<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S-CHIP Veto Sustained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:25:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: irtexas44</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/comment-page-1/#comment-24668</link>
		<dc:creator>irtexas44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/#comment-24668</guid>
		<description>I guess Clinton didn&#039;t make any audible sounds would be the correct term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Clinton didn&#8217;t make any audible sounds would be the correct term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irtexas44</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/comment-page-1/#comment-24667</link>
		<dc:creator>irtexas44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/#comment-24667</guid>
		<description>BD,

The lib&#039;s aren&#039;t upset about the SCHIP not passing they are upset that the over 1000 earmarks they attached to it will not put that money back in their pockets. Like I was telling someone else the SCHIP is probably worth about a buck. It&#039;s the $580 something million in earmarks they aren&#039;t going to get their money grimmy gabbing hands on yet. At least the Beast and Schumuckie had their million turned down on the Woodstock crap. That project is being done by Alan Gerry, a billionire that likes to give a lot of money to the dimwits. What a surprize, huh? Schumuckie is still pushing it. And Clinton didn&#039;t make any sounds. 

This idiot Stark needs to step down. There is no excuse for him. Oh yeah, Murtha&#039;s move to try and dump the Pet Rock and side with the president isn&#039;t flying either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BD,</p>
<p>The lib&#8217;s aren&#8217;t upset about the SCHIP not passing they are upset that the over 1000 earmarks they attached to it will not put that money back in their pockets. Like I was telling someone else the SCHIP is probably worth about a buck. It&#8217;s the $580 something million in earmarks they aren&#8217;t going to get their money grimmy gabbing hands on yet. At least the Beast and Schumuckie had their million turned down on the Woodstock crap. That project is being done by Alan Gerry, a billionire that likes to give a lot of money to the dimwits. What a surprize, huh? Schumuckie is still pushing it. And Clinton didn&#8217;t make any sounds. </p>
<p>This idiot Stark needs to step down. There is no excuse for him. Oh yeah, Murtha&#8217;s move to try and dump the Pet Rock and side with the president isn&#8217;t flying either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/comment-page-1/#comment-24522</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/#comment-24522</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCHIP Sunk...&lt;/strong&gt;

The House of Representatives has failed to override Bush’s veto of the fraudulent SCHIP bill. AP reports that the pro-override forces fell more than a dozen votes short: 
The 273-156 roll call was 13 votes short of the two-thirds that majority supp...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCHIP Sunk&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The House of Representatives has failed to override Bush’s veto of the fraudulent SCHIP bill. AP reports that the pro-override forces fell more than a dozen votes short: <br />
The 273-156 roll call was 13 votes short of the two-thirds that majority supp&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Always On Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/comment-page-1/#comment-24509</link>
		<dc:creator>Always On Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/#comment-24509</guid>
		<description>The Pelosi Congress is a failure in every sense.

In my mind&#039;s eye, I keep seeing her triumphant look when she took office.  Pfffft!  Hasn&#039;t exactly turned out that way.  Good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pelosi Congress is a failure in every sense.</p>
<p>In my mind&#8217;s eye, I keep seeing her triumphant look when she took office.  Pfffft!  Hasn&#8217;t exactly turned out that way.  Good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irtexas44</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/comment-page-1/#comment-24424</link>
		<dc:creator>irtexas44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/s-chip-veto-sustained/#comment-24424</guid>
		<description>BD,

I was just reading your post on the SCHIP. Thanks for the up date. 

I also just looked for my online SS form to see if anything had been done. Guess what&#039;s not there anymore. So now they will get me live and in person. I think they will wish the form had stayed online. When I&#039;m not a happy camper doing what they have suggested that I do which I did. So this should be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BD,</p>
<p>I was just reading your post on the SCHIP. Thanks for the up date. </p>
<p>I also just looked for my online SS form to see if anything had been done. Guess what&#8217;s not there anymore. So now they will get me live and in person. I think they will wish the form had stayed online. When I&#8217;m not a happy camper doing what they have suggested that I do which I did. So this should be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

