<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Proof of Liberal Media Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/more-proof-of-liberal-media-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/more-proof-of-liberal-media-bias/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:27:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/more-proof-of-liberal-media-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-119505</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=3475#comment-119505</guid>
		<description>Conservatives have been long citing liberal bias in the media one case at a time.  It&#039;s like looking into a huge tank of M&amp;M&#039;s and pulling out only the blue ones and then saying, &quot;See.  There are more blue M&amp;M&#039;s than any other color!&quot;

For every case you cite there can be at least one other case that has conservative bias.  You dare to bring up the 100 years thing when we&#039;re just a few years out of the Swift Boat bunk that turned out to be totally false but was given thousands of hours of free air time in the last presidential election?  Don&#039;t make me laugh.  It hurts too bad.

Sure, you got your Dan Rather&#039;s and you got your Glenn Beck&#039;s, but there&#039;s a ton of M&amp;M&#039;s in the tank.  The truth is there&#039;s no slant left or right, there&#039;s just an &quot;if it bleeds it leads&quot; mentality.  The problem with our media isn&#039;t bias, it&#039;s just that they&#039;re all owned by major corporations placing profit above all else, most of all above actual fact telling.

Adams last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lostadam.net/?p=389&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Hillary Clinton Stalwart?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives have been long citing liberal bias in the media one case at a time.  It&#8217;s like looking into a huge tank of M&amp;M&#8217;s and pulling out only the blue ones and then saying, &#8220;See.  There are more blue M&amp;M&#8217;s than any other color!&#8221;</p>
<p>For every case you cite there can be at least one other case that has conservative bias.  You dare to bring up the 100 years thing when we&#8217;re just a few years out of the Swift Boat bunk that turned out to be totally false but was given thousands of hours of free air time in the last presidential election?  Don&#8217;t make me laugh.  It hurts too bad.</p>
<p>Sure, you got your Dan Rather&#8217;s and you got your Glenn Beck&#8217;s, but there&#8217;s a ton of M&amp;M&#8217;s in the tank.  The truth is there&#8217;s no slant left or right, there&#8217;s just an &#8220;if it bleeds it leads&#8221; mentality.  The problem with our media isn&#8217;t bias, it&#8217;s just that they&#8217;re all owned by major corporations placing profit above all else, most of all above actual fact telling.</p>
<p>Adams last blog post..<a href="http://www.lostadam.net/?p=389" rel="nofollow">A Hillary Clinton Stalwart?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
