Big Dogs House

Does Obama Have Two Dogs?

by Big Dog on Dec 22, 2011 at 16:15 Posted in Political Leave a comment

A big deal was made yesterday because Barack Obama went to the store to shop for his dog and his kids. He went to Pet Smart and bought his dog, which was with him, an expensive chew toy and then headed to Best Buy to get his daughters a few presents.

I will stop here and say that the reporter who wrote about the trip was irresponsible when he reported what presents Obama bought for his kids. No matter how one feels about the man it is just wrong to report what presents he got for his kids because they might see the report and it will ruin it for him.

But the issue that is in the news today is how did his dog Bo get to DC for the shopping trip? It was reported that Bo traveled to Hawaii with Michelle and the kids and folks on the ground in Hawaii report seeing the dog there.

Did Obama have his dog flown back to DC for a photo-op to show he is a regular guy like the rest of us or does he own two dogs?

Since we have never seen two dogs the answer must be that the dog was flown back. That, of course, assumes that the reports of the dog being in Hawaii are correct.

If the dog was flown back, how much did it cost?

This is something that needs to be explained.

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: air force one, bo the dog, hawaii, Obama, photo op, taxpayer money

Temporary Tax Cut, Permanent Mortgage Fee

by Big Dog on Dec 21, 2011 at 16:15 Posted in Political 1 Comment

The House and Senate are still fighting over extending the so called payroll tax cut that was enacted last year. That cut was in the FICA or Social Security tax. So what government did was cut the amount of money being paid into a system that is already going broke. Democrats say that failure to act will result in a tax increase but the tax will only go back to where it was before they temporarily reduced it. Isn’t this the argument they make regarding the Bush tax cuts? Don’t they say it is not an increase because the rates will only go back to where they were?

In any event, the tax cut needs to be paid for and the government will do this with a PERMENANT mortgage fee. The folks who get a new home or refinance an existing one through either Fannie or Freddie will pay a $15 a month fee (on a $200,000 loan) that will not go away. If the tax cut ends in two months or a year, the fee will continue because it is a permanent fee. The fee will allegedly be used to pay back the loss to Social Security but the reality is that the fee will go into the general fund and be used, as was ALL past Social Security money, to pay for careless spending by Congress.

It is not bad enough that those who can afford to get a home will pay fees to cover a tax cut for those who can’t (or won’t) buy one but the fee will last forever and will not pay back the Social Security money lost.

The fee would amount to $180 a year for a $200k loan and $360 a year for a $400k loan. Over a 30 year loan that would be $5,400 and $10,800 respectively. People who buy or refinance a loan will end up paying this amount of money even if the tax cut ends or if the Social Security tax rate goes up.

This is another wealth redistribution scheme that uses a sneaky way to force people to pay for the fiscally irresponsible government.

Stuart Varney explains it in this video.

The government continues to soak those who produce and try to have a better life. How long will it be before they add some kind of monthly fee to a car loan to pay for green energy?

Why is government hell bent on screwing us and why have businesses become tax collectors in the redistributive States of America?

Think you can avoid this by getting a mortgage where Fannie and Freddie are not involved? Good luck. They are involved in about 90% of all mortgages…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: fannie, freddie, lies, mortgages, permanent fees, tax cuts

A Voter’s Guide To Republicans – Bill Whittle

by Big Dog on Dec 21, 2011 at 09:58 Posted in Political Leave a comment

Bill Whittle has provided us with a timely and accurate voter’s guide to Republicans. He discusses greed, racism, and fascism as they pertain to the Republican party. This is something all voters need to watch to be informed:

Watch and learn.

Then send it to your friends so they can learn as well.

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: bill whittle, Democrats, fascism, greed, racism, Republicans, voting guide

Dear Leader Meet Grim Reaper

by Big Dog on Dec 19, 2011 at 12:32 Posted in Political 5 Comments

North Korea’s whack job Dictator, Kim Jong Il has died of a heart attack. The official report is that he died because of great mental and physical strain.

This satanic jackass died of overindulgence (and his perversions) while enslaving the people of his country and subjecting them to all kinds of abuses. Yes, while Lil’ Kim was enjoying expensive food and booze his people were eating dirt prior to dying of starvation.

There is a special place in hell for him and I hope he enjoys it. I am not ashamed to say I am not sad that he is dead.

The country will be run by his son Kim Jong Un. No one knows how he will lead of if there will be unrest in an attempt to take control of his power and the world is on high alert for problems. South Korea needs to be particularly cautious.

I hope that the country will be give up Communism and become a neighbor of the rest of the nations so the people there will not suffer but it is unlikely that those who are living the high life will worry too much about those who are suffering and dying.

That is how these kinds of nations exist.

Communism does not work.

Now if we could only convince our so called leaders of this…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: communism, dead, grim reaper, jum jong un, kim jung il, north korea, Obama

Let’s Abolish All ID Requirements

by Big Dog on Dec 18, 2011 at 06:15 Posted in Political 20 Comments

The criminal gun runner Eric Holder is waging war against states that have enacted voter ID laws. These laws require people to show an ID before they can vote. How dare these states force people to prove they are who they claim to be?

According to Democrat Congressman John Lewis voter ID laws [are]:

…”a deliberate and systematic attempt to prevent millions of elderly voters, young voters, students, minority and low-income voters from exercising their constitutional right to engage in the democratic process. New York Post

Since we require people to show an ID to get on a plane, rent a car, cash a check, buy certain OTC medications, buy controlled prescription drugs, enter a government building, buy alcohol or tobacco, get a driver’s license, receive medical care, open a bank account, buy a firearm, rent a hotel room, and receive government welfare it is logical to extend Lewis’ argument to these items and assert that requiring IDs for these things prevents millions of the young, the elderly, college students (don’t colleges issue a student ID), and minority and low income folks from participating in any of the events I listed. That is but a small list of things that an ID is required for so the list of things that excludes these groups is much bigger.

And our government is aware of the disparity. Since government thinks it is necessary to show an ID for these things but also believes that making people show an ID is a way to prevent some folks from doing things then we can conclude that the government does not want everyone to be able to participate in all facets of society.

Eric Holder, John Lewis and everyone else who thinks that voter ID requirements are designed to disenfranchise people are idiots. There is no other way to put it, they are idiots.

Voter ID does not disenfranchise anyone. Almost everyone has an ID. The college students have college IDs, many have a driver’s license and others have some sort of ID that allowed them to sign up for welfare. You can bet that anyone who receives a government check has some form of ID and does not believe it to be an imposition because they know, no ID, no welfare.

Perhaps the next time I enter a government building and they ask for an ID I should tell them they are discriminating against me. Maybe the next time someone (I look to old for it to be me) buys alcohol and an ID is requested that person should file a lawsuit for discrimination. The state requires those who sell alcohol to ID anyone who buys the product if they look too young.

Why should a person have to prove they are old enough to buy alcohol but not have to prove their identity before they vote?

Because the lack of voter ID helps Democrats and as long as something benefits them they care little about the rule of law.

With Eric Holder this is particularly true. The New Black Panther case and Fast and Furious are prime examples of where they ignored or broke the law in order to advance a liberal cause or protect a liberal demographic.

I support voter ID requirements and if a person is too lazy to get an ID then that person should not be allowed to vote. Can’t afford one? Give up a week’s worth of smokes or forgo the alcohol for a while and save that money for an ID.

Having an ID to vote is as much a national security issue as is requiring an ID to board a plane.

Anyone who opposes ID laws does not care about national security and is opposing freedom and the rule of law.

And they are idiots.

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: crimes, discrimination, eric holder, fast and furious, john lewis, voter fraud, voter id laws