<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Dogs House &#187; deception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/tag/deception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sheriff Taylor Loses Small Town Values</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/sheriff-taylor-loses-small-town-values/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/sheriff-taylor-loses-small-town-values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and griffith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=10185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/sheriff-taylor-loses-small-town-values/.Andy Griffith played a sheriff in the fictional town of Mayberry. In Mayberry people did not have to lock their doors, neighbors helped each other out, Sundays were for worship, and children were allowed to play cops and robbers, cowboys and Indians and any other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/sheriff-taylor-loses-small-town-values/">http://www.onebigdog.net/sheriff-taylor-loses-small-town-values/</a>.<br /><p>Andy Griffith played a sheriff in the fictional town of Mayberry.  In Mayberry people did not have to lock their doors, neighbors helped each other out, Sundays were for worship, and children were allowed to play cops and robbers, cowboys and Indians and any other game and were not considered politically incorrect or bigoted.</p>
<p>Something happened to the people of the town of Mayberry.  Ron Howard, who played Opie Taylor, is one of Hollywood&#8217;s biggest left wing liberals and Sheriff Taylor has abandoned the small town values people who watched the show admired.</p>
<p>Andy Griffith is now a spokesperson for Obamacare and his gig is paid for with our tax dollars out of Medicare funds.  Griffith appears in an ad telling seniors how wonderful Obamacare will be:</p>
<blockquote><p>The TV star &#8211; whose role as sheriff of Mayberry made him an enduring symbol of small-town American values &#8211; tells seniors that &#8220;good things are coming&#8221; under the health care overhaul, including free preventive checkups and lower-cost prescriptions for Medicare recipients.  <a href="http://apnews.myway.com//article/20100730/D9H9EIV03.html">My Way News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It would appear as if the Obama regime and Andy Griffith are trying to dupe seniors.  As the piece reads, the role of sheriff in Mayberry made Griffith and enduring symbol of small town American values.</p>
<p>Reliance on the government is not a small town American value.  Expecting others to pay for you is not a small town American value.  In small town America, people are self reliant and do not want government interference.</p>
<p>To make things worse, Griffith tells seniors that good things are coming including FREE check ups.  NOTHING IS FREE.  Taxpayers have to pay for this.  It is definitely not free and saying it is only muddies the waters.  It is confusing by design.  Seniors are skeptical about Obamacare and they should be.  The man he picked to run Medicare believes in rationing care and is a supporter of the British system that allows people who are deemed too expensive to care for to die.</p>
<p>Yes, we are talking about death panels.  There is no doubt that government officials will make decisions about people&#8217;s care and that some folks will not get care because it is too expensive or they are too old.  They will be sent home with pain pills, per Dr. Obama&#8217;s instructions.</p>
<p>Andy Griffith is the symbol of small town America and trust.  Everyone trusted sheriff Taylor and the way he handled things.  Certainly this man is not lying to seniors and only has their best interests at heart.</p>
<p>Right.  He is duping the poor seniors at the behest of the Obama regime because seniors are reliable voters and they will be at the polls in November even if no other demographic sees fit to vote.  Seniors will be there and they are not happy so the regime needed to bring in a trusted senior to talk some sense into them.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Griffith cannot be trusted.  He has been a Democrat supporter for years so his support for this is not surprising.  However, casting him in the ad, given the association his former character had with small town American values, is nothing more than a deception designed to dupe the elderly simply because Griffith does not hold those values in real life.</p>
<p>If the Obama regime believed in truth in advertising they would have Dr. Jack Kevorkian as their spokesperson.</p>
<p>That would be an accurate portrayal of the things to come under Obamacare.</p>
<p>Griffith is lucky though.  He is not going to live much longer and if he happens to make it to the implementation of Obamacare it will not effect him.  He has enough money to pay for whatever care he wants.</p>
<p>The rest of the elderly will not be so fortunate.  You old folks had better vote in November and get rid of all the people who did this to you.</p>
<p>And if you are smart you will ditch your AARP membership.  There are other organizations (<a href="http://www.americanseniors.org/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.amac.us/amac-was-founded-to-be-your-alternative-to-aarp-2/">here</a>) that assist the elderly and, unlike the AARP, they actually look out for the interests of the elderly.</p>
<p>Cave Canem!<br />
Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton10185" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fsheriff-taylor-loses-small-town-values%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Sheriff%20Taylor%20Loses%20Small%20Town%20Values&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/sheriff-taylor-loses-small-town-values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obama Media</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-obama-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-obama-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journolist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state run media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=10134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/the-obama-media/.The main stream media is a wing of the Democrat party. The MSM carries the water for Democrats and will do anything to push that point of view. The journalists have gone from reporting the news to being fixers who promote good stories and kill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/the-obama-media/">http://www.onebigdog.net/the-obama-media/</a>.<br /><p>The main stream media is a wing of the Democrat party.  The MSM carries the water for Democrats and will do anything to push that point of view.  The journalists have gone from reporting the news to being fixers who promote good stories and kill bad ones when a Democrat is involved but make sure any bad act (real, perceived, or invented) by a Republican is pushed and played on a continuous loop.</p>
<p>Rush Limbaugh has stated many times that the members of the liberal state run media get their marching orders and talking points from one place.  Rush often plays a montage of audio clips from the various news shows and in the clips the reporters all use the same buzz words.  If a few reporters use the word gravitas it would be a coincidence but when 10 or 15 (or more) use it then it is coordinated.  Limbaugh has played clips on a number of occasions and each time some new word, phrase, or theme is repeated by the journalists.</p>
<p>They are all getting their marching orders from the Democrats.</p>
<p>We have also long suspected that the media members got together to coordinate stories and to figure ways to help the Democrats.  We now know that the private journalist list (Journolist) to which many liberal members of the media belong, is a place where they get together and figure ways to help Democrats.</p>
<p>This was particularly true for Barack Obama.  When Jeremiah Wright first emerged the impact on the Obama campaign could have been a disaster.  Wright is an anti American racist preacher who spouts off stupidity about white people and this country and his rantings could have made things difficult for Obama because the only way he wins is with the white vote. </p>
<p>In steps the MSM via the Journolist.  They decided on ways to steer the story away from Wright and to make it another issue.  They decided to pick a conservative who opposed Obama and call him a racist.  They actually coordinated using the race card to help Obama.</p>
<p>The people on the list also discussed ways to intimidate other news people who they felt were not following the script.</p>
<p>Rush was right.  They do get their marching orders and they do sit around and think of ways to protect Obama.</p>
<p>In the good ole days we had investigative reporters.  Now we have hacks who work for the Democrats posing as reporters.</p>
<p>And look what they have done to this country&#8230;</p>
<p>Sources:<br />
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/20/documents-show-media-plotting-to-kill-stories-about-rev-jeremiah-wright/2/">The Daily Caller</a><br />
<a href="http://redmaryland.blogspot.com/2010/07/baltimore-sun-tom-schaller-and.html">Red Maryland</a></p>
<p>Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton10134" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fthe-obama-media%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=The%20Obama%20Media&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-obama-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rory Reid Removes Raunchy Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/rory-reid-removes-raunchy-reference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/rory-reid-removes-raunchy-reference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rory reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=9948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/rory-reid-removes-raunchy-reference/.Rory Reid, SON OF SENATE MAJORITY LEADER HARRY REID, has stopped using his last name in his campaign ads and on his website. Rory REID is running to be governor of Nevada and has apparently discovered that HIS FATHER is not too popular. Harry REID [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/rory-reid-removes-raunchy-reference/">http://www.onebigdog.net/rory-reid-removes-raunchy-reference/</a>.<br /><p>Rory Reid, SON OF SENATE MAJORITY LEADER HARRY REID, has stopped using his last name in his campaign ads and on his website.  Rory REID is running to be governor of Nevada and has apparently discovered that HIS FATHER is not too popular.  Harry REID has approval ratings that are extremely low and is running behind a TEA PArty nominee in the latest polls.  There is little belief that Harry REID will win reelection and evidently his son believes the name recognition could spell trouble for him.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=226WGpoJ6hE">In an ad that abuses children</a>, Rory REID&#8217;s last name is not present.  It is now all about Rory for governor.  The ad itself is despicable enough because children are used as props (no doubt the children of teacher&#8217;s union members) to push some notion that it is all about the children and that Rory cares (Rory REID, that is).  The ad has children telling adults how they should go about selecting the next governor and doing it with ideas that children their ages do not think about.  But hey, it is all for the children who obviously know nothing about Rory REID because they describe &#8220;highest ethical standards&#8221; (as if they would know), something not generally associated with the REID political family.</p>
<p>Rory REID has also removed his name from his website (though you can find it if you look around).  The url used to be roryreid.com but that redirects to rory2010.com.  If you hit the stop button quickly enough you can see the old url just before it redirects (sorry, no links to the moron.  You will have to type it in to see).</p>
<p>Rory REID (son of politician Harry REID) is so embarrassed by his father that he has removed the family name in order to deceive voters.  Funny, he did not mind using it when he thought it would help.</p>
<p>There is one problem though.  Rory REID&#8217;s last name will need to be on the ballot when it is time to vote and it will be on the ballot with his father.</p>
<p>Yes, you progressive morons can run but you cannot hide.</p>
<p>People in Nevada, you do not need another REID in government.  They are a bunch of corrupt, self-serving morons who are out for themselves only.</p>
<p>Get rid of Harry REID and keep his disgusting offspring from ever being elected.</p>
<p>You will be much better for it.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong>  <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_governor_elections/nevada/election_2010_nevada_governor">Rory REID down by more than 20 points</a></p>
<p>Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton9948" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Frory-reid-removes-raunchy-reference%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Rory%20Reid%20Removes%20Raunchy%20Reference&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/rory-reid-removes-raunchy-reference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Push Forward Despite Danger</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-push-forward-despite-danger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-push-forward-despite-danger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caddell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schoen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=9296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-push-forward-despite-danger/.The Democrats are moving along at full speed in order to ram the health care takeover down our throats (though it might be more appropriate to indicate they are ramming it in another body part considering what they are trying to do to us). Nancy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-push-forward-despite-danger/">http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-push-forward-despite-danger/</a>.<br /><p>The Democrats are moving along at full speed in order to ram the health care takeover down our throats (though it might be more appropriate to indicate they are ramming it in another body part considering what they are trying to do to us).  Nancy Pelosi is busing tightening leashes and Barack Obama has postponed his mini vacation for a few days to help usher this thing along.</p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="noteclassic">I hope he has as much success as he did getting the Olympics in Chicago and Democrats elected in Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts.</div></div></p>
<p>I told you before that this is not about health and it is not about care, it is about control.  It is also something that Democrats must pass.  They need this to secure a win on a signature issue for Obama.  Democrats push forward at their own peril because, by and large, Americans do not want this.  The reasons are many including those who do not want it because it is not liberal enough, those who do not like certain provisions and those who do not want any of it because they believe government does not belong in the health care business.</p>
<p><span class="pullquote"><!-- “…the battle for public opinion has been lost.” --></span>No matter what the reason, the opposition is too loud to ignore.  The Democrats However, are good at doing just that.  Last August Americans came out in force to town hall meetings and voiced their objections.  The Democrat&#8217;s answer was to stop having town hall meetings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/11/AR2010031102904.html">Patrick H. Caddell and Douglas E. Schoen</a>, two Democrat pollsters, are warning of Armageddon if the Democrats pass this monstrosity over the objections of the public.  They freely admit that Democrats stand to lose seats in the midterm elections (a historical trend) but go on to say that Democrats will lose many more if they pass it.</p>
<blockquote><p>Their blind persistence in the face of reality threatens to turn this political march of folly into an electoral rout in November. In the wake of the stinging loss in Massachusetts, there was a moment when the president and the Democratic leadership seemed to realize the reality of the health-care situation. Yet like some seductive siren of Greek mythology, the lure of health-care reform has arisen again. </p>
<p>~snip~</p>
<p>However, a solid majority of Americans opposes the massive health-reform plan. Four-fifths of those who oppose the plan strongly oppose it, according to Rasmussen polling this week, while only half of those who support the plan do so strongly. Many more Americans believe the legislation will worsen their health care, cost them more personally and add significantly to the national deficit. Never in our experience as pollsters can we recall such self-deluding misconstruction of survey data.</p></blockquote>
<p>The writing is on the wall.  Despite the claims that people like the bill when they know more about it, the reality is people do not like it and do not want it.  Democrats proceed at their own peril.</p>
<p>The authors indicate that people agree that reform is needed and that some parts of the plan are appealing but that the plan in total is not liked.  This has not stopped Democrats from moving on, full speed ahead.  They continue to claim people will like it once they see what is in it (which we apparently cannot do until it is passed).  This is untrue because people already know what is in it and they do not like it.</p>
<p>As Caddell and Schoen state; &#8220;&#8230;the battle for public opinion has been lost.&#8221;</p>
<p>But this will not stop Democrats from walking off a cliff.</p>
<p>And the bad thing for them is that if this does not pass, at this point in the game, those who voted for it will be in real trouble for backing a loser and against the wishes of those they are supposed to represent.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notehelp">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton9296" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fdemocrats-push-forward-despite-danger%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Democrats%20Push%20Forward%20Despite%20Danger&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-push-forward-despite-danger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elect Scott Brown To Kill This Health Legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/elect-scott-brown-to-kill-this-health-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/elect-scott-brown-to-kill-this-health-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martha coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/elect-scott-brown-to-kill-this-health-legislation/. There is little disagreement on the need for health care reform. Health care, in its current configuration, is unsustainable and it needs to be fixed. The disagreement is in how to fix it. Conservatives want a free market approach that allows people to shop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/elect-scott-brown-to-kill-this-health-legislation/">http://www.onebigdog.net/elect-scott-brown-to-kill-this-health-legislation/</a>.<br /><div class="lpic"><object width="300" height="225"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HcBaSP31Be8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HcBaSP31Be8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="300" height="225"></embed></object></div>
<p>There is little disagreement on the need for health care reform.  Health care, in its current configuration, is unsustainable and it needs to be fixed.  The disagreement is in how to fix it.  Conservatives want a free market approach that allows people to shop across state lines, less government interference, and more competition.  The statists want the government to run the show and become the keepers of our health care.  Government does not run anything efficiently and the estimates of the cost of their monstrosity are well below what the actual costs will be.  One only needs to look at Massachusetts to see how the cost of &#8220;free&#8221; health care has skyrocketed to far above what was estimated and this has led to some people not being covered and care being rationed.  Mitt Romney, a conservative of convenience, put this monster in place.</p>
<p>The people of Massachusetts have a chance to keep the rest of the country from suffering a similar fate by electing Scott Brown to fill the seat formerly occupied by Ted Kennedy&#8217;s rotund rear.  Electing Brown will add a little more balance to the Senate and help keep Congress from rubber stamping Obama&#8217;s radical socialist agenda.</p>
<p>This will not be easy.  The Democrats have mobilized and Obama himself is heading to the state to scare up support for the &#8220;yes&#8221; woman, Martha Coakley.  Ted Kennedy is working the graveyards to scare up the dead people vote and the unions and community organizing groups, such as ACORN, are out in force to do whatever it takes to get Coakley elected.</p>
<p>Scott Brown needs to win and win by enough to keep from having a recount.  Two problems emerge with a recount.  The first is it will delay Brown&#8217;s arrival at the Senate and give the shady liberals more time to ram the current bill through.  Second, Democrats ALWAYS find ballots when there is a recount.  In elections where the Democrat is behind the liberal machine miraculously finds a stack of ballots that were &#8220;not counted.&#8221;  It takes a while for them to emerge because it takes a while for union workers and ACORN thieves to sit in a room and fill them out.  Democrats find ways to manufacture ballots that they need.  If Al Gore had asked that the entire state of Florida be recounted Democrat operatives would have &#8220;found&#8221; enough votes to secure a victory for him.</p>
<p>Beating a recount will be hard and will take time so we need to ensure that the margin of victory is large enough not to have one.  The Democrats are already working on contingencies for a Brown win.  The state will delay, as long as it can, the certification of Brown.  When Ted Kennedy won the special election for this seat he was sworn in the very next day.  Kennedy is a Democrat and there are different rules for them.  Niki Tsongas was in the House in three days after her special election victory.</p>
<p>But Brown will face a hurdle of however long the Democrats can make the wait.  Once he is certified he must be sworn into the Senate and this will be done at the convenience of Joe Biden&#8217;s schedule.  Look for Biden to be sent on an overseas mission if Brown wins.</p>
<p>Barney Frank is worried about the election and has told people <a href="http://www.ajc.com/business/final-frantic-run-for-275977.html">that if Brown wins health care is dead</a>.  I assume he means this health care bill, not all health care but he is a drama queen and needs to deceive for maximum effect.  He is good at it too.  This is the guy who helped force banks to make risky loans, claimed that Fannie and Freddie MAC were not in trouble and then blamed it all on the banking industry.  He is slick and he knows how to lie but he is right that <strong><em>this</em></strong> legislation would be in trouble.</p>
<p>Barney has his panties in a wad but the Democrats have a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aPg2UfFaCh9c&#038;pos=9">plan to use reconciliation</a> in the Senate if Brown wins.  This process is not supposed to be used for this type of legislation because it is for tax issues and budget issues.  While health care will impact each of these it is not either of these.  Democrats will have to scale the bill back in order to use reconciliation but once they get what they want they will try to add things in.  Brown&#8217;s vote could prevent that from happening.  The Democrats, who chastised Republicans for using all tools at their disposal, will use a tool that is not designed for this type of legislation in order to FORCE this bill on the public.  The rules have never meant much to Democrats but more Americans are watching and there will be hell to pay if they play slick games which is especially true because conservatives are already looking to vote them out and liberals will be ticked off at the watered down legislation.</p>
<p>Patriots in Massachusetts, now is the time for you to band together to elect a man who can slow down this process and make these people listen to the public.  You can elect a Senator who will not be a rubber stamp to every Obama/Pelosi/Reid gimmick that comes down the pike.  Martha Coakley will vote in lockstep with these people and will help leave this country a vastly different (and much worse) place by the time Obama is out of office.</p>
<p>Everyone else, please call you Congress critters and tell them not to play games.  Tell these temple monkeys that we will not tolerate reconciliation or delaying Brown&#8217;s certification and swearing in, should he win.</p>
<p>Tuesday has the potential to be a big day in US political history and the voters of Massachusetts have the chance to do something that will go down in the history books (not the rewritten ones liberals use) as a game changing moment in our history.</p>
<p>Vote for Scott Brown!</p>
<p>That is change you can believe in.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong>  <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/16/coakley-on-schilling-a-yankee-fan/">Another Coakly gaffe</a>.  Red Sox nation cannot be happy with her.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8824" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Felect-scott-brown-to-kill-this-health-legislation%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Elect%20Scott%20Brown%20To%20Kill%20This%20Health%20Legislation&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/elect-scott-brown-to-kill-this-health-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Are In Panic Mode In Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-are-in-panic-mode-in-massachusetts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-are-in-panic-mode-in-massachusetts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martha coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ted kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-are-in-panic-mode-in-massachusetts/.US Army veteran and candidate for the US Senate in Massachusetts Scott Brown is causing quite a stir among those in the liberal establishment who believe that the Senate seat in question is &#8220;Ted Kennedy&#8217;s&#8221; seat and that Martha Coakley is the rightful owner of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-are-in-panic-mode-in-massachusetts/">http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-are-in-panic-mode-in-massachusetts/</a>.<br /><p>US Army veteran and candidate for the US Senate in Massachusetts Scott Brown is causing quite a stir among those in the liberal establishment who believe that the Senate seat in question is &#8220;Ted Kennedy&#8217;s&#8221; seat and that Martha Coakley is the rightful owner of that seat but has yet to go through the formality of an election.  Rasmussen found Brown 9 points behind Coakley last week but my liberal commenters discounted this because they say Rasmussen is a shill for Republicans and if -9 is all he could scare up then she is doing OK.</p>
<p>This week finds us using a left wing polling organization, <a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/01/toss-up-in-massachusetts.html">Public Policy Polling</a>, which shows Brown with a 1 point lead which makes this race a toss-up.  Brown could certainly lose this election very easily because the Democrats have a lot of tools at their disposal.  SEIU is out in full force and supporting Coakley and <a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2010/01/moveonorg-comes-to-coakleys-rescue.html">MoveOn.org</a> is in the mix helping her.  Add in ACORN and its criminal activities and we see the shenanigans the left is known for.  This is especially true when one considers that Massachusetts is a very blue state and, for some reason, the Kennedys think they own that Senate Seat.</p>
<p>Let me be clear, this seat is not Ted Kennedy&#8217;s seat, it belongs to the <em>people</em>.  It was the seat <em>held</em> by Kennedy but he did not own it despite what Democrats will have you believe.  No one can blame them because Ted Kennedy acted as if he owned the seat.  He acted as if he and his Democrats owned both of them.  He worked to have the law changed so if John Kerry won the presidency in 2004, Mitt Romney could not appoint a Republican to the seat.  There had to be a special election.  When Kennedy was near the end of his life he asked the legislature to change the law back so that the now Democrat Governor could appoint a Democrat to fill the seat when Kennedy died.  They did that and we are now faced with the typical shenanigans Democrats are known for.</p>
<p>The latest poll shows that Republicans and Independents heavily favor Brown.  Coakley has name recognition and has a lot of liberal support but many folks are unhappy with the health care reform being rammed through Congress.  Most folks who supported Kennedy&#8217;s dream of universal health care do not believe what is going through Congress is anything close to what he wanted.  Democrats are less enthusiastic about this election and the youth will likely not be out in force like it was in 2008.</p>
<p>Republicans and Independents are fired up and the seniors are always a reliable voting block.  This is going to mean trouble for Ms. Coakley but she still has 9 days to get the SEIU and ACORN bandits out to work some magic.</p>
<p><a href="http://weeklystandard.com/tws/daily/daily.asp#blog-307820">The Weekly Standard</a> says the poll is likely to spur the Democrat machine to get busy in Massachusetts and that is spot on.</p>
<p>Democrats have already begun contingency plans in case Brown wins.  The state of Massachusetts must wait 10 days after a federal election for absentee and military ballots.  The state will wait to certify even if there is no mathematical possibility for Brown to lose because of these ballots.  The state plans to delay signing the election certification as long as it can so that the interim appointment can vote on the health care bill in the Senate.  The Democrats have a plan to delay the duly elected Senator from Massachusetts if that person happens to be a Republican.  If Coakley wins she will likely be certified very quickly and sworn in as soon as humanly possible.</p>
<p>These Democrats are the same ones who whined about Al Franken even though he was involved in a legal recount.  These Democrats are the ones who want people in DC and sworn in immediately when they are Democrats.  These people are showing the American public exactly how underhanded and unethical they are.  They are willing to thwart the will of the people in Massachusetts in order to get what they want.  As <a href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/01/figures-dem-leaders-are-stripping-gop-amendments-from-health-care-bill-after-they-were-approved-in-committee/">Gateway Pundit</a> reports, Democrats are stripping amendments that Republicans had put in the bills and that were approved.  They are unethical and will do what they want regardless of what it means.</p>
<p>If Brown wins it will be a clear sign that NO ONE is safe.  If a Republican wins in Massachusetts it will be another shot heard round the world and will signal that Democrats are in real trouble.  But it will also tell them to ram as much as they can now because it will be their last chance.</p>
<p>We need Scott Brown to win.  The lawyers can work on what happens after in order to get him in the Senate.  All of it will be moot if Brown loses so you folks in Massachusetts need to elect Scott Brown in order to stop the run away government.</p>
<p>Remember folks, <a href="http://sigmundcarlandalfred.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/depends-who-you-ask/">the same government that is running TSA</a> and Homeland Security wants to run your health care.</p>
<p>Others:<br />
<a href="http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2010/01/rut-roh-nyts-panic-in-kennedy-country-thanks-to-scott-brown.html">Riehl World View</a><br />
<a href="http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/08/a-white-house-power-grab-that-congress-and-america-doesnt-see/">Big Government</a> shows exactly how they will obtain power and push in universal health care.  Be very careful of what you let these people do.  THIS IS A MUST READ.<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704130904574644230678102274.html?mod=rss_Today%27s_Most_Popular">Wall Street Journal</a> &#8211; Where America Ranks Number One In Health Care<br />
<a href="http://hillbuzz.org/2010/01/09/harry-reid-and-democrats-mark-our-words-we-will-seat-senator-scott-brown-on-the-steps-of-the-capitol-if-we-have-to/">HillBuzz</a> talks about the Democrats refusal to seat Brown should he win.  The word is people will set up an office for Brown on the Capitol steps if they have to.  Screw that.  If they will not seat him I say we enter the Capitol by force of arms and PUT him in his office.  If they want to play hardball let&#8217;s show them what hardball is.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8753" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fdemocrats-are-in-panic-mode-in-massachusetts%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Democrats%20Are%20In%20Panic%20Mode%20In%20Massachusetts&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-are-in-panic-mode-in-massachusetts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Was Obama Who Made The Bogus Claim</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/it-was-obama-who-made-the-bogus-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/it-was-obama-who-made-the-bogus-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clandestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/it-was-obama-who-made-the-bogus-claim/.On several occasions Barack Obama has stated that his health care plan would not cover abortions. What he specifically said was that federal dollars (read taxpayer money) would not be used to pay for abortions. Obama said that the people who were saying this were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/it-was-obama-who-made-the-bogus-claim/">http://www.onebigdog.net/it-was-obama-who-made-the-bogus-claim/</a>.<br /><p>On several occasions Barack Obama has stated that his health care plan would not cover abortions.  What he specifically said was that federal dollars (read taxpayer money) would not be used to pay for abortions.  Obama said that the people who were saying this were making &#8220;bogus&#8221; claims:</p>
<blockquote><p>In a one-line response to charges that taxpayers will foot the bill for abortions, Obama Wednesday night called it a &#8220;bogus&#8221; claim.</p>
<p>&#8220;One more misunderstanding I want to clear up &#8212; under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place,&#8221; the president said in an address to a joint session of Congress to sell health care reforms.  <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/10/redux-obama-claims-health-care-plan-cover-abortion-services/">Fox</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The bill that the House passed allowed taxpayer money to pay for abortions until a Democrat worked to change the bill.  The Senate bill absolutely allows for abortions to be paid for with taxpayer dollars.  Representative Bart Stupak, the Democrat who introduced the amendment changing the language in the House bill has read the language in the Senate bill and he says that it is not good enough and that it allows for taxpayer money to fund abortion.  He claims that he cannot vote for the bill if the language is changed to the Senate version.</p>
<p><a href="http://cnsnews.com/news/article/58921">Stupak also claims</a> that he has been contacted by the White House and by House leadership telling him not to make any statements on the issue until they get a chance to sell him the language.  In other words, they want to try and buy him off like they did all those Senators but Stupak said he does not need to discuss this with the White House or House leaders because he can read.  He indicated that he does not need the language sold to him and that what he has read is not good enough.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s revisit the statement Obama made about taxpayer money paying for abortions.  He said it was a bogus claim.  It looks like Obama&#8217;s statement that it was a bogus claim was a bogus claim.  Obama said that abortions would not be paid for with taxpayer money but the bill will allow that so he made the bogus claim as he has done with a lot of legislation.  Remember Mr. &#8220;no earmarks&#8221; who has signed bills with earmarks totaling around 10,000?  There is also no mechanism to keep illegals from getting coverage so when Joe Wilson said &#8220;you lie&#8221; he was right.</p>
<p>But back to abortion.  If the White House wants Stupak not to talk about this it means that they know it exists, that the bill covers abortions and that it would be a problem for some in the House.  The request for silence also means they are playing the kind of politics that Obama said he would put an end to.  He is trying to get this through without drawing attention to his LIE.  The Democrats passed this stuff in the dead of night and now the Obama thugs are trying to keep things hush-hush.</p>
<p>There is still a big chance that this whole thing will go down in flames because it is unlikely that the House and Senate will agree.  Of course, there appears to be no such thing as truly moderate Democrats and the only real question is how much do they need to be bought off.  I would like to believe that Stupak will stand his ground but recent events involving Democrats indicate that they will stand their ground until their price is reached and then they fold like a bad poker hand.</p>
<p>One thing is for sure.  They do not have our best interests in mind.  They want to pass something, anything, to make the messiah look good and they don&#8217;t care what it has in it.</p>
<p>Their philosophy is to pass something now and then fix it later which is no way to do anything.  Would you have faith in a car company if its philosophy was to slap cars together quickly and with little regard to what is right and then worry about fixing them later?  Come to think of it, you might have that now that government owns a few car companies&#8230;</p>
<p>This will be interesting to watch but it is important for people to remember that the Democrats do not care about getting it right, just getting it passed and Obama will sign whatever hits his desk even if it contains things he said would not be in his plan.  Obama and House leaders are anxious to keep certain things quiet so they can pass them without public scrutiny.</p>
<p>This is the most transparent administration in history, just ask them.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8581" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fit-was-obama-who-made-the-bogus-claim%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=It%20Was%20Obama%20Who%20Made%20The%20Bogus%20Claim&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/it-was-obama-who-made-the-bogus-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kratovil And Bartlett Use Smoke And Mirrors</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/kratovil-and-bartlett-use-smoke-and-mirrors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/kratovil-and-bartlett-use-smoke-and-mirrors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bartlett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kratovil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/kratovil-and-bartlett-use-smoke-and-mirrors/.Maryland Congressmen Frank Kratovil (D &#8211; MD1) and Roscoe Bartlett (R &#8211; MD6) voted against the year end spending bill that contained millions of dollars in earmarks. They are touting themselves as champions of the people who are fiscally responsible. The only problem is that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/kratovil-and-bartlett-use-smoke-and-mirrors/">http://www.onebigdog.net/kratovil-and-bartlett-use-smoke-and-mirrors/</a>.<br /><p>Maryland Congressmen Frank Kratovil (D &#8211; MD1) and Roscoe Bartlett (R &#8211; MD6) voted against the year end spending bill that contained millions of dollars in earmarks.  They are touting themselves as champions of the people who are fiscally responsible.</p>
<p>The only problem is that this is all smoke and mirrors.  Both of these Congressmen requested earmarks and those were inserted in the bill.  They then voted against the bill knowing that it would pass and they would get what they requested while pretending that they were against it from the start.</p>
<p>If these two boneheads were actually responsible they would not have requested ANY earmarks.  We are in tough financial times and while I am opposed to the earmark process all together, it is especially important not to request them when our economy is in dire straits.</p>
<p>Kratovil is my Congressman and I have a few words for him.  You are out pal.  Andy Harris is going to beat you in 2010.  You rode the Obama coattails in on the anybody but Bush gravy train along with the turncoat Gilchrest supporting you in 2008 but MD1 is a Conservative district.  The people here do not want you and you are going home as a one term Congressman.</p>
<p>You sealed your fate with this sham maneuver designed to trick people into thinking you are concerned about the budget.  You and Bartlett played a parlor game with your vote and while you will tout your tough stance and principled position I will be out in the community working hard to defeat you.  Gilchrest ignored me and he went home.  You are on your way.</p>
<p>Those of you in MD6, please find a few good, responsible candidates to challenge Bartlett.  He played the same game as Kratovil and he did it with the intent of deceiving you.  Both of these men knew the bill would pass without their votes and they inserted earmarks knowing full well the bill would pass.  Here is the hypocrisy from Kratovil:</p>
<blockquote><p>Kratovil, in a statement, said that while the package included &#8220;many deserving programs and projects,&#8221; it failed to reflect the &#8220;tough choices&#8221; needed to control federal spending.</p></blockquote>
<p>Frank, the tough choices are to NOT add earmarks.  It is not a tough choice to vote no if you know the bill will pass and you will get what you wanted in the first place.  The Democrats who voted against this bill are from conservative districts so their NO vote was cover for them (and I am sure they had earmarks as well).  This is a game and it is Congress openly saying that the American public is stupid.</p>
<p>For those of you in Maryland who are out of work or having trouble making ends meet, Kratovil had 36 MILLION dollars in earmark requests (Bartlett had more than 16 MILLION dollars worth).  It is always easy to spend someone else&#8217;s money.  In this case, Kratovil is spending money we do not have, something he said we should make the tough choice not to do.</p>
<p>If either of these men had scruples or the courage of their convictions (or at least the convictions they claim to have) they would not have inserted any earmarks.</p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bal-md.earmarks11dec11,0,6180124.story">Baltimore Sun</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8511" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fkratovil-and-bartlett-use-smoke-and-mirrors%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Kratovil%20And%20Bartlett%20Use%20Smoke%20And%20Mirrors&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/kratovil-and-bartlett-use-smoke-and-mirrors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mother Of All Health Care Bills</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-mother-of-all-health-care-bills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-mother-of-all-health-care-bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monstrosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke and mirrors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/the-mother-of-all-health-care-bills/.The Senate Finance Committee filed its health care bill today and it is designated as S. 1796. The monstrosity of a bill contains 1,502 pages meaning it has about 500 more than any previous version that has been debated. The members of Congress have shown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/the-mother-of-all-health-care-bills/">http://www.onebigdog.net/the-mother-of-all-health-care-bills/</a>.<br /><p>The Senate Finance Committee filed its health care bill today and it is designated as S. 1796.  The monstrosity of a bill contains 1,502 pages meaning it has about 500 more than any previous version that has been debated.</p>
<p>The members of Congress have shown they are unable to read bills that are this big.  They admitted that they did not read the stimulus bill that weighed in around 1,200 pages and they did not read the thousand plus page cap and trade bill.  Given their admission that they cannot read large bills one would think that they would make smaller bills.</p>
<p>But if they did that the smoke and mirrors would be gone.  They would have something to read and the public would be able to digest the information more easily.  However, the public&#8217;s interests are not an issue as the health care bill is a dream of Democrats intent on taking control of every aspect of our lives.</p>
<p>The bill has not yet been added to the web and it is unlikely that it will be posted with enough time for people to read it and express their opinions to their elected officials.</p>
<p>This is all by design.  They are making these things more and more difficult so they can blow smoke up the collective rear ends of all Americans.  These criminals are bound and determined to push this on us regardless of what we think.  Fortunately, some Democrats are expressing concern over some of the contents of this thing.</p>
<p>The people in Congress have a very short time left.  The next election is just about a year away and I see a bloodbath taking place.  People are fed up with the careless manner with which this bunch is operating and have had quite enough.  Even <a href="http://www.thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/63689-poll-34-of-californians-approve-of-pelosis-job-performance">Nancy Pelosi is polling</a> very low in her home state.</p>
<p>Hold their feet to the fire on this.  We can win if we keep up the pressure but they must understand the consequences of their actions.</p>
<p>Vote them out.  That is the only way short of an armed revolution to get anything accomplished.</p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1009/Finance_Committee_bill_has_been_filed_.html">Politico</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8192" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fthe-mother-of-all-health-care-bills%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=The%20Mother%20Of%20All%20Health%20Care%20Bills&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/the-mother-of-all-health-care-bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom of Choice</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/freedom-of-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/freedom-of-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 14:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Blake. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/freedom-of-choice/.I have been posting for a little while now, and I have come across many other opinions, some agreeing with me, and some not so much. Some have been truly vindictive (probably evidence of poor breeding), but this has not, nor will not deter me from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Blake</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/freedom-of-choice/">http://www.onebigdog.net/freedom-of-choice/</a>.<br /><p>I have been posting for a little while now, and I have come across many other opinions, some agreeing with me, and some not so much. Some have been truly vindictive (probably evidence of poor breeding), but this has not, nor will not deter me from presenting my viewpoint as I see it. This is a part of free speech, and also a part of our freedom of choice- we can choose to say something, or abstain from speaking. They are also free to go to another site if they wish. It&#8217;s all about the freedom here.</p>
<p>As the days of this &#8220;revered leaders&#8221; term winds on, the term &#8220;Freedom of Choice&#8221; will increasingly be under fire from all quarters of the liberal front, as these socialists seek to make us all into &#8220;good people&#8221;. This would mean, of course, people who blindly agree with their nutjob socialistic thinking.</p>
<p>But to do this, they have to subvert the little roadbump in the road called the Constitution, and they have found ways around this.</p>
<p>A good example is the First Amendment, which details freedom of speech. Well, they can&#8217;t get past that one, can they? Oh yes- by two different ways- first is a little innocent thing called &#8220;localism&#8221;, whereby a radio station could be forced to put on &#8220;local&#8221; opposing views to counter the talk radio. The trouble with that is, first, the opposing views would not have to pay for their time, so stations would lose money on these &#8220;views&#8221; (comments from the Commissar, perhaps?). The second problem is that IF these views were popular, they would already BE on the radio. The failure of liberal Air America radio proves there is no market for their drivel.</p>
<p>The second step in the battle over freedom of speech is what is known as &#8220;diversity of ownership&#8221;- where certain stations would be stripped from the rightful owners, and given, in the name of &#8220;diversity&#8221;, to others with the politically correct viewpoint. I&#8217;m not saying that Barama is Chavez, but he&#8217;s looking &#8220;Chavez-ish.&#8221;</p>
<p>The restrictions on the Second Amendment are, in part, thanks to the comedian Chris Rock who made the suggestion of pricing ammunition at $1,000 a bullet, and so there will be onerous taxes on the ammo- that&#8217;s not the only way around the Second Amendment, but mark my words, that is at least one of the ways they will go, because they need the money, their printer is about out of ink.</p>
<p>Green jobs will make us less prosperous, because as a study of the Green industry has shown in Spain, 2.2 jobs are lost for every 1 job created by green technology, and subsidies for companies put many utilities out of business, causing the others who survived to be monopolies and able to charge what they wished, and it was not cheaper for the consumer.</p>
<p>We will have less freedom in our job choices, because the government wants to determine just what THEY determine you are worth. Keep in mind, this is the same people who tout the 7.35 minimum wage as a step forward- Bulls**t! The minimum wage should have been tied to the yearly rise in inflation back in 1970, but nooooooooo. So now the government wants to look at other wages? Might they do as poor a job on these as they did with the minimum wage. One might think so.</p>
<p>Small businesses will not be able to grow as they might in a capitalistic society- many people forget that Bill Gates was a small businessman once. But under Barama, you get just so large, and you will be punished for your success, taxed to within an inch of your life.</p>
<p>Because of the hybrid technology, and the blind refusal to drill off of our coasts, our choices for transportation will be severely restricted to p**spoor electric and wimpy little tinfoil cars that can&#8217;t carry a driver, much less a real- life load for work. And of course less choice in auto maker, because only a fool or a Russian buys a government- made car, and I am neither.</p>
<p>There is already less choice on schools- Congress, in its infinite stupidity, cancelled school vouchers for Washington D.C. schools, so Barama&#8217;s children, I guess, wouldn&#8217;t have to mix with the riff- raff of common people. They will continue this pattern for the rest of the states, and that runs counter to the Tenth Amendment, pertaining to state&#8217;s rights, but they&#8217;ve done so many end arounds on the Constitution that they probably feel they can do it all.</p>
<p>And finally, there will be less choice in terms of social services and infrastructure, because of B&#8217;s onerous taxes, there will have to be less. All the people making or having enough money will find ways around taxation, even if it meant moving somewhere in the Bahamas or Cayman Islands. This puts the burden on the captive people,those who can&#8217;t move, and these people will be taxed to the max. Streets, which already look like those in Iraq, will go longer between repaving, but it will all work out, I am sure, because we will not have the money to drive anywhere, nor will we have a car that would be able to navigate the potholes in order to get to a sub-standard school.</p>
<p>We will, however, be able to sit in the car and listen to the local Commissar rant.</p>
<p>It will be SO much fun.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/blakesignature.png" alt="Blake" /><br />
<div class="note"><div class="notetip"><em>If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader.  If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</em></div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton6616" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Ffreedom-of-choice%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Freedom%20of%20Choice&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/freedom-of-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

