<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama:  Ask Doctors For Health Care Reform Prescription</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140396</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140396</guid>
		<description>Your Buffet argument was previously &quot;roasted&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Buffet argument was previously &#8220;roasted&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140382</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140382</guid>
		<description>Bigd: Michael Moore is a [insult].&gt;&gt;

DAR
  If you had good arguments/evidence for your claims you would use those rather than appeal to personal attack.

Bigd: Why should the wealthy pay 95% of the taxes&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Because they (top 1%) have 95% of the wealth and this wealth is entirely dependent upon the health of the whole system.

Bigd: The tax rate should be equal across the board&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Well then they can expect to get hammered even more. If Buffet were taxed at the same rate as his secretary his effective tax hit would almost double. Instead, the rules let the rich hide/shelter the vast majority of their wealth.

That said, the US tax system is, as you point out, rather progressive for the lower income folks. And that&#039;s a good thing.

Bigd: Right now 40% of the people can vote and pay nothing&gt;&gt;

DAR
   Voting has nothing to do with &quot;paying.&quot; See the Constitution.

  Apparently what you want is a permanent  aristocracy, not a democracy. Congratulations, we&#039;re getting pretty close. 

But after a while, you get too many poor people and just a few very wealthy people (see that 1%), then the poor rise up and eat the rich.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigd: Michael Moore is a [insult].&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  If you had good arguments/evidence for your claims you would use those rather than appeal to personal attack.</p>
<p>Bigd: Why should the wealthy pay 95% of the taxes&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Because they (top 1%) have 95% of the wealth and this wealth is entirely dependent upon the health of the whole system.</p>
<p>Bigd: The tax rate should be equal across the board&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Well then they can expect to get hammered even more. If Buffet were taxed at the same rate as his secretary his effective tax hit would almost double. Instead, the rules let the rich hide/shelter the vast majority of their wealth.</p>
<p>That said, the US tax system is, as you point out, rather progressive for the lower income folks. And that&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
<p>Bigd: Right now 40% of the people can vote and pay nothing&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
   Voting has nothing to do with &#8220;paying.&#8221; See the Constitution.</p>
<p>  Apparently what you want is a permanent  aristocracy, not a democracy. Congratulations, we&#8217;re getting pretty close. </p>
<p>But after a while, you get too many poor people and just a few very wealthy people (see that 1%), then the poor rise up and eat the rich.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140363</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140363</guid>
		<description>Michael Moore is a moron who deceives people by using things out of context.

Why should the wealthy pay 95% of the taxes when they use far less government services than the other 95%?

The tax rate should be equal across the board so each person pays the same percent of income.  Then everyone has an equal say in government.  Right now 40% of the people can vote and pay nothing toward running the government (Medicare and SS are things they pay to benefit from in the future).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moore is a moron who deceives people by using things out of context.</p>
<p>Why should the wealthy pay 95% of the taxes when they use far less government services than the other 95%?</p>
<p>The tax rate should be equal across the board so each person pays the same percent of income.  Then everyone has an equal say in government.  Right now 40% of the people can vote and pay nothing toward running the government (Medicare and SS are things they pay to benefit from in the future).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140359</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140359</guid>
		<description>It would tell me that the highest wage earners pay a disproportionate share of the money that it takes to run the country and that the bottom 40% have no skin in the game.

The top 60% do not account for the greatest number of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would tell me that the highest wage earners pay a disproportionate share of the money that it takes to run the country and that the bottom 40% have no skin in the game.</p>
<p>The top 60% do not account for the greatest number of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140358</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140358</guid>
		<description>No one said it differs (that higher earners pay a higher rate) what is debated is whether the tax cuts benefited the wealthy more than the middle class.

The wealthy certainly did better in raw dollars but the middle class had a better percentage cut.  Considering 40% do not pay taxes and they received credits and rebates then they made out well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one said it differs (that higher earners pay a higher rate) what is debated is whether the tax cuts benefited the wealthy more than the middle class.</p>
<p>The wealthy certainly did better in raw dollars but the middle class had a better percentage cut.  Considering 40% do not pay taxes and they received credits and rebates then they made out well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140321</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140321</guid>
		<description>Bigd: &quot;The top 1% pay about 25%.&quot;&gt;&gt;

DAR
  According to Michael Moore&#039;s new movie:

&quot;The richest 1 percent have more financial wealth than the bottom 95 percent combined.&quot;

So why aren&#039;t they paying 95% of the taxes?

They&#039;ve bought the politicians and are ripping us off.

Know what I like about Michael Moore? When he comes out with a documentary (usually recording breaking and always award winning) he backs up all of his claims, line by line, on his website. I don&#039;t know anyone else that does that. Then when the lying liars, and BS artists spread their stuff around and go after him, all I have to do is go to his site and check his references. And then I bust them on their lies. Nice.

Oh if I only had a dime for every lie about Michael Moore I have knocked down!

D.
--------------------
CapitalismALoveStory.com

AP: &#039;Warmly Received&#039; &#124; Variety: &#039;Returning to His Roots, One of His Best Films&#039; &#124; Time: &#039;Moore&#039;s Magnum Opus&#039; &#124; Bloomberg: &#039;Scathing, Effective and Hilarious&#039; &#124; The Independent: &#039;Rousing and Entertaining&#039; &#124; Guardian: &#039;Tumultuous Applause&#039;

Next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigd: &#8220;The top 1% pay about 25%.&#8221;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  According to Michael Moore&#8217;s new movie:</p>
<p>&#8220;The richest 1 percent have more financial wealth than the bottom 95 percent combined.&#8221;</p>
<p>So why aren&#8217;t they paying 95% of the taxes?</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve bought the politicians and are ripping us off.</p>
<p>Know what I like about Michael Moore? When he comes out with a documentary (usually recording breaking and always award winning) he backs up all of his claims, line by line, on his website. I don&#8217;t know anyone else that does that. Then when the lying liars, and BS artists spread their stuff around and go after him, all I have to do is go to his site and check his references. And then I bust them on their lies. Nice.</p>
<p>Oh if I only had a dime for every lie about Michael Moore I have knocked down!</p>
<p>D.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
CapitalismALoveStory.com</p>
<p>AP: &#8216;Warmly Received&#8217; | Variety: &#8216;Returning to His Roots, One of His Best Films&#8217; | Time: &#8216;Moore&#8217;s Magnum Opus&#8217; | Bloomberg: &#8216;Scathing, Effective and Hilarious&#8217; | The Independent: &#8216;Rousing and Entertaining&#8217; | Guardian: &#8216;Tumultuous Applause&#8217;</p>
<p>Next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140320</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140320</guid>
		<description>Bigd: &quot;Yes, I said broke. I did not mean they are bankrupt,&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Again with the word games and pretending not to understand grade school definitions. 

From dictionary.com:

broke
–verb
4. without money; penniless.
5. bankrupt.

8. go broke,
a. to become destitute of money or possessions.
b. to go bankrupt: In that business people are forever going broke.

Synonyms:
4, 5. insolvent, destitute, impoverished.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/broke

Bigd: &quot;Also, you forgot to add Obama to your names of people who have added to the debt.&gt;&gt;

DAR
  He&#039;s still operating under a budget shared with Bush. Too early. Considering the train wreck he walked in upon, reasonable people will be giving him quite a break.

Bigd: &quot;You also forgot Clinton and Carter.&quot;&gt;&gt;

DAR
  No I didn&#039;t. They didn&#039;t add to the debt. Reference already provided.

Bigd: &quot;I have always railed against adding to the debt.&quot;&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Republicans do that. Then they blow money like drunken sailors. Usually on wars and subsidies for the rich. Stupid stuff.

Bigd: &quot;VA and Medicare are not less than private. Demonstrated time and again.&quot;&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Try again:

Overview of VA Cost Methods - How do VA costs compare to the cost of non-VA providers?

Excerpts:

&quot;Comparison of VA Cost to Medicare Reimbursement

The most thorough study comparing the relative cost of VA provided care was an HSR&amp;D study that compared actual VA costs at six VA medical centers to the hypothetical fee-for-service payments for the same services that would have been paid by Medicare. The final report (Nugent, 2004) found that VA was providing care at a lower cost.&quot;

[Dar note]: The VA gets it done cheaper than the rates medicare pays.

&quot;CONCLUSIONS: That review finds no convincing evidence that VA has been significantly more or less efficient than nonfederal hospitals in delivering care. However, VA costs do appear to have been significantly lower than fee-for-service charges that the federal government might have to pay if veterans were treated in private sector hospitals for the same diagnoses.&quot;

http://www.herc.research.va.gov/resources/faq_b06.asp

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigd: &#8220;Yes, I said broke. I did not mean they are bankrupt,&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Again with the word games and pretending not to understand grade school definitions. </p>
<p>From dictionary.com:</p>
<p>broke<br />
–verb<br />
4. without money; penniless.<br />
5. bankrupt.</p>
<p>8. go broke,<br />
a. to become destitute of money or possessions.<br />
b. to go bankrupt: In that business people are forever going broke.</p>
<p>Synonyms:<br />
4, 5. insolvent, destitute, impoverished.</p>
<p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/broke" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/broke</a></p>
<p>Bigd: &#8220;Also, you forgot to add Obama to your names of people who have added to the debt.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  He&#8217;s still operating under a budget shared with Bush. Too early. Considering the train wreck he walked in upon, reasonable people will be giving him quite a break.</p>
<p>Bigd: &#8220;You also forgot Clinton and Carter.&#8221;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  No I didn&#8217;t. They didn&#8217;t add to the debt. Reference already provided.</p>
<p>Bigd: &#8220;I have always railed against adding to the debt.&#8221;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Republicans do that. Then they blow money like drunken sailors. Usually on wars and subsidies for the rich. Stupid stuff.</p>
<p>Bigd: &#8220;VA and Medicare are not less than private. Demonstrated time and again.&#8221;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Try again:</p>
<p>Overview of VA Cost Methods &#8211; How do VA costs compare to the cost of non-VA providers?</p>
<p>Excerpts:</p>
<p>&#8220;Comparison of VA Cost to Medicare Reimbursement</p>
<p>The most thorough study comparing the relative cost of VA provided care was an HSR&amp;D study that compared actual VA costs at six VA medical centers to the hypothetical fee-for-service payments for the same services that would have been paid by Medicare. The final report (Nugent, 2004) found that VA was providing care at a lower cost.&#8221;</p>
<p>[Dar note]: The VA gets it done cheaper than the rates medicare pays.</p>
<p>&#8220;CONCLUSIONS: That review finds no convincing evidence that VA has been significantly more or less efficient than nonfederal hospitals in delivering care. However, VA costs do appear to have been significantly lower than fee-for-service charges that the federal government might have to pay if veterans were treated in private sector hospitals for the same diagnoses.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.herc.research.va.gov/resources/faq_b06.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.herc.research.va.gov/resources/faq_b06.asp</a></p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eLwood</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140305</link>
		<dc:creator>eLwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140305</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;The top 60% of wage earners pay 100% of the income taxes.&lt;&lt;

What would this tell a thinking person  about income distribution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;The top 60% of wage earners pay 100% of the income taxes.&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>What would this tell a thinking person  about income distribution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eLwood</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140304</link>
		<dc:creator>eLwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140304</guid>
		<description>Again, just trying to clarify what you wrote.

Of course under U.S. tax policy since 1930 higher incomes have paid higher rates of taxes. This has been true of all the presidents since Hoover. So how does Bush&#039;s tax rates differ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, just trying to clarify what you wrote.</p>
<p>Of course under U.S. tax policy since 1930 higher incomes have paid higher rates of taxes. This has been true of all the presidents since Hoover. So how does Bush&#8217;s tax rates differ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/obama-ask-doctors-for-health-care-reform-prescription/comment-page-1/#comment-140301</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7923#comment-140301</guid>
		<description>The wealthy paid a higher tax rate and they paid more in raw dollars.

The top 60% of wage earners pay 100% of the income taxes.  The top 1% pay about 25%.

No matter how you slice it, the wealthy pay more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wealthy paid a higher tax rate and they paid more in raw dollars.</p>
<p>The top 60% of wage earners pay 100% of the income taxes.  The top 1% pay about 25%.</p>
<p>No matter how you slice it, the wealthy pay more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

