Pez dispenser has a limit of one package of candy. The only real difference is that Pez dispensers only come in one capacity where magazines come in different sizes.
Back to magazines. The user fills one with bullets and inserts it in a firearm. Then he pulls the trigger and each time he does one round (and one round only) is fired. When the last round has fired, now pay close attention here, the shooter removes the magazine and inserts more bullets in it (like the Pez dispenser). Once that is done the magazine can be used AGAIN.
Usually, shooters have several magazines filled so they can switch an empty one with a full one without having to reload the magazine immediately. Think of it as carrying several loaded Pez dispensers so when one is empty another can dispense the tasty treats without the need to immediately reload.
Perhaps we should ban these high capacity Pez dispensers and tax the hell out of the candy (ammo) because of the obesity problem in this country and the ever increasing number of diabetics.
I will let you ponder that while you take in all the info I have provided to help you do an effective job. I am sure you are not interested in being informed because if you were, you would be a conservative.
Perhaps being loaded is a problem YOU have and that is why you are not so bright…
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[jpsub]
Tags: ammunition, anti freedom, backlash, colorado, diana degette, gun ban, lies, magazines, moron, pez dispenser, semi automatic
Feinstein And The Other Oath Breakers
Jan 24, 2013 Political, Second Amendment
Senator Dianne Feinstein of Commiefornia has introduced her anti Second Amendment bill and in that bill she and several other oath breakers list 150 different firearms that they want banned. Her anti American bill also calls for a national registry ala Adolph Hitler and most other dictators.
Feinstein introduced this bill and the national registry provision would violate Public Law 99-308, the Firearms Owner’s Protection Act, which prohibits a national database. This law was the result of documented abused by the ATF in enforcing the Gun Control Act of 1968.
That should come as no surprise since the attempt to ban firearms is in and of itself, unconstitutional as it violates the Second Amendment.
Keep in mind, Feinstein had her own carry permit because she was threatened with harm. She had one while claiming other women do not need to have firearms because women are not strong enough to use these machines of destruction.
She was joined by Chuck Schumer of New York, another gun grabber who has a New York carry permit AND has armed officers surrounding him when he is in New York.
Banning firearms will not stop the next lunatic from shooting people because criminals and those who have mental health problems will not follow the law. They will still be able to get firearms, banned or not, and they will still be able to get magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. These are facts and have been demonstrated time and again. The Columbine shootings happened in the middle of the last “assault weapons” ban so it would appear as if the ban did not work.
It is important to emphasize the point that laws do not keep criminals from doing bad things. The overarching thing to remember when it is reported that someone murdered people with a gun is that MURDER IS ILLEGAL. If laws against murder are not obeyed what makes anyone think laws banning the instruments used by criminals will be obeyed?
The very people who want to ban firearms are against the death penalty. They claim that the death penalty does not deter crime. That is an issue for another time but someone please tell me, if the death penalty is not a deterrent how will a gun ban deter criminals from using guns to do bad things?
This whole anti American bill from Feinstein and her cohorts is nothing but a move to further control people’s lives. Millions of gun owners do not commit crimes each day but they suffer for the criminals who do.
We have not banned banks to prevent bank robberies. We have not banned cars or alcohol to prevent drunk driving. We have not banned forks to prevent obesity but somehow banning guns will prevent gun crime.
Gun control is not about guns, it is about control.
[note]References:
Washington Times
Weekly Standard
CBS San Fran
Daily Caller
Guns Save Lives
Reason
State Department Memo 7277, September 1961[/note]
MOLON LABE
Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[jpsub]
Tags: criminals, dianne feinstein, gun ban, lies, oath breaker, Second Amendment