Comments on: Prominent Democrat States What We Already Knew

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:50:52 +0000

I would not say almost no one but there is an element who would say she lied if she claimed to be a woman. Hell, they said she lied about Trig being her child.

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:17:59 +0000

“She resigned to keep from having the bogus lawsuits (filed by Dem operatives) bankrupt her.”

That’s what she said anyway. Almost nobody believes that though even if it might be true.

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:43:06 +0000

She had not quit during the last election.

She resigned to keep from having the bogus lawsuits (filed by Dem operatives) bankrupt her.

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:27:30 +0000

If only Palin hadn’t quit her job to get rich instead of serve the people of Alaska. Her executive experience might have actually meant something in the next election if she hadn’t. Quitting that gig will doom her in the end I believe.

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:01:03 +0000

I have support for Ron Paul’s monetary ideas and Constitutional requirements, not for him to be president.

And I compared Palin and Obama, not Clinton an Carter.

Carter and Clinton had the experience. Carter was terrible and Clinton manageable.

By: Adam

Adam — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:25:17 +0000

What about Ron Paul? I’ve never heard you question his lack of executive experience in your support for him.

By: Adam

Adam — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:22:12 +0000

I don’t get why you beat this dead horse on executive experience. Clinton was Governor of Arkansas and Carter Governor of Georgia and served in the Navy. Of course you still think they were terrible presidents. You’d find just another thing to attack Obama for if he’d been in the military or had been a Governor.
It’s not the experience that matters to you. It’s the D next to their name that renders them unqualified in your opinion.