Big Dogs House

Democrats Do Not Want Fair Elections

by Big Dog on Nov 2, 2006 at 22:19 Posted in Political 1 Comment

The Democrats in America do not want fair elections. They know that if the people who are allowed to vote show up at the polls they will lose because their ideas are out of touch with the mainstream. This is why Democrats have perfected the art of getting dead people to the polls. It is amazing because the only elections where they do not scream about irregularities are the ones they win. They screamed about irregularities in Washington State until they had enough recounts and enough forged ballots to win. Then, they stopped crying and deemed the election fair. Despite the fact they cheated the fair winner, they were content because it is all about them being in power.

Democrats and their comrades in the ACLU are always happy to object to basic measures to establish a fair election. They oppose requiring an ID. To them this disenfranchises people and equates to a poll tax (which is a BS argument). In this society people require IDs and anyone who votes has one. But, any place that requires an ID will provide them for free and this is still not good enough. It is considered a burden to have a person get an ID to vote. Well I consider it a burden to have people vote who are not entitled to. I also think that if it is such a burden put the government ID stations in the liquor store and you will hit about anyone who needs an ID.

In Maryland, the Republican Party put out a guide for poll watchers. The booklet is designed to assist them in recognizing fraudulent behavior and instructs them in how to report it. It tells them some things to look for. The Democrats have gone ballistic and said this is a scare tactic to keep people from the polls. What Democrats are really afraid of is that all the folks they have voting multiple times will now not be able to do so. The guide book opens with a paragraph that explains that it is the job of the poll watchers to ensure each person who is entitled, gets to vote. Then it tells them:

The guide describes out how to challenge voters’ credentials and urges volunteers to tell election judges they could face jail time if a challenge is ignored.

The G-O-P handbook, obtained by The Washington Post, states, “Your most important duty as a poll worker is to challenge people who present themselves to vote but who are not authorized to vote.” WBAL

There is absolutely nothing wrong with this book. It has been used in the past. The Democrats know this will be a tight election and they are worried that their the tactics they used to win in the past will be nullified by astute workers. The Democrats, lead by Elijah Cummings, are decrying this as some method to intimidate voters. I can not understand this mentality because when there were problems in Florida, the donks said they wanted people who are entitled to vote to do so. When Maryland had problems in the primary, the donks demanded that things change so that people who are entitled to vote, vote. As soon as a party teaches its workers how to address fraud, they cry that this keeps people from voting.

To the Democrats, if a person comes in and does not know his middle name or date of birth, that is no problem. Let the guy vote, I mean you can’t expect everyone to know that stuff. Besides, he is probably a veteran and John Kerry told us they are dumb. To a person who is truly concerned with the integrity of the process, this person needs to be checked a little closer. Republicans in Maryland know how Democratic fraud can change elections. We witnessed this in two recent Governor’s races in which the losing Republican was beaten by all the dead folks who dragged themselves to the polls.

Democrats like Elijah Cummings and Ben Cardin cry about this as a scare tactic and Cardin said that we can all bet the books would not be used in Republican districts. Sure they will and they should. The Democrats have their version of this and it involves NAACP or Michael Moore types with cameras filming what goes on. This is definitely intimidating but Republicans do not cry because the bulk of the corruption lies with the Democratic party and that is why they oppose simple measures to ensure the integrity of the voting process.

The book provides people watching elections information to ensure that everything is fair. The Democrats do not want fair because they are obsessed with obtaining power. For the first time in many, many years Maryland is in play. Robert Ehrlich is in a dead heat with Martin O’Malley and Michael Steele is a few points behind Ben Cardin. The Democrats are bringing in all the big guns, most recently Clinton and Fox because this state’s dynamics are changing and the pendulum is beginning to swing to the right. This is something they do not like so they will cheat every way possible.

I urge all election volunteers to enforce the rules completely. Do not allow the Democrats to intimidate you. If they intimidate you then they are likely breaking the law. Call the police and have them arrested. But whatever you do, you can not allow Cardin and Cummings or any other donk to intimidate you.

Tags: Political

Terrorists Want Democrats In Charge

by Big Dog on Nov 2, 2006 at 13:05 Posted in Political 4 Comments

If people think that Republican talk about leaving Iraq being a bad idea is political rhetoric then they should listen to what the enemy has to say about the subject. Republicans contend that leaving Iraq before the job is done would embolden the terrorists and allow them to claim victory. This in turn would lead to more attacks on an America perceived as weak. Democrats and their cut and run policies are not believers of this philosophy. WND interviewed terrorist leaders and this is what they had to say:

Everybody has an opinion about next Tuesday’s midterm congressional election in the U.S. – including senior terrorist leaders interviewed by WND who say they hope Americans sweep the Democrats into power because of the party’s position on withdrawing from Iraq, a move, as they see it, that ensures victory for the worldwide Islamic resistance.

The terrorists told WorldNetDaily an electoral win for the Democrats would prove to them Americans are “tired.”

They rejected statements from some prominent Democrats in the U.S. that a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency, explaining an evacuation would prove resistance works and would compel jihadists to continue fighting until America is destroyed.

They said a withdrawal would also embolden their own terror groups to enhance “resistance” against Israel. (emphasis mine)

Here are the words of the terrorists and they are telling us they want Democrats in power because Democrats would withdraw from Iraq. They indicate they would claim victory after withdraw, continue jihad until America is destroyed, and become emboldened to attack Israel. The terrorists, in their own words, are confirming the Republican stance on the consequences of leaving Iraq before the job is completed.

The Democrats have told us they are tougher on national security but their leadership is hell bent on leaving Iraq and handing victory to the enemy. They are determined to see America defeated. We can not allow this to happen and that is why it is extremely important for everyone to get out and vote and to cast a vote which ensures Republicans retain control of the Congress.

To do anything less is to hand victory to the enemy and that is treason.

Any bets that this gets little attention from the TSM?

Tags: Political

John Kerry Has a History of Insulting the Military

by Big Dog on Nov 2, 2006 at 07:53 Posted in Political 4 Comments

In 1972 John Kerry filled out a questionnaire for a group called Massachusetts Political Action for Peace. In that questionnaire, he was asked about the military. Here are a few of the things he wrote:

“I am convinced a volunteer army would be an army of the poor and the black and the brown,” Kerry wrote. “We must not repeat the travesty of the inequities present during Vietnam. I also fear having a professional army that views the perpetuation of war crimes as simply ‘doing its job.’

“Equally as important, a volunteer army with our present constitutional crisis takes accountability away from the president and put the people further from control over military activities,” he wrote. WBAL

Notice that Kerry was convinced an all volunteer Army would be the poor, the black and the brown. His statement about war crimes also illustrates that he believes professional Armies perpetrate war crimes. He did not say he fears they would be more prone to or might have more incentive, the sentence states it as a given in the premise. Kerry viewed a professional Army as criminals.

I also notice that Kerry mentions a Constitutional crisis. Is there never a time for Democrats when there is not a Constitutional crisis? Oh, yes I forgot. They only see a Constitutional crisis when Republicans occupy the White House. All other times are good for them.

John Kerry disrespected and dishonored the troops upon his return from Vietnam when he protested and called them rapists and killers. He again showed the low regard he had for them when he filled out this questionnaire. Is it any wonder he continues to disrespect and dishonor our troops today? Kerry loathes the military and he has demonstrated that since he was a long haired protester. He only uses his service for political gain and to excuse himself when he insults the real heroes.

He is a disgrace and his past is once again showing his true colors.

Here is the complete questionnaire. Read it and you will learn a lot about Kerry. Considering Halloween was several days ago, this is a fitting story of frightful answers.

Tags: Political

Is John Kerry An Anomaly or a Symptom?

by Big Dog on Nov 1, 2006 at 19:15 Posted in Political 6 Comments

On Monday of this week John Kerry caused a firestorm when he said:

“You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and do your homework, and make an effort to be smart, uh, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.

Kerry could have easily apologized and said he made a mistake. If he had the issue would have likely blown over. Instead, he came unhinged when it was suggested that he had insulted the troops and when he finally apologized he only said he was sorry that his words were misinterpreted. I guess the rest of us should have gotten an education so we could interpret what he has to say. In his initial protestations, Kerry indicated he would never insult the troops when the fact is, he has done just that since the Vietnam War. Kerry attributes the gaffe to a blown joke. According to him he blew the punch line of a joke that was supposed to be a slam of the President. First of all, I fail to see how he could possibly see an insult to the president as a joke. He could have said that he meant to insult the president and I might have given him the benefit of the doubt. Regardless of what he meant to say, the fact is he said something offensive to the troops. This likely was an expression of how he really feels and was a classic demonstration of what is known as a Freudian Slip, at least that is what this uneducated soldier once heard an Ivy League elitist Northeastern Liberal say.

The question that people should be asking is, did John Kerry speak for himself or for the Democratic Party? It is easy to dismiss the expressions as those of one man who happens to serve in the Congress but I would submit that Kerry’s slip was a symptom of a much larger problem. That problem is that the liberals in this country are not for a united stance against our enemies and in their hatred of Bush they have forgotten that we are all Americans first. Country trumps party but the Democrats seem unable to grasp that concept. It is unfortunate but we have plenty of examples of this among the ranks of those who want to lead us into the hands of the enemy.

Throughout the history of this great nation we have overcome much adversity. We never lost a war where the majority of the country was behind the effort and those who fought. When our politicians came together and the country backed the troops we won. We beat the Brits, though they had a better Army, we won WWI, and WWII because everyone made sacrifices and everyone was behind those efforts. Changing attitudes about our role in the world and the general acceptance by the left that all solutions can be negotiated gave us a defeat in Vietnam despite the fact that we won every battle we fought. During Vietnam the country was divided and, more importantly, the politicians were divided. The troops became political tools for people like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. Kerry actively protested the troops and demonized them. He met with the enemy and he told Congress that his fellow vets were rapists and killers. He has called our current crop of heroes terrorists and uneducated, regardless of what he meant, he said it. We lost Vietnam because people like Kerry could not give the men and women who were fighting the support that is needed. We lost our national will and the support of our elected officials and we lost the war. Democrats like John Kerry, Jack Murtha, and all the others who, when they are not demeaning our troops, are making plans to cut and run will, if they have it their way, lead America to the path of defeat.

There are over 50,000 names of brave men and women who died in Vietnam inscribed on a wall in DC. Those people did their duty and they paid the ultimate sacrifice so that we could live in freedom. It does not matter how we feel about any conflict, once we commit our troops we must back them 100% and we must win. We pulled out of Vietnam without a win. Not only did millions of Vietnamese die as a result of our departure but the honor of those who match up to the inscriptions was trounced upon and they truly died in vain. They fought as they were ordered and they never lost the will to win. They were betrayed by elected leaders and a fickle public that wants the benefits of a free society without the sacrifices those benefits cost. As was once stated, freedom is not free.

The disdain for the military seems to be systemic among the Democratic psyche. In addition to Kerry, there is Jack Murtha who declared that some accused service members were guilty of murder before charges were brought and before a courts martial was convened. He could not give the military the benefit of the doubt and would rather accuse them of crimes than let the judicial process run its course. Considering the fact that Jack Murtha accepted a bribe in the ABSCAM fiasco and escaped indictment by testifying against others, it is odd he would be so quick to pass judgment. Perhaps his years of corruption has removed any shred of honor he once held as a proud Marine and he is now a doddering old fool who can only think of ways to demean the military and to line his own pockets. Max Cleland, who blew himself up with a grenade he picked up in Vietnam, defends Kerry by stating that “John Kerry is a patriot who has fought tooth and nail for veterans ever since he came home from Vietnam.” John Kerry did not fight for the vets when he was in Vietnam and he damn sure did not fight for them when he returned, tooth and nail or otherwise. That grenade must have rattled Cleland’s brain loose and he missed Kerry’s “support” of the troops upon his rapid return from Vietnam.

These are the same Democrats who tell us that they support the troops. If this is their idea of support then we want them to stop their support right now. It is not hard to imagine that they feel their actions are support. They are constantly harping about being patriotic while doing everything they possibly can to prevent us from winning the war. There is no national unity because the Democrats will not unite around the idea of winning. Cutting and running is not proper mission planning and will only embolden the enemy to attack us again and this time they might just be successful in hitting the Capitol. At that instant it will be a bit too late for them to decide that they need to climb on board the idea of winning.

We can see that there is no unity in this country. In case the Democrats do not know this we are a NATION at war. This is not Bush’s war, this is America’s war. This country is in a war against an ideology that wants to kill or convert us and they will not stop until they are successful or until we kill them. You would never know we are a nation at war because every Democratic campaign ad references “Bush’s War.” They say we are fighting George Bush’s war, or that our soldiers are dying in “Bush’s war” and this is not correct. An overwhelming majority of the Congress voted to take action against Iraq and that action included acts of war. They knew this when they voted and that means this war is theirs as well. Since they represent us as a people it is our war. We are a nation at war and until the Democrats grasp that concept we will continue to have barriers along the way. Their hatred for George Bush and our military has clouded their minds. The same people who told us how evil Hussein was and how he had WMD when Clinton was President are now saying bush lied about those WMD. They are looking for every excuse to cut and run and once again tell our troops that they died in vain because the left in America did not have the stomach for a fight. I thank God every day that these same Democrats were not here when we had to fight for our independence as a nation. If they had been we would still belong to the Monarchy in England.

John Kerry is a symptom of a much larger illness. He can claim that he supports the troops but in reality his Freudian Slip allowed another look into his mind. He still holds the same opinions he held so long ago when young men fought and died in the jungles of Southeast Asia while he protested and accused. His opinion is that uneducated people join the service because he can not imagine why anyone would join the military, unless of course, they had aspirations of one day being President.

Tags: Political

This Guy is Lucky Someone Did Not Shoot Him

by Big Dog on Nov 1, 2006 at 10:59 Posted in Uncategorized 1 Comment

A lawyer in Maine dressed up as Osama bin Laden and was out in traffic carrying fake dynamite and waving a plastic gun. This was, according to him, a protest to a change in tax code.

Lt. Todd Bernard said the police department received calls about a man wearing Middle Eastern garb and a bin Laden mask and carrying fake dynamite standing along an interstate highway. When police arrived, they saw Connolly holding a gun. al-Reuters

This guy is lucky someone did not shoot him while he was acting stupid. People could obviously tell he was wearing a mask but had no way of knowing if the dynamite and gun were real. Someone could have easily shot this guy and in my opinion, would have been well within his rights.

Someone tell this idiot lawyer that there are better ways to protest. The unfortunate thing is that guys like this become judges one day and give us stupid decisions.

Tags: News