Question Of The Day
by Big Dog on Dec 13, 2005 at 13:18 Political
The question of the day is very simple. Take a look at the picture and ask yourself the question. The answer is one of the many things wrong with liberalism.
Why do the liberals not fight as hard to keep the innocent alive as they do for the people who murder?
Trackback to:
Choose Life
Tags: Political
Loading ...
Loading... 
December 14th, 2005 at 01:55
They do this because anything against ‘the man’ must be right. They think every guilty idiot is a misled, innocent, unfortunate, poor, depraved, stupid, (oops, that’s what I think. lol. depraved and stupid!), piece of trash that only they can get through to. Like they are ’someone special.’
Actually, they don’t give a rat’s behind about stanley. He is just a poster child for their agenda. They don’t want the death penalty to be allowed. (I wonder if this is because they are thinking of committing murder? Hmm…) If we do not see the world as they do, we are not only wrong but evil. Why do you think they all share the same shrinks? LOL.
I’m glad the creep is finally gone. Mr. Owens and the Yang family FINALLY get justice. Did you know there were 9 children left behind? I didn’t until I heard Tony Snow (search: tonysnow.com) on the redio at 6 am PCT. (The people that wanted idiot to live, also could not name ONE of the people he murdered. Including Jesse Jackson.)
The death penalty is not used as a deterant. It is used against those who DARE to take another’s life. There is only one way to atone for that. DIE, you bast****!
They also want the benefits of doing anything they want without having any consequences. That is how they are able to murder an unborn child that is NOT their right to do because it is convenient or to use as a weapon against a man. This is the cruelist genocide of the human race ever. EVER. And we’re cruel? Go figure…
PS. Hi! Yes, it is a great comparison. Thank you.
December 14th, 2005 at 05:13
Actually the death penalty IS a deterrent.
Some claim that criminals do not fear death because they do not take time to think about the concequences of their acts. If that were true, then how do police officers manage to arrest criminals without killing them??? When a policeman holds a criminal at gunpoint and tells him to get on the ground, the criminal will comply fully in the vast majority of of these cases. Why would they do that unless they were afraid of the lethal power of the gun? It is because regardless of what abolitionists claim, criminals are not immune to fear! It is a common misconception to believe that fear is a thought process that has to be worked out with a piece of paper. It’s not! It is an instinct that automatically kicks in when one is faced with lethal force!
During the temporary suspension on capital punishment from 1972-1976, researchers gathered murder statistics across the country. In 1960, there were 56 executions in the USA and 9,140 murders. By 1964, when there were only 15 executions, the number of murders had risen to 9,250. In 1969, there were no executions and 14,590 murders, and 1975, after six more years without executions, 20,510 murders occurred rising to 23,040 in 1980 after only two executions since 1976. In summary, between 1965 and 1980, the number of annual murders in the United States skyrocketed from 9,960 to 23,040, a 131 percent increase. The murder rate — homicides per 100,000 persons — doubled from 5.1 to 10.2. So the number of murders grew as the number of executions shrank. Researcher Karl Spence of Texas A&M University said:
Abolitionists claim that there are alternatives to the death penalty. They say that life in prison without parole serves just as well. Certainly, if you ignore all the murders criminals commit within prison when they kill prison guards and other inmates, and also when they kill decent citizens upon escape, like Dawud Mu’Min who was serving a 48-year sentence for the 1973 murder of a cab driver when he escaped a road work gang and stabbed to death a storekeeper named Gadys Nopwasky in a 1988 robbery that netted $4.00. Fortunately, there is now no chance of Mu’Min commiting murder again. He was executed by the state of Virginia on November 14, 1997.
Another flaw is that life imprisonment tends to deteriorate with the passing of time. Take the Moore case in New York State for example.
In 1962, James Moore raped and strangled 14-year-old Pamela Moss. Her parents decided to spare Moore the death penalty on the condition that he be sentenced to life in prison without parole. Later on, thanks to a change in sentencing laws in 1982, James Moore is eligible for parole every two years!
If Pamela’s parents knew that they couldn’t trust the state, Moore could have been executed long ago and they could have put the whole horrible incident behind them forever. Instead they have a nightmare to deal with biannually. I’ll bet not a day goes by that they don’t kick themselves for being foolish enough to trust the liberal sham that is life imprisonment and rehabilitation. (According to the US Department of Justice, the average prison sentence served for murder is five years and eleven months.)
December 14th, 2005 at 07:35
H&I Fires
CAPT H sends this along - things may well be changing in Canada. Nothing earth-shattering, just, change. Speaking of the Canadian Military… “Oops We Did It Again” (the Press, not the Canadians) Conservative Leader Stephen Harper promised to signifi…