O-BOMB-a’s Ties To Terrorists

Of all the terrorists in the world none are lower than the homegrown variety. While the radical Islamic terrorists might be the most dangerous, those who live among us and commit acts of terror are the lowest forms of life on Earth. Therefore, anyone who would associate with those kinds of lowlife people are equally despicable forms of life. Barack Hussein Obama is one such person.

In 1995, State Senator Alice Palmer introduced her chosen successor, Barack Obama, to a few of the district’s influential liberals at the home of two well known figures on the local left: William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

…“I can remember being one of a small group of people who came to Bill Ayers’ house to learn that Alice Palmer was stepping down from the senate and running for Congress,” said Dr. Quentin Young, a prominent Chicago physician and advocate for single-payer health care, of the informal gathering at the home of Ayers and his wife, Dohrn. “[Palmer] identified [Obama] as her successor.”

Obama and Palmer “were both there,” he said.

Obama’s connections to Ayers and Dorhn have been noted in some fleeting news coverage in the past. But the visit by Obama to their home — part of a campaign courtship — reflects more extensive interaction than has been previously reported.

Ayers and Dorhn were radical members of the Weather Underground, a group that detonated bombs in the US and act that Ayers said he did not do enough of.

I will admit that this is probably a minor thing given that Obama does not spend a lot of time with these two people but he spent enough time that he should have been more closely scrutinized. If the New York Times is able to publish a hit piece on John McCain that implies sex and that implies impropriety took place based upon the word of anonymous sources then certainly they should be publishing stories about Obama’s ties to a domestic terror group.

Perhaps they decided it would not be a good idea to show that Obama is weak on national security. He has stated he would meet unconditionally with our enemies (most of whom lead terrorist sponsoring nations) and he has met with homegrown terrorists who, regardless of their successes, tried to kill members of the US Army. I know there is no sexual component to sell the story but the NYT could dig into the story of Larry Sinclair, a man who alleges he used drugs with Obama and had homosexual sex with him.

Sure, Sinclair might just be a nut looking for attention but he has a name and he has gone public. The people who supposedly accused McCain are anonymous. In any event, the NYT should give equal time to the Obama story as it did the McCain story, in the sense of fair play. However, the NYT might have been better off leaving the sensational stuff for the Enquirer for both candidates rather than leaving the tabloid stuff for Obama off the table while attacking McCain.

All this aside, one needs to ask what B. Hussein Obama’s ties are to these terrorists. He met with them and he has worked with people they have in common. Why has he not distanced himself from them and why has he not come out publicly against what they did? Perhaps it is because Obama is naive and has little experience. His ties to terrorists would only show that he would be a disaster as president.

One thing is for sure, the NYT and other puppets in the liberal world might not want to touch this but it will be exploited when the general election is in full bloom.

Obama has some explaining to do and he needs to tell people where he stands on these people and what they represent. It needs a lot of attention because too many people are listening to the Pied Piper Obama and following him around without paying any real attention to the empty suit leading the way.

A man named Hussein should be out in front of these kinds of allegations…
The Politico
Stop the ACLU



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

4 Responses to “O-BOMB-a’s Ties To Terrorists”

  1. Barbara A says:

    Hey Dog, why don’t you send this to the NYT or would it get you into trouble?
    Barb

  2. Big Dog says:

    It might cause me trouble. Also, it is not like they do not know it. They just ignore these things.

  3. lori says:

    I worry about him even talking to these known terrorists? I don’t care that he is black but he’s not black enough to be a true christian as a christian would be preaching! He’s not talking about his ties to these people & he’s getting donations that u can’t track if they are under $200.Once a muslim always a musslim….. I think).it’s like being a catholic.Hillary is getting the questions first? Why? So Obama can mimick her? I want the news to tell the truth..They’re being bought by Obama’s money backers..Are they the middle East?You find out..I’m voting for Nader if Hillary loses to him.Open your eyes America..To his ties.This is the highest spot being the president of our USA

  4. Stefan says:

    These allegations are based on correlation. Obama used the inner-city Chicago connection that Ayers had to gain political ground in Chicago. While Ayers past is unforgivable, why are you judging Obama for something another man did. If you had a friend that cheated on his wife (or husband) does that mean you will cheat on your spouse? I think most of us would agree that we are not guilty by association. Don’t get me wrong, having a connection with a terrorist is unnerving, however the events that took place are decades in the past. Ayers has served the Chicago community (public schools). Aside from the fact, has Obama spent substantial amounts of time with Ayers in the past 10 years? No. If Obama had any intention of attacking America, surely he would have done that as Senator. I think people are buying into this Republican propaganda because they’re afraid of having somebody different in the white house. So his name has resemblance to what we associate with terrorism. Again this is a fabricated correlation. Does being Muslim mean that you’re a terrorist? No. People are so narrow minded. Yes there is a threat there that is associated with Muslims, but not ALL of them. There is a bad apple in every religion, community, or any other group. And if you decide to vote for Nader, you’re wasting your vote, you might as well vote for the Republicans, and give them a chance at winning. But good luck with that, because Obama will be our next president. And I’m darn proud of that. OBAMA 08.