Our Government; State Sponsors Of Terrorism

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) staged a protest at the home of Greg Baer, a Bank of America executive. Five hundred union sponsored thugs arrived at the home, located in Montgomery County, Maryland, escorted by officers from the DC police department. The DC police have no jurisdictional authority in Maryland and were there to ensure the safety of the protesters.

So let’s get this straight, 500 people arrive at a home and trespass on the property. The only person home is a teen aged child of Baer and the DC police are there to protect the protesters. Even if the entire family had been home they would have been outnumbered by about 100:1 so who actually needed protection?

The DC police watched as the protesters trespassed but they did nothing because they do not have jurisdiction. If the protest had gotten more out of hand and turned violent or if they decided to burn the house down, would the DC police officers have been obligated to intervene?

Suppose the homeowner felt threatened and stepped out with a shotgun and told the protesters to leave the property, would the DC police officers, as protectors of the thugs, then had the authority to intervene? If they have no jurisdiction, what kind of protection were they providing. As an aside, who paid their salaries for this protection?

The Montgomery County Police Department arrived after being called by a neighbor and dispersed the crowd but no charges were filed. Perhaps a multi-million dollar lawsuit against SEIU and the DC Police Department is in order here. A teen aged boy was scared to death and locked himself in a bathroom while police officers, the people children are taught to seek for help, watched him be terrorized.

Your right to protest ends when you infringe upon the rights of others and terrorizing people in their homes is an infringement upon them.

SEIU and their protectors in the DC Police Department engaged in terrorist acts against citizens of this country. They should be held accountable.

There had better be a strong stance taken against this kind of terrorism. The last thing the police want to see is homeowners defending themselves though I would not blame any homeowner who did so.

Homegrown terrorists like SEIU and their protectors in the DC Police Department need to be taken to Gitmo.

Since DC is a federal property and the DC police are part of that property it is now clear that our government has become a state sponsor of terrorism.

And they wonder why we say Obama is soft on terror.

Source:
Big Journalism

Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

11 Responses to “Our Government; State Sponsors Of Terrorism”

  1. Had they trespassed in fact, and had Mr. Baer shown up heavily armed and taken payment in blood for the violation of his rights, it would have been no more than those thugs deserved.

    It’s time for unions to go on the ash-heap of history. But our Omnipotent State is far too concerned about private militias, which have never committed a violent act as far as I know, to spare the time to deal with them.

  2. Blake says:

    I know here in Texas, if they had shown up on MY lawn, they would have indeed been shot, as we allow that here- and it keeps unions and other vermin in their place.
    After all, if you know the law says that you could be shot for trespassing, how many gutless SEIU jerks would like to be the first?

  3. Bunny Colvin says:

    Dog too is a sponsor of terr’ism. Cuban terr’ism.

    Blake- I think we can safely assert that your answer to any problem is to conquer/attack/kill/shoot it. You needn’t constantly repeat yourself. Your position is very clear.

    PEACE

    • Big Dog says:

      Care to prove that Bunny? How can I be a sponsor of terrorism? You blast Blake for reading comprehension and yet you lack the skill to see what I wrote about the issue.

  4. Bunny Colvin says:

    What did you write about the issue? That Clinton pardoned the terr’sts? I haven’t found any proof of this. So do you or don’t you support Cuban terr’sts living in America?

    As for Blakes reading comprehension skills, I made my position clear and then he accused me of being on the opposite side of the issue. This indicates a fundamental breakdown in his ability to retain new information. Poor reading comprehension. His solution to all of the problems of the world is to identify a different enemy every few days, kill them and conquer their land. I just don’t see this as being workable with our military already as busy as it is. What say you, Doggie? Is it time to scale back the war on terra and follow Blake in the invasion and conquest of Cuba? Or Mexico? Or “druggie people”? Or oil rigs?

    PEACE

    • Big Dog says:

      I don’t see any need to go to war with any of these countries. I do however, see a need to secure our border and if this means shooting the drug runners and cartel members who are heavily armed and killing people then so be it. That would be a law enforcement issue though. Cuba is not usually a problem and I don’t think it is foolish enough to attack us. I do think we should never have taken all their people in as we were flooded with criminals. A lot of good people ended up here but we should have been able to weed them out.

    • Blake says:

      Actually, I prize the individual’s right to protect his or her own property- and on that i am very clear, and it is you who has a problem with comprehension, especially as regards the laws in Texas. Become informed.

  5. Bunny Colvin says:

    So do you or don’t you support Cuban terr’sts living in America?

    Blake (and/or Dog)- should the invasions of Cuba and Mexico begin simultaneously or would the oil spill prevent such “shock and awe”? Maybe Doug Feith is reading and he can answer this question. For those that don’t know Douggie, he is a gifted military strategist. Check out his resume.

    PEACE

    • Big Dog says:

      Let me be clear for you Bunny. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY TERRORISTS LIVING IN THE US.

      Is that clear enough for you? ANY means all of them regardless of their ethnic background.

      How many more ways do you need to hear it before you understand?

      I don’t think we need to invade either country unless they pick a fight with us. Secure the border, send the illegals home and let Cuba continue its downward spiral.

    • Blake says:

      While I believe even a cur dog could run Mexico better than it has been run so far, I do not support invading the place- I do think they have problems they would do well not to export here, and I WOULD support the shooting of drugrunners coming into our country- they are invaders, and it is our government’s SWORN DUTY to repel ALL invaders- the fact that you choose to ignore this just makes you look as you act- ignorant- and that is not a good look for you.