Life begins at conception, yes we believe that.

It does not end at birth, it ends at death. Your ilk finds it hard to understand how one can oppose abortion and sanction the death penalty.

An unborn child committed NO crime. Some crimes merit the death penalty which is a punishment for doing something really bad. There are instances where a person should have to pay with his life. That is the problem, you cannot understand the difference between innocence as in the unborn and guilt as in the murderer.

You side would rather murder the child that has done nothing wrong and fight to keep the murderer who has done something wrong, alive.

I have no problem with a life without parole sentence for some crimes but that means WITHOUT. Not letting them loose in 20 years because the jails are crowded. But for these guys I want the death penalty. I do not want them in jail converting simple minds to their cult. I do not want them communicating with the outside world. The best way to do that is to put them to death.

It is funny that libs like Hillary and Holder are pushing for the death penalty. They have to show how tough they are I suppose.

Funny how for conservatives life begins at conception and ends at birth.

Funny how liberals will fight to the death to allow abortions, the murder of innocent beings, but will fight even harder to keep murderers alive.

What kind of message is it to say that the innocent should be murdered and the guilty should live?

It’s a waste of my money to feed and house these people that do not deserve to live. No, it will not bring back the people who have died but it will make sure that these indigents don’t kill another 3000 or help or encourage others to kill by their mere presence on this earth. This should make most libs happy – we are giving them what they want. Sending them to Allah fast quick and in a hurry.

First of all Holder is not and never was a “senior partner” as you call him (they don’t even have such a thing there as far as I can tell) but rather just a partner for 8 years until he left the firm and become Attorney General.

Second, notice it is not that Holder came to the defense of the 17 Yemenis but rather the firm he was partner for. This same firm has also represented Halliburton and Phillip Morris. Is Holder on the hook for those clients as well? Covington & Burlington is one of the top legal firms in the world.

Third, Malkin seeks to make it seem as if representing GITMO detainees is an endorsement of any evil actions by alleged terrorists. John Adams represented the shooters in the Boston Massacre. If Adams was running for office today I’m sure Malkin would be blowing hot air about it trying to smear him as if he endorsed the actions of the shooters.

Putting on the best terrorist defense is a Covington & Burling specialty. Among the firm’s other celebrity terrorist clients: 17 Yemenis held at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. The law firm employed dozens of radical attorneys such as David Remes and Marc Falkoff to provide the enemy combatants with more than 3,000 hours of pro bono representation. Covington & Burling co-authored one of three petitioners’ briefs filed in the Boumediene v. Bush detainee case, and secured victories for several other Gitmo enemy combatants in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Falkoff went on to publish a book of poetry, Poems from Guantanamo: The Detainees Speak, which he dedicated to the suspected terrorists: “For my friends inside the wire, Mahmoad, Majid, Yasein, Saeed, Abdulsalam, Mohammed, Adnan, Jamal, Othman, Adil, Mohamed, Abdulmalik, Areef, Adeq, Farouk, Salman, and Makhtar. Inshallah, we will next meet over coffee in your homes in Yemen.”