Oct 3, 2010 Political
The Socialists and the Communists and other backers of Obama and the Democrats decided to have a rally in DC to counter the very successful Restoring Honor Rally that Glenn Beck held on August 28th. This was heavily promoted by the Socialists, some teachers were able to attend because the unions paid part fo the cost and other union members were required to attend.
Even with required attendance and a plethora of Socialist organizations and unions (but I repeat myself) backing this rally it could not get attendance numbers anywhere close to what Beck brought in. The AP reports that there was a sparse crowd and that it was not as densely packed as the Restoring Honor crowd.
I don’t care how many people they drew or that they had a rally but after Restoring Honor Ed Schultz, one of the speakers at the Socialist Rally, claimed he could draw 300,000 easily. I don’t think his TV show gets that many viewers but he assured us he could draw that many for a rally.
It is highly doubtful he drew that many and this rally was supported by a number of Socialist organizations and labor unions (there I go again). Still, they could not do it.
How do we know? If this had been as huge a success as Beck’s rally the MSM would be trumpeting the numbers and proclaiming how great it was. We would have non stop coverage of the great masses and they would be telling us it is America speaking out.
Instead, the MSM reports it drew thousands and that it was not as densely packed. If it was anywhere near as many the MSM would inflate numbers and try to make people believe that more were there than actually were (like the Million Man March). Even with deflated numbers the MSM assigns to conservative rallies and the imaginary numbers it invents for liberal (Socialist) ones, the MSM could not invent enough people to show this did better than Restoring Honor.
I am sure Schultz will be on the air Monday telling us about the millions of people who attended but we all know that it will be a lie.
At least he gave some fringe moonbats a chance to take shots at conservatives. Too bad not very many were there to listen.
Never surrender, never submit.
Nov 24, 2009 Political
Barack Obama warned against jumping to conclusions when terrorist Nidal Hasan shot and killed members of the US Army. This from the guy who jumped to conclusions when a police officer arrested his buddy for being disorderly. The warning signs were there and Army officers report that they were afraid to report the issue because of political correctness. One claimed his concerns were ignored for that very reason.
The communications with an al-Qaeda cleric, the rantings about Islam, the threats to infidels, the poor performance are all out there now and we are warned not to jump to conclusions.
Hasan might claim insanity and he might be on to something. One would have to be insane to follow the teachings of the radical faction of Islam.
But where were the liberals warning about jumping to conclusions when a part time census worker was found hanging from a tree in Kentucky, allegedly with the words FED scrawled on his chest? The left immediately jumped all over the case and indicted the right wing in America. The blame was placed squarely on so called hate speech from the right. Michelle Malkin detailed, at the time, all of the liberals who were blaming conservatives. Here is a sample from the Democratic Underground (as reported by her):
We need to absolutely expose Glenn Beck, Michele Bachmann, Michelle Malkin, CNN’s Lou Dobbs, Michael Steele, Rush Limbaugh and the legion of others parroting right-wing lies for trumping up this nonsense and getting people to now commit murder in a hideous fashion.
HuffPo, Radio Equalizer and New York Magazine all put the blame on conservatives. There was even a picture of a hanging body with the words FED on the chest and the names of conservatives printed behind it.
It would seem that this was a bit premature because the official finding in the case is that the worker, Bill Sparkman, committed suicide.
It would seem that all of the conclusions as to whom was responsible were quite a bit off the mark. None of the liberals espousing restraint with regard to Nidal Hasan opened their mouths to caution restraint. There is plenty of evidence in the case against Hasan but there was not one shred of evidence in Sparkman’s death that pointed to conservatives talk being the cause of his death. The left jumped all over it nonetheless. Where were the trusty liberal mouthpieces when this was taking place? They were agreeing with the accusations of their echo chamber roommates. While they might not have publicly expressed the same sentiments, they were thinking it because they all believe that conservatives are violent.
Who can blame them for thinking this? The botox bimbo, San Fran Nan, told them that conservatives were violent. She teared up at a meeting to discuss the anger from the tea party protesters and stated she had seen this before in her home state and it led to violence. She was referring to Harvey Milk who, by the way, was murdered by another state employee over a job dispute. His murder had nothing to do with “angry mobs.” But Nancy had to make people believe that the tea party people are violent. The left looks at the tea parties as conservatives but the movement has people from all political ideologies and all walks of life. But the left has to focus on conservatives and isolate them in order to carry out Alinsky’s rules.
It is quite evident that this whole idea of violence is a fabrication because there has been no violence perpetrated by tea party members during all of the heated town hall meetings. The only violence came at the hands of union thugs who were acting as the enforcement arm of liberals. Those jackasses beat the hell out of a man. Those jackasses threatened the elderly. Those jackasses were the ones there to demonstrate a show of force. The tea party people know how to demonstrate peacefully. Another bit of evidence of the desire to pin violence on the conservatives appeared when the media reported that a number of people were arrested in DC at the rally Congresswoman Michele Bachman called for prior to the House vote on health care. The media neglected to indicate that those arrested were from the left. Those arrested were Code Pinko members who were protesting Lieberman’s decision to block health care. The media referred to them as tea partiers and failed to make any distinction when reporting the story.
This is a desire to pin it all on conservatives. Those who admonish against jumping to conclusions when there is mounting evidence are all too happy to sit around doing the first digit rectal interface when their side is indicting people who do not advocate violence and who do not incite violence.
Every time there is a death or violence the left is quick to point fingers at Malkin, Beck, Limbaugh and other conservatives and they point reflexively with no evidence whatsoever. Obama is an extension of that and demonstrated it with the Cambridge cop.
Let the conservatives point when there is a mountain of evidence and we are jumping to conclusions.
This liberal double standard is why they have no credibility (well one reason among many).