Comments on: Obama Nazis And Voter Fraud

By: Jazzi

Jazzi — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:20:12 +0000

Staff voted in 3 states?

Outrageous lies! You know, I had a story from another blog last night about a potential “outing” in the Republican party leadership, and posted it. Reflecting on it, I went back and deleted the story in hopes our discussions would become more civil. One day after the election, wingnuts are still pushing vicious lies.

Obama has his work cut out for him.

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:47:42 +0000

Wrong, there is no deliberate attempt to prevent but there is fraud. Like I said, Obama’s staff voted in 3 different states.

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:46:39 +0000

No Adam, you are incorrect. There are problems with voting but most are mistakes or the fault of the voter.

People are not deliberately denied unless black panthers are in the area.

I would have shot those two basta*ds

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:45:27 +0000

Let me ask you. You and Obama oppose IDs to vote. Obama is having a big party in Chicago tonight and you have to have an ID to get in.

Why is that?

By: Barbara

Barbara — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:40:53 +0000

The bible says the Lord sets the king in office and removes him. Obama just doesn’t realize who he is fooling with.

By: Adam

Adam — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:00:14 +0000

“You make it seem as if millions of people are not allowed to vote rather than they will not vote.”

You make it seem like I make it seem like that. How’s that sound?

What I claim is that millions of real votes don’t count because of intimidation, confusing ballots or registration rules, broken machines that “spoil” a vote, people mislabeled a felon and removed from registration rules, voters challenged at the polls, confusing signs that direct people to the wrong voting place or the wrong voting date, and so on.

And you go on about how you want to make it harder to register and vote in order to prevent fraudulent votes?

But it’s not just me. The vast majority of groups that study voting and voting patterns and have researched things like voter ID’s disagree with your philosophy on voting.

By: Adam

Adam — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:48:10 +0000

And you can use my name twice in a row for condescension all you want. Use it a third time if you feel so inclined. You’re still wrong and I’m still right.

By: Adam

Adam — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:45:32 +0000

And furthermore as I’ve said a dozen times before: Your fears about dead voters, illegals, terrorists, and cartoon characters? Get real.

Your post is just more evidence for my case: The vast majority of voting issues will deal with preventing folks from voting instead of counting fraudulent votes. The problem is exclusion, not inclusion.

Find me saying otherwise on this site and then you can call me a hypocrite. Otherwise you just look dumb doing it.

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:44:26 +0000

Adam, Adam.
I have written in the past that there are problems on both sides but that there are very few instances. You make it seem as if millions of people are not allowed to vote rather than they will not vote.

There was not a great deal of voter suppression in FL in 2000 and that was studied to death.

Fraud is much more rampant. People already caught voting in 2 states, Obama staffers voting in all the states they work in.

But, it is a repeat performance to see the jackbooted thugs in Philly. Obama supporters acting like thugs, imagine that.

By: Adam

Adam — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:28:27 +0000

Hypocrisy? Don’t make me laugh. I’ve been talking about voter suppression for weeks now with no suggestion that there is a partisan side to it and you couldn’t care less. But now you’re blogging on it only when it’s happening to folks you care about. That’s hypocrisy.