Recent Articles

Welfare Funding Terrorism…

A number of Muslim store owners have been caught in an EBT for cash scheme that uses the money scammed from the welfare system to pay for jihad.

These schemes are not new and they are not limited to Muslim businesses. The EBT system has been rife with corruption and fraud for a number of years. There are plenty of stores that use illegal means to give cash to people for bogus charges against the EBT. Usually a store will ring up items and pay the person a portion of the amount while keeping the items in stock where they can actually be sold for profit. There are also schemes where people get 50 cents on the dollar for bogus transactions.

The system is full of fraud and now the Muslim businesses have taken the fraud scheme a step further and are using the money to pay for holy war.

Fortunately these people were found out and many are now in custody with warrants out for a lot more of them.

The welfare system is a mess. There is no accountability and billions of taxpayer dollars are wasted through this system of fraud.

We need to end this system and do something else. The best welfare, of course, is a job.

But there are millions of cases of MREs in warehouses that can be given to families so they can eat. If they are good enough for the troops they are good enough for welfare recipients.

No matter what they do though, there is no way this program should be financing terrorism.

Joe Biden said it was patriotic to pay taxes.

Looks like using welfare is supporting terrorism…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

Obama Is A Delusional Narcissist

Obama is viewed as weak by a large portion of the world. He is routinely made a fool of by other nations and their people and he has made the US a laughing stock in some parts of the world.

But to listen to Bathhouse Barry tell it he made the US the most respected country on the planet:

“People don’t remember, but when I came into office, the United States in world opinion ranked below China and just barely above Russia, and today once again, the United States is the most respected country on earth. Part of that I think is because of the work we did to reengage the world and say we want to work with you as partners with mutual interests and mutual respect. It was on that basis we were able to end two wars while still focusing on the very real threat of terrorism and try to work with our partners in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s the reason why we are moving in the direction to normalize relations with Cuba and the nuclear deal that we are trying to negotiate with Iran.” Breitbart [Spelling errors in original corrected in this copy]

We get so much respect that Russia and China are doing what they want and slapping us in the face while doing it, Iran is negotiating with us while openly telling us they won’t abide by the deal and ISIS is threatening to come to this nation and kill the president at the White House. Not to mention the wars he ended are still ongoing and we have lost billions of dollars in equipment to terrorists because those we are “working with in Iraq and Afghanistan” fled and left it for them to take.

This does not sound like respect to me.

Then again maybe it means something different to Obama.

Of course he does have a history of drug use…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

Making Vaccines Mandatory Requires Hiding Data

There is no doubt government at all levels wants mandatory vaccines for everyone. The big push was for school aged children but in recent years there has been a backlash over the program.

Some parents do NOT want their children vaccinated. I think vaccines are generally a good idea but have issues with them being mandatory. Once government can make any vaccine mandatory it can make them all so. This was the case with Gardasil. It was made mandatory in Texas and people pushed back. But government had a precedent because it has already made some vaccines mandatory.

Gardasil is not a necessary vaccine. While it might be helpful to some it is not something that is required and can cause more problems than it solves.

I understand the whole herd immunity idea but if most kids are vaccinated and a few are not then they are at risk and if they get sick or die because they were not vaccinated then it is on the parents who decided not to do so.

Funny how a woman’s body is her own if she wants to abort her unborn child but if she decides not to vaccinate a child she chooses to have she is in the wrong…(In both cases she is deciding for the child. It just depends on where the child is residing at the time)

The government wants to extend its reach and force adults to get vaccinated as well. One would expect that most adults are vaccinated but there are some who are not. The government wants to force them to get vaccinated.

Who the hell is the government to force people, particularly adults, to have something injected into their bodies?

What’s the big deal? They should have gotten them as children and they will be healthier. Really? Seems to me they made it this far without them.

Plus, and this is a big plus, what happens when the government decides some new vaccine is a must for everyone? What happens when flu shots are made mandatory (and government never gets that one wrong /sarc)?

Suppose a vaccine is developed to prevent HIV and government decides that everyone MUST get it? Now a vaccine for that might be good and it might help at risk populations (homosexual males and IV drug users) but for the larger population it will have no value. It will likely be worse for them in the long run given the low odds of getting HIV.

There are also the sinister aspects of this. Government can’t be trusted. What if they decided that mandatory vaccines would be a good way to put RFID chips in people without their consent? Can’t happen you say?

The US used a vaccine program as a cover to get DNA samples of people in the Middle East to look for relatives of terrorists particularly Bin Laden in hopes of tracking him down.

What is all the hidden data you referred to in the title?

Sharyl Attkisson has a piece up about how the government has wiped recent vaccine injury data from its website. It is a good read and worth the time.

What does that have to do with your whole rant here?

In order to get buy in of the population to willingly line up and let people inject stuff into them it must be presented as safe. By hiding data the government can tell people that it is safe and there are no worries. If people can’t find information to the contrary they will foolishly believe that their government is telling them the truth and they will not resist. Why else would they hide it?

The liberal/progressive/socialist people in government don’t care how they get you to comply so long as you comply.

If you want to be vaccinated then by all means do so. But you are supposed to be free and if you do not want things injected into your body then you can say no.

Just don’t sue if you catch something you could have been vaccinated for and get sick or die (in which case it would obviously be your heirs suing).

Government lies so it is best to know the facts before doing anything.

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

Just Like Obamacare, Unions Want Out Of Wage Increase

The unions were all behind Obamacare and supported the occupant of the White House in his quest to control more and more people. They were thrilled when it passed because it would bring joy and happiness to all the peons, the mindless rabble who need to be told what to do.

Then those very unions applied for, and were granted, exceptions to the law. You see, they supported it as good for you but then decided they did not want any part of it for their union members.

This ties in with the minimum wage increase in California. The state passed a law incrementally raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour. There is already backlash over this.

You see, as many warned, the hike in minimum wage resulted in higher costs to employers and anyone who knows business knows this cost (as are all costs) is passed on to someone else, usually the consumer. At many restaurants a portion of the worker’s tips are being confiscated to make up for the additional cost. You read that right, the people who are getting a wage increase are paying for part of that increase by losing some of their tip money to cover it.

Some restaurants stopped with tipping and add a 16% surcharge to the bill which is divided between the servers and the business (want to bet who gets more of it).

This is no surprise. If wages go up they need to be paid for and those costs are passed on in higher prices or fewer workers (some are fired to pay for the rest) or, as in this case, taking worker’s tips.

But what does that have to do with unions?

The unions pushed for the wage increase. They worked hard to get it passed and now they are negotiating exemptions for their union members.

Just like Obamacare it is good for all the rabble but not for the unions.

Careful what you ask for because you might not like it.

And if a union supports it then you know it is not a good idea…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

Federal Coercion Is Done With YOUR Money

The federal government collects trillions of dollars in taxes from various entities including corporations and some people who earn income. About 48% of the population earning wages pay no taxes and often get back much more than they paid in.

The government uses this money to run the country, or it is supposed to. It usually spends the money in a reckless fashion and increases the debt to the nation.

One thing the federal government does with the tax money, money that comes from the states, is use it to force states to do what the federal government wants.

We are familiar with speed limits and how federal highway money is withheld if speed limits do not meet some federal standard. This is true with a number of things. The federal government takes money from the states and then says that it will give some back for one thing or another so long as the states abide by rules the feds want to impose.

This is also the case with the school lunch program. The program is designed to provide reduced or no cost lunches to children from low income families. The feds take money in taxes from the states and then send it back to the states to pay for the program.

But there is a catch. If a school system participates in the program then it is bound by the rules set forth by the federal government or it risks losing the money.

By participating in the National School Lunch Program, the school district must adhere to edicts handed down from Washington, D.C. [Linked article]

So if the feds say that schools can’t provide cake with lunch then they can’t. This idiocy extends to the classroom where the feds could say they can’t serve cake for birthday celebrations as well. As far as I know these are not the rules. I post them examples of what the feds CAN do.

A teacher in West Virginia is in trouble for giving wrapped candy to students as a reward for hard work and good behavior. That is a big no-no under the federal program. The teacher faces a fine or reeducation and the school risks losing money for the lunch program.

This is what happens when you get in bed with the devil.

Perhaps states should opt out of the program and stop sending money to the federal government for it. The states could set up their own programs and then reduce that cost from what the feds collect. I know it is much more complicated than that and that is by design.

If the feds can make every state and every person dependent on the federal government then it will have total control over every aspect of life.

This is what liberal/progressive/socialists on the left want. Unfortunately, it is also what many on the right want as well.

The government is not much different than the mafia in that it uses the same tactics to get what it wants. The only real difference is that the government has made what it does legal.

It is a shame the federal government uses coercion to force us to do things it wants.

It is a crying shame it does it with our own money…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.