<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Dogs House &#187; chuck schumer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/tag/chuck-schumer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Democrat&#8217;s Strategy; LIE!</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-strategy-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-strategy-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steny hoyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=11467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-strategy-lie/.The Democrats are in full court press mode as the budget battle heads toward the next round of attempting to get a budget in order. Chuck Schumer, the whiny liberal Senator, was caught on a conference call instructing fellow Democrats to use the word extreme [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-strategy-lie/">http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-strategy-lie/</a>.<br /><p>The Democrats are in full court press mode as the budget battle heads toward the next round of attempting to get a budget in order.  Chuck Schumer, the whiny liberal Senator, <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/03/schumer-coordinates-dem-budget-attack-gop">was caught on a conference call</a> instructing fellow Democrats to use the word extreme while describing the Republican&#8217;s cuts and to tell the press that was supposed to join the call that Republicans were refusing to negotiate.  The problem is that the reporters were already on the line and heard Schumer instructing his colleagues to lie about what is going on.</p>
<p>Evidently, the Democrats had a liberal focus group and when they said Republican&#8217;s budget cuts are extreme the wimpy liberals wet their pink panties so Democrats are now using that term.  Harry Reid used it as well during the day because that is the new plan.</p>
<p>The Democrat who takes the cake is the moron from Maryland, Steny Hoyer.  Hoyer, who calls the Tea Party Caucus the perfectionist caucus, said that Democrats will not be to blame if the government shuts down (which it never really does) and he made the amazing claim that this would not be a problem if Democrats were in charge:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s self-evident we don&#8217;t control Washington, or we wouldn&#8217;t be having this problem,&#8221; Hoyer said, arguing that Democrats would not be to blame if the government shuts down.  <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03/29/budget-talks-sour-dems-blame-tea-party-stalemate-deadline-looms/">FOX News</a></p></blockquote>
<p>This is amazing because the reason we have the problem is that Democrats WERE in charge.  Yes Mr. Hoyer, the problem we are now facing over not having a budget is because you and your fellow Democrats failed to exercise your Constitutional duties and pass a budget last year.  You were too cowardly to pass a budget prior to the election and this is why we have a problem.</p>
<p>If you had done your job then we would have a budget in place and would not be wasting time trying to get one passed nearly a half year after it was due.</p>
<p>In other words Steny, you are full of crap.  We certainly would have this problem if you were in charge because that is why we have the problem.</p>
<p>It is amazing to me that this moron would make such an obviously stupid (and false) statement but then again Democrats are full of people who make stupid and false statements.</p>
<p>You did not do you job Mr. Hoyer and that is one of the reasons you and your party took a first class beating in the last election.</p>
<p>As for calling the Tea Party Caucus the perfectionist caucus, perhaps if we had more people trying to achieve perfection and fewer trying to rape the taxpaying public we would not be in such bad shape.</p>
<p>I would rather be part of the perfectionist party than be part of the dumb ass party and that sir, is where you reside.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/29/Cantor-Time-is-up-on-budget/UPI-22451301439279/">Time is running ou</a>t and if the government shuts down it will be the sole responsibility of the Democrats for failing to pass a budget when they were suposed to.</p>
<p>Cave Canem!<br />
Never surrender,never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton11467" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fdemocrats-strategy-lie%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Democrat%26%238217%3Bs%20Strategy%3B%20LIE%21&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/democrats-strategy-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chuck Schumer Thinks He Is More Important Than You</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/chuck-schumer-thinks-he-is-more-important-than-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/chuck-schumer-thinks-he-is-more-important-than-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do as i say]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elitist liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun permit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=10503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/chuck-schumer-thinks-he-is-more-important-than-you/.Chuck Schumer is not a supporter of the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms. He is in favor of more gun control and more restrictions on Americans in violation of our Constitutional right. But Chuckie is not completely against the Second Amendment. Chuck [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/chuck-schumer-thinks-he-is-more-important-than-you/">http://www.onebigdog.net/chuck-schumer-thinks-he-is-more-important-than-you/</a>.<br /><p>Chuck Schumer is not a supporter of the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms.  He is in favor of more gun control and more restrictions on Americans in violation of our Constitutional right.  But Chuckie is not completely against the Second Amendment.  Chuck has a gun permit and carries one even though he is in a state where it is extremely tough to get any kind of carry permit.  The kind of permit Chuckie has is nearly impossible to get.</p>
<blockquote><p>Not only does Schumer carry a handgun, the New York City Police Department also provides armed escorts for the good senator. In fact, the Government Accounting Office &#8212; the investigative arm of the US Congress &#8212; slammed Schumer&#8217;s use of police resources for personal protection. It&#8217;s clear that Schumer believes he&#8217;s special. He wishes to ban private citizens&#8217; ownership of firearms, while he enjoys layers of protection.</p>
<p>&#8220;No wonder Chuckie Schumer shoots his mouth off so much &#8212; he&#8217;s able to protect himself,&#8221; says a 25-year police veteran.</p>
<p>Also, a check of Pistol License records shows that Senator Schumer possesses an &#8220;unrestricted&#8221; pistol permit, a rarity in New York City. Licenses are distributed in different categories in the Big Apple: Target Permits allow only use of a firearm at a licensed firing range; Premises Permits allow weapons to be kept in a home or apartment; Restricted Permits allow the gunowner to carry their firearms concealed but only within the purview of their job (security, jewelers, armored car guards, etc.). So it&#8217;s evident that Senator Schumer has two sets of rules &#8212; one for Americans and one for himself.  <a href="http://www.americandaily.com/article/9405">American Daily</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, Schumer is part of the political class that thinks he is more important than you.  He thinks he deserves more protection than you so much so that he even has police officers who escort him.  He can defend himself and he has an escort detail of police officers.</p>
<p>Most citizens I know do not want their own police officer and if the state of New York wants to pay cops to tag along with Chuckie then it is their business as long as it is only New York taxpayers footing the bill.</p>
<p>But what we do want is to be able to exercise our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.  The people of New York (and all of the states for that matter) deserve THE EXACT SAME carry permit that Chuckie was able to get.  The people are his boss and if he can get a permit then they all should have one.</p>
<p>In fact, if we were to follow the Constitution (assuming that requiring permits is not a violation of it) then people should be issued permits unless there is some compelling reason not to allow an individual to carry.</p>
<p>Obviously Schumer feels that he has certain inalienable rights that the rest of us do not.  He would like to disarm you while packing his own heat.</p>
<p>And this people, is why we need to get rid of all these pukes.</p>
<p>It is November or never.</p>
<p>Cave Canem!<br />
Never surrender, never submit.<br />
<img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div> </p><div id="tweetbutton10503" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fchuck-schumer-thinks-he-is-more-important-than-you%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Chuck%20Schumer%20Thinks%20He%20Is%20More%20Important%20Than%20You&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/chuck-schumer-thinks-he-is-more-important-than-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bow Down To Schumer Or You Are A Female Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/bow-down-to-schumer-or-you-are-a-female-dog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/bow-down-to-schumer-or-you-are-a-female-dog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight attendant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inconsideration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/bow-down-to-schumer-or-you-are-a-female-dog/.Chuck Schumer was on an airplane waiting for it to takeoff. He was using his cell phone after the flight attendant&#8217;s instructions to everyone to turn off their electronic devices. Evidently the rules do not apply to Chuck Schumer because he kept talking. A flight [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/bow-down-to-schumer-or-you-are-a-female-dog/">http://www.onebigdog.net/bow-down-to-schumer-or-you-are-a-female-dog/</a>.<br /><p>Chuck Schumer was on an airplane waiting for it to takeoff.  He was using his cell phone after the flight attendant&#8217;s instructions to everyone to turn off their electronic devices.  Evidently the rules do not apply to Chuck Schumer because he kept talking.  A flight attendant told him that he had to turn it off and he asked if he could complete his call to which she said &#8220;No.&#8221;  Schumer ended his call and then turned to the other Senator from New York, Kirsten Gillibrand, and said the flight attendant was a &#8220;bitch.&#8221;  Then Schumer&#8217;s phone rang (which means he did not turn it off) and he announced that it was Harry Reid but that health care would have to wait until they landed.</p>
<p>Federal law states that passengers must follow the instructions of flight crews.  Schumer broke the law so why is he not facing charges?</p>
<p>I have been on flights with jackasses like him.  They continue to use phones and ipods (and other devices) even after they have been told to turn them off.  People keep chatting away and act like they are being imposed upon when told to turn the phone off.  These people hold up the flight and inconvenience everyone on board and more than once I have voiced my disgust with these morons.  Schumer is a Senator so he believes that he is above the law and that the rules do not apply to him.</p>
<p>Calling the flight attendant a bitch was out of line and not very professional for a Senator.  I am sure my liberal commenters will take him to task for his act of demeaning a woman, I won&#8217;t hold my breath.</p>
<p>Schumer is a whiny puke moron who should have been told to get off the plane.  The Air Marshals should have frog marched him out and then strip searched him.</p>
<p>No one, including Schumer is so important that phone calls can&#8217;t wait.  How did people ever get along before cell phones were invented?  If you are so important that you can&#8217;t wait to use a cell phone then stay on the ground.</p>
<p>The rest of us do not want to put up with your inconsiderate behavior.</p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0912/schumer_has_a_flight_to_forget_.html">Politico</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/gunline.gif" alt="Gunline" /></p>
<p><div class="note"><div class="notetip">If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.</div></div></p><div id="tweetbutton8525" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fbow-down-to-schumer-or-you-are-a-female-dog%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Bow%20Down%20To%20Schumer%20Or%20You%20Are%20A%20Female%20Dog&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/bow-down-to-schumer-or-you-are-a-female-dog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Is Responsible For This Financial Mess?</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/who-is-responsible-for-this-financial-mess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/who-is-responsible-for-this-financial-mess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barney frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial trouble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/who-is-responsible-for-this-financial-mess/.Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats have been putting the blame for the current financial crisis on the back of the president and the Republican Party who Democrats claim failed to address the issue. The Democrat&#8217;s parrots in the media have been shouting to anyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/who-is-responsible-for-this-financial-mess/">http://www.onebigdog.net/who-is-responsible-for-this-financial-mess/</a>.<br /><p>Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats have been putting the blame for the current financial crisis on the back of the president and the Republican Party who Democrats claim failed to address the issue.  The Democrat&#8217;s parrots in the media have been shouting to anyone who will listen trying to make the accusations stick.  This is a coordinated attack to take the focus off all the Democrats who have been bought and paid for by the greedy people on Wall Street.  Fox News had a story and this should provide documented proof, with audio and video, as to whom the blame lies.  In reality, this news story shows the efforts of the Bush Administration in trying to reign in the mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  The complete history goes back decades and involves Democratic plans that allowed people to buy things they had no hope of ever affording.</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VgctSIL8Lhs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VgctSIL8Lhs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>I doubt this will do any good because too many people have overdosed on the moonbat Kool Aid, but it clearly shows that there were a number of people, including President Bush, on multiple occasions who tried to reign in Fannie and Freddie.  Pay attention to Barney Frank and see how his assessment squares with the reality we&#8217;re facing.  Listen to the people who said that we were heading for trouble and see how Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer had a hand in preventing any regulation.</p>
<p>Then take heart in the knowledge that Nancy Pelosi assigned Barney Frank the job of fixing the problem.</p>
<p>How can one fix something if one does not recognize the problem?</p>
<p>You should also keep in mind that these are the people who want to lead you.  While John McCain headed back to DC, Barack Obama prepared for a debate and fund raising (he was left with little option than to return after a call from the President).</p>
<p>Who puts the country first?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2008/09/as-obama-balks.html">Riehl World View</a> says that Palin should debate Obama while McCain is TCB in DC.  Not a bad idea.  Could be risky but she is not a member of Congress so she does not have to be there and Obama has no intention of staying in DC.</p>
<p><img src="http://home.comcast.net/~big-dog/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" alt="Big Dog" /></p><div id="tweetbutton4273" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fwho-is-responsible-for-this-financial-mess%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Who%20Is%20Responsible%20For%20This%20Financial%20Mess%3F&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/who-is-responsible-for-this-financial-mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schumer Now Likes Arab Emirate Business</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/schumer-now-likes-arab-emirate-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onebigdog.net/schumer-now-likes-arab-emirate-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abu dhabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab emirate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brown skin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[largest bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/schumer-now-likes-arab-emirate-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright &#169; 2012 Big Dog. Visit the original article at http://www.onebigdog.net/schumer-now-likes-arab-emirate-business/.A few years back Dubai wanted to purchase several ports in the United States. Democrats, trying to make people believe they were tough on security, raised a stink about the security implications of such a move. The deal was eventually halted and the Democrats got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright &copy; 2012 <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net">Big Dog</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/schumer-now-likes-arab-emirate-business/">http://www.onebigdog.net/schumer-now-likes-arab-emirate-business/</a>.<br /><p>A few years back Dubai wanted to purchase several ports in the United States.  Democrats, trying to make people believe they were tough on security, raised a stink about the security implications of such a move.  The deal was eventually halted and the Democrats got their way though there was no real reason for their opposition.  Interestingly, none of their toadies made comments about hating people with brown skin.  It was just accepted that a partner in the war on terror would undermine our security and cause us harm.  Chuck Schumer was one of the loudest (and most annoying) voices to express opposition.</p>
<p>My how the times have changed.  With the sub-prime housing market collapsing a lot of businesses are going south very quickly.  Some have filed for bankruptcy protection and others have seen their assets cut in half.  Companies have been forced to suffer the consequences of their poor decisions (it is called SUB prime for a reason) and they did not like it.  Citigroup, the largest US bank, was one of the companies suffering because of the sub-prime mess.  Not any longer though as they were bailed out by, get this, Abu Dhabi, of the Arab emirate.  </p>
<p>Abu Dhabi will purchase 7.5 billion dollars worth of Citigroup and will see a guaranteed return on investment of 11%.  With its purchase of 4.9% of the company, Abu Dhabi will become Citigroup&#8217;s largest shareholder.  And what did the mouth Schumer have to say about all this Arab money?</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;the Citi transaction will bolster the bank&#8217;s competitiveness and &#8220;help preserve New York&#8217;s status as the world&#8217;s financial center.&#8221;  <cite><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/071127/citi_abudhabi.html?.v=24">Yahoo News</a></cite></p></blockquote>
<p>Amazingly, mouth almighty Chuck Schumer, who saw problems with having Dubai owning six ports in the US, seems unconcerned that Abu Dhabi will be the largest shareholder in America&#8217;s largest bank.  Where is that level of concern for national security?</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t see a problem with the deal but then again I had no problem with the Dubai port deal.  I might be wrong about both but at least I have been consistent.</p>
<p>Schumer, on the other hand, has shown inconsistent positions on similar issues.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onebigdog.net/wp-images/trans-signature3a.gif" title="Trans Signature3a" alt="Big Dog" /></p>
<p>Others with similar items:<br />
<a href="http://perrinelson.com/2007/11/27/1086.aspx">Perri Nelson&#8217;s Website</a>, <a href="http://morewhat.com/wordpress/?p=2704">Blog @ MoreWhat.com</a>, <a href="http://rosemarysthoughts.blogspot.com/2007/11/simplified-mitt.html">Rosemary&#8217;s Thoughts</a>, <a href="http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2007/11/mahdi-army-and.html">Right Truth</a>, <a href="http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/post-of-the-day-november-27-2007/">Adam&#8217;s Blog</a>, <a href="http://leaningstraightup.com/2007/11/26/thoughts-on-tasers/">Leaning Straight Up</a>, <a href="http://www.bullwinkleblog.com/?p=5434">The Bullwinkle Blog</a>, <a href="http://amboytimes.typepad.com/the_amboy_times/2007/11/huckabee-americ.html">The Amboy Times</a>, <a href="http://thepopulistblog.com/2007/11/27/tuesday-open-trackback-and-open-tread/">Chuck Adkins</a>, <a href="http://the-pet-haven.blogspot.com/2007/11/diabetes-rising-in-pets-too.html">The Pet Haven</a>, <a href="http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/11/26/what-im-reading-instead-of-sleeping/">Pursuing Holiness</a>, <a href="http://allieiswired.com/archives/2007/11/allies-wired-hot-links-49/">Allie is Wired</a>, <a href="http://dragonladysworld.com/wordpress/?p=1380">DragonLady&#8217;s World</a>, <a href="http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/?p=1226">The World According to Carl</a>, <a href="http://bluestarchronicles.com/2007/11/26/johann-pachelbel-canon-in-d/">Blue Star Chronicles</a>, <a href="http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=4813">Pirate&#8217;s Cove</a>, <a href="http://thepinkflamingo.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2007/11/27/3378306.html">The Pink Flamingo</a>, <a href="http://rncnyc2004.blogspot.com/2007/11/rememberance-hanukkah-5768.html">Republican National Convention Blog</a>, <a href="http://commonsenseamerica.net/blog1/?p=1520">CommonSenseAmerica</a>, <a href="http://thomistic.blogspot.com/2007/11/novak-slams-huckabee.html">Dumb Ox Daily News</a>, <a href="http://highdesertwanderer.com/archives/1054">High Desert Wanderer</a>, and <a href="http://rightvoices.com/2007/11/26/hey-dems-i-thought-schip-was-all-about-the-children/">Right Voices</a>, thanks to <a href="http://www.linkfests.us">Linkfest Haven Deluxe</a>.</p><div id="tweetbutton3143" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onebigdog.net%2Fschumer-now-likes-arab-emirate-business%2F&amp;via=onebigdog&amp;text=Schumer%20Now%20Likes%20Arab%20Emirate%20Business&amp;related=onebigdog:The+Big+Dog&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.onebigdog.net/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onebigdog.net/schumer-now-likes-arab-emirate-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

