Yes, the SDs were set up to vote any way they want and I made it clear that I thought they could vote however they wanted. The rules are also that FL and MI cannot seat delegates so they should not be seated. If they are it will look like it was done to give her the advantage.

The point in comparing this to 2000 is not a weak one. In 2000 it was all done according to the law and the courts made decisions based on the law (or the rules) and yet there are people who believe that the court ignored the will of the people and selected Bush.

In 2008 there are rules for the SDs (they can select who they want). There are Obama supporters who think they should follow the voting of the majority (especially in their states). If Obama is in the lead and they vote to give her the nomination there are many people who will believe it was done wrong even though they followed all the rules. So, given that these are similar (both are following the rules) will the same people who said Bush was selected say the same Bout Hillary.

Not weak at all when you look at it logically.

Adam’s last blog post..The Potomac Primary

It took just over twenty-four hours for Big Dog to start backpedaling:

I wrote yesterday that the people who are elected to represent us should vote in accordance with the wishes of the majority of their constituents. I realize that there are man…