No Reason To Worry About Voter Fraud
by Big Dog on Oct 30, 2010 at 15:39 Political
We know that voter fraud exists and we know that Democrats and their surrogates in the unions know how to do it very well. It should come as no surprise that people are complaining about electronic voting machines not working correctly and it should not come as a surprise that all the reported concerns involve Republican votes being cast for Democrats. After all, SEIU maintains the machines…
When the first complaints started coming in from Nevada the Clark County Registrar of Voters, Larry Lomax, said the complaints were not founded. Then after looking into the issue, he stated that the discrepancies had been resolved and that the results would be available after the election. Shocker, I know.
The machines registered more votes than the number of people who voted but that is nothing to be concerned with according to Lomax.
You peons get out there and vote and don’t worry your pretty little heads about shenanigans taking place. We have found the issue and we are not concerned with it.
What he means is the machines are registering votes for Democrats that were not cast. That is why things are OK.
We the people, the employers of all these slugs, expect a fair and honest election. Democrats know they never win while running on what they believe so they ignore their misdeeds and attack opponents. They also know that well placed operatives will help them come election time.
We expect a fair vote and if we do not get one we will take steps to resolve the matter.
Of course, I have always believed that if your vote actually counted they would not let you do it.
In any event, be on the lookout for misdeeds by anyone and report them to officials. Check your ballots several times before submitting to be sure it reads what you put on it.
And if any black panthers try to intimidate you beat the hell out of them.
Sources:
McClatchy
Las Vegas Review Journal
Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
[tip]If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.[/tip]
Tags: cheating, evletion fraud, lies, nevada, unions
I’ve been worrying along two tracks. First, enough voter fraud to win could undo the wave of anti-Democrat sentiment in many districts. Second, voter fraud insufficient to win, but which is reported from a wide enough assortment of states, might constitute a pretext to set the elections aside by federal ukase.
No, I don’t sleep at night anymore. Do you?
I agree.
I am well Second Amendment outfitted so I sleep fairly well.
Of course, after 24 years in the Army sleep is not something I get much of anyway so my sleeping well is relative…
I really love what’s building from your side. You’ve already won the election. If the final counts don’t match that conclusion then it’s been stolen. Convenient. I don’t think you’ll have much to complain about the day after anyway though.
By your logic you’re suggesting the GOP were rigging elections when machined failed in their favor in the past. The truth is that any number of problems can occur between engineering, programming, voting, and vote tally when it comes to machine aided voting. It happens all the time and it’s not evidence of a larger Democratic Party (or union) conspiracy to steal elections.
Every year though the right hypes voter fraud while totally ignoring the fact that the larger problem is always a problem of exclusion and not inclusion. There are some in your ranks that actually still believe ACORN stole the election for Obama. Then you turn around and call my side nuts for being concerned about the problems in Florida when the election decided by that one by less than 1000 votes.
And yesy you show no concern when Democrats who were trailing suddenly win a recount by a little more than was needed.
The issue is, the person said that the problems had no merit and then said, OK there was a problem and we will let you know how it works out after the election.
Not a huge confidence builder.
And let us not forget, it is your side that screams stolen election when Republicans win but think all went well when Democrats win.
“And yet you show no concern when Democrats who were trailing suddenly win a recount by a little more than was needed.”
You’d have to name a case again. Usually the case is that your side suspects fraud but have no proof and can’t understand why we aren’t equally outraged.
“The issue is, the person said that the problems had no merit and then said, OK there was a problem and we will let you know how it works out after the election.”
I’d like to see the first quotes you’re going by for that because I haven’t seen statements from him that backtrack the way you present them.
“And let us not forget, it is your side that screams stolen election when Republicans win but think all went well when Democrats win.”
We get upset about elections that are decided in single states under suspicious circumstances. It’s not like there were any fewer problems or irregularities in 2008. It’s just that when you win in a landslide you don’t have many thinking people suggesting the election was stolen. That doesn’t mean the county election commissions and the states themselves don’t investigate and work to make the process better each election.
Adam, it is well known, but hotly denied by liberals, that it IS the Democrats that have perfected how to steal elections. Beginning with Tammany Hall, and continuing on to the cemetaries full of dead people in Duval County- THAT led to LBJ being elected by 29 votes to the Senate- hell, if it weren’t for the 17th amendment, instigated by the Wilson(progressive) administration, our State Legislators would STILL be appointing the Senators as the Constitution originally intended.
That is just ONE of the amendments we need to repeal, as well as do something to close that pesky “interstate commerce” clause.
Why should he show concern, BG? He’d need actual moral constraints to be disturbed even by the most egregious fraud — and the Democrats have perpetrated plenty of those.
That’s the defining characteristic of the left-liberal: no moral standards. All that matters is the Cause: total government power. Anything is acceptable if it advances their Cause. On top of which, whatever they’ve been doing is what they accuse conservatives — people with actual moral standards — of doing. It’s a handy guide to their agenda.
No moral standards? Total government power? You haven’t met any actual liberals in a while have you? It must bother you a lot that I can speak my mind here in the comment threads without you being able to delete it.
“Anything is acceptable if it advances their Cause.”
Bingo.
Here is an example from my state:
http://www.electionintegritywatch.com/crow-wing-county-voter-fraud