Comments on: Pelosi’s Mouse Pad http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/ "Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right" Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:10:22 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134288 Blake Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:23:37 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134288 I did not threaten you in that statement, I just used that as a comparison. Apparently when you want to, you CAN read for comprehension. Amazing. I did not threaten you in that statement, I just used that as a comparison. Apparently when you want to, you CAN read for comprehension. Amazing.

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134287 Blake Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:19:35 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134287 Actually what said was that the mouse should ADAPT or die- that is what all life must do ,in the end anyway. Why do you take things out of context? Actually what said was that the mouse should ADAPT or die- that is what all life must do ,in the end anyway. Why do you take things out of context?

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134230 Blake Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:00:52 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134230 You still cannot read for complete comprehension, like many of your fellow libs- what a shame. Come back and try again when you are open to common sense- what I said above was relating to Palin, but you just keep on with your libbie talking points and deliberate misunderstandings and you can continue to believe you and the others are clever. All I ever see in my mind when I think of you and D and the others, is ANIMAL FARM, by george Orwell- you and the other little piggies, so sure in your puffed up intelligence. So wrong in reality. You still cannot read for complete comprehension, like many of your fellow libs- what a shame.
Come back and try again when you are open to common sense- what I said above was relating to Palin, but you just keep on with your libbie talking points and deliberate misunderstandings and you can continue to believe you and the others are clever.
All I ever see in my mind when I think of you and D and the others, is ANIMAL FARM, by george Orwell- you and the other little piggies, so sure in your puffed up intelligence. So wrong in reality.

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134205 Blake Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:45:10 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134205 Human intervention is a natural thing- I know you libs feel that humans = bad, nature= good, but that's not true. When deer carve a path out in the forest, they are changing the ecology. When the great herds of buffalo had their dust and mud wallows, or walked in the same paths for thousands of years, they created new landscapes. Humans are no different. I agree that wetlands are important to nature- they should not be in this bill- especially after the libs said it would not be- they lied, big surprise- but especially when we have a FINITE amount of money, we need to budget for priorities, and this doesn't make the cut right now. If you think it does, I submit that you need your priorities reset. Human intervention is a natural thing- I know you libs feel that humans = bad, nature= good, but that’s not true.
When deer carve a path out in the forest, they are changing the ecology. When the great herds of buffalo had their dust and mud wallows, or walked in the same paths for thousands of years, they created new landscapes.
Humans are no different.
I agree that wetlands are important to nature- they should not be in this bill- especially after the libs said it would not be- they lied, big surprise- but especially when we have a FINITE amount of money, we need to budget for priorities, and this doesn’t make the cut right now. If you think it does, I submit that you need your priorities reset.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134185 Darrel Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:58:06 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134185 SAV: "Now, you could prove me wrong by posting the text of the stimulus package that mentions the mouse, but you won’t be doing that, will you?>> BLK: "Me post a 1200 page bill,...?">> DAR Good grief. "the text... that mentions the mouse." D. SAV: “Now, you could prove me wrong by posting the text of the stimulus package that mentions the mouse, but you won’t be doing that, will you?>>

BLK: “Me post a 1200 page bill,…?”>>

DAR
Good grief.

“the text… that mentions the mouse.”

D.

]]> By: Savonarola http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134183 Savonarola Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:11:20 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134183 BLAKE What I might like to do and what I would actually do might be two different things- I can have a wish list, can’t I? SAV Do you really think this makes it better? You <i>want</i> to shoot me, but you wouldn't, so it's okay? See also below. BLAKE If you cannot read a proper sentence, there are some real good courses at Sylvan Learning Center you can take- perhaps then you can properly parse a sentence. SAV But if we "parse" the sentence, we can see that you "would just probably shoot" me. That's not merely expressing a desire to shoot me, that's a statement of likelihood: you'd probably shoot me. I'm not sure if Sylvan has any technical writing classes, but maybe you should try to find out. Actually, check that. You and I both know perfectly well that you wrote exactly what you meant to write, even if you didn't actually mean it literally. You don't have the mental wherewithal to engage in honest debate, so you buck reality (not to mention the limitations of your personal knowledge of a subject) and over-blow your statements hoping to detract from the actual points. Here, those points are that the project is not "to save a mouse" and that this project not to save a mouse was not in the legislation. Both points have been completely refuted, but you still cling to both because it fits your warped little Republican-red tinted glasses interpretation of the world. ************************* Darrel style bumper: I worked for a tutoring agency -- a competitor of Sylvan -- for a couple years. Kept getting excellent reviews from clients. Imagine that. BLAKE
What I might like to do and what I would actually do might be two different things- I can have a wish list, can’t I?

SAV
Do you really think this makes it better? You want to shoot me, but you wouldn’t, so it’s okay? See also below.

BLAKE
If you cannot read a proper sentence, there are some real good courses at Sylvan Learning Center you can take- perhaps then you can properly parse a sentence.

SAV
But if we “parse” the sentence, we can see that you “would just probably shoot” me. That’s not merely expressing a desire to shoot me, that’s a statement of likelihood: you’d probably shoot me.

I’m not sure if Sylvan has any technical writing classes, but maybe you should try to find out.
Actually, check that. You and I both know perfectly well that you wrote exactly what you meant to write, even if you didn’t actually mean it literally. You don’t have the mental wherewithal to engage in honest debate, so you buck reality (not to mention the limitations of your personal knowledge of a subject) and over-blow your statements hoping to detract from the actual points. Here, those points are that the project is not “to save a mouse” and that this project not to save a mouse was not in the legislation. Both points have been completely refuted, but you still cling to both because it fits your warped little Republican-red tinted glasses interpretation of the world.

*************************
Darrel style bumper:
I worked for a tutoring agency — a competitor of Sylvan — for a couple years. Kept getting excellent reviews from clients. Imagine that.

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134176 Blake Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:13:31 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134176 Me post a 1200 page bill, written by the biggest fools in the room? I think not- but you are being dishonest here, and you know it. Whether this is a good thing or not isn't the debate- it is whether this thing should be in the bill, or whether this was a dishonest use (or misuse) of this stimulus bill as a means of injecting pork (defined as unnecessary spending) into Pelosi's area. Look, as a person who has rehabbed songbirds for release into the wild, something that is MY specialty, something I have done for over ten years, I do feel for wildlife, and indeed, I like animals much better than most people- that is NOT the point here- the point is that we have a finite amount of money, a point Hussein seems not to know, but we have to focus our finite resources on what the problem IS. Money for Murtha's airport, or Pelosi's mouse, is not directing the money to the greatest good, just the fattest pigs. Me post a 1200 page bill, written by the biggest fools in the room? I think not- but you are being dishonest here, and you know it.
Whether this is a good thing or not isn’t the debate- it is whether this thing should be in the bill, or whether this was a dishonest use (or misuse) of this stimulus bill as a means of injecting pork (defined as unnecessary spending) into Pelosi’s area.
Look, as a person who has rehabbed songbirds for release into the wild, something that is MY specialty, something I have done for over ten years, I do feel for wildlife, and indeed, I like animals much better than most people- that is NOT the point here- the point is that we have a finite amount of money, a point Hussein seems not to know, but we have to focus our finite resources on what the problem IS.
Money for Murtha’s airport, or Pelosi’s mouse, is not directing the money to the greatest good, just the fattest pigs.

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134175 Blake Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:03:32 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134175 What I might like to do and what I would actually do might be two different things- I can have a wish list, can't I? When I said that about Sarah Palin, I was pointing out that I do not have the temperament for politics- she is much more patient than I as is her husband Todd. If you cannot read a proper sentence, there are some real good courses at Sylvan Learning Center you can take- perhaps then you can properly parse a sentence. What I might like to do and what I would actually do might be two different things- I can have a wish list, can’t I?
When I said that about Sarah Palin, I was pointing out that I do not have the temperament for politics- she is much more patient than I as is her husband Todd.
If you cannot read a proper sentence, there are some real good courses at Sylvan Learning Center you can take- perhaps then you can properly parse a sentence.

]]> By: Savonarola http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134167 Savonarola Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:26:35 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134167 DOG I don’t recall him saying he wanted to shoot you. I remember him saying he wanted to slap you. SAV It's true that Blake said that he'd slap me, but he also said that he'd probably shoot me if he had the chance. BLAKE (earlier) Should Sarah decide to re enter politics, we shall see what comes of that- personally I would not, but then I haven’t the temperament for it- I’d just probably shoot fools like you. SAV (now) This was followed by "In On It Not" saying that s/he actually would shoot me. <a href="http://www.onebigdog.net/back-in-a-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-133739" rel="nofollow">LINK</a> Let's hear it for rightwing conflict resolution! DOG
I don’t recall him saying he wanted to shoot you. I remember him saying he wanted to slap you.

SAV
It’s true that Blake said that he’d slap me, but he also said that he’d probably shoot me if he had the chance.

BLAKE (earlier)
Should Sarah decide to re enter politics, we shall see what comes of that- personally I would not, but then I haven’t the temperament for it- I’d just probably shoot fools like you.

SAV (now)
This was followed by “In On It Not” saying that s/he actually would shoot me.

LINK

Let’s hear it for rightwing conflict resolution!

]]> By: Big Dog http://www.onebigdog.net/pelosis-mouse-pad/comment-page-1/#comment-134157 Big Dog Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:19:56 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7166#comment-134157 Blake asked a theoretical question. I don't recall him saying he wanted to shoot you. I remember him saying he wanted to slap you. A bit of a difference. Blake asked a theoretical question. I don’t recall him saying he wanted to shoot you. I remember him saying he wanted to slap you.

A bit of a difference.

]]>