<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Loses Sleep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:25:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132537</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132537</guid>
		<description>ADM: &quot;unemployment climbs by an even 0.5% each month while job losses have declined...&quot;&gt;&gt;

DAR
  It seems to me an answer would be that these are two different numbers that don&#039;t necessarily follow each other well. &quot;Job losses&quot; would be the category of jobs disappearing due to contraction and businesses closing. Saying it declined also refers to a &quot;rate.&quot;

Many of these people may find employment so because they experienced &quot;job loss&quot; they don&#039;t necessarily go into the unemployed column. Or, as is very common, they are people who hold more than one job, so they don&#039;t go in the unemployment column. Also, people who are unemployed for too long, and give up, tend to not be counted anymore.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ADM: &#8220;unemployment climbs by an even 0.5% each month while job losses have declined&#8230;&#8221;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  It seems to me an answer would be that these are two different numbers that don&#8217;t necessarily follow each other well. &#8220;Job losses&#8221; would be the category of jobs disappearing due to contraction and businesses closing. Saying it declined also refers to a &#8220;rate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many of these people may find employment so because they experienced &#8220;job loss&#8221; they don&#8217;t necessarily go into the unemployed column. Or, as is very common, they are people who hold more than one job, so they don&#8217;t go in the unemployment column. Also, people who are unemployed for too long, and give up, tend to not be counted anymore.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132536</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132536</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have much interest at all in the arcane metaphysics of job prediction. As with the stock market, monkeys throwing darts at a dart board tend to compete real well (all though some trends are obvious and everyone knew, post Bush, unemployment was going to skyrocket). The report put out by Obama&#039;s people was filled with the necessary qualifiers and admitting a wide range of estimates. So all this attempt to say Obama said X was going to happen is an exercise in pretending those qualifiers didn&#039;t exist or weren&#039;t clearly stated or really really obvious to anyone who knows about &quot;projections&quot; and &quot;estimates.&quot;

There are no end of ways of counting the unemployed and the numbers are adjusted seasonally and for other variables. It&#039;s a mess and I think the US, for political reasons, has cooked their numbers a bit. And for quite a long time.

And it&#039;s not true I am an expert on everything. For instance, I know nothing about sports.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have much interest at all in the arcane metaphysics of job prediction. As with the stock market, monkeys throwing darts at a dart board tend to compete real well (all though some trends are obvious and everyone knew, post Bush, unemployment was going to skyrocket). The report put out by Obama&#8217;s people was filled with the necessary qualifiers and admitting a wide range of estimates. So all this attempt to say Obama said X was going to happen is an exercise in pretending those qualifiers didn&#8217;t exist or weren&#8217;t clearly stated or really really obvious to anyone who knows about &#8220;projections&#8221; and &#8220;estimates.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are no end of ways of counting the unemployed and the numbers are adjusted seasonally and for other variables. It&#8217;s a mess and I think the US, for political reasons, has cooked their numbers a bit. And for quite a long time.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not true I am an expert on everything. For instance, I know nothing about sports.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132530</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132530</guid>
		<description>Tamara, it was the dems who began the &quot;mess&quot; that you attribute to &quot;baby&quot; Bush- the war is all his, but the housing crisis and mortgage meltdown is all the dems- to say otherwise is a lie, plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamara, it was the dems who began the &#8220;mess&#8221; that you attribute to &#8220;baby&#8221; Bush- the war is all his, but the housing crisis and mortgage meltdown is all the dems- to say otherwise is a lie, plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132529</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132529</guid>
		<description>I am sure Darrel can explain it to you since he is an expert on everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure Darrel can explain it to you since he is an expert on everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132528</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132528</guid>
		<description>Just thought you ought to get the straight talk here- you need to rid yourself of this destructive delusion that this man is the messiah, or you will spiral down into a life of socialism, and you do not want that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought you ought to get the straight talk here- you need to rid yourself of this destructive delusion that this man is the messiah, or you will spiral down into a life of socialism, and you do not want that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132512</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132512</guid>
		<description>INON: &quot;if Obama only gets guns outlawed in USA during his term, libs will see it as a sussessful term.&quot;&gt;&gt;

DAR
  How frustrating it must be to the righties to find that their old hobby horses and boogiemen don&#039;t work anymore. They try to bring them out and play with them but people just point at them and snicker.

Obama doesn&#039;t care about your guns or the gun issue but the NRA likes to lie and try to scare people by saying he wants to &quot;grab them.&quot; Yawn. Nobody believes it anymore. The generation that cared about keeping the gays down is dying and quickly becoming irrelevant and a farce. Abortion is what it is, Roe v. isn&#039;t going anywhere. Terrorism is a concern but it&#039;s a tactic and a law enforcement issue. You don&#039;t start a conventional war over a tactic (with the wrong country), that&#039;s just stupid.

&quot;Obama&#039;s gonna outlaw guns!&quot; &quot;The gays are coming for your kiddies and they want to wreck your marriage too!&quot;

These are now punchlines for jokes. Your party platform I mean. What else do you guys have?

D.
-----------------
&quot;What is a political party that is vastly white, middle-aged, male, Southern, pious, conservative, aggrieved, impotent, nostalgic, rude—and regarded negatively by more than half the respondents? Time magazine’s Republican political consultant Mike Murphy looks at the demographics and warns of a coming “ice age” for the party. That is grossly optimistic. No longer in second place, the voter self-identification polls place the Republicans well behind the leading independents and the second-place Democrats. The GOP is the equivalent of a shrinking third party on its way to becoming a museum piece beside the Whigs, the Greenbacks, and the Prohibitionists. The GOP is like a zombie cartoon reading the daily headlines of the last four years and asking, “Am I dead?”&quot;  
--Conservative, life long republican, John Batchelor, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-06-14/attack-of-the-zombie-republicans/?cid=hp:mostpopular2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INON: &#8220;if Obama only gets guns outlawed in USA during his term, libs will see it as a sussessful term.&#8221;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  How frustrating it must be to the righties to find that their old hobby horses and boogiemen don&#8217;t work anymore. They try to bring them out and play with them but people just point at them and snicker.</p>
<p>Obama doesn&#8217;t care about your guns or the gun issue but the NRA likes to lie and try to scare people by saying he wants to &#8220;grab them.&#8221; Yawn. Nobody believes it anymore. The generation that cared about keeping the gays down is dying and quickly becoming irrelevant and a farce. Abortion is what it is, Roe v. isn&#8217;t going anywhere. Terrorism is a concern but it&#8217;s a tactic and a law enforcement issue. You don&#8217;t start a conventional war over a tactic (with the wrong country), that&#8217;s just stupid.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama&#8217;s gonna outlaw guns!&#8221; &#8220;The gays are coming for your kiddies and they want to wreck your marriage too!&#8221;</p>
<p>These are now punchlines for jokes. Your party platform I mean. What else do you guys have?</p>
<p>D.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8220;What is a political party that is vastly white, middle-aged, male, Southern, pious, conservative, aggrieved, impotent, nostalgic, rude—and regarded negatively by more than half the respondents? Time magazine’s Republican political consultant Mike Murphy looks at the demographics and warns of a coming “ice age” for the party. That is grossly optimistic. No longer in second place, the voter self-identification polls place the Republicans well behind the leading independents and the second-place Democrats. The GOP is the equivalent of a shrinking third party on its way to becoming a museum piece beside the Whigs, the Greenbacks, and the Prohibitionists. The GOP is like a zombie cartoon reading the daily headlines of the last four years and asking, “Am I dead?”&#8221;<br />
&#8211;Conservative, life long republican, John Batchelor, <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-06-14/attack-of-the-zombie-republicans/?cid=hp:mostpopular2" rel="nofollow">LINK</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamara</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132510</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132510</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s those insults a-flying already. I guess &quot;insulting me (him) is just your way of admitting your weak argument.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s those insults a-flying already. I guess &#8220;insulting me (him) is just your way of admitting your weak argument.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132509</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132509</guid>
		<description>Baby Bush wasn&#039;t included since this was done in &#039;04. He would easily be last, well below his father and everyone else. Off the charts, so to speak.

Carter was worst in inflation. Nixon was second worst. The seventies, and oil prices we bad for that.

The categories considered in this chart are normal categories we judge the health of the country by.

Total of average rank (lower number better)

Demo&#039;s: 22.9

Repub&#039;s: 32.2

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baby Bush wasn&#8217;t included since this was done in &#8217;04. He would easily be last, well below his father and everyone else. Off the charts, so to speak.</p>
<p>Carter was worst in inflation. Nixon was second worst. The seventies, and oil prices we bad for that.</p>
<p>The categories considered in this chart are normal categories we judge the health of the country by.</p>
<p>Total of average rank (lower number better)</p>
<p>Demo&#8217;s: 22.9</p>
<p>Repub&#8217;s: 32.2</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamara</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132508</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132508</guid>
		<description>Really BD? You need a chart for &quot;baby&quot; Bush? Do you really need a chart to see the economic mess that his office handed us? Numbers on the Katrina disaster? Data on the Iraq war? (with Osama still at large I may add) He&#039;s a walking disaster that needs no chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really BD? You need a chart for &#8220;baby&#8221; Bush? Do you really need a chart to see the economic mess that his office handed us? Numbers on the Katrina disaster? Data on the Iraq war? (with Osama still at large I may add) He&#8217;s a walking disaster that needs no chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-loses-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-132503</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6937#comment-132503</guid>
		<description>I should have said job losses are leveling off, not unemployment rate.  I&#039;m not sure exactly how though unemployment climbs by an even 0.5% each month while job losses have declined 4 months in a row.  Maybe somebody can explain that for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have said job losses are leveling off, not unemployment rate.  I&#8217;m not sure exactly how though unemployment climbs by an even 0.5% each month while job losses have declined 4 months in a row.  Maybe somebody can explain that for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

