See if you can find them:

http://www.loc.gov/library/libarch-digital.html

D.

They don’t censor for “truth.” All books published by major (and even minor) publishing houses are archived in the Library of Congress. A friend of mine wrote a book about atheism (Atheism: A short Introduction) and it is in the “Library of Congress,” this doesn’t mean his book is true or any more likely to be true. I have photographs preserved in “The Library of Congress,” etc.,.

For instance, I, or someone else, could contact this webcapture portion of the Library of Congress and recommend our Fayetteville Freethinker site be considered for inclusion (which is probably what happened in this Obamafile case). Acceptance would not make the material any more true. They might send me a letter like the fellow from “obamafile.com” site says he received.

If you would like to see how their material holds up, take me up on my offer.

Incidentally, I went to the Library of Congress, from the link at your obamafile.com site and I searched their digital archives, which includes their online, digital and webpage records. I searched for “obamafile.com.” The result was as follows:

***
“You Searched For: obamafile.com

There were no results for this search”
***

Safe to say, the obamafile.com people are not included in the “Library of Congress” record system. Why? Two reasons come to mind:

1) A search of the L of C finds nothing

2) If they were there, the folks at obamafile.com would probably provide a direct link to it.

Not that it would matter if it did exist, for the reasons given above.

D.

So you got nothing.

Actually, someone on our forum called me an “Obama hater” because criticized something he did. Nuts to my right, nuts to my left.

Me? Independent and right down the middle.

D.

DAR
Show he paused out of confusion. Show he paused. Where’s the video? What Bigd quoted is a doctored, comedic, hit piece filled with insertions and thus has no credibility. I asked for an example of Obama speaking incoherently, not an example of Obama not speaking quick enough.

The suggestion that Obama has any trouble speaking just makes you look foolish. Ask Hillary or McCain about his communication skills.

D.

DAR
Some things don’t rise to the level of being roastable. There needs to be a little substance. So the roast of your comment here consists of pointing out, there is no substance.

Oh, and apparently, you don’t have the balls to read it, or respond to it substantively. You resort to your same knee jerk insults based upon conjecture. Boring.

Regarding me being a “fake.” I make no claims that cannot be easily backed up regarding myself or anything else. I hesitate to say more about my businesses or myself for three reasons:

1) It’s an irrelevant distraction.
2) You would just try to use the information to fashion more insults.
3) You would accuse me of bragging (see #2).

D.

“Incompetent:…[list of names]”

Is *not* an argument.

I’ve already covered his stricter lobbyist rules. You know, if you fellows actually cared about the issue rather than your blind devotion to attempt to bash anything Obama, you might admit that it is actually something good he has done. As even those on the right have acknowledged, and I have cited, his rules are far stricter than GW’s.

But you would have to stop hyperventilating a moment to admit that. You would have to be open to reason. And as Thomas Paine once said regarding people who refuse to reason:

“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”

D.