Notice that this sentence DOES NOT state they used foreign law in this decision. The liberal minority views that method as appropriate. I give less credence to them because of it with regard to many cases.

The definition of Civil:
1 a: of or relating to citizens b: of or relating to the state or its citizenry [emphasis mine]

Therefore civil anything applies to citizens. The definition spells it out, no case law is required to figure that out.

Meathead is incapable of actually seeing anything. He is blinded by hatred (and self gratification) and he continually cherry picks or follows illogical paths. He is a cretin who writes fiction, all his work is fiction.

I read the Supreme Court ruling as well as the dissenting opinion, I agree with them and not the liberals who think we should use other country’s laws to make rulings.

Many have been released without Habeas Corpus, the ruling deals with those being held without charge (not ones that have been mitigated and either released or held because no one will take them). The ruling means they have to be given the opportunity to address charges against them, the meaning of habeas corpus, a body must be brought before the court so the court may determine if the person is being held lawfully.

Since some have been released without HC it would stand to reason that the tribunal determined they could leave. There are others who can leave but have no place to go (screw them, release them to their home countries and let them deal with it) and then there are those who have yet to appear. The SCOTUS said they must be brought to court to determine if they are being lawfully held.

I think the legal experts who have written about this know more about it than Meathead (or me) and they have discussed these very things, not the ACLU version of appeasement and civil liberty (which non citizens do not have). Anything CIVIL pertains to CITIZENS of a country. People who are not citizens and who are not here in some legal capacity have no civil rights or liberties.

Meathead has a man crush on me. He keeps coming here and reading my stuff and writing about it.

He does this because his site is a reaction to the work of others. He is unable to write original content. He probably took the ideas for his books from others.

Just remember, Meathead calls me a liar but he writes fiction for a living. He is a science FICTION writer. I also heard he is the product of an incestuous relationship. His father and mother are brother and sister.

Meathead, get a life. LOSER

Meathead still has a man crush on me. He wants me to come visit his site and get into his circle jerk. Not going to happen. It irritates him immensely when people ignore him or fail to visit his site. He thinks he is a big man and it is quite easy for him to be tough over the Internet. I have seen his picture. He is a little troll who would be real easy to beat like a tied yard dog.

I cannot imagine he has a wife but if he does she is either a saint or a retard because only one of those two could put up with him. Though I know he had a wife at one time because he has kids, one lives in California, San Diego I think.

The ruling by the SCOTUS means more people will have to be released. If a soldier is killed by a released detainee we should seriously consider action against the justices who allowed it.

Why don’t we call them prisoners of war? Then they would not be allowed to have a trial.

Wishing for another attack on America is more common among wingnuts (let alone lobbyists for various foreign dictators who run the Republican nominees campaign) are quiet common. From your superstitions friend Kat in a post I responded to at my blog a while back:

“I will concede that I frequently wonder whether another attack on American soil is the only thing which will remove liberal craniums out of anal orifices. Considering that we’re having this discussion only six short years after 9-11, and after almost 10,000 terrorist attacks around the world, I doubt it.”

She thinks that without another attack, Americans won’t roll over and let the Adminsitration take the rest of our freedoms. The only difference between Kat and McCain’s head lobbyist is that the lobbyist says it would help Republicans. Kat thinks it would help all of America.

That’s why I always compare you guys to bin Laden.

Bosuns last blog post..Does Obama Distort the Bible?

Seriously the “attack” statement was in poor taste and I am not sure that it would even hurt Obama’s chances, they would blame Bush and McCain and start the “Inside job” no matter what occurred.

Roberts last blog post..The Dutch can see the future, AFTER OBAMA.