<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Ayers Dirty Laundry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bozworth</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123945</link>
		<dc:creator>Bozworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123945</guid>
		<description>Smoking Gun?

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2008/09/obama-file-30-former-terrorists-bill.html

It sure is a good thing there are screencaps and copies of video clips, as well as Google and Wayback Machine caches of the websites cited. I imagine the owers behind the Obama Machine are going to be busy as hell for a while getting the word out to all comrades in the network that it's time to go into Redaction Overdrive.

Maybe we should all pitch in to get several hundred gallons of Starbucks sent to the Ayers-Dohrn home in Hyde Park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smoking Gun?</p>
<p><a href="http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2008/09/obama-file-30-former-terrorists-bill.html" rel="nofollow">http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2008/09/obama-file-30-former-terrorists-bill.html</a></p>
<p>It sure is a good thing there are screencaps and copies of video clips, as well as Google and Wayback Machine caches of the websites cited. I imagine the owers behind the Obama Machine are going to be busy as hell for a while getting the word out to all comrades in the network that it&#8217;s time to go into Redaction Overdrive.</p>
<p>Maybe we should all pitch in to get several hundred gallons of Starbucks sent to the Ayers-Dohrn home in Hyde Park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123710</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123710</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://prairiepundit.blogspot.com/2008/09/democrat-loser-strategy.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Just for you Adam&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://prairiepundit.blogspot.com/2008/09/democrat-loser-strategy.html" rel="nofollow">Just for you Adam</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123709</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123709</guid>
		<description>You did not say both but you ignored that Rove said both.  FWIW, Obama only put out one ad last week that I am aware of and it was full of lies and it discredited and dishonored a disabled veteran.  That is class for you.

Obama's ads are just as bad, AS ROVE NOTED AND EVERYONE IGNORED.  He only mentioned one ad of each campaign as being untruthful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did not say both but you ignored that Rove said both.  FWIW, Obama only put out one ad last week that I am aware of and it was full of lies and it discredited and dishonored a disabled veteran.  That is class for you.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s ads are just as bad, AS ROVE NOTED AND EVERYONE IGNORED.  He only mentioned one ad of each campaign as being untruthful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123708</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123708</guid>
		<description>"I never thought I would see the day when Adam would use Karl Rove as his source and support him."

All I gotta say about that when even a liar of Rove's stature can't spin himself out of the truth that McCain lied in his ads you know your side has a problem.

Again, never once have I denied that "BOTH, BOTH, BOTH, BOTH" campaigns have stretched the truth, but the fact is there's only one campaign that went into a frenzy last week with ads and attacks that were so full of lies and half truths that every major news outlet including Fox News had to call them on it.  McCain.

I saw conservative bloggers scrambling all week long to spin out of the truth that their "RINO" is a big fat liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I never thought I would see the day when Adam would use Karl Rove as his source and support him.&#8221;</p>
<p>All I gotta say about that when even a liar of Rove&#8217;s stature can&#8217;t spin himself out of the truth that McCain lied in his ads you know your side has a problem.</p>
<p>Again, never once have I denied that &#8220;BOTH, BOTH, BOTH, BOTH&#8221; campaigns have stretched the truth, but the fact is there&#8217;s only one campaign that went into a frenzy last week with ads and attacks that were so full of lies and half truths that every major news outlet including Fox News had to call them on it.  McCain.</p>
<p>I saw conservative bloggers scrambling all week long to spin out of the truth that their &#8220;RINO&#8221; is a big fat liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123702</link>
		<dc:creator>Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123702</guid>
		<description>Well he hasn't. He hasn't been pressured about the issues, he hasn't had his past dug into as much as Palin or McCain.

If he had he wouldn't be the Dems nominee for President, we'd be discussing Hillary right now not Obama. Hey I don't mind though, he's handing the keys to D.C. back to the conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well he hasn&#8217;t. He hasn&#8217;t been pressured about the issues, he hasn&#8217;t had his past dug into as much as Palin or McCain.</p>
<p>If he had he wouldn&#8217;t be the Dems nominee for President, we&#8217;d be discussing Hillary right now not Obama. Hey I don&#8217;t mind though, he&#8217;s handing the keys to D.C. back to the conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123698</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123698</guid>
		<description>Believe what you want.

But, the problem with liberals is they have selective listening skills.  Karl Rove said that BOTH campaign's lies had exceeded the limit.  BOTH, BOTH, BOTH.

You see, liberals have a game plan and it is to repeat things over and over until it is the last thing that sticks in people's minds and is accepted as true.  As for Rove, he also said (after all the liberals made the same claim that you did) that the left ignored that he said it about BOTH campaigns.

&lt;em&gt;Former Bush campaign guru Karl Rove said Sunday that both campaigns’ attacks have “gone one step too far,” adding that some McCain spots go “beyond the 100-percent-truth test.”

“Both campaigns ought to be careful about it. They ought to — there ought to be an adult who says, ‘Do we really need to go that far in this ad? Don’t we make our point and won’t we get broader acceptance and deny the opposition an opportunity to attack us if we don’t include that one little last tweak in the ad?’” Rove told Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday.&lt;/em&gt;

Notice the word both.  Two things about this amaze me.  1.  The left is screaming that Rove said McCain has gone too far in not being truthful and they are being untruthful in making the attack.  Google Rove says McCain goes too far and you will get a zillion liberals parroting that line but none of them bother to show that Rove was talking about BOTH campaigns and that he gave an example from each.

BOTH, BOTH, BOTH, BOTH

If I write it enough you might understand.

Also, since when do any of you liberals listen to anything Rove says.  Any other time he is a villain.  If he now claims that an Obama ad is a lie you will be back all over the bash Rove bandwagon.

BOTH campaigns are going beyond what they need to.  BOTH campaigns are stretching the truth.  Obama's ad denigrates McCain because he can't type on a computer.  The ad makes it look like he is too old and out of touch.  Fact is, he can't because of injuries.  Not only did they lie but they dishonored a disabled veteran at the same time.

If McCain can't use a computer then Obama can't use Google because the information is available all over...

I never thought I would see the day when Adam would use Karl Rove as his source and support him.

Using the man libs all say is a liar.  Hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe what you want.</p>
<p>But, the problem with liberals is they have selective listening skills.  Karl Rove said that BOTH campaign&#8217;s lies had exceeded the limit.  BOTH, BOTH, BOTH.</p>
<p>You see, liberals have a game plan and it is to repeat things over and over until it is the last thing that sticks in people&#8217;s minds and is accepted as true.  As for Rove, he also said (after all the liberals made the same claim that you did) that the left ignored that he said it about BOTH campaigns.</p>
<p><em>Former Bush campaign guru Karl Rove said Sunday that both campaigns’ attacks have “gone one step too far,” adding that some McCain spots go “beyond the 100-percent-truth test.”</p>
<p>“Both campaigns ought to be careful about it. They ought to — there ought to be an adult who says, ‘Do we really need to go that far in this ad? Don’t we make our point and won’t we get broader acceptance and deny the opposition an opportunity to attack us if we don’t include that one little last tweak in the ad?’” Rove told Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday.</em></p>
<p>Notice the word both.  Two things about this amaze me.  1.  The left is screaming that Rove said McCain has gone too far in not being truthful and they are being untruthful in making the attack.  Google Rove says McCain goes too far and you will get a zillion liberals parroting that line but none of them bother to show that Rove was talking about BOTH campaigns and that he gave an example from each.</p>
<p>BOTH, BOTH, BOTH, BOTH</p>
<p>If I write it enough you might understand.</p>
<p>Also, since when do any of you liberals listen to anything Rove says.  Any other time he is a villain.  If he now claims that an Obama ad is a lie you will be back all over the bash Rove bandwagon.</p>
<p>BOTH campaigns are going beyond what they need to.  BOTH campaigns are stretching the truth.  Obama&#8217;s ad denigrates McCain because he can&#8217;t type on a computer.  The ad makes it look like he is too old and out of touch.  Fact is, he can&#8217;t because of injuries.  Not only did they lie but they dishonored a disabled veteran at the same time.</p>
<p>If McCain can&#8217;t use a computer then Obama can&#8217;t use Google because the information is available all over&#8230;</p>
<p>I never thought I would see the day when Adam would use Karl Rove as his source and support him.</p>
<p>Using the man libs all say is a liar.  Hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123697</link>
		<dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123697</guid>
		<description>The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - &lt;a href="http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/09/web-reconnaissance-for-09152008.html" rel="nofollow"&gt; Web Reconnaissance for 09/15/2008 &lt;/a&gt; A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - <a href="http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/09/web-reconnaissance-for-09152008.html" rel="nofollow"> Web Reconnaissance for 09/15/2008 </a> A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day&#8230;so check back often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123695</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123695</guid>
		<description>Again with the "Obama has never been asked tough questions bit."  Can't you give it a rest?  In this example you bring up I'm reminded that once  Stephanopoulos asked Obama about the Ayers connection on national television.  That one doesn't count?  Or maybe because that idiot Sean Hannity talked him into asking it nullifies it?

"Fortunately, Obama is suffering a meltdown and is beginning to lose real estate in the battleground states. It is too early for predictions but, at least for now, things are looking good for McCain."

You keep saying there's a meltdown and that Obama will lose his mind but I'm just not seeing it.  Poll slipping is not the end of the world and from what I can see McCain sure isn't riding high this week when even Karl Rove had to admit this weekend that McCain's campaign ad lies exceeded the limit. 

You guys are measuring the curtains now that Palin has showed up but I think the race is just getting interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again with the &#8220;Obama has never been asked tough questions bit.&#8221;  Can&#8217;t you give it a rest?  In this example you bring up I&#8217;m reminded that once  Stephanopoulos asked Obama about the Ayers connection on national television.  That one doesn&#8217;t count?  Or maybe because that idiot Sean Hannity talked him into asking it nullifies it?</p>
<p>&#8220;Fortunately, Obama is suffering a meltdown and is beginning to lose real estate in the battleground states. It is too early for predictions but, at least for now, things are looking good for McCain.&#8221;</p>
<p>You keep saying there&#8217;s a meltdown and that Obama will lose his mind but I&#8217;m just not seeing it.  Poll slipping is not the end of the world and from what I can see McCain sure isn&#8217;t riding high this week when even Karl Rove had to admit this weekend that McCain&#8217;s campaign ad lies exceeded the limit. </p>
<p>You guys are measuring the curtains now that Palin has showed up but I think the race is just getting interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webloggin &#187; Obama - Ayers Connection A Little More than Community Organizing</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ayers-dirty-laundry/comment-page-1/#comment-123689</link>
		<dc:creator>Webloggin &#187; Obama - Ayers Connection A Little More than Community Organizing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=4138#comment-123689</guid>
		<description>[...] [Discuss This Topic with Big Dog]   Share This Article With Others: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Discuss This Topic with Big Dog]   Share This Article With Others: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
