Nationalized Socialism Is Obama’s Goal
Mar 21, 2009 Political
It is no secret to people who are not infected with Obamaitis that he is a radical who has studied Saul Alinsky and that he wants to make this country a Socialist haven. He has already worked toward that and his grand plans include socializing health care and confiscating wealth from the affluent and giving it to the less affluent. His toadies are also working on back door gun bans to run around the Second Amendment. Top it off with the re-imposition of slavery in this country and it is not hard to see we are heading in the wrong direction.
Recently, the government demonstrated its intentions by using the tax policies to negate legal contracts and to punish those who received money to which they were entitled. The punitive taxes are being implemented because Congress failed in its duties. They are punishing people in order to cover the mistakes they made and that Obama allowed. This is how government will handle laws it does not like. Unfortunately, this will probably stand because the courts do not like to get involved in tax legislation.
I know there are many who are happy about this but they ignore the rule of law in their delight. But, but, Congress is only taking care of the mess that these companies made. These companies got taxpayer money so we Congress can make sure they act right.
[note]Thought to ponder: Barney Frank said the US owned part of AIG so it was OK to negate legal contracts. Why has he not advocated for negating the autoworker union contracts? We gave them money as well.[/note]
I know, people believe that Congress has every right to get involved in businesses that taxpayer money has gone to (even though some companies were forced to take the money) but now Obama wants to go after all executive pay regardless of whether the companies received a bailout or not. Drudge is reporting that a Sunday New York Times piece will report that:
Obama will call for increased oversight of ‘executive pay at all banks, Wall Street firms and possibly other companies’ as part of sweeping plan to ‘overhaul financial regulation’, NY TIMES reporting Sunday, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE…
What gives Obama the right to decide executive pay in any company? What gives him the right to decide how much money an individual is allowed to make?
Nothing in our system of government does but Obama does not like our system of government. He wants us to be a Socialist nation where government decides what people do and how much they make. He wants to take wealth and move it in a downward direction rather than encourage people to make money and move upward.
Maybe a few things can happen to derail this phony leader and his gang of Socialist conspirators. First of all, companies that did not get bailout money should tell the administration they WILL NOT cap pay or bonuses and that as long as they make money they will decide how to spend it. All companies (whether they got bailout money or not) should stop ALL political donations. If they employ lobbyists then they should fire them. Not one dime should come from anywhere in the financial district. That would reduce the amount of money going to politicians by millions. I also wonder how it would screw things up if all the folks at AIG who received bonuses donated enough of it to charity to offset the punitive taxes imposed by Congress. I would donate 100% of it to charity before I paid 90% in taxes on it.
Congress and the usurper in the White House are out of control. They are going balls to the walls in order to steamroll this country. They want Socialism and they are working very hard to get it. I read a quote that Socialism works until you run out of other people’s money. We are already spending the money of future generations. When will the madness stop?
I asked earlier why the Democrats are not going after union contracts the way they did the AIG contracts. They want more union people in this country and they are working hard to get all the workers unionized through card check and through fast track amnesty plans for illegals. They want nationalized socialism with workers who do the bidding of their charismatic leader.
They called George Bush the Nazi and compared him to Hitler but Obama is more closely aligned with those items. If we do not oppose him now it will not be long before brown shirted Obama Nazis will be marching in our streets.
What do you think a national civilian security force is for? Here is a hint: It is not to stop people from outside our borders. That only leaves those within…
Join the resistance.
Wake up America.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: aig, bonus, confiscation, nazi, Obama, socialist, taxes, wealth
Obama Says No Need To Stock Up On Guns
Dec 9, 2008 Political
Barack Obama must be aware that since he was elected to the presidency the sale of guns and ammunition has gone through the roof. Many gun stores report a 50-60% increase in sales, gun shows have more people than at any time in recent memory and ammunition supply places report that they are out of ammo and most is on back order. This is all because Americans are aware of Barack Obama’s stance on gun control.
But Barry says not to worry. He said that people did not need to stock up on guns because he has no intention of taking them.
“I believe in common-sense gun safety laws, and I believe in the second amendment,” Obama said at a news conference. “Lawful gun owners have nothing to fear. I said that throughout the campaign. I haven’t indicated anything different during the transition. I think people can take me at my word.”
Before it was common sense gun laws. When that did not fly it changed to safety laws and who is to say exactly what that means and according to what person’s definition of safety? Obama’s common sense laws have led his hometown to have countless murders by gun, guns that are illegal to possess in a city from which this so called gun friendly man hails (and served in office). Barack Obama has a long history of abusing the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. There can be no doubt about this regardless of what he or his kool aid drinking followers say. Obama’s legislative record tells a much different story than the one he fabricated in order to get elected. He did not believe that it was an individual right and he sided with DC in the Heller case. It was not until after the SCOTUS ruled that gun ownership was an idividual right that Obama told us he has believed that all along (remember, if he says “like I have always said” or “I have not changed my position” then he is lying). Take him at his word? All of his promises come with expiration dates, just ask his kooky left wingnuts who are not real happy with him.
The NRA is not fooled by Obama:
But National Rifle Association spokesman Andrew Arulanandam said it’s not Obama’s words — but his legislative track record — that has gun-buyers flocking to the stores.
“Prior to his campaign for president, his record as a state legislator and as a U.S. Senator shows he voted for the most stringent forms of gun control, the most Draconian legislation, gun bans, ammunition bans and even an increase in federal excise taxes up to 500 percent for every gun and firearm sold,” Arulanandam said.
Obama answered “yes” in 1996 to a questionnaire from an Illinois group on whether he supported a handgun ban. But he later said a staffer filled out that answer and he did not support a ban.
Obama said that a staffer filled out the questionnaire but it was filled out in Obama’s handwriting. That is a talented staffer indeed. Obama wants to take guns away because an unarmed citizenry is more easily controlled by government. This government is getting more and more out of control and it will get worse under Obama. He wants complete control so he can run his Socialist Utopia and he knows that the armed among us will not take his crap.
It should surprise no one that Obama will ignore the Constitution because he is doing so right now. He has not proven he is a natural born citizen and thus will be an illegitimate president. Maybe this is the perfect ruse for him. He can impose all kinds of things and then when the armed take the country back he can say that it is not his fault because he is not really qualified for the job. He can then throw whomever failed to properly vet him right under the bus.
If Obama is telling you there is no need to stock up on guns then you need to stock up on guns. He and the idiots who want to remove guns from society believe they know better than you how to live your life. They believe they are smarter than you and they should be deciding on dangerous things like guns. This is what Peter Hamm of the Brady Center against Gun Violence had to say:
“Anyone who thinks they need to rush out and buy a firearm clearly has not been paying attention to how quickly we make progress on this issue. We don’t think these are first-time buyers. We think they are people who already have more than enough guns at their homes to protect themselves and are buying more.”
These are people who already have more than enough guns. Who is this jerk to decide how many is enough? Does this guy go around telling people they have too many cars, or too many pair of shoes, or too many clothes? If people have the money and they want to buy lots of guns then who is Hamm (or anyone else) to say that they already have enough? This is the same philosophy that liberals use when they take you money in taxes. You already have enough so we will take some from you.
Barak Obama must think that he has credibility because he won an election. He lost his credibility a long time ago and were it not for white guilt and dreamy eyed liberals (coupled with blacks voting for race) he would be another name in a history book. His word is his bond but only to the idiots who supported him. The rest of us know better.
But Barack Says there is nothing to worry about and that we do not need to buy guns. He even says he is all in favor of gun ownership. Yes, Barack Obama is a friend to the gun owner. I don’t believe that for a minute.
And judging from the sales of guns and ammo, neither do a lot of others.
Source:
Chicago Sun Times
Tags: ammunition, confiscation, gun shows, guns, law, liar, Obama, Second Amendment
What’s In Store For Your 401(k)?
Nov 6, 2008 Political
…Or as Congress would ask; What’s in your wallet?
Socials Security has been a disaster. The money that people put into it is pooled together and then redistributed. Regardless of how much one makes, there is a cap as to how much one can receive. One of the problems is, the money is not put into an account in your name. It is put in the general fund and Congress spends it. Then, every four years Congress cries about Socials Security going bankrupt. If a person dies then the money is not passed on to heirs. There are some benefits but basically the money goes to others who did not die. If a single person works for 40 years and dies before reaching retirement age then all his hard work pays for someone who outlived him.
The 401(k) retirement was set up so that people could save money for retirement. The money is theirs and they would be able to use it for retirement. Those who saved more would be able to retire a bit better off than those who did not save or saved very little. There is a tax benefit to contributing as the money is tax deferred and reduces taxable income.
This is not good for the Democrats because they are losing 80 billion dollars a year because of the tax break. There is now a plan to forcibly take your 401(k) money and put it in your Social Security “account” and then pay that out to you when you retire. This will allow the government to pool your money and redistribute it as it sees fit. If you were fortunate to put away a great deal of money you will retire with the same amount as someone who paid much less. The government will decide how you get to live your retirement years. Rush Limbaugh explained the plan, as it is right now. I heard the audio of the person he discusses and she said exactly what he reports.
She wants to basically eliminate the 401(k), and the way she wants to do it is she wants to go to people who have a 401(k), who have seen its asset value plummet because of the market plunge. So she wants to go back to August levels. Everybody that has a 401(k), we’ll take you back and we’ll give you money. We’ll restore the value. The government will. We’re just going to print some money here, and we’re going to restore your 401(k) to its August amount. Then we’re going to take it. We’re going to take your 401(k), and we will put it in your Social Security account that the government is monitoring for you, and we will invest every year 3% in government bonds. We’ll buy government bonds so that your 401(k) will grow at 3% every year adjusted for inflation. The most that you will be able to contribute to your 401(k) every year is 5% of what you earn.
Read the rest of the article and see how things will work. This is highly irregular and amounts to nothing more than theft. It is a socialistic policy designed to redistribute wealth and it should cause alarm for anyone who is saving for his future. The moochers out there probably can’t wait to get another piece of your earnings so they will like it but this is pure evil.
Keep a close eye on this. If they pass legislation to confiscate your money then I recommend you see a broker before they implement it so that you can close your account and put it somewhere where it will be protected from the thieves in DC. There is probably a penalty associated with early withdraw but I am willing to pay it to move my money to other investment vehicles so that I will have what I earned when I retire.
People should decide on their own investments and they should not have to worry about their government confiscating their money. This is what they do in Socialist countries and it keeps the masses in poverty while government elitists live like kings. Social Security should be abolished and people allowed to decide where their money is invested.
We get to decide how to save and how we want to retire. It is up to us to provide for ourselves and our families. It is our decision as to how much we want to have when we retire and our future should not depend on a government bean counter deciding how much we need to live.
I don’t know if Obama will buy off on this but given he is a Socialist and wants to spread the wealth, I have no doubt he will be more than happy to take your money and spread it around.
Our future should be based on our own sound decisions and not those of people who do not know what fiscal responsibility is. You know better what to do with your money than they do.
You can’t rob a bank to get money so why should they be allowed to rob you to improve their flow of cash?
Tags: 401k, confiscation, Congress, robbery, social security, taxes